1. bookVolumen 23 (2023): Heft 2 (April 2023)
25 Nov 2011
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Pragmatic applications of DNA barcoding markers in identification of fish species – A review

Online veröffentlicht: 03 May 2023
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 23 (2023) - Heft 2 (April 2023)
Seitenbereich: 363 - 389
Eingereicht: 11 Mar 2022
Akzeptiert: 27 Sep 2022
25 Nov 2011
4 Hefte pro Jahr

Abdullah A., Nurilmala M., Jacoeb A.M., Sitaresmi K.P. (2019). Mini DNA-barcode as molecular marker for heavily processed hairtail fish products authentication. Proc: IOP Conf. Ser., Earth Environ. Sci., 278: 012001. Search in Google Scholar

Abdullah A., Nurilmala M., Muttaqin E., Yulianto I. (2020). DNAbased analysis of shark products sold on the Indonesian market towards seafood labelling accuracy program. Biodiversitas, 21: 1385–1390. Search in Google Scholar

Adibah A.B., Syazwan S., Hanim M.H., Munir M.B., Faraha A.I., Azizah M.S. (2020). Evaluation of DNA barcoding to facilitate the authentication of processed fish products in the seafood industry. LWT, 129: 109585. Search in Google Scholar

Aglieri G., Baillie C., Mariani S., Cattano C., Calò A., Turco G., Spatafora D., Di Franco A., Di Lorenzo M., Guidetti P., Milazzo M. (2021). Environmental DNA effectively captures functional diversity of coastal fish communities. Mol. Ecol., 30: 3127–3139. Search in Google Scholar

Ahmed M.S., Dina S.R., Nahar L., Islam N.N., Al Reza H. (2018). Molecular characterization of Channa species from Bangladesh based on Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit I (COI) gene. FishTaxa, 3: 87–93. Search in Google Scholar

Ahmed M.S., Chowdhury M.M.K., Nahar L. (2019). Molecular characterization of small indigenous fish species (SIS) of Bangladesh through DNA barcodes. Gene, 684: 53–57. Search in Google Scholar

Ahmed M.S., Datta S.K., Zhilik A.A. (2020). Molecular diversity of freshwater fishes of Bangladesh assessed by DNA barcoding. Bangladesh J. Zool., 48: 1–19. Search in Google Scholar

Ahn H., Kume M., Terashima Y., Ye F., Kameyama S., Miya M., Kasai A. (2020). Evaluation of fish biodiversity in estuaries using environmental DNA metabarcoding. PloS One, 15: e0231127. Search in Google Scholar

Alcantara S.G., Yambot A.V. (2016). DNA barcoding of commercially important grouper species (Perciformes, Serranidae) in the Philippines. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 27: 3837–3845. Search in Google Scholar

Andruszkiewicz E.A., Starks H.A., Chavez F.P., Sassoubre L.M., Block B.A., Boehm A.B. (2017). Biomonitoring of marine vertebrates in Monterey Bay using eDNA metabarcoding. PLoS One, 12: e0176343. Search in Google Scholar

Ansfield M., Reaney S.D., Jackman R. (2000). Production of a sensitive immunoassay for detection of ruminant and porcine proteins, heated to ≫ 130°C at 2.7 bar, in compound animal feedstuffs. Food Agric. Immunol., 12: 273–284. Search in Google Scholar

Aquino L.M.G., Tango J.M., Canoy R.J.C., Fontanilla I.K.C., Basiao Z.U., Ong P.S., Quilang J.P. (2011). DNA barcoding of fishes of Laguna de Bay, Philippines. Mitochondrial DNA, 22: 143–153. Search in Google Scholar

Armani A., Tinacci L., Lorenzetti R., Benvenuti A., Susini F., Gasperetti L., Ricci E., Guarducci M., Guidi A. (2017). Is raw better? A multiple DNA barcoding approach (full and mini) based on mitochondrial and nuclear markers reveals low rates of misdescription in sushi products sold on the Italian market. Food Control, 79: 126–133. Search in Google Scholar

Asensio L. (2007). PCR-based methods for fish and fishery products authentication. Trends Food Sci. Tech., 18: 558–566. Search in Google Scholar

Asensio L., González I., García T., Martín R. (2008). Determination of food authenticity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Food Control, 19: 1–8. Search in Google Scholar

Avise J.C. (2000). Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Baik I., Abbott R.D., Curb J.D., Shin C. (2010). Intake of fish and n-3 fatty acids and future risk of metabolic syndrome. J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 110: 1018–1026. Search in Google Scholar

Balami S., Sharma A., Karn R. (2019). Significance of nutritional value of fish for human health. Malays J. Halal Res., 2: 32–34. Search in Google Scholar

Balasingham K.D., Walter R.P., Mandrak N.E., Heath D.D. (2018). Environmental DNA detection of rare and invasive fish species in two Great Lakes tributaries. Mol. Ecol., 27: 112–127. Search in Google Scholar

Bálint M., Nowak C., Márton O., Pauls S.U., Wittwer C., Aramayo J.L., Jansen M. (2018). Accuracy, limitations and cost efficiency of eDNA-based community survey in tropical frogs. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 18: 1415–1426. Search in Google Scholar

Ballard J.W.O., Whitlock M.C. (2004). The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol., 13: 729–744. Search in Google Scholar

Behrens-Chapuis S., Malewski T., Suchecka E., Geiger M.F., Herder F., Bogdanowicz W. (2018). Discriminating European cyprinid specimens by barcode high-resolution melting analysis (Bar- HRM) – A cost efficient and faster way for specimen assignment? Fish. Res., 204: 61–73. Search in Google Scholar

Belle C.C., Stoeckle B.C., Geist J. (2019). Taxonomic and geographical representation of freshwater environmental DNA research in aquatic conservation. Aquat. Conserv., 29: 1996–2009. Search in Google Scholar

Bellmann C., Tipping A., Sumaila U.R. (2016). Global trade in fish and fishery products: An overview. Mar. Policy, 69: 181–188. Search in Google Scholar

Berry O., Bulman C., Bunce M., Coghlan M., Murray D.C., Ward R.D. (2015). Comparison of morphological and DNA metabarcoding analyses of diets in exploited marine fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 540: 167–181. Search in Google Scholar

Bineesh K.K., Gopalakrishnan A., Akhilesh K.V., Sajeela K.A., Abdussamad E.M., Pillai N.G.K., Ward R.D. (2017). DNA barcoding reveals species composition of sharks and rays in the Indian commercial fishery. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 28: 458–472. Search in Google Scholar

Bingpeng X., Heshan L., Zhilan Z., Chunguang W., Yanguo W., Jianjun W. (2018). DNA barcoding for identification of fish species in the Taiwan Strait. PloS One, 13: e0198109. Search in Google Scholar

Blabolil P., Harper L.R., Říčanová Š., Sellers G., Di Muri C., Jůza T., Haenfling B. (2021). Environmental DNA metabarcoding uncovers environmental correlates of fish communities in spatially heterogeneous freshwater habitats. Ecol. Ind., 126: 107698. Search in Google Scholar

