[
Alam, A. and Mohanty, A. (2023) ‘Educational technology: exploring the convergence of technology and pedagogy through mobility, interactivity, AI, and learning tools’, Cogent Engineering, 10(2), article 2283282. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2283282
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allbon, E. (2013) ‘Too cool for (law) school? Using technology to engage students in legal skills’, European Journal of Law and Technology, 4(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alruthaya, A., Nguyen, T.T. and Lokuge, S. (2021) ‘The application of digital technology and the learning characteristics of Generation Z in higher education’, ArXiv, article 2111.05991. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.05991
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Avila-Garzon, C., Bacca-Acosta, J., Kinshuk, Duarte, J. and Betancourt, J. (2021) ‘Augmented reality in education: an overview of twenty-five years of research’, Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), article ep302. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10865
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berger-Walliser, G. (2012) ‘The past and future of proactive law: an overview of the development of the proactive law movement’, in G. Berger-Walliser and K. Østergaard (eds) Proactive law in a business environment. DJØF Publishing, pp. 13–31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berger-Walliser, G. and Shrivastava, P. (2015) ‘Beyond compliance: sustainable development, business, and proactive law’, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 46(2), pp. 417–474.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biggs, J. and Tang, C. (2011) Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Education.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caron, P.L. and Gely, R. (2020) ‘Taking back the law school classroom: using technology to foster active student learning’, Journal of Legal Education, 54(551), pp. 1–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castro-Zubizarrieta, A., Patera, S. and Fernández, D. (2020) ‘¿Cómo aprenden las generaciones Z y Alpha desde la perspectiva docente? Implicaciones para desarrollar la competencia aprender a aprender’, Aula Abierta, 49(3), pp. 279–292. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.49.3.2020.279-292
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chávez, L.S. and de Cubilla, R.L.R. (2023) ‘La generación alfa o los nativos digitales 100% ¿cómo aprenden desde la perspectiva académica? The alpha generation or digital natives 100% how do they learn from an academic perspective?’ LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(6), pp. 715–722. Available at: https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i6.1483
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chebotareva, I., Pashutina, O. and Makhova, V. (2020) ‘Digital gamification as a leading factor in the educational and learning process of law students’, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social, economic, and academic leadership (ICSEAL-6-2019). Atlantis Press, pp. 228–234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200526.034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corrales Compagnucci, M., Fenwick, M. and Haapio, H. (2019) ‘Digital technologies, legal design and the future of the legal profession’, in M. Corrales Compagnucci, M. Fenwick and H. Haapio (eds) Legal tech, smart contracts and blockchain. Springer, pp. 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6086-2_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Demirbilek, M. and Talan, T. (2018) ‘The effect of social media multitasking on classroom performance’, Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), pp. 117–129. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417721
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dhar, D.K., Saiyad, S. and Mahajan, N. (2024) ‘Assessing the effectiveness of student-generated scenario-based questions as a tool for active learning’, International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 14(4), pp. 278–283. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_320_24
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doherty, M. (2020) ‘Comprehensibility as a rule of law requirement: the role of legal design in delivering access to law’, Journal of Open Access to Law, 8(1), pp. 1–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farber, S. (2024) ‘Harmonizing AI and human instruction in legal education: a case study from Israel on training future legal professionals’, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 31(3), pp. 349–363. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2024.2430018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fortson, C.A. (2021) ‘Now is not the time for another law school lecture: an andragogical approach to virtual learning for legal education’, Saint Louis University Law Journal, 65(3), article 5, pp. 505–530. Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj/vol65/iss3/5 (Accessed: 28 February 2025).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grant, A.M. and Ashford, S.J. (2008) ‘The dynamics of proactivity at work’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, pp. 3–34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grimes, R. (ed) (2017) Re-thinking legal education under the civil and common law: a road map for constructive change. Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grosinger, J. (2022) ‘On proactive human–AI systems’, in CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Örebro University, pp. 140–146.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gurcan, F., Cagiltay, N.E. and Cagiltay, K. (2021) ‘Mapping human–computer interaction research themes and trends from its existence to today: a topic modeling-based review of past 60 years’, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(3), pp. 267–280. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1819668
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haapio, H. (2006a) ‘Business success and problem prevention through proactive contracting’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach: Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 149–194. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-9.pdf (Accessed: 31 January 2025).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haapio, H. (2006b) ‘Introduction to proactive law: a business lawyer’s view’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 21–34. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-2.pdf (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haapio, H. and Hagan, M. (2020) ‘Legal design as a thing: a theory of change and a set of methods to craft a human-centered legal system’, Design Issues, 36(3), pp. 3–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00600
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hagan, M. (no date) Law by design (Continuously updated). Available at: https://lawbydesign.co/ (Accessed: 1 September 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hagan, M. (2020) ‘Design comes to the law school’, in C. Denvir (ed) Modernising legal education. Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–125.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hietanen-Kunwald, P. and Haapio, H. (2021) ‘Effective dispute prevention and resolution through proactive contract design’, Journal of Strategic Contracting Negotiation, 5(1–2), pp. 3–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636211016878
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ireland, C. and Hockley, R. (2020) ‘A call for introducing LegalTech in the classroom’, Computer Law & Security Review, 36, article 105399, pp. 38–45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105399
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Isaac, O. and Abiola, B. (2025) ‘Gamification of legal education: promoting legal empowerment through interactive learning tools’. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388178412_Gamification_of_Legal_Education_Promoting_Legal_Empowerment_through_Interactive_Learning_Tools (Accessed: 28 February 2025).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iyer, D. (2022) ‘Online learning: shaping the future of law schools’, Obiter, 43(1), pp. 142–151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v43i1.13505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joamets, K. and Solarte-Vásquez, M.C. (2019) ‘Working while studying–some legal and political questions affecting the right to higher education in Estonia’, in HEAD’19. 5th International Conference on Higher Education Advances, 2–5 July 2019, Universitat Politècnica de València, pp. 549–557. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAD19.2019.9201
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaave, P. (2023) ‘Proactive legal design—making sustainability visible and monitorable in SME loan agreements’, International Journal of Commerce and Contracting, 7(3–4), pp. 100–124. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636231209217
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khaleel, F.L., Ashaari, N.S. and Wook, T.S.M.T. (2020) ‘The impact of gamification on students learning engagement’, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 10(5), pp. 4965–4972.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K. and Evangelidis, G. (2022) ‘Augmented reality and gamification in education: a systematic literature review of research, applications, and empirical studies’, Applied Sciences, 12(13), article 6809. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136809
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maharg, P. (2016) Transforming legal education: learning and teaching the law in the early twenty-first century. Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315235752
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayer, R.E. (2005) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCrindle, M. and Wolfinger, E. (2009) The ABC of XYZ: understanding the global generations. University of New South Wales Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mellman, L.M. (2020) Getting online with Generation Z: learning preferences. PhD thesis. University of Northern Colorado.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montoya Vargas, J. (2009) ‘Educación jurídica en América Latina: dificultades curriculares para promover los temas de interés público y justicia social’, El otro derecho, 38, pp. 29–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nielsen, J. (1993) Usability engineering. San Diego: Academic Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-21512-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nilupu-Moreno, K., Riega-Virú, Y., Puga-Ayala, E. M., Salas-Riega, J. L. and Lázaro-Ortiz, Y. (2024) ‘Legaltech in legal education: a systematic review of the training of technological competencies’, in 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies on Education & Research (ICALTER). IEEE, pp. 1–4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALTER65499.2024.10819225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nystén-Haarala, S. (2006) ‘Contract law and everyday contracting’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 263–268. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-15.pdf (Accessed: 15 October 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Okros, A. (2020) ‘Generational theory and cohort analysis’, in Harnessing the potential of digital post-millennials in the future workplace. Springer, pp. 33–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25726-2_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parra-González, M.E., López-Belmonte, J., Segura-Robles, A. and Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J. (2021) ‘Gamification and flipped learning and their influence on aspects related to the teaching-learning process’, Heliyon, 7(2), article e06254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06254
