Telomere fragility in radiology workers occupationally exposed to low doses of ionising radiation
Article Category: Original article
Online veröffentlicht: 07. Apr. 2022
Seitenbereich: 23 - 30
Eingereicht: 01. Nov. 2021
Akzeptiert: 01. März 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2022-73-3609
© 2022 Jelena Filipović Tričković, Ana Valenta Šobot, Ivana Joksić, Gordana Joksić, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Biological effects of long-term exposure to ionising radiation are attributed to direct (nuclear and mitochondrial) and indirect DNA damage through increased oxidative changes in biomolecules. Many biomarkers have been studied so far, including chromosome aberrations (CA), micronuclei (MN), single-strand breaks, phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γ-H2AX), premature chromosome condensation, telomere length, and oxidative DNA damage to find the ones most relevant for occupational exposure to low doses of ionising radiation (1). An extensive meta-analysis by Clemence et al. (2) showed that the most accurate bioindicators are chromosome aberrations (CA) and micronuclei (MN). Chromosome aberrations involving telomeres are a reliable tool to assess misrepaired and unrepaired chromosomal damage and radiosensitivity (3, 4), as telomere length alone is not sensitive enough, because it depends on other confounding factors such as age (5), lifestyle (6), and infection with specific pathogens (7, 8). Telomeres, as specific nucleoprotein structures with high guanine content, are more susceptible to oxidative damage generating single-strand breaks and double-strand breaks, as they shorten more quickly and become fragile (8).
To the best of our knowledge, however, there are no studies investigating telomere fragility in persons occupationally exposed to ionising radiation. As occupational exposure to ionising radiation mostly affects healthcare workers (10), the aim of our study was to investigate telomere length and fragility in this population group working in diagnostic radiology units. Our secondary aim was to see if and how telomere parameters are related to oxidative stress parameters.
The study included 34 radiologists and technicians exposed to X-rays at their diagnostic radiology units and 30 healthy unexposed controls. All participants were volunteers recruited during periodical check-ups in agreement with current conventions (11), who signed informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia.
All participants answered a questionnaire asking for basic demographic information, type of work they do, job duration, diet, and smoking. Occupationally exposed participants wore personal dosimeters on the chest, and the absorbed dose was reviewed every three months.
From each participant we collected 6 mL of peripheral blood into Li-heparin vacutainers (Becton Dickinson, Plymouth, UK). An aliquot of 0.5 mL was used for cell culture, while the rest of heparinised blood was centrifuged at 1.400
One set of slides with harvested lymphocytes was used for classical chromosome aberration analysis and the other set for telomere quantitative FISH (Q-FISH). Data of exposed participants who showed chromosome aberrations (N=14) were separated from those without chromosome aberrations (N=20) for further statistical analysis and comparison of all data (telomerase length, percent of fragile telomeres, PAB, lipid peroxidation products, and 8-oxo dG) between these two subgroups and control.
Lymphocytes for the chromosome aberration test were obtained by culturing aliquots of heparinised whole blood with the Gibco® PB-MaxTM karyotyping medium (Catalogue No. 12557-021, ThermoFisher Scientific, Life Technologies Corporation, Grand Island, NY, USA) at 37 °C for 48 h. In the last three hours, the cultures were added colchicine (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) in the final concentration of 2.5 μg/mL according to the standard procedure described elsewhere (12).
Slides were analysed under a Zeiss Axio Imager A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with the ISIS imaging software package (MetaSystems Hard & Software GmbH, Altlussheim, Germany). At least 200 metaphase spreads were analysed at 10–100× magnification for chromosome aberrations (chromosome and chromatid breaks, dicentric and ring chromosomes, acentric fragments, stable aberrations, and radial figures) (13).
Even though telomere length can be assessed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) thanks to its high throughput (14), its inter and intra-sample variability may exceed 10 % (15), which is why we opted for Q-FISH as a more consistent method of telomere fragility assessment. We assessed lymphocyte chromosome metaphase spreads on slides using the Cy3-labelled peptide nucleic acid (PNA) telomere probe supplemented with PNA centromere probe for chromosome 2 (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) as previously described in detail (16). Denatured slides were hybridised in a dark humidified chamber for 2 h, then washed in 70 % formamide solution (Carlo Erba Reagents, Val-de-Reuil, France), dehydrated in a series with ethanol, and counterstained with 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-containing mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK). Telomere length and fragility (split, fused, or no signal telomeres) were analysed on a Zeiss Axioimager A1 microscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with a telomere measurement tool for ISIS software (MetaSystems Hard & Software GmbH) with centromere fluorescence set to 100 %. Telomere length was expressed as the ratio between the actual telomere and set centromere signal intensity (T/C ratio) (17). At least 20 metaphase spreads per slide were analysed. The rate of fragile telomeres was expressed as the ratio between the number of fragile telomeres and total number of analysed metaphase spreads.