Boivin-Delisle D., Laporte M., Burton F., Dion R., Normandeau E., Bernatchez L. (2021). Using environmental DNA for biomonitoring of freshwater fish communities: Comparison with established gillnet surveys in a boreal hydroelectric impoundment. Envir. DNA, 3: 105–120. Search in Google Scholar

Bokulich N.A., Subramanian S., Faith J.J., Gevers D., Gordon J.I., Knight, R., Mills D.A., Caporaso J.G. (2013). Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods, 10: 57–59. Search in Google Scholar

Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 30: 2114–2120. Search in Google Scholar

Bottero M.T., Dalmasso A. (2011). Animal species identification in food products: Evolution of biomolecular methods. Vet. J., 190: 34–38. Search in Google Scholar

Callejas C., Ochando M.D. (2001). Molecular identification (RAPD) of the eight species of the genus Barbus (Cyprinidae) in the Iberian Peninsula. J. Fish Biol., 59: 1589–1599. Search in Google Scholar

Čandek K., Kuntner M. (2015). DNA barcoding gap: reliable species identification over morphological and geographical scales. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 15: 268–277. Search in Google Scholar

Cardeñosa D., Fields A., Abercrombie D., Feldheim K., Shea S.K., Chapman D.D. (2017). A multiplex PCR mini-barcode assay to identify processed shark products in the global trade. PloS One, 12: e0185368. Search in Google Scholar

Carvalho D.C., Palhares R.M., Drummond M.G., Frigo T.B. (2015). DNA barcoding identification of commercialized seafood in South Brazil: A governmental regulatory forensic program. Food Control, 50: 784–788. Search in Google Scholar

Chang C.H., Lin H.Y., Ren Q., Lin Y.S., Shao K.T. (2016). DNA barcode identification of fish products in Taiwan: Government-commissioned authentication cases. Food Control, 66: 38–43. Search in Google Scholar

Changizi R., Farahmand H., Soltani M., Asareh R., Ghiasvand Z. (2013). Species identification reveals mislabeling of important fish products in Iran by DNA barcoding. Iran. J. Fish. Sci., 12: 783–791. Search in Google Scholar

Chapela M.J., Sotelo C.G., Pérez-Martín R.I., Pardo M.Á., Pérez-Villareal B., Gilardi P., Riese J. (2007). Comparison of DNA extraction methods from muscle of canned tuna for species identification. Food Control, 18: 1211–1215. Search in Google Scholar

Chen C., Ding Y., Wang Y., Jiang Q., Wang F., Lu C., Zhu C. (2021). High-resolution melting analysis of COI sequences distinguishes pufferfish species (Takifugu spp.) in China. J. Agric. Food Chem., 69: 794–804. Search in Google Scholar

Chen W., Ma X., Shen Y., Mao Y., He S. (2015). The fish diversity in the upper reaches of the Salween River, Nujiang River, revealed by DNA barcoding. Sci. Rep., 5: 1–12. Search in Google Scholar

Chen X., Cui Y., Nie L., Hu H., Xu Z., Sun W., Yao H. (2019). Identification and phylogenetic analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of three ephedra herbs containing ephedrine. BioMed Res. Int., 2019: 5921725. Search in Google Scholar

Chin T.C., Adibah A.B., Hariz Z.D., Azizah M.S. (2016). Detection of mislabelled seafood products in Malaysia by DNA barcoding: Improving transparency in food market. Food Control, 64: 247–256. Search in Google Scholar

Chrysohoou C., Panagiotakos D.B., Pitsavos C., Skoumas J., Krinos X., Chloptsios Y., Nikolaou V., Stefanadis C. (2007). Long-term fish consumption is associated with protection against arrhythmia in healthy persons in a Mediterranean region – the ATTICA study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 85: 1385–1391. Search in Google Scholar

Chuang P.S., Hung T.C., Chang H.A., Huang C.K., Shiao J.C. (2016). The species and origin of shark fins in Taiwan’s fishing ports, markets, and customs detention: A DNA barcoding analysis. PloS One, 11: e0147290. Search in Google Scholar

Closek C.J., Santora J.A., Starks H.A., Schroeder I.D., Andruszkiewicz E.A., Sakuma K.M., Boehm A.B. (2019). Marine vertebrate biodiversity and distribution within the central California Current using environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding and ecosystem surveys. Front. Mar. Sci., 6: 732. Search in Google Scholar

Coghlan M.L., Haile J., Houston J., Murray D.C., White N.E., Moolhuijzen P., Bunce M. (2012). Deep sequencing of plant and animal DNA contained within traditional Chinese medicines reveals legality issues and health safety concerns. PLoS Genet., 8: e1002657. Search in Google Scholar

Collins R.A., Bakker J., Wangensteen O.S., Soto A.Z., Corrigan L., Sims D.W., Genner M.J. Mariani S. (2019). Non-specific amplification compromises environmental DNA metabarcoding with COI. Methods Ecol. Evol., 10: 1985–2001. Search in Google Scholar

Czeglédi I., Sály P., Specziár A., Preiszner B., Szalóky Z., Maroda Á., Pont D., Meulenbroek P., Valentini A., Erős T. (2021). Congruency between two traditional and eDNA-based sampling methods in characterising taxonomic and trait-based structure of fish communities and community-environment relationships in lentic environment. Ecol. Ind., 129: 107952. Search in Google Scholar

Dal Pont G., Duarte Ritter, C., Agostinis A.O., Stica P.V., Horodesky A., Cozer N., Balsanelli E., Netto O.S.M., Henn C., Ostrensky A., Pie M.R. (2021). Monitoring fish communities through environmental DNA metabarcoding in the fish pass system of the second largest hydropower plant in the world. Sci. Rep., 11: 1–13. Search in Google Scholar

Day K., Campbell H., Fisher A., Gibb K., Hill B., Rose A., Jarman S.N. (2019). Development and validation of an environmental DNA test for the endangered Gouldian finch. Endanger. Species Res., 40: 171–182. Search in Google Scholar

Deagle B.E., Jarman S.N., Coissac E., Pompanon F., Taberlet P. (2014). DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match. Biol. Lett., 10: 20140562. Search in Google Scholar

Dhar B., Ghosh S.K. (2017). Mini-DNA barcode in identification of the ornamental fish: A case study from Northeast India. Gene, 627: 248–254. Search in Google Scholar

Di Muri C., Lawson Handley L., Bean C.W., Li J., Peirson G., Sellers G.S., Walsh K., Watson H.V., Winfield I.J., Hänfling B. (2020). Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds. Metabarcoding Metagenom., 4: 97–112. Search in Google Scholar

Di Pinto A., Marchetti P., Mottola A., Bozzo G., Bonerba E., Ceci E., Tantillo G. (2015). Species identification in fish fillet products using DNA barcoding. Fish. Res., 170: 9–13. Search in Google Scholar

