[
1. Lerner, J. Playing with power: Participatory planning games in Rosario’s villas. Latin American Perspectives, 2013, Vol. 20, Issue 189, pp. 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X1246776010.1177/0094582X12467760
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Shipley, R., Shipley, S. UTZ. Making it Count: A Review of the Value and Techniques for Public Consultation. Journal of Planning Literature, 2012, Vol. 27, Issue 1, pp. 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541221141313310.1177/0885412211413133
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Horelli, L. A Methodology of Participatory Planning. In Robert B. Bechtel, Robert & Arza Churchman, ed., Handbook of Environmental Psychology. S.l.: John Wiley & Sons, 2002, pp. 607–628. ISBN 0-471-40594-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Aravena, A. My architectural philosophy? Bring the community into the process. TEDGlobal 2014 [online]. TED Ideas worth spreading [cited 13.01.2020]. https://www.ted.com/talks/alejandro_aravena_my_architectural_philosophy_bring_the_community_into_the_process/discussion?referrer=playlist-11_must_see_ted_talks
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. BLOCK BY BLOCK. Our work. Project selection [online]. Block by Block [cited 13.01.2020]. https://www.blockbyblock.org/our-work
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Connelly, S. Looking inside public involvement: How is it made so ineffective and can we change this? Community Development Journal. 2006, Vol. 41, Issue 1, pp. 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsi04610.1093/cdj/bsi046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Nienhuis, I., Van Dijk, T., De Roo, G. Let’s Collaborate! But Who’s Really Collaborating? Individual Interests as a Leitmotiv for Urban Renewal and Regeneration Strategies. Planning Theory & Practice, 2011, Vol. 12, Issue 1, pp. 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2011.54667110.1080/14649357.2011.546671
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Donders, M., Hartmann, T., Kokx, A. E-Participation in Urban Planning: Getting and Keeping Citizens Involved. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 2014, Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 54–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.201404010410.4018/ijepr.2014040104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Rowe, G., Frewer, L.J. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2000, Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 2–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439000250010110.1177/016224390002500101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Johnson, I.G., Macdonald, A., Briggs, J., Manuel, J., Salt, K., Flynn, E., Vines, J. Community Conversational. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’17. S.l.: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017, pp. 2320–2333. ISBN 978-1-4503-4655-9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.302555910.1145/3025453.3025559
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Wilson, A., Tewdwr-Jones, M., Comber, R. Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: App development as a method of generating citizen involvement in local planning process. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2019, Vol. 46, Issue 2, pp. 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/239980831771251510.1177/2399808317712515
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Schneider, S.H., Busse, S. Participatory Budgeting in Germany–A Review of Empirical Findings. International Journal of Public Administration, 2019, Vol. 43, Issue 3, pp. 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.142660110.1080/01900692.2018.1426601
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Kleinhans, R., Van Ham, M., Evans-Cowley, J. Using Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Engagement and Self-Organization in Participatory Urban Planning and Neighbourhood Governance. Planning Practice & Research, 2015, Vol. 30, Issue 3, pp. 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.105132010.1080/02697459.2015.1051320
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Klamert, K., Münster, S. Child’s play - A literature-based survey on gamified tools and methods for fostering public participation in urban planning. In: Electronic Participation, 9th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, ePart 2017, St. Petersburg, Russia, September 4-7, 2017, Proceedings, S.l.: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 24–33. ISBN 978-3-319-64321-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64322-9_310.1007/978-3-319-64322-9_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Ampatzidou, C., Gugerell, K., Constantinescu, T., Devisch, O., Jauschneg, M., Berger, M. All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance. Urban Planning, 2018, Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 34–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i1.126110.17645/up.v3i1.1261
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Minnery, J., Searle, G. Toying with the City? Using the Computer Game SimCityTM4 in Planning Education. Planning Practice and Research, 2013, Vol. 29, Issue 1, pp. 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2013.82933510.1080/02697459.2013.829335
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Potts, R., Jacka, L., Yee, L.H. Can we ‘Catch ‘em All’? An exploration of the nexus between augmented reality games, urban planning and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 2017, Vol. 22, Issue 6, pp. 866–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.136987310.1080/13574809.2017.1369873