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Passera, S., Pohjonen, S., Koskelainen, K. and Anttila, S. (2013) ‘User-friendly contracting tools—a visual guide to facilitate public procurement contracting’, in Proceedings of the IACCM Academic Forum on Contract and Commercial Management, 8th October ‘13, Phoenix, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pohjonen, S. (2006) ‘Proactive law in the field of law’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 53–70. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-4.pdf (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reis, R.I. (2023) ‘Law schools under siege: the challenge to enhance knowledge, creativity, and skill training’, Ohio Northern University Law Review, 38(3), article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.onu.edu/onu_law_review/vol38/iss3/2 (Accessed: 28 February 2025).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ribstein, L.E. (2010) ‘Practicing theory: legal education for the twenty-first century’, Iowa Law Review, 96, pp. 1649–1676.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robotham, D. (2013) ‘Students’ perspectives on term-time employment: an exploratory qualitative study’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(3), pp. 431–442. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2012.666892
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryan, F. (2021) ‘Rage against the machine? Incorporating legal tech into legal education’, The Law Teacher, 55(3), pp. 392–404. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2020.1805927
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryndak, V.G. and Saldaeva, O.V. (2020) ‘Students from Generation Z: trends in education and development’, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(3), pp. 619–634.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salmi-Tolonen, T. (2011) ‘Proactive law and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms’, in K. Sorsa (ed) Proactive management and proactive business law: a handbook. Turku University of Applied Sciences, pp. 85–108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schartum, D.W. (2006) ‘Introduction to a government-based perspective on proactive law’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 35–51. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-3.pdf (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, S.R. (2023) ‘The Fourth Industrial Revolution and legal education’, Georgia State University Law Review, 39(2), pp. 337–399.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solarte-Vásquez, M.C., Järv, N. and Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2016) ‘Usability factors in transactional design and smart contracting’, in T. Kerikmäe and A. Rull (eds) The future of law and eTechnologies, pp. 149–176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spencer, A.B. (2012) ‘The law school critique in historical perspective’, Washington and Lee Law Review, 69(4), pp. 1949–2063. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol69/iss4/5 (Accessed 28 February 2025).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sonsteng, J. (2021) ‘Preparing lawyers for practice: innovations in legal education’, Journal of Legal Education, 70(1), pp. 15–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suffia, G. (2023) ‘How to regulate a digital twin city? Insights from a proactive law approach: how “human in the loop” and “precautionary principles” can serve policymakers in their attempt to incorporate respect of rights and solidarity in the smart city’, in Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 122–128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598482
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sulkowski, A. and Jebe, R. (2022) ‘Evolving ESG reporting governance, regime theory, and proactive law: predictions and strategies’, American Business Law Journal, 59(3), pp. 449–503. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12210
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toda, A.M., Klock, A.C.T., Oliveira, W. et al. (2019) ‘Analysing gamification elements in educational environments using an existing gamification taxonomy’, Smart Learning Environments, 6, article 16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0106-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Universidad de Medellín (2023) ‘Current micro-curriculum of the curricular organization unit for the commercial law course.’ [Course].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Valcke, C. (2019) ‘Comparing legal styles’, International Journal of Law in Context, 15(3), pp. 274–296. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552319000284
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Viano, H., Zúñiga, M. and Rosas, M.V. (2021) ‘Accesibilidad académica en la educación superior. Docencia en línea en contexto de pandemia por COVID-19’, Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología en Educación y Educación en Tecnología, (28), pp. 221–229. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959.28.e27
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vlachogianni, P. and Tselios, N. (2022) ‘Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the System Usability Scale (SUS): a systematic review’ Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(3), pp. 392–409. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1867938
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wijnen, M., Loyens, S., Smeets, G., Kroeze, M. and Van der Molen, H. (2017) ‘Students’ and teachers’ experiences with the implementation of problem-based learning at a university law school’, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1681
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Winstone, N.E. and Boud, D. (2022) ‘The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education’, Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), pp. 656–667. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ziatdinov, R. and Cilliers, J. (2022) ‘Generation Alpha: understanding the next cohort of university students’, ArXiv, article 2202.01422. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.0142
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zakaria, M.I., Maat, S.M. and Khalid, F. (2019) ‘A systematic review of problem-based learning in education’, Creative Education, 10(12), pp. 2671–2688. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012194
]Search in Google Scholar