Díaz C., Wege F.F., Tang C.Q., Crampton-Platt A., Rüdel H., Eilebrecht E., Koschorreck J. (2020). Aquatic suspended particulate matter as source of eDNA for fish metabarcoding. Sci. Rep., 10: 1–8. Search in Google Scholar

Díaz J., Villanova G.V., Brancolini F., Del Pazo F., Posner V.M., Grimberg A., Arranz S.E. (2016). First DNA barcode reference library for the identification of South American freshwater fish from the lower Paraná river. PLoS One, 11: e0157419. Search in Google Scholar

Doble C.J., Hipperson H., Salzburger W., Horsburgh G.J., Mwita C., Murrell D.J., Day J.J. (2020). Testing the performance of environmental DNA metabarcoding for surveying highly diverse tropical fish communities: A case study from Lake Tanganyika. Environ. DNA, 2: 24–41. Search in Google Scholar

Duke E.M., Burton R.S. (2020). Efficacy of metabarcoding for identification of fish eggs evaluated with mock communities. Ecol. Evol., 10: 3463–3476. Search in Google Scholar

Duong T.Y., Tran L.V.D., Nguyen N.T.T., Jamaluddin J.A.F., Azizah M.N.S. (2020). Unravelling taxonomic ambiguity of the Mastacembelidae in the Mekong Delta (Vietnam) through DNA barcoding and morphological approaches. Trop. Zool., 33: 63–76. Search in Google Scholar

Durand J.D., Pham M.H., Tran T.T.V., Hoang D.H., Van Vo Q. (2020). Sorting the wheat from the chaff: a review of BINs associated with groupers of Vietnam and the implications for species identification from DNA barcoding. Mar. Biodivers., 50: 1–23. Search in Google Scholar

Etienne M., Jérôme M., Fleurence J., Rehbein H., Kündiger R., Mendes R., Luten J. (2000). Identification of fish species after cooking by SDS−PAGE and urea IEF: a collaborative study. J. Agric. Food Chem., 48: 2653–2658. Search in Google Scholar

Euclide P.T., Lor Y., Spear M.J., Tajjioui T., Vander Zanden J., Larson W.A. Amberg J.J. (2021). Environmental DNA metabarcoding as a tool for biodiversity assessment and monitoring: reconstructing established fish communities of North-Temperate lakes and rivers. Divers. Distrib., 27: 1966–1980. Search in Google Scholar

Evans N.T., Olds B.P., Renshaw M.A., Turner C.R., Li Y., Jerde C.L., Lodge D.M. (2016). Quantification of mesocosm fish and amphibian species diversity via environmental DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Res., 16: 29–41. Search in Google Scholar

Fadli N., Nor S.A.M., Othman A.S., Sofyan H., Muchlisin Z.A. (2020). DNA barcoding of commercially important reef fishes in Weh Island, Aceh, Indonesia. PeerJ., 8: e9641. Search in Google Scholar

Fatima R. (2018). CO1 gene based identification analysis of two freshwater fish and Cirrhinus mrigala Ravi, Punjab. Search in Google Scholar

Fields A.T., Abercrombie D.L., Eng R., Feldheim K., Chapman D.D. (2015). A novel mini-DNA barcoding assay to identify processed fins from internationally protected shark species. PloS One, 10: e0114844. Search in Google Scholar

Filonzi L., Vaghi M., Ardenghi A., Rontani P.M., Voccia A., Nonnis Marzano F. (2021). Efficiency of DNA mini-barcoding to assess mislabeling in commercial fish products in Italy: An overview of the last decade. Foods, 10: 1449. Search in Google Scholar

Freyhof J., Abdullah Y.S., Ararat K., Ibrahim H., Geiger M.F. (2016). Eidinemacheilus proudlovei, a new subterranean loach from Iraqi Kurdistan (Teleostei; Nemacheilidae). Zootaxa, 4173: 225–236. Search in Google Scholar

Frigerio J., Marchesi C., Magoni C., Saliu F., Ballabio D., Consonni V., Labra M. (2021). Application of DNA mini-barcoding and infrared spectroscopy for the authentication of the Italian product “Bottarga”. LWT, 139: 110603. Search in Google Scholar

Fujii K., Doi H., Matsuoka S., Nagano M., Sato H. Yamanaka H. (2019). Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods. PLoS One, 14: e0210357. Search in Google Scholar

Fukaya K., Oka S.I., Sato K., Kondoh M., Miya M. (2019). Evaluation of detection probabilities at the water-filtering and initial PCR steps in environmental DNA metabarcoding using a multispecies site occupancy model. Sci. Rep., 9: 1–8. Search in Google Scholar

Galal-Khallaf A., Osman A.G., Carleos C.E., Garcia-Vazquez E., Borrell Y.J. (2016). A case study for assessing fish traceability in Egyptian aquafeed formulations using pyro sequencing and metabarcoding. Fish. Res., 174: 143–150. Search in Google Scholar

Gao T.X., Ji D.P., Xiao Y.S., Xue T.Q., Yanagimoto T., Setoguma T. (2011). Description and DNA barcoding of a new Sillago species, Sillago sinica (Perciformes: sillaginidae), from coastal waters of China. Zool. Studies, 50: 254–263. Search in Google Scholar

Garcia-Vazquez E., Georges O., Fernandez S., Ardura A. (2021). eDNA metabarcoding of small plankton samples to detect fish larvae and their preys from Atlantic and Pacific waters. Sci. Rep., 11: 7224. Search in Google Scholar

Gaston K.J., O’Neill M.A. (2004). Automated species identification: why not? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 359: 655–667. Search in Google Scholar

Ghouri M.Z., Ismail M., Javed M.A., Khan S.H., Munawar N., Umar A.B., Ahmad A. (2020). Identification of edible fish species of Pakistan through DNA barcoding. Front. Mar. Sci., 7: 554183. Search in Google Scholar

Gold Z., Sprague J., Kushner D.J., Zerecero Marin E., Barber P.H. (2021). eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas. PLoS One, 16: e0238557. Search in Google Scholar

Guimarães-Costa A.J., Machado F.S., Oliveira R.R., Silva-Costa V., Andrade M.C., Giarrizzo T., Schneider H. (2019). Fish diversity of the largest deltaic formation in the Americas – a description of the fish fauna of the Parnaíba Delta using DNA barcoding. Sci. Rep., 9: 1–8. Search in Google Scholar

Guimarães-Costa A., Machado F.S., Reis-Filho J.A., Andrade M., Araújo R.G., Corrêa E.M.R., Giarrizzo T. (2020). DNA barcoding for the assessment of the taxonomy and conservation status of the fish bycatch of the northern Brazilian shrimp trawl fishery. Front. Mar. Sci., 7: 566021. Search in Google Scholar

Ha T.T.T., Huong N.T., Hung N.P., Guiguen Y. (2018). Species identification using DNA barcoding on processed panga catfish products in Viet Nam revealed important mislabeling. Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 18: 457–462. Search in Google Scholar

Hajibabaei M., Smith M.A., Janzen D.H., Rodriguez J.J., Whitfield J.B., Hebert P.D. (2006). A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 6: 959–964. Search in Google Scholar

Handy S.M., Deeds J.R., Ivanova N.V., Hebert P.D., Hanner R.H., Ormos A., Yancy H.F. (2011). A single-laboratory validated method for the generation of DNA barcodes for the identification of fish for regulatory compliance. J. AOAC Int., 94: 201–210. Search in Google Scholar

Hänfling B., Lawson Handley, L., Read D.S., Hahn C., Li J., Nichols P., Winfield I.J. (2016). Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods. Mol. Ecol., 25: 3101–3119. Search in Google Scholar

Hanner R., Becker S., Ivanova N.V., Steinke D. (2011). FISH-BOL and seafood identification: Geographically dispersed case studies reveal systemic market substitution across Canada. Mitochondrial DNA, 22: 106–122. Search in Google Scholar

Harper L.R., Lawson Handley L., Hahn C., Boonham N., Rees H.C., Gough K.C., Lewis E., Adams I.P., Brotherton P., Phillips S., Hänfling B. (2018). Needle in a haystack? A comparison of eDNA metabarcoding and targeted qPCR for detection of the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Ecol. Evol., 8: 6330–6341. Search in Google Scholar

Hashemzadeh Segherloo I., Tabatabaei S.N., Abdolahi-Mousavi E., Hernandez C., Normandeau E., Laporte M., Boyle B., Amiri M., GhaedRahmati N., Hallerman E. Bernatchez L. (2021). eDNA metabarcoding as a means to assess distribution of subterranean fish communities: Iranian blind cave fishes as a case study. Environ. DNA, 4: 402–416. Search in Google Scholar

Hassan M.M., Sabry A., Ismai M. (2020). Molecular identification and characterization of parrotfish species from the Farasan Islands, Red Sea-Saudi Arabia. Jordan J. Biol. Sci., 13: 535–541. Search in Google Scholar

Hassold S., Lowry P.P., Bauert M.R., Razafintsalama A., Ramamonjisoa L., Widmer A. (2016). DNA barcoding of Malagasy rosewoods: towards a molecular identification of CITES-listed Dalbergia species. PLoS One, 11: e0157881. Search in Google Scholar

Hebert P.D., Cywinska A., Ball S.L., De Waard J.R. (2003 a). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. Royal Society of London. Series B: Biol. Sci., 270: 313–321. Search in Google Scholar

Hebert P.D., Ratnasingham S., De Waard J.R. (2003 b). Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc. Royal Society of London. Series B: Biol. Sci., 270: S96–S99. Search in Google Scholar

Hellberg R.S., Isaacs R.B., Hernandez E.L. (2019). Identification of shark species in commercial products using DNA barcoding. Fish. Res., 210: 81–88. Search in Google Scholar

Hering D., Borja A., Jones J.I., Pont D., Boets P., Bouchez A., Kelly M. (2018). Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive. Water Res., 138: 192–205. Search in Google Scholar

Hogg I.D., Hebert P.D. (2004). Biological identification of springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) from the Canadian Arctic, using mitochondrial DNA barcodes. Canadian J. Zool., 82: 749–754. Search in Google Scholar

Hollingsworth P.M. (2007). DNA barcoding: potential users. Genomics Soc. Policy, 3: 44–47. Search in Google Scholar

Hossain M.M., Uddin S.M.K., Chowdhury Z.Z., Sultana S., Johan M.R., Rohman A., Ali M.E. (2019). Universal mitochondrial 16s rRNA biomarker for mini-barcode to identify fish species in Malaysian fish products. Food Addit. Contam.: Part A, 36: 493–506. Search in Google Scholar

Hu Y., Huang S.Y., Hanner R., Levin J., Lu X. (2018). Study of fish products in Metro Vancouver using DNA barcoding methods reveals fraudulent labeling. Food Control, 94: 38–47. Search in Google Scholar

Hubalkova Z., Kralik P., Tremlova B., Rencova E. (2007). Methods of gadoid fish species identification in food and their economic impact in the Czech Republic: a review. Vet. Med., 52: 273–292. Search in Google Scholar

Hubert N., Hanner R., Holm E., Mandrak N.E., Taylor E., Burridge M., Bernatchez L. (2008). Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLoS One, 3: e2490. Search in Google Scholar

Kappel K., Schröder U. (2016). Substitution of high-priced fish with low-priced species: adulteration of common sole in German restaurants. Food Control, 59: 478–486. Search in Google Scholar

Karim A., Iqbal A., Akhtar R., Rizwan M., Amar A., Qamar U., Jahan S. (2016). Barcoding of fresh water fishes from Pakistan. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 27: 2685–2688. Search in Google Scholar

Kearse M., Moir R., Wilson A., Stones-Havas S., Cheung M., Sturrock S., Drummond A. (2012). Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28: 1647–1649. Search in Google Scholar

Keskin E. (2014). Detection of invasive freshwater fish species using environmental DNA survey. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 56: 68–74. Search in Google Scholar

Keskin E., Atar H.H. (2013). DNA barcoding commercially important fish species of Turkey. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 13: 788–797. Search in Google Scholar

Keskin E., Ağdamar S., Tarkan A.S. (2013). DNA barcoding common non-native freshwater fish species in Turkey: Low genetic diversity but high population structuring. Mitochondrial DNA, 24: 276–287. Search in Google Scholar

Khaliq F., Shafi N., Rehman A., Janjua S. (2015). Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene based phylogenetic analysis of Mahseer (Tor putitora) of Pakistan. J. Anim. Plant. Sci., 25: 527–531. Search in Google Scholar

Khedkar G.D., Jamdade R., Naik S., David L., Haymer D. (2014). DNA barcodes for the fishes of the Narmada, one of India’s longest rivers. PloS One, 9: e101460. Search in Google Scholar

Ko H.L., Wang Y.T., Chiu T.S., Lee M.A., Leu M.Y., Chang K.Z., Shao K.T. (2013). Evaluating the accuracy of morphological identification of larval fishes by applying DNA barcoding. PLoS One, 8: e53451. Search in Google Scholar

Kume M., Lavergne E., Ahn H., Terashima Y., Kadowaki K., Ye F., Kameyama S., Kai Y., Henmi Y., Yamashita Y., Kasai A. (2021). Factors structuring estuarine and coastal fish communities across Japan using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Ecol. Ind., 121: 107216. Search in Google Scholar

Kvasnička F. (2005). Capillary electrophoresis in food authenticity. J. Sep. Sci., 28: 813–825. Search in Google Scholar

Lakra W.S., Singh M., Goswami M., Gopalakrishnan A., Lal K.K., Mohindra V., Ayyappan S. (2016). DNA barcoding Indian freshwater fishes. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 27: 4510–4517. Search in Google Scholar

Lara A., Ponce de León J.L., Rodriguez R., Casane D., Cote G., Bernatchez L., García-Machado E.R.I.K. (2010). DNA barcoding of Cuban freshwater fishes: evidence for cryptic species and taxonomic conflicts. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 10: 421–430. Search in Google Scholar

Laskar B.A., Bhattacharjee M.J., Dhar B., Mahadani P., Kundu S., Ghosh S.K. (2013). The species dilemma of northeast Indian mahseer (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae): DNA barcoding in clarifying the riddle. PloS One, 8: e53704. Search in Google Scholar

Lawson Handley L. (2015). How will the ‘Molecular revolution’ contribute to biological recording? Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 115: 750–766. Search in Google Scholar

Lecaudey L.A., Schletterer M., Kuzovlev V.V., Hahn C., Weiss S.J. (2019). Fish diversity assessment in the headwaters of the Volga River using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosys., 29: 1785–1800. Search in Google Scholar

Lee H.T., Liao C.H., Hsu T.H. (2021). Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding in the fish market and nearby seafood restaurants in Taiwan reveals the underestimation of fish species diversity in seafood. Biology, 10: 1132. Search in Google Scholar

Leray M., Meyer C.P., Mills S.C. (2015). Metabarcoding dietary analysis of coral dwelling predatory fish demonstrates the minor contribution of coral mutualists to their highly partitioned, generalist diet. PeerJ., 3: e1047. Search in Google Scholar

Li J., Hatton-Ellis T.W., Lawson Handley L.J., Kimbell H.S., Benucci M., Peirson G., Hänfling B. (2019). Ground-truthing of a fishbased environmental DNA metabarcoding method for assessing the quality of lakes. J. App. Ecol., 56: 1232–1244. Search in Google Scholar

Limmon G., Delrieu-Trottin E., Patikawa J., Rijoly F., Dahruddin H., Busson F., Steinke D., Hubert N. (2020). Assessing species diversity of Coral Triangle artisanal fisheries: A DNA barcode reference library for the shore fishes retailed at Ambon harbor (Indonesia). Ecol. Evol., 10: 3356–3366. Search in Google Scholar

Lipscomb D., Platnick N., Wheeler Q. (2003). The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2: 65–66. Search in Google Scholar

Liu K., Zhao S., Yu Z., Zhou Y., Yang J., Zhao R., Yang C., Ma W., Wang X., Feng M., Tang Y., Li K., Zhou C. (2020). Application of DNA barcoding in fish identification of supermarkets in Henan province, China: More and longer COI gene sequences were obtained by designing new primers. Food Res. Int., 136: 109516. Search in Google Scholar

Liu S.Y.V., Chan C.L.C., Lin O., Hu C.S., Chen C.A. (2013). DNA barcoding of shark meats identify species composition and CITESlisted species from the markets in Taiwan. PloS One, 8: e79373. Search in Google Scholar

Ma C.Y., Ma H.Y., Ni Y., Wang W., Ma L.B. (2015). Molecular identification of the genus Thryssa based on DNA barcoding. Genet. Mol. Res., 14: 18580–18586. Search in Google Scholar

Mabragana E., Díaz de Astarloa J.M., Hanner R., Zhang J., Gonzalez Castro M. (2011). DNA barcoding identifies Argentine fishes from marine and brackish waters. PLoS One, 6: e28655. Search in Google Scholar

Macher T.H., Schütz R., Arle J., Beermann A.J., Koschorreck J., Leese F. (2021). Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species. Metabarcoding Metagenom., 5: e66557. Search in Google Scholar

Marko P.B., Lee S.C., Rice A.M., Gramling J.M., Fitzhenry T.M., McAlister J.S., Harper G.R., Moran A.L. (2004). Mislabelling of a depleted reef fish. Nature, 430: 309–310. Search in Google Scholar

Matz M.V., Nielsen R. (2005). A likelihood ratio test for species membership based on DNA sequence data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 360: 1969–1974. Search in Google Scholar

McClenaghan B., Fahner N., Cote D., Chawarski J., McCarthy A., Rajabi H., Singer G., Hajibabaei M. (2020). Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. PloS One, 15: e0236540. Search in Google Scholar

McCusker M.R., Denti D., Van Guelpen L., Kenchington E., Bentzen P. (2013). Barcoding Atlantic Canada’s commonly encountered marine fishes. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 13: 177–188. Search in Google Scholar

Meusnier I., Singer G.A., Landry J.F., Hickey D.A., Hebert P.D., Hajibabaei M. (2008). A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis. BMC Genom., 9: 214. Search in Google Scholar

Milan D.T., Mendes I.S., Damasceno J.S., Teixeira D.F., Sales N.G., Carvalho D.C. (2020). New 12S metabarcoding primers for enhanced Neotropical freshwater fish biodiversity assessment. Sci. Rep., 10: 17966. Search in Google Scholar

Mirimin L., Desmet S., Romero D.L., Fernandez S.F., Miller D.L., Mynott S., Aguzzi J. (2021). Don’t catch me if you can – Using cabled observatories as multidisciplinary platforms for marine fish community monitoring: an in situ case study combining Underwater Video and environmental DNA data. Sci. Total. Environ., 773: 145351. Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell J.K., Hellberg R.S. (2016). Use of the mitochondrial control region as a potential DNA mini-barcoding target for the identification of canned tuna species. Food Anal. Methods, 9: 2711–2720. Search in Google Scholar

Miya M., Sato Y., Fukunaga T., Sado T., Poulsen J.Y., Sato K., Iwasaki W. (2015). MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. R. Soc. Open Sci., 2: 150088. Search in Google Scholar

Miya M., Gotoh R.O., Sado T. (2020). MiFish metabarcoding: a highthroughput approach for simultaneous detection of multiple fish species from environmental DNA and other samples. Fish Sci., 86: 939–970. Search in Google Scholar

Morey K.C., Bartley T.J., Hanner R.H. (2020). Validating environmental DNA metabarcoding for marine fishes in diverse ecosystems using a public aquarium. Environ. DNA, 2: 330–342. Search in Google Scholar

Muchlisin Z.A., Thomy Z., Fadli N., Sarong M.A., Siti-Azizah M.N. (2013). DNA barcoding of freshwater fishes from lake Laut Tawar, Aceh Province, Indonesia. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat., 43: 21–29. Search in Google Scholar

Mueller R.L. (2006). Evolutionary rates, divergence dates, and the performance of mitochondrial genes in Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol., 55: 289–300. Search in Google Scholar

Muha T.P., Rodriguez-Barreto D., O’Rorke R., Garcia de Leaniz C., Consuegra S., (2021). Using eDNA metabarcoding to monitor changes in fish community composition after barrier removal. Front. Ecol. Evol., 9: 629217. Search in Google Scholar

Muttaqin E., Abdullah A., Nurilmala M., Ichsan M., Simeone B.M., Yulianto I., Booth H. (2019). DNA-barcoding as molecular marker for seafood forensics: Species identification of locally consumed shark fish products in the world’s largest shark fishery. Proc. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ Sci., 278: 012049. Search in Google Scholar