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Gordon, E., Baldwin-Philippi, J. Playful civic learning: Enabling reflection and lateral trust in game-based public participation. International Journal of Communication, 2014, Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 759–786.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Tan, E. Negotiation and Design for the Self-Organizing City. Gaming as a method for Urban Design. S.l.: TU Delft, 2014. A+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment. ISBN 978-94-6186-356-0. https://doi.org/10.7480/abe.2014.11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Thiel, S.K., Ertiö, T.P., Baldauf, M. Why so serious? The Role of Gamification on Motivation and Engagement in e-Participation. Interaction Design and Architectures, 2017, Vol. 35, pp. 158–181.10.55612/s-5002-035-008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Winn, B. M. The Design, Play, and Experience Framework. In: Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education. Hershey, PA, USA: Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global), 2009, pp. 1010–1024. ISBN 978-1-59904-808-6. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-808-6.ch05810.4018/978-1-59904-808-6.ch058
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Duke, R. D. Origin and Evolution of Policy Simulation: A Personal Journey. Simulation & Gaming, 2011, Vol. 42, Issue 3, pp. 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/104687811036757010.1177/1046878110367570
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Feldt, A.G. Experience with Simulation / Gaming: 1960–2010. Simulation & Gaming, 2014, Vol. 45, Issue 3, pp. 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/104687811454398310.1177/1046878114543983
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Sanoff, H. Community participation methods in design and planning. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2000. 320 p. ISBN 0-471-35545-3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Sanoff, H. Democratic Design: Participation Case Studies in Urban and Small Town Environments. S.l.: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, 2010. 168 p. ISBN 978-3-639-28830-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Devisch, O., Poplin, A., Sofronie, S. The Gamification of Civic Participation: Two Experiments in Improving the Skills of Citizens to Reflect Collectively on Spatial Issues. Journal of Urban Technology, 2016, Vol. 23, Issue 2, pp. 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.110241910.1080/10630732.2015.1102419
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Thiel, S.-K., Lehner, U., Sturmer, T., Gospodarek, J. Insights from a m-participation prototype in the wild. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops 2015). S.l.: IEEE, 2015, pp. 166–171. ISBN 978-1-4799-8425-1. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2015.713401310.1109/PERCOMW.2015.7134013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Thiel, S.-K., Frohlich, P. Gamification as Motivation to Engage in Location-Based Public Participation. In: Georg GARTNER and Haosheng HUANG, ed., Progress in Location-Based Services 2016. S.l.: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017, Lecture notes in Geoinformation and cartography, pp. 399–421. ISBN 978-3-319-47289-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47289-8_2010.1007/978-3-319-47289-8_20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Gordon, E., Haas, J., Michelson, B. Civic creativity: Role-playing games in deliberative process. International Journal of Communication, 2017, Vol. 11, pp. 3789–3807.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Devisch, O. Should Planners Start Playing Computer Games? Arguments from SimCity and Second Life. Planning Theory & Practice, 2008, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935080204223110.1080/14649350802042231
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Devisch, O., Gugerell, K., Diephuis, J., Constantinescu, T., Ampatzidou, C., Jauschneg, M. Mini is beautiful. Playing serious mini-games to facilitate collective learning on complex urban processes. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 2017, Vol. 35, pp. 141–157.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Poplin, A. Games and serious games in urban planning: study cases. In: Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2011. S.l.: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 1–14. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. ISBN 978-3-642-21887-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21887-3_110.1007/978-3-642-21887-3_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Poplin, A. Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 2012, Vol. 36, Issue 3, pp. 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.10.00310.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.10.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Poplin, A. Digital serious game for urban planning: „B3-Design your Marketplace!” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2014, Vol. 41, pp. 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3903210.1068/b39032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Poplin, A., Shenk, L., Passe, U. Transforming Pervasive into Collaborative: Engaging Youth as Leaders with GIS through a Framework that Integrates Technologies, Storytelling, and Action. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 2017, Vol. 35, pp. 182–204.10.55612/s-5002-035-009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. The A-Z of social research: a dictionary of key social science research concepts (Eds.: R. L. Miller, J.D. Brewer). London; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE, 2003. 362 p. ISBN 978-0-7619-7132-0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Taylor, D. The Literature Review: A Few Tips on Conducting It. University of Toronto. Writing Advice [online, cited 13.01.2020]. https://advice.writing.utoronto.ca/types-of-writing/literature-review/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Creswell, J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: SAGE Publications, 2009. 