Reframing Cancer through a Processual Ontology

1. Stratton MR, Alexandrov LB. The genomic landscape of cancer. Nature. 2014;508: 307–308. doi: 10.1038/508307a StrattonMR AlexandrovLB The genomic landscape of cancer Nature 2014 508 307 308 10.1038/508307a Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Huang S, Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. The end of the genetic paradigm of cancer. PLoS Biology. 2025;23(3): e3003052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003052 HuangS SotoAM SonnenscheinC The end of the genetic paradigm of cancer PLoS Biology 2025 23 3 e3003052 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003052 Search in Google Scholar

3. Kakiuchi N, Ogawa S. Clonal expansion in non-cancer tissues. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2021;21: 239–256. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00335-3 KakiuchiN OgawaS Clonal expansion in non-cancer tissues Nature Reviews Cancer 2021 21 239 256 10.1038/s41568-021-00335-3 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Mintz B, Illmensee K. Normal genetically mosaic mice produced from malignant teratocarcinoma cells. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1975;72: 3585–3589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3585 MintzB IllmenseeK Normal genetically mosaic mice produced from malignant teratocarcinoma cells Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1975 72 3585 3589 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3585 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. The tissue organization field theory of cancer: a testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory. Bioessays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology. 2011;33: 332–340. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100025 SotoAM SonnenscheinC The tissue organization field theory of cancer: a testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory Bioessays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology 2011 33 332 340 10.1002/bies.201100025 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Whitehead AN. Process and reality. New York: Macmillan; 1929. WhiteheadAN Process and reality New York Macmillan 1929 Search in Google Scholar

7. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144: 646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 HanahanD WeinbergRA Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation Cell 2011 144 646 674 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Pisco AO, Huang S. Non-genetic cancer cell plasticity and therapy-induced stemness in tumour relapse. British Journal of +Cancer. 2015;112: 1725–1732. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.146 PiscoAO HuangS Non-genetic cancer cell plasticity and therapy-induced stemness in tumour relapse British Journal of +Cancer 2015 112 1725 1732 10.1038/bjc.2015.146 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. Tisty TD, Coussens LM. Tumor stroma and regulation of cancer development. Annual Review of Pathology. 2006;1: 119–150. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.1.110304.100224 TistyTD CoussensLM Tumor stroma and regulation of cancer development Annual Review of Pathology 2006 1 119 150 10.1146/annurev.pathol.1.110304.100224 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Davies PCW, Lineweaver CH. Cancer tumors as Metazoa 1.0: tapping genes of ancient ancestors. Physical Biology. 2011;8: 015001. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/1/015001 DaviesPCW LineweaverCH Cancer tumors as Metazoa 1.0: tapping genes of ancient ancestors Physical Biology 2011 8 015001 10.1088/1478-3975/8/1/015001 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11. de Thé H. Differentiation therapy revisited. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2018;18: 117–127. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.103 de ThéH Differentiation therapy revisited Nature Reviews Cancer 2018 18 117 127 10.1038/nrc.2017.103 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar