Architects from Different Fields of Activities in Lithuania and their Specific Mindsets

1 Erman, T., Altay, B., Altay, C. Architects and the Architectural Profession in the Turkish Context. Journal of Architectural Education, vol. 58, no. 2, 2004, pp. 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/1046488042485394 Search in Google Scholar

2 Cohen, L., Wilkinson, A., Arnold, J., Finn, R. ‘Remember I’m the Bloody Architect!’ Architects, organizations and discourses of profession. Work, Employment and Society, vol. 19, no. 4, 2005, pp.775–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017005058065 Search in Google Scholar

3 Hemström, K., Mahapatra, K., Gustavsson, L. Perceptions, attitudes and interest of Swedish architects towards the use of wood frames in multi-storey buildings. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 55, no. 11, 2011, pp. 1013– 1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.012 Search in Google Scholar

4 Ilgın, H. E., Karjalainen, M., Pelsmakers, S. Finnish architects’ attitudes towards multi-storey timber-residential buildings. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, vol. 42 no. 3, 2024, pp. 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-04-2021-0059 Search in Google Scholar

5 ACE Observatory – Home – Europe 2022 [online]. Architects’ Council of Europe [cited 01.03.2024]. https://www.ace-cae.eu/activities/publications/ace-2022-sector-study/ Search in Google Scholar

6 Maciuika, J. V., Drėmaitė, M. (eds.). Lithuanian architects assess the Soviet era: the 1992 oral history tapes / Lietuvos architektai pasakoja apie sovietmetį: 1992 m. įrašai. Vilnius, Lithuania: Lapas, 2020. 256 p. Search in Google Scholar

7 Grunskis, T., Reklaitė, J. Laisvės architektūra. Vilnius: Baltos lankos, 2012. 383 p. Search in Google Scholar

8 Čiupailaitė, D. Architektų vaidmens ir statuso dilemos posocialistiniame mieste. Santalka: Filosofija. Komunikacija, vol. 22, no. 1, 2014, pp. 15–37. Search in Google Scholar

9 Vyšniūnas, A. Hamletiškas klausimas: architektas – profesija ar statusas [online, cited 01.03.2024]. http://pilotas.lt/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/files_urbopopulizmas_2012_12.pdf Search in Google Scholar

10 Dijokienė, D., Navickienė, E., Riaubienė, E. Self-awareness of Soviet Lithuanian architects in their creative power and social significance. Buildings, vol. 12, no. 1, 2022, 10001. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010001 Search in Google Scholar

11 Riaubienė, E., Navickienė, E., Dijokienė, D. The profile of Lithuanian architects in relation to the professional generations active today. Landscape Architecture and Art, vol. 22, no. 22, 2023, pp. 69–80. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2023.22.07 Search in Google Scholar

12 Navickienė, E. From Art-Creator towards Moderator: Roles of Lithuanian Architects. ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, vol. 18, no. 53, 2023, 11907. https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.18.53.11907 Search in Google Scholar

13 Leech, N., Onwuegbuzie, A. A Typology of Mixed Methods Research Designs. Quality and Quantity, vol. 43, no. 2, 2009, pp. 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3 Search in Google Scholar

14 Kardelis, K. Mokslinių tyrimų metodologija ir metodai. Kaunas: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos centras, 2002. 488 p. Search in Google Scholar

15 Tidikis, R. Socialinių mokslų tyrimų metodologija. Vilnius: LTU, 2003. 626 p. Search in Google Scholar

16 Trochim, W. M. K., Donnelly, J. P. The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Cengage Learning, 2008. 361 p. Search in Google Scholar

17 Trochim, W. M. K., Descriptive Statistics [online]. Research Methods Knowledge Base, Cengage Publishing, 2006 [cited 01.03.2024]. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statdesc.php Search in Google Scholar

18 Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). T housand Oaks, C A: Sage, 2004. 413 p. Search in Google Scholar

19 Braun V., Clarke V. Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications, 2021. 376 p. Search in Google Scholar

20 Mustapha, A., Mohammad, M., Noorhani, N., Abidin, Z. Establishment the Scope of Work for Interior Designers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 105, 2013, pp. 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.11.089 Search in Google Scholar

21 Ahmad Noorhani, N., Mustapha, A. Interior Design Practice: Project Management Competency Framework. Built Environment Journal, [S.l.], vol. 18, no. 1, 2021, pp. 98– 105. https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v18i1.12991 Search in Google Scholar

22 Duffy CBE, F., Rabeneck, A. Professionalism and architects in the 21st century. Building Research & Information, vol. 41, no. 1, 2013, pp. 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.724541 Search in Google Scholar

23 Bos-de Vos, M., Lieftink, M. B., Lauche, K. How to claim what is mine: Negotiating roles in inter-organizational projects. Journal of Professions and Organization, vol. 6, no. 2, 2019, pp. 128–155. Search in Google Scholar

24 Burr, K. L., Jones, C. B. The Role of the Architect: Changes of the Past, Practices of the Present, and Indications of the Future. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, vol. 6, no. 2, 2010, pp. 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2010.482878 Search in Google Scholar

25 Ahuja, S. Professional Identity Threats in Interprofessional Collaborations: A Case of Architects in Professional Service Firms. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 60, no. 2, 2023, pp. 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12847 Search in Google Scholar

26 Ahuja, S., Nikolova, N. and Clegg, S. Paradoxical Identity: The Changing Nature of Architectural Work and Its Relation to Architects’ Identity. Journal of Professions and Organization, vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, pp. 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jow013 Search in Google Scholar

27 Kashef, M. The Urban Design Discourse and Professional Divide. Open House International, vol. 32, no. 3, 2007, pp. 27– 37. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-03-2007-B0004 Search in Google Scholar

28 Childs, M. C. A Spectrum of Urban Design Roles. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, no. 1, 2010, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800903429357 Search in Google Scholar

29 Ahmad Noorhani, N. M., Mustapha, A. A., Adnan, H. Project Management Roles and Task for Interior Designer during Design Phase. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, vol. 12, no. 5, 2021, pp. 136–146. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.05.014 Search in Google Scholar

30 Andereas, P. “MESE” Fundamental as Best Human Interior Designer. Journal of Engineering and Scientific Research, vol. 1, no. 2, 2019, pp. 59–63. https://doi.org/10.23960/jesr.v1i2.15 Search in Google Scholar

31 Buchanan, R. Surroundings and Environments in Fourth Order Design. Design Issues, vol. 35, no. 1, 2019, pp. 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00517 Search in Google Scholar

32 Smith, D., Metcalfe, P., Lommerse, M. Interior architecture as an agent for wellbeing. Journal of the HEIA, vol. 19, no. 3, 2012, pp. 2–9. Search in Google Scholar

33 Anderson, B., Honey, P., Dudek, M. Interior Design’s Social Compact: Key to the Quest for Professional Status. Journal of Interior Design, vol. 33, no. 2, 2007, pp. 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2007.tb00313.x Search in Google Scholar

34 Buie Harwood, M.F.A. Comparing the Standards in Interior Design and Architecture to Assess Similarities and Differences. Journal of Interior Design Education and Research, vol. 17, no. 1, 1991, pp. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.1991.tb00058.x Search in Google Scholar