296 p. ISBN 978-1-4129-6557-6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A. Research methods for business students. 7th edition. Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex, England: Pearson Education Ltd., 2016. 768 p. ISBN 978-1-292-01662-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Cord, A. F., Roessiger, F., Schwarz, N. Geocaching data as an indicator for recreational ecosystem services in urban areas: Exploring spatial gradients, preferences and motivations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, Vol. 144, pp. 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.08.01510.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.08.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Eklund, A. Gaming the Real World [online]. Plethora-project [cited 13.01.2020]. https://www.plethora-project.com/gaming-the-real-world
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Stark, E. Playful places: Uncovering hidden heritage with Ingress. In: Social, Casual and Mobile Games: The changing gaming landscape. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. ISBN 978-1-5013-1060-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Charmaz, K. Constructing grounded theory. London, UK: Sage Publications, 2006. 416 p. ISBN 978-0-7619-7352-2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. IAP2 International Association for Public Participation. Core Values, Ethics, Spectrum – The 3 Pillars of Public Participation. IAP2 International Association for Public Participation. Resources, 2018 [online]. IAP2 [cited 14.01.2020]. https://www.iap2.org/page/pillars
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Rowe, G., Frewer, L. J. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science Technology and Human Values, 2005, Vol. 30, Issue 2, pp. 251–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390427172410.1177/0162243904271724
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Hamdi, N., Goethert, R. Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice. Chichester; New York: John Wiley, 1997. 264 p. ISBN 978-0-471-96928-0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Wates, N. The community planning handbook: how people can shape their cities, towns and villages in any part of the world. London: Earthscan, 2000. 240 p. ISBN 978-1-85383-654-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. ENGAGEMENT LAB. What’s @stake? [online]. atstakegame [cited 14.01.2020]. https://atstakegame.org
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Hummel, K. @Stake: A Role-Playing Card Game. 18. September 2015 [online]. NCDD. Resource Center [cited 14.01.2020]. http://ncdd.org/rc/item/10150/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Cameron, K. Using a B.U.G. to Promote Urban Design. 1. March 2004 [online]. Metropolis [cited 14.01.2020]. http://www.metropolismag.com/cities/using-a-b-u-g-to-promote-urban-design/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Ferri, G., Coppock, P. Serious Urban Games. From play in the city to play for the city. In: Media and the City: Urbanism, Technology and Communication [Eds.: Simone Tosoni, Matteo Tarantino and Chiara Giaccardi]. S.l.: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013, pp. 120–134. ISBN 978-1-4438-4943-2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Salen, K. Big Urban Game [online]. Katie Salen. Selekted Work [cited 14.01.2020]. https://www.katiesalen.me/projects#/big-urban-game/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. STEVENMN01. B.U.G. Blue Day 1, 3. June 2011 [online]. YouTube Video [cited 14.01.2020]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2opyxELpaHM
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Constantinescu, T. I., Devisch, O., Kostov, G. City Makers: Insights on the Development of a Serious Game to Support Collective Reflection and Knowledge Transfer in Participatory Processes. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 2017, Vol. 6, Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.201710010310.4018/IJEPR.2017100103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. INSHENGXIA. What is „Community PlanIt”, 9 February 2013 [online]. YouTube Video [cited 14.01.2020]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcJ09qtkOpw
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Gugerell, K., Zuidema, C. Gaming for the energy transition. Experimenting and learning in co-designing a serious game prototype. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, Vol. 169, pp. 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.14210.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.142
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Prilenska, V. Serious game for modelling neighbourhood energy supply scenarios. In: SBE19 Thessaloniki − Sustainability in the built environment for climate change mitigation. 23−25 October 2019, Conference Proceedings. S.l.: IOP Science.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. PLAY!UC. Floating City [online]. Play!UC Playing with Urban Complexity [cited 14.01.2020]. http://play-uc.net/?page_id=529
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Prandi, C., Roccetti, M., Salomoni, P. Valentina NISI and Nuno Jardim NUNES. Fighting exclusion: a multimedia mobile app with zombies and maps as a medium for civic engagement and design. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2017, Vol. 76, pp. 4951–4979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3780-910.1007/s11042-016-3780-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Prilenska, V. Participation Game. Reflections on the iterative design process. PlaNext. In print.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Valdez Young, A. Play Before Plan: Games for the Public and Planners to Value the Street. Journal of Urban Technology, 2015, Vol. 22, Issue 3, pp. 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.104029910.1080/10630732.2015.1040299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Valdez Young, A. Shopomama. 25 August 2012 [online]. ISSUU [cited 23.08.2019]. https://issuu.com/betterthanliving/docs/shopomama
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Valdez Young, A. Arrivalocity. 25 August 2012 [online]. ISSUU [cited 23.08.2019]. https://issuu.com/betterthanliving/docs/arrivalocity
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Valdez Young, A. Pech City, 25 August 2012 [online]. ISSUU [cited 23.08.2019]. https://issuu.com/betterthanliving/docs/pechcity
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. KULTÚRAKTÍV. Games: Pop-up Pest [online]. KULTÚRAKTÍV [cited 23.08.2019]. https://kulturaktiv.hu/en/projects/pop-up-pest/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. Toth, E., Poplin, A. Pop-up Pest: An Educational Game for Active Participation of Children and Youth in Urban Planning. In: REAL CORP 2013. Planning Times You better keep planning or you get in deep water, for the cities they are a-changin’. Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society. Schwechat-Rannersdorf, Austria: CORP – Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning, 2013, pp. 731–741. ISBN 978-3-9503110-4-4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. Toth, E., Poplin, A. ParticiPécs − a cooperative game fostering learning about the built environment and urban planning. In: 17th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science (AGILE 2014), Workshop Geogames and Geoplay, June 03–06, 2014, Castellón, Spain. 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
68. Olszewski, R., Turek, A., Laczynski, M. Urban Gamification as a Source of Information for Spatial Data Analysis and Predictive Participatory Modelling of a City’s Development. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Data Management Technologies and Applications - Vol. 1: DATA. 2016, pp. 176–181. https://doi.org/10.5220/000600520176018110.5220/0006005201760181
]Search in Google Scholar
[
69. LOGIVILLE. Urbax 21. Simulation pédagogique de l’aménagement urbain [online]. Urbax 21. [cited 23.08.2019]. https://www.urbax.eu/en/presentation-2/10.3917/cdsu.069.0021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
70. Gomes, S. L., Hermans, L. M., Islam, K. F., Huda, S. N., Hossain, Z., Thissen, W.A.H. Capacity Building for Water Management in Peri-Urban Communities, Bangladesh: A Simulation-Gaming Approach. Water, 2018, Vol. 10, pp. 1704–1723. https://doi.org/10.3390/w1011170410.3390/w10111704
]Search in Google Scholar
[
71. ILAB.O. ZWERM [online]. Player Vimeo [cited 23.08.2019]. https://player.vimeo.com/video/65648085
]Search in Google Scholar
[
72. Laureyssens, T., Coenen, T., Claeys, L., Mechant, P., Criel, J., Van De Moere, A. ZWERM: A modular component network approach for an urban participation game. In: CHI ’14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2014, pp. 3259–3268. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.255705310.1145/2556288.2557053
]Search in Google Scholar
[
73. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L. From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In: MindTrek ’11: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 2011, pp. 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.218104010.1145/2181037.2181040
]Search in Google Scholar
[
74. Leao, S., Izadpahani, P. Factors Motivating Citizen Engagement in Mobile Sensing: Insights from a Survey of Non-Participants. Journal of Urban Technology, 2016, Vol. 23, Issue 4, pp. 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2016.117582410.1080/10630732.2016.1175824
]Search in Google Scholar
[
75. Bowser, A. E., Hansen, D. L., Raphael, J., Reid, M., Gamett, R. J., He, Y. R., Rotman, D., Preece, J. J. Prototyping in PLACE: A Scalable Approach to Developing Location-Based Apps and Games. In: CHI ’13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2013, pp. 1519–1528. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.246620210.1145/2470654.2466202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
76. Bowser, A., Hansen, D., Preece, J., He, Y., Boston, C., Hammock, J. Gamifying citizen science: A study of two user groups. In: CSCW Companion ’14: Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, 2014, pp. 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.255650210.1145/2556420.2556502
]Search in Google Scholar
[
77. Raczkowsky, F. Making Points the Point - Towards a History of Ideas of Gamification. In: Mathias Fuchs, Sonia Fizek, Paolo Ruffino and Niklas Schape, ed., Rethinking Gamification. Lüneburg, Germany: Meson Press, Hybrid Publishing Lab, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, n.d., pp.141–160. ISBN 978-3-95796-000-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
78. Bogost, I. Persuasive Games: Exploitationware, 3 May 2011 [online]. Gamasutra [cited 14.01.2020]. https://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/134735/persuasive_games_exploitationware.php
]Search in Google Scholar
[
79. Yannakakis, G. N., Paiva, A. Emotion in Games. In: The Oxford Handbook of Affective Computing [Eds.: Rafael Calvo, Sidney D’Mello, Jonathan Gratch and Arvid Kappas]. S.l.: Oxford University Press, 2014. ISBN 978-0-19-994223-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
80. Geher, G. Video Games and Emotional States. why your kid is addicted to Fortnite, 3 September 2018 [online]. Psychology Today [cited 14.01.2020]. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/darwins-subterranean-world/201809/video-games-and-emotional-states
]Search in Google Scholar
[
81. Nicholson, S. A User-Centered Theoretical Framework for Meaningful Gamification. In: Games+Learning+Society 8.0. June 13–15, 2012, 2013, 658 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