Nagalakshmi K., Annam P.K., Venkateshwarlu G., Pathakota G.B., Lakra W.S. (2016). Mislabeling in Indian seafood: An investigation using DNA barcoding. Food Control, 59: 196–200. Search in Google Scholar

Nalugwa A., Jørgensen A., Nyakaana S., Kristensen T.K. (2010). Molecular phylogeny of Bulinus (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) reveals the presence of three species complexes in the Albertine Rift freshwater bodies. Int. J. Genet. Mol. Biol., 2: 130–139. Search in Google Scholar

Nicolè S., Negrisolo E., Eccher G., Mantovani R., Patarnello T., Erickson D., Barcaccia G. (2012). DNA barcoding as a reliable method for the authentication of commercial seafood products. Food Technol. Biotechnol., 50: 387–398. Search in Google Scholar

Olds B.P., Jerde C.L., Renshaw M.A., Li Y., Evans N.T., Turner C.R., Deiner K., Mahon A.R., Brueseke M.A., Shirey P.D., Pfrender M.E. (2016). Estimating species richness using environmental DNA. Ecol. Evol., 6: 4214–4226. Search in Google Scholar

Ooi Z.S., Jahari P.N.S., Sim K.S., Foo S.X., Zawai N.M., Salleh F.M. (2021). DNA barcoding of commercial fish products using dual mitochondrial markers exposes evidence for mislabelling and trade of endangered species. Proc. IOP Conf. Ser., Earth Environ. Sci., 736: 012052. Search in Google Scholar

Pan Y., Qiu D., Chen J., Yue Q. (2020). Combining a COI mini-barcode with next-generation sequencing for animal origin ingredients identification in processed meat product. J. Food Qual., 2020: 2907670. Search in Google Scholar

Panprommin D., Panprommin N. (2017). Assessment of the DNA barcoding for identification of Trigonostigma somphongsi, a critically endangered species in Thailand. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 70: 200–204. Search in Google Scholar

Panprommin D., Soontornprasit K., Tuncharoen S., Pithakpol S., Keereelang J. (2019). DNA barcodes for the identification of species diversity in fish from Kwan Phayao, Thailand. J. Asia-Pac. Biodivers., 12: 382–389. Search in Google Scholar

Panprommin D., Soontornprasit K., Tuncharoen S., Iamchuen N. (2020). The utility of DNA barcoding for the species identification of larval fish in the Lower Ing River, Thailand. Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 20: 671–679. Search in Google Scholar

Pappalardo A.M., Ferrito V. (2015). DNA barcoding species identification unveils mislabeling of processed flatfish products in southern Italy markets. Fish. Res., 164: 153–158. Search in Google Scholar

Parson W., Pegoraro K., Niederstätter H., Föger M., Steinlechner M. (2000). Species identification by means of the cytochrome b gene. Int. J. Leg. Med., 114: 23–28. Search in Google Scholar

Patel S., Waugh J., Millar C.D., Lambert D.M. (2010). Conserved primers for DNA barcoding historical and modern samples from New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 10: 431–438. Search in Google Scholar

Pawlowski J., Esling P., Lejzerowicz F., Cedhagen T., Wilding T.A. (2014). Environmental monitoring through protist next-generation sequencing metabarcoding: Assessing the impact of fish farming on benthic foraminifera communities. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 14: 1129–1140. Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Martin R.I., Sotelo C.G. (2003). Authenticity of species in meat and seafood products. Eduardo Cabello, Spain: Association International Congress on Authenticity of Species in Meat and Seafood Products. Search in Google Scholar

Poinar H.N., Schwarz C., Qi J., Shapiro B., MacPhee R.D., Buigues B., Schuster S.C. (2006). Metagenomics to paleogenomics: largescale sequencing of mammoth DNA. Science, 311: 392–394. Search in Google Scholar

Pollack S.J., Kawalek M.D., Williams-Hill D.M., Hellberg R.S. (2018). Evaluation of DNA barcoding methodologies for the identification of fish species in cooked products. Food Control, 84: 297–304. Search in Google Scholar

Pont D., Rocle M., Valentini A., Civade R., Jean P., Maire A., Roset N., Schabuss M., Zornig H., Dejean T. (2018). Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation. Sci. Rep., 8: 10361. Search in Google Scholar

Popa G.O., Dudu A., Bănăduc D., Curtean-Bănăduc A., Barbălată T., Burcea A., Costache M. (2017). Use of DNA barcoding in the assignment of commercially valuable fish species from Romania. Aquat. Living Res., 30: 20. Search in Google Scholar

Port J.A., O’Donnell J.L., Romero-Maraccini O.C., Leary P.R., Litvin S.Y., Nickols K.J., Kelly R.P. (2016). Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol., 25: 527–541. Search in Google Scholar

Qu C., Stewart K.A., Clemente-Carvalho R., Zheng J., Wang Y., Gong C., Ma L., Zhao J., Lougheed S.C. (2020). Comparing fish prey diversity for a critically endangered aquatic mammal in a reserve and the wild using eDNA metabarcoding. Sci. Rep., 10: 16715. Search in Google Scholar

Quyen V.D.H., Phuong T.T.L., Oanh T.T., Thuoc T.L., Binh D.T. (2015). Phylogenetic relationship of freshwater fish in Vietnamese Mekong. Proc. International Conference on Biological, Environment and Food Engineering (BEFE), Singapore. Search in Google Scholar

Rabaoui L., Yacoubi L., Sanna D., Casu M., Scarpa F., Lin Y.J., Qurban M.A. (2019). DNA barcoding of marine fishes from Saudi Arabian waters of the Gulf. J. Fish. Biol., 95: 1286–1297. Search in Google Scholar

Raja M., Perumal P. (2017). DNA barcoding and phylogenetic relationships of selected South Indian freshwater fishes based on mtDNA COI sequences. J. Phylogenetics Evol. Biol., 5: 1000184. Search in Google Scholar

Rasmussen R.S., Morrissey M.T., Hebert P.D. (2009). DNA barcoding of commercially important salmon and trout species (Oncorhynchus and Salmo) from North America. J. Agric. Food Chem., 57: 8379–8385. Search in Google Scholar

Rasmussen Hellberg R.S., Naaum A.M., Handy S.M., Hanner R.H., Deeds J.R., Yancy H.F., Morrissey M.T. (2011). Interlaboratory evaluation of a real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction method for identification of salmon and trout species in commercial products. J. Agric. Food Chem., 59: 876–884. Search in Google Scholar

Ratcliffe F.C., Uren Webster T.M., Garcia de Leaniz C., Consuegra S. (2021). A drop in the ocean: Monitoring fish communities in spawning areas using environmental DNA. Environ. DNA, 3: 43–54. Search in Google Scholar

Rehbein H. (1990). Electrophoretic techniques for species identification of fishery products. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 191: 1–10. Search in Google Scholar