The PAB assay followed the standard protocol described elsewhere in detail (18). The assay measures differences in two ongoing reactions in the same sample: oxidation of chromogen 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) by peroxides and reduction of coloured cation by antioxidants. The absorbance was measured colourimetrically on a Sunrise absorbance microplate reader at 450 nm (cut-off at 570 nm) (Tecan Group Ltd, Männedorf, Switzerland). The results are presented as arbitrary Hamidi-Koliakos (HK) units (percentage of hydrogen peroxide in the standard solution).
8-oxo-dG was measured using the HT 8-oxo-dG ELISA Kit (Trevigen®, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) as described by Haghdoost et al. (19). Briefly, the reaction is based on competitive reaction between the sample and 8-oxo-dG monoclonal antibody to bind to the immobilised 8-oxo-dG on pre-coated wells. Plasma levels of 8-oxo-dG are inversely proportional to the product formation detected using a horseradish peroxidase conjugate and colourimetric substrate. The absorbance was measured colourimetrically on a Sunrise absorbance microplate reader at 450 nm (cut-off at 570 nm) and the results presented as nmol/L of 8-oxo-dG.
Lipid peroxidation products were measured according to the method of Tsikas (20). The assay is based on the reaction of the chromogen
The results are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The groups were compared and relations between parameters analysed with the Mann-Whitney
Occupationally exposed and control participants did not significantly differ in age, gender, or job duration (Table 1).
General characteristics of study participants (N=64)
| Participants (N) | Annual TLD dose (mSv) | Male | Female | Age Mean±SD (years) | Job duration Mean±SD (years) | Smokers (N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupationally exposed to ionising radiation | 34 | 5.2±3.6 | 8 | 26 | 35.3±8.2 | 20.2±4.2 | 14 |
| Radiologists | 4 | 4.83±4.44 | 1 | 3 | 36±3.1 | 12.7±1.9 | 1 |
| Technicians | 30 | 5.25±3.46 | 7 | 23 | 43±3.7 | 24.6±2.3 | 13 |
| Controls | 30 | - | 7 | 23 | 39.5±6.8 | 21.8±5.1 | 12 |
| Total | 64 | - | 15 | 49 | 37.8±6.7 | - | 26 |
TLD – thermoluminescent dosimeter
Of the 34 exposed participants, 14 had chromosome aberrations in first division metaphases (Table 2), including dicentric chromosomes with accompanying fragments, excesses acentrics, and chromosome and chromatid breaks. Dicentric chromosomes without accompanying fragments and pericentric inversions were also detected, both representing long-lived chromosome aberrations from past exposure (21, 22). Numerous studies support our findings of increased rate of chromosome aberrations and high interindividual variability (23, 24, 25), which is attributed to differences in genetic susceptibility towards ionising radiation (26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32), activation of DNA repair (33, 34), and anti-inflammatory processes (35). Lymphocyte chromosome aberrations in our occupationally exposed participants whose annual doses did not exceed risk limits can also be attributed to cumulative effects of chronic exposure to low-dose ionising radiation (36).
Chromosome aberrations, telomere length and fragility, and oxidative stress parameters by study groups
| Exposed participants with CAs | Exposed participants without CAs | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 20 | 30 | |
| No. of dicentrics* | 4 | ||
| No. of excess acentrics* | 9 | ||
| No. of chromosome breaks* | 9 | ||
| No. of chromatid breaks* | 7 | 3 | 3 |
| No. of stable chromosome aberrations* | 2 | ||
| Average rate of breaks per cell | 0.139 | ||
| Telomere length (T/C ratio) | 40.84±1.63 | 43.54±1.08 | 41.71±1.78 |
| Rate of fragile telomeres/cell | 0.64±0.13c | 0.15±0.01c,d | 0.01±0.004 |
| PAB | 21.7±1.42 | 21.91±0.835 | 21.69±0.34 |
| LPP | 5.88±0.38a | 7.58±0.46b,c | 4.59±0.16 |
| 8-oxo dG | 100.85±7.6c | 122.41±8.15c | 45.15±1.62 |
* per 200 first division metaphases; a significantly different from control at p<0.05; b significantly different from the exposed group with CAs at p<0.05; c significantly different from control at p<0.001; d significantly different from the exposed group with CAs at p<0.001
We found no significant differences in average relative telomere length between the groups. However, the rate of fragile telomeres was significantly higher in both exposed subgroups than control. Figure 1 shows that telomeres of chromosomes 1p, 5p, 4q, and 7q were the longest and of chromosomes Yq, 21p, and 22p the shortest in the exposed subgroup with chromosome aberrations. The rate of split telomere signals (fragile telomeres) was the highest with the longest telomeres 5p, 7q (9.33 % of the total number of either 5p or 7q fragile telomeres), and 2p (8 %), while the involvement of all other chromosomes, including autosomes and sex chromosomes, was below 4 % of the total fragile telomere count. In one participant from the exposed subgroup with chromosome aberrations we noticed telomere fusion between chromosomes 1p and 16q.
Figure 1
Telomere length of individual chromosomes in the exposed subgroup with chromosome aberrations (a), exposed subgroup without chromosome aberrations (b), and controls (c)
The exposed subgroup without chromosome aberrations had the longest telomeres on chromosomes 4p, 5p, 11p, and Xp. Even though only 0.15±0.01 of fragile telomeres per cell were present, this subgroup showed a similar trend in telomere fragility, i.e., telomere fragility in chromosomes 4q and 11p was 27.27 % and 18.18 %, respectively, while telomere fragility in all other chromosomes was considerably lower. Unlike the exposed subgroups, controls had a much more even distribution of telomere lengths across chromosomes, as we did not observe any extremely long (>60 T/C) or extremely short telomeres (<20 T/C).
Figure 2 shows photomicrographs representative of telomere fragility, including the lack of telomere signal and fusion as an exchange of two independent double-strand breaks between two different chromosomes.
Figure 2
Representative photomicrographs of fragile telomeres (Q-FISH). White arrow indicates a dicentric chromosome without telomere signal (a). Red arrow indicates fragile telomeres (b, c). Green arrow indicates telomere fusion between two chromosomes (d)
Accelerated telomere shortening has been reported in Chernobyl clean-up workers (37), whereas in citizens who lived in areas with high natural background radiation no such shortening was found (38).
The most interesting finding in our study is that the most fragile telomeres in participants occupationally exposed to ionising radiation were the longest ones. This phenomenon is perhaps best explained by the activation of a specific homology directed repair pathway known as mitotic DNA synthesis (MiDAS), which is a form of break-induced replication activated in response to replicative stress at loci difficult to replicate, such as telomeres (39, 40, 41). It was recently demonstrated that the highest levels of basal telomere MiDAS occur in cells with the longest telomeres and that 8-oxo-dG in telomere regions activates MiDAS instead of shortening telomeres, which results in their fragility (9, 42). This mechanism in response to radiation-induced oxidative damage might be an attempt to prevent genomic instability (43).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of telomere fragility in persons occupationally exposed to ionising radiation. In view of the fact that dysfunctional telomeres coincide with many late effects or radiation (44, 45), we believe our findings provide one more argument to use telomere fragility as a biomarker of health risks associated with occupational exposure to ionising radiation.
As for oxidative stress parameters, PAB values in the exposed subgroups did not significantly differ from control, whereas the average LPP levels were significantly higher (almost double), which is in line with earlier reports (46, 47). What surprised us, however, was that LPP levels were significantly lower in the exposed subgroup showing chromosome aberrations than in the subgroup without chromosome aberrations. This may be owed to accelerated removal of oxidised nucleotides by base excision repair coupled with other repair pathways (48).
Our findings of significantly higher 8-oxo-dG in the exposed than control participants were expected, as earlier studies have shown that the highest levels of oxidised guanine are expected on telomeres. 8-oxo-dG induces single-strand breaks throughout the genome, which are usually completely repaired except in the telomere regions (41, 42).
While telomere length did not correlate with either LPP or 8-oxo-dG levels, the rate of fragile telomeres correlated with 8-oxo-dG levels (p<0.01, r=0.655), which suggests that oxidative damage of guanine could be the main cause of telomere fragility in people occupationally exposed to ionising radiation. LPP levels also significantly correlated with 8-oxo-dG (r=0.644, p<0.01). El-Benhawy et al. (50) claim to be the first to have established a correlation between 8-oxo-dG and chromosome aberrations in persons occupationally exposed to ionising radiation, but they did not look into telomere fragility. We therefore believe that our study contributes to the current debate about telomere response to occupational radiation exposure and associated health risks by arguing in favour of telomere fragility and lipid peroxidation products as potentially reliable biomarkers of increased health risk in occupations exposed to ionising radiations, but more studies are needed to corroborate our findings.
Our study clearly shows that occupational exposure to low doses of ionising radiation makes telomeres fragile, most likely through oxidative damage of guanine and activation of base excision repair-induced pathways in response to oxidative or replicative stress.