82. Brown, G., Kyttä, M. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 2014, Vol. 46, pp. 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.00410.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
83. Wiggins, A. Free as in puppies. In: Proc. CSCW 2013, 2013, pp. 1469–1480. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.244194210.1145/2441776.2441942
]Search in Google Scholar
[
84. Ertiö, T.-P. Participatory Apps for Urban Planning—Space for Improvement. Planning Practice & Research, 2015, Vol. 30, Issue 3, pp. 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.105294210.1080/02697459.2015.1052942
]Search in Google Scholar
[
85. Kahila-Tani, M., Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., Tyger, T. Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process. Planning Practice and Research, 2016, Vol. 31 Issue 2, pp. 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.110420310.1080/02697459.2015.1104203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
86. Eräranta, S., Kahila-Tani, M., Nummi-Sund, P. Web-based Public Participation in Urban Planning Competitions: International Journal of E-Planning Research, 2015, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.201501010110.4018/ijepr.2015010101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
87. EESTI ARHITEKTUURIKESKUS. Main Street: giving public spaces back to people [online]. Peatänav [cited 14.01.2020]. http://www.peatanav.ee/en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
88. Oser, J., Hooghe, M., Marien, S. Is Online Participation Distinct from Offline Participation? A Latent Class Analysis of Participation Types and Their Stratification. Political Research Quarterly, 2013, Vol. 66, Issue 1, pp. 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591291243669510.1177/1065912912436695
]Search in Google Scholar
[
89. Krek, A. Rational Ignorance of the Citizens in Public Participatory Planning Alenka Krek. In: Manfred SCHRENK, ed., CORP 2005 GEO MULTIMEDIAProceedings 10th International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) in Urban Planning and Spatial Development and Impacts of ICT on Physical Space. S.l.: Department of computer aided planning and architecture, Vienna University of Technology, 2005, pp. 165–169. ISBN 3-901673-12-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
90. Graells-Garrido, E., Ferres, L., Caro, D., Bravo, L. The effect of Pokémon Go on the pulse of the city: a natural experiment. EPJ Data Science, 2017, Vol. 6, Issue 1, p. 23. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0119-310.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0119-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
91. Thakuriah, P., Tilahun, N. Y., Zellner, M. Big Data and Urban Informatics: Innovations and Challenges to Urban Planning and Knowledge Discovery. In: Seeing Cities Through Big Data [Eds.: Piyushimita Thakuriah, Nebiyou Tilahun and Moira Zellner]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 11–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40902-3_210.1007/978-3-319-40902-3_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
92. Goodspeed, R. Digital knowledge technologies in planning practice: from black boxes to media for collaborative inquiry. Planning Theory & Practice, 2016, Vol. 17, Issue 4, pp. 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.121299610.1080/14649357.2016.1212996
]Search in Google Scholar
[
93. Rodriguez, H. The playful and the serious: An approximation to Huizinga’s Homo Ludens, 2006 [online]. Game Studies [cited 14.01.2020]. http://gamestudies.org/0601/articles/rodriges
]Search in Google Scholar
[
94. Van Dijk, T., Ubels, H. How Dutch professionals conduct interactive design sessions to foster ‘shared understanding’. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2015, Vol. 43, Issue 3, pp. 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/026581351561765810.1177/0265813515617658
]Search in Google Scholar
[
95. Innes, J. E., Booher, D.E. Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1999, Vol. 65, Issue 1, pp. 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194436990897603110.1080/01944369908976031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
96. Sotamaa, O., Ermi, L., Laukkanen, T., Mäyrä, F., Nummela, J. The Role of Players in Game Design: A Methodological Perspective. In: Proceedings of Digital Experience: Design, Aesthetics, Practice. DAC 2005. 2005, pp. 35–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
97. Isbister, K., Flanagan, M., Hash, C. Designing games for learning: insights from conversations with designers. In: the 28th international conference: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’10. Atlanta, Georgia, USA: ACM Press, 2010, p. 204. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.175363710.1145/1753326.1753637
]Search in Google Scholar
[
98. Khaled, R., Vasalou, A. Bridging serious games and participatory design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2014, Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.03.00110.1016/j.ijcci.2014.03.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
99. Adams, E. Fundamentals of game design. Third edition. Berkeley, CA: New Riders, 2014. 576 p. ISBN 978-0-321-92967-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
100. Luck, R. What is it that makes participation in design participatory design? Design Studies, 2018, Vol. 59, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.00210.1016/j.destud.2018.10.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
101. Gee, J. P. Good Video Games and Good Learning: Collected Essays on Video Games, Learning and Literacy. 2nd edition. S.l.: Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers, 2013. 194 p. ISBN 978-1-4331-2393-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