Riaz T., Shehzad W., Viari A., Pompanon F., Taberlet P., Coissac E. (2011). ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 39: e145–e145. Search in Google Scholar

Ribeiro A.D.O., Caires R.A., Mariguela T.C., Pereira L.H.G., Hanner R., Oliveira C. (2012). DNA barcodes identify marine fishes of São Paulo State, Brazil. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 12: 1012–1020. Search in Google Scholar

Rivera S.F., Rimet F., Vasselon V., Vautier M., Domaizon I., Bouchez A. (2021). Fish eDNA metabarcoding from aquatic biofilm samples: Methodological aspects. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 22: 1440–1453. Search in Google Scholar

Roungchun J.B., Tabb A.M., Hellberg R.S. (2022). Identification of tuna species in raw and processed products using DNA mini-barcoding of the mitochondrial control region. Food Control, 134: 108752. Search in Google Scholar

Sakai H., Iguchi K., Yamazaki Y., Sideleva V.G., Goto A. (2009). Morphological and mtDNA sequence studies on three crucian carps (Carassius: Cyprinidae) including a new stock from the Ob River system, Kazakhstan. J. Fish. Biol., 74: 1756–1773. Search in Google Scholar

Sakata M.K., Watanabe T., Maki N., Ikeda K., Kosuge T., Okada H., Minamoto T. (2021). Determining an effective sampling method for eDNA metabarcoding: a case study for fish biodiversity monitoring in a small, natural river. Limnology, 22: 221–235. Search in Google Scholar

Sato H., Sogo Y., Yamanaka H. (2017). Usefulness and limitations of sample pooling for environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish communities. Sci. Rep., 7: 14860. Search in Google Scholar

Schenekar T., Schletterer M., Lecaudey L.A., Weiss S.J. (2020). Reference databases, primer choice, and assay sensitivity for environmental metabarcoding: Lessons learnt from a re-evaluation of an eDNA fish assessment in the Volga headwaters. River Res. App., 36: 1004–1013. Search in Google Scholar

Schindel D.E., Miller S.E. (2005). DNA barcoding a useful tool for taxonomists. Nature, 435: 17. Search in Google Scholar

Schmieder R., Edwards R. (2011). Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics, 27: 863–864. Search in Google Scholar

Schütz R., Tollrian R., Schweinsberg M. (2020). A novel environmental DNA detection approach for the wading birds Platalea leucorodia, Recurvirostra avosetta and Tringa totanus. Conserv. Genet. Res., 12: 529–531. Search in Google Scholar

Sembiring A., Pertiwi N.P.D., Mahardini A., Wulandari R., Kurniasih E.M., Kuncoro A.W., Mahardika G.N. (2015). DNA barcoding reveals targeted fisheries for endangered sharks in Indonesia. Fish. Res., 164: 130–134. Search in Google Scholar

Sevilla R.G., Diez A., Norén M., Mouchel O., Jérôme M., Verrez-Bagnis V., Van Pelt H., Favre-Krey L., Krey G., Consortium T.F., Bautista J.M. (2007). Primers and polymerase chain reaction conditions for DNA barcoding teleost fish based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b and nuclear rhodopsin genes. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 7: 730–734. Search in Google Scholar

Shaw J.L., Clarke L.J., Wedderburn S.D., Barnes T.C., Weyrich L.S., Cooper A. (2016). Comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and conventional fish survey methods in a river system. Biol. Conserv., 197: 131–138. Search in Google Scholar

Shirak A., Barkai O., Lernau O., Kahanov Y., Seroussi E., Ron M. (2013). DNA barcoding analysis of fish bones from a shipwreck found at Dor, Israel. Isr. J. Aquac-Bamid., 65: 1–5. Search in Google Scholar

Shokralla S., Zhou X., Janzen D.H., Hallwachs W., Landry J.F., Jacobus L.M., Hajibabaei M. (2011). Pyrosequencing for mini-barcoding of fresh and old museum specimens. PLoS One, 6: e21252. Search in Google Scholar

Shokralla S., Hellberg R.S., Handy S.M., King I., Hajibabaei M. (2015). A DNA mini-barcoding system for authentication of processed fish products. Sci. Rep., 5: 15894. Search in Google Scholar

Silva A.J., Kawalek M., Williams-Hill D.M., Hellberg R.S. (2020). PCR cloning combined with DNA barcoding enables partial identification of fish species in a mixed-species product. Front. Ecol. Evol., 8: 28. Search in Google Scholar

Srivastava R., Srivastava N. (2008). Changes in nutritive value of fish, Channa punctatus after chronic exposure to zinc. J. Environ. Biol., 29: 299–302. Search in Google Scholar

Sriwattanarothai N., Steinke D., Ruenwongsa P., Hanner R., Panijpan B. (2010). Molecular and morphological evidence supports the species status of the Mahachai fighter Betta sp. Mahachai and reveals new species of Betta from Thailand. J. Fish. Biol., 77: 414–424. Search in Google Scholar

Staats M., Arulandhu A.J., Gravendeel B., Holst-Jensen A., Scholtens I., Peelen T., Kok E. (2016). Advances in DNA metabarcoding for food and wildlife forensic species identification. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 408: 4615–4630. Search in Google Scholar

Stat M., John J., DiBattista J.D., Newman S.J., Bunce M., Harvey E.S. (2019). Combined use of eDNA metabarcoding and video surveillance for the assessment of fish biodiversity. Conserv. Biol., 33: 196–205. Search in Google Scholar

Steinke D., Zemlak T.S., Hebert P.D. (2009 a). Barcoding Nemo: DNA-based identifications for the ornamental fish trade. PLoS One, 4: e6300. Search in Google Scholar

Steinke D., Zemlak T.S., Boutillier J.A., Hebert P.D. (2009 b). DNA barcoding of Pacific Canada’s fishes. Mar. Biol., 156: 2641–2647. Search in Google Scholar

Strauss R.E., Bond C.E. (1990). Taxonomic methods: morphology. In: Methods for fish biology, P. Moyle, C. Schreck (eds). American Fisheries Society, Special Publication, pp. 109–140. Search in Google Scholar

Su M., Liu H., Liang X., Gui L., Zhang J. (2018). Dietary analysis of marine fish species: enhancing the detection of prey-specific DNA sequences via high-throughput sequencing using blocking primers. Estuaries Coasts, 41: 560–571. Search in Google Scholar

Sujatha K., Joice A.A., Kumaar P.S. (2013). Total protein and lipid content in edible tissues of fishes from Kasimodu fish landing centre, Chennai, Tamilnadu. Eur. J. Exp. Biol., 3: 252–257. Search in Google Scholar

Swartz E.R., Mwale M., Hanner R. (2008). A role for barcoding in the study of African fish diversity and conservation. S. Afr. J. Sci., 104: 293–298. Search in Google Scholar

