[
1. Varela, F., Thompson, E., Rosch, E. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993. 328 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Ward, D. Silverman, D. Villalobos, M. Introduction: The Varieties of Enactivism. Topoi, Vol. 36, 2017, pp. 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9484-610.1007/s11245-017-9484-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Varela, F. Whence perceptual meaning? A cartography of current ideas. In F. Varela & J. P. Dupuy (Eds.) Understanding origins: Contemporary views on the origins of life, mind and society. Springer, Dordrecht, 1992, pp. 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8054-0_1310.1007/978-94-015-8054-0_13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Maturana, H., Varela, F. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co, 1980. 146 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8947-410.1007/978-94-009-8947-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Maturana, H., Varela, F. The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala, 1992. 269p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Hallowell, R. Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela’s Contribution to Media Ecology: Autopoiesis, The Santiago School of Cognition, and Enactive Cognitive Science. Proceedings of the Media Ecology Assocation, Vol. 10, 2009, pp. 143–158.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Hayles, N. K. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1999. 364 p. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.000110.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Arshinov, V. I., Lepskij, V. E. (Eds). Problemy subjektov v postneklassicheskoj nauke. Moskva: Kogito-Centr, 2007. 272p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Stepin, V. S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. Moskva: Progress Tradicija, 2003. 393 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Mamardashvili, M. Klassicheskij i neklassicheskij idealy racionalnosti. Moskva: Logos, 2004. 288 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Vladiv-Glover, S. What is classical and non-classical knowledge? Studies in East European Thought, Vol. 58, 2006, pp. 205–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-006-9004-510.1007/s11212-006-9004-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Schumacher P. The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume I: A New Framework for Architecture. New York: Wiley, 2011. 478 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Schumacher P. The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume II: A New Agenda for Architecture. New York: Wiley, 2012. 784 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Samalavičius, A. Ideology as Geometry: A note on Parametricism and its theoretical foundations. Symmetry: Culture and Science, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2020, pp. 353–364. https://doi.org/10.26830/symmetry_2020_3_35310.26830/symmetry_2020_3_353
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. McKay, G. The Autopoiesis of Architecure Vol. I (review) [online]. misfits’ architecture [cited 5.08.2020]. https://misfitsarchitecture.com/2018/07/29/the-autopoiesis-of-architecure-vol-1/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Petrušonis, V. Methodological Perspectives of Evaluation of Cultural Heritage in The Context of Changing Scientific Paradigms. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2012.67977210.3846/20297955.2012.679772
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Petrušonis, V. Conditions for a dialogue of local community and genius loci. Architecture and Urban Planning, Vol. 14, Issue 1, 2018, pp. 70–74. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2018-000910.2478/aup-2018-0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Petrušonis, V. Urbanistinė renovacija ir kultūriniai archetipai [online]. Spec.lt [cited 05/10/2018]. https://www.spec.lt/straipsniai/urbanistine-renovacija-ir-kulturiniai-archetipai.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Lithuania. Description of filling in the form of the act of the immovable cultural heritage assessment council (approved by the Director of the Department of Cultural Heritage under the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Lithuania in 12/10/2020, order No. Į-272), = Nekilnojamojo kultūros paveldo vertinimo tarybos akto formos pildymo aprašas, in Lithuanian, [interactive], accessed 02/12/2020. https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.404018/asr
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Minister of Culture of the Republic of Lithuania. Description of the criteria for the assessment, selection and determination of the level of significance of immovable cultural property (approved by the Minister of Culture of the Republic of Lithuania in 4/10/2016, order NoĮV-150), = Nekilnojamųjų kultūros vertybių vertinimo, atrankos ir reikšmingumo lygmens nustatymo kriterijų aprašas, in Lithuanian, [interactive], accessed 02/12/2020. https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.254663/asr
]Search in Google Scholar