Taberlet P., Bonin A., Zinger L., Coissac E. (2018). Environmental DNA: For biodiversity research and monitoring. Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Tacon A.G., Metian M. (2018). Food matters: fish, income, and food supply – a comparative analysis. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac., 26: 15–28. Search in Google Scholar

Tacon A.G., Lemos D., Metian M. (2020). Fish for health: improved nutritional quality of cultured fish for human consumption. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac., 28: 449–458. Search in Google Scholar

Tanabe S., Miyauchi E., Muneshige A., Mio K., Sato C., Sato M. (2007). PCR method of detecting pork in foods for verifying allergen labeling and for identifying hidden pork ingredients in processed foods. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 71: 1663–1667. Search in Google Scholar

Tautz D., Arctander P., Minelli A., Thomas R.H., Vogler A.P. (2002). DNA points the way ahead in taxonomy. Nature, 418: 479–479. Search in Google Scholar

Teletchea F., Maudet C., Hänni C. (2005). Food and forensic molecular identification: update and challenges. Trends Biotechnol., 23: 359–366. Search in Google Scholar

Thu P.T., Huang W.C., Chou T.K., Van Quan N., Van Chien P., Li F., Liao T.Y. (2019). DNA barcoding of coastal ray-finned fishes in Vietnam. PloS One, 14: e0222631. Search in Google Scholar

Trivedi S., Affan R., Alessa A.H.A., Ansari A.A., Dhar B., Mahadani P., Ghosh S.K. (2014). DNA barcoding of Red Sea fishes from Saudi Arabia – the first approach. DNA Barcodes, 2: 17–20. Search in Google Scholar

Tsoupas A., Papavasileiou S., Minoudi S., Gkagkavouzis K., Petriki O., Bobori D., Sapounidis A., Koutrakis E., Leonardos I., Karaiskou N., Triantafyllidis A. (2022). DNA barcoding identification of Greek freshwater fishes. PloS One, 17: e0263118. Search in Google Scholar

Ushio M., Murata K., Sado T., Nishiumi I., Takeshita M., Iwasaki W., Miya M. (2018). Demonstration of the potential of environmental DNA as a tool for the detection of avian species. Sci. Rep., 8: 4493. Search in Google Scholar

Valdivia-Carrillo T., Rocha-Olivares A., Reyes-Bonilla H., Domínguez-Contreras J.F., Munguia-Vega A. (2021). Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 21: 1558–1574. Search in Google Scholar

Valentini A., Taberlet P., Miaud C., Civade R., Herder J., Thomsen P.F., Dejean T. (2016). Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol., 25: 929–942. Search in Google Scholar

Wallace L.J., Boilard S.M., Eagle S.H., Spall J.L., Shokralla S., Hajibabaei M. (2012). DNA barcodes for everyday life: Routine authentication of Natural Health Products. Food Res. Int., 49: 446–452. Search in Google Scholar

Wang H.Y., Dong C.A., Lin H.C. (2017). DNA barcoding of fisheries catch to reveal composition and distribution of cutlassfishes along the Taiwan coast. Fish. Res., 187: 103–109. Search in Google Scholar

Ward R.D., Zemlak T.S., Innes B.H., Last P.R., Hebert P.D. (2005). DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 360: 1847–1857. Search in Google Scholar

Wibowo A., Panggabean A.S., Zamroni A., Priatna A., Yusuf H.N. (2018). Using DNA barcode to improve the identification of marine fish larvae, case study coastal water near Jakarta and Banda Sea, Indonesia. Indones. Fish. Res. J., 24: 23–30. Search in Google Scholar

Wu Q., Sakata M.K., Wu D., Yamanaka H., Minamoto T. (2021). Application of environmental DNA metabarcoding in a lake with extensive algal blooms. Limnology, 22: 363–370. Search in Google Scholar

Xiao J., Song N., Gao T., McKay R.J. (2016). Redescription and DNA barcoding of Sillago indica (Perciformes: Sillaginidae) from the Coast of Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool., 48. 317–323. Search in Google Scholar

Xie R., Zhao G., Yang J., Wang Z., Xu Y., Zhang X., Wang Z. (2021). eDNA metabarcoding revealed differential structures of aquatic communities in a dynamic freshwater ecosystem shaped by habitat heterogeneity. Environ. Res., 201: 111602. Search in Google Scholar

Xing B., Zhang Z., Sun R., Wang Y., Lin M., Wang C. (2020). Mini- DNA barcoding for the identification of commercial fish sold in the markets along the Taiwan Strait. Food Control, 112: 107143. Search in Google Scholar

Xing R.R., Hu R.R., Wang N., Zhang J.K., Ge Y.Q., Chen Y. (2021). Authentication of sea cucumber products using NGS-based DNA mini-barcoding. Food Control., 129: 108199. Search in Google Scholar

Xiong X., Yao L., Ying X., Lu L., Guardone L., Armani A., Xiong X. (2018). Multiple fish species identified from China’s roasted Xue Yu fillet products using DNA and mini-DNA barcoding: Implications on human health and marine sustainability. Food Control, 88: 123–130. Search in Google Scholar

Xiong X., Yuan F., Huang M., Xiong X. (2020). Exploring the possible reasons for fish fraud in China based on results from monitoring sardine products sold on Chinese markets using DNA barcoding and real time PCR. Food Addit. Contam.: Part A, 37: 193–204. Search in Google Scholar

Yamamoto S., Masuda R., Sato Y., Sado T., Araki H., Kondoh M., Minamoto T., Miya M. (2017). Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals local fish communities in a species-rich coastal sea. Sci. Rep., 7: 40368. Search in Google Scholar

Yan S., Lai G., Li L., Xiao H., Zhao M., Wang M. (2016). DNA barcoding reveals mislabeling of imported fish products in Nansha new port of Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China. Food Chem., 202: 116–119. Search in Google Scholar

Zahn R.J., Silva A.J., Hellberg R.S. (2020). Development of a DNA mini-barcoding protocol targeting COI for the identification of elasmobranch species in shark cartilage pills. Food Control, 109: 106918. Search in Google Scholar

Zhang J.B., Hanner R. (2011). DNA barcoding is a useful tool for the identification of marine fishes from Japan. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 39: 31–42. Search in Google Scholar

Zhang J., Hanner R. (2012). Molecular approach to the identification of fish in the South China Sea. PLoS One, 7: e30621. Search in Google Scholar

Zhang S., Zhao J., Yao M. (2020 a). A comprehensive and comparative evaluation of primers for metabarcoding eDNA from fish. Methods Ecol. Evol., 11: 1609–1625. Search in Google Scholar

Zhang S., Lu Q., Wang Y., Wang X., Zhao J., Yao M. (2020 b). Assessment of fish communities using environmental DNA: Effect of spatial sampling design in lentic systems of different sizes. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 20: 242–255. Search in Google Scholar

Zimmermann J., Hajibabaei M., Blackburn D.C., Hanken J., Cantin E., Posfai J., Evans T.C. (2008). DNA damage in preserved specimens and tissue samples: a molecular assessment. Front Zool., 5: 1–13. Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD