Central resources of variant discovery and annotation and its role in precision medicine

[1] Durmaz AA, Karaca E, Demkow U, Toruner G, Schoumans J, Cogulu O. Evolution of genetic techniques: past, present, and beyond. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:461524. doi: 10.1155/2015/461524 DurmazAA KaracaE DemkowU TorunerG SchoumansJ CoguluO Evolution of genetic techniques: past, present, and beyond Biomed Res Int. 2015 2015 461524 10.1155/2015/461524 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2] Steward CA, Parker APJ, Minassian BA, Sisodiya SM, Frankish A, Harrow J. Genome annotation for clinical genomic diagnostics: strengths and weaknesses. Genome Med. 2017; 9:49. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0441-1 StewardCA ParkerAPJ MinassianBA SisodiyaSM FrankishA HarrowJ Genome annotation for clinical genomic diagnostics: strengths and weaknesses Genome Med. 2017 9 49 10.1186/s13073-017-0441-1 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Miller JE, Veturi Y, Ritchie MD. Innovative strategies for annotating the “relationSNP” between variants and molecular phenotypes. Bio Data Min. 2019; 12:10. doi: 10.1186/s13040-019-0197-9 MillerJE VeturiY RitchieMD Innovative strategies for annotating the “relationSNP” between variants and molecular phenotypes Bio Data Min. 2019 12 10 10.1186/s13040-019-0197-9 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Ramos EM, Hoffman D, Junkins HA, Maglott D, Phan L, Sherry ST, et al. Phenotype-Genotype Integrator (PheGenI): synthesizing genome-wide association study (GWAS) data with existing genomic resources. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014; 22:144–7. RamosEM HoffmanD JunkinsHA MaglottD PhanL SherryST Phenotype-Genotype Integrator (PheGenI): synthesizing genome-wide association study (GWAS) data with existing genomic resources Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 22 144 7 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Samuels DC, Yu H, Guo Y. Is it time to reassess variant annotation? Trends Genet. 2022; 38:521–3. SamuelsDC YuH GuoY Is it time to reassess variant annotation? Trends Genet. 2022 38 521 3 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hebbar P, Sowmya SK, editors. Genomic variant annotation: a comprehensive review of tools and techniques. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. HebbarP SowmyaSK editors. Genomic variant annotation: a comprehensive review of tools and techniques Cham Springer International Publishing 2022 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, Jang W, Rubinstein WS, Church DM, Maglott DR. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D980–5. LandrumMJ LeeJM RileyGR JangW RubinsteinWS ChurchDM MaglottDR ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 42 D980 5 Search in Google Scholar

[8] MacArthur JA, Morales J, Tully RE, Astashyn A, Gil L, Bruford EA, et al. Locus reference genomic: reference sequences for the reporting of clinically relevant sequence variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D873–8. MacArthurJA MoralesJ TullyRE AstashynA GilL BrufordEA Locus reference genomic: reference sequences for the reporting of clinically relevant sequence variants Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 42 D873 8 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Sosnay PR, Cutting GR. Interpretation of genetic variants. Thorax. 2014; 69:295–7. SosnayPR CuttingGR Interpretation of genetic variants Thorax. 2014 69 295 7 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Li MM, Datto M, Duncavage EJ, Kulkarni S, Lindeman NI, Roy S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of sequence variants in cancer: a joint consensus recommendation of the association for molecular pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists. J Mol Diagn. 2017; 19:4–23. LiMM DattoM DuncavageEJ KulkarniS LindemanNI RoyS Standards and guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of sequence variants in cancer: a joint consensus recommendation of the association for molecular pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists J Mol Diagn. 2017 19 4 23 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, Kantarci S, Kearney H, Patel A, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2020; 22:245–57. RiggsER AndersenEF CherryAM KantarciS KearneyH PatelA Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Genet Med. 2020 22 245 57 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, Kantarci S, Kearney H, Patel A, et al. Correction: technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2021; 23:2230. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01150-9 RiggsER AndersenEF CherryAM KantarciS KearneyH PatelA Correction: technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Genet Med. 2021 23 2230 10.1038/s41436-021-01150-9 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Thusberg J, Olatubosun A, Vihinen M. Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction methods on missense variants. Hum Mutat. 2011; 32:358–68. ThusbergJ OlatubosunA VihinenM Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction methods on missense variants Hum Mutat. 2011 32 358 68 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Chaitankar V, Karakülah G, Ratnapriya R, Giuste FO, Brooks MJ, Swaroop A. Next generation sequencing technology and genomewide data analysis: perspectives for retinal research. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016; 55:1–31. ChaitankarV KarakülahG RatnapriyaR GiusteFO BrooksMJ SwaroopA Next generation sequencing technology and genomewide data analysis: perspectives for retinal research Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016 55 1 31 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Serin EA, Nijveen H, Hilhorst HW, Ligterink W. Learning from co-expression networks: possibilities and challenges. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:444. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00444 SerinEA NijveenH HilhorstHW LigterinkW Learning from co-expression networks: possibilities and challenges Front Plant Sci. 2016 7 444 10.3389/fpls.2016.00444 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Asplund A, Edqvist PH, Schwenk JM, Ponten F. Antibodies for profiling the human proteome-the human protein atlas as a resource for cancer research. Proteomics. 2012; 12:2067–77. AsplundA EdqvistPH SchwenkJM PontenF Antibodies for profiling the human proteome-the human protein atlas as a resource for cancer research Proteomics. 2012 12 2067 77 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Lee CY, Chattopadhyay A, Chiang LM, Juang JJ, Lai LC, Tsai MH, et al. VariED: the first integrated database of gene annotation and expression profiles for variants related to human diseases. Database (Oxford). 2019; 2019:baz075. doi: 10.1093/database/baz075 LeeCY ChattopadhyayA ChiangLM JuangJJ LaiLC TsaiMH VariED: the first integrated database of gene annotation and expression profiles for variants related to human diseases Database (Oxford). 2019 2019 baz075 10.1093/database/baz075 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Liu X, Li C, Mou C, Dong Y, Tu Y. dbNSFP v4: a comprehensive database of transcript-specific functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVs. Genome Med. 2020; 12:103. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00803-9 LiuX LiC MouC DongY TuY dbNSFP v4: a comprehensive database of transcript-specific functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVs Genome Med. 2020 12 103 10.1186/s13073-020-00803-9 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Ramos EM, Din-Lovinescu C, Berg JS, Brooks LD, Duncanson A, Dunn M, et al. Characterizing genetic variants for clinical action. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014; 166C:93–104. RamosEM Din-LovinescuC BergJS BrooksLD DuncansonA DunnM Characterizing genetic variants for clinical action Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014 166C 93 104 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Riggs ER, Ledbetter DH, Martin CL. Genomic variation: lessons learned from whole-genome CNV analysis. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2014; 2:146–50. RiggsER LedbetterDH MartinCL Genomic variation: lessons learned from whole-genome CNV analysis Curr Genet Med Rep. 2014 2 146 50 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Dahary D, Golan Y, Mazor Y, Zelig O, Barshir R, Twik M, et al. Genome analysis and knowledge-driven variant interpretation with TGex. BMC Med Genomics. 2019; 12:200. doi: 10.1186/s12920-019-0647-8 DaharyD GolanY MazorY ZeligO BarshirR TwikM Genome analysis and knowledge-driven variant interpretation with TGex BMC Med Genomics. 2019 12 200 10.1186/s12920-019-0647-8 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Arnold M, Raffler J, Pfeufer A, Suhre K, Kastenmüller G. SNiPA: an interactive, genetic variant-centered annotation browser. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31:1334–6. ArnoldM RafflerJ PfeuferA SuhreK KastenmüllerG SNiPA: an interactive, genetic variant-centered annotation browser Bioinformatics. 2015 31 1334 6 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Sayers EW, Beck J, Brister JR, Bolton EE, Canese K, Comeau DC, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(D1):D9–D16. SayersEW BeckJ BristerJR BoltonEE CaneseK ComeauDC Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 48 D1 D9 D16 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Sayers EW, Beck J, Bolton EE, Bourexis D, Brister JR, Canese K, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(D1):D10–D7. SayersEW BeckJ BoltonEE BourexisD BristerJR CaneseK Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 49 D1 D10 D7 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Sayers EW, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Canese K, Chan J, Comeau DC, et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50(D1):D20–D6. SayersEW BoltonEE BristerJR CaneseK ChanJ ComeauDC Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 50 D1 D20 D6 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Evans K, Hayden M, Heywood S, et al. The human gene mutation database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies. Hum Genet. 2017; 136:665–77. StensonPD MortM BallEV EvansK HaydenM HeywoodS The human gene mutation database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies Hum Genet. 2017 136 665 77 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Fokkema IF, Taschner PE, Schaafsma GC, Celli J, Laros JF, den Dunnen JT. LOVD v.2.0: the next generation in gene variant databases. Hum Mutat. 2011; 32:557–63. FokkemaIF TaschnerPE SchaafsmaGC CelliJ LarosJF den DunnenJT LOVD v.2.0: the next generation in gene variant databases Hum Mutat. 2011 32 557 63 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Fokkema IFAC, Kroon M, López Hernández JA, Asscheman D, Lugtenburg I, Hoogenboom J, den Dunnen JT. The LOVD3 platform: efficient genome-wide sharing of genetic variants. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021; 29:1796–803. FokkemaIFAC KroonM López HernándezJA AsschemanD LugtenburgI HoogenboomJ den DunnenJT The LOVD3 platform: efficient genome-wide sharing of genetic variants Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 29 1796 803 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29:308–11. SherryST WardMH KholodovM BakerJ PhanL SmigielskiEM SirotkinK dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 29 308 11 Search in Google Scholar

[30] Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Sayers EW. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(D1):D41–D7. BensonDA CavanaughM ClarkK Karsch-MizrachiI OstellJ PruittKD SayersEW GenBank Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 46 D1 D41 D7 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Sayers EW, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Pruitt KD, Schoch CL, Sherry ST, et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(D1):D92–D6. SayersEW CavanaughM ClarkK PruittKD SchochCL SherryST GenBank Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 49 D1 D92 D6 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Rehm HL, Berg JS, Brooks LD, Bustamante CD, Evans JP, Landrum MJ, et al. ClinGen – the clinical genome resource. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:2235–42. RehmHL BergJS BrooksLD BustamanteCD EvansJP LandrumMJ ClinGen – the clinical genome resource N Engl J Med. 2015 372 2235 42 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Yang H, Robinson PN, Wang K. Phenolyzer: phenotype-based prioritization of candidate genes for human diseases. Nat Methods. 2015; 12:841–3. YangH RobinsonPN WangK Phenolyzer: phenotype-based prioritization of candidate genes for human diseases Nat Methods. 2015 12 841 3 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Desvignes JP, Bartoli M, Delague V, Krahn M, Miltgen M, Béroud C, Salgado D. VarAFT: a variant annotation and filtration system for human next generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(W1):W545–W53. DesvignesJP BartoliM DelagueV KrahnM MiltgenM BéroudC SalgadoD VarAFT: a variant annotation and filtration system for human next generation sequencing data Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 46 W1 W545 W53 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al. Variation across 141,456 human exomes and genomes reveals the spectrum of loss-of-function intolerance across human protein-coding genes. bioRxiv. 2019:531210. doi: 10.1101/531210 KarczewskiKJ FrancioliLC TiaoG CummingsBB AlföldiJ WangQ Variation across 141,456 human exomes and genomes reveals the spectrum of loss-of-function intolerance across human protein-coding genes bioRxiv 2019 531210 10.1101/531210 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Yates AD, Achuthan P, Akanni W, Allen J, Allen J, Alvarez-Jarreta J, et al. Ensembl 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(D1):D682–D8. YatesAD AchuthanP AkanniW AllenJ AllenJ Alvarez-JarretaJ Ensembl 2020 Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 48 D1 D682 D8 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Birney E, Andrews TD, Bevan P, Caccamo M, Chen Y, Clarke L, et al. An overview of Ensembl. Genome Res. 2004; 14:925–8. BirneyE AndrewsTD BevanP CaccamoM ChenY ClarkeL An overview of Ensembl Genome Res. 2004 14 925 8 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Zhou J, Troyanskaya OG. Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model. Nat Methods. 2015; 12:931–4. ZhouJ TroyanskayaOG Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model Nat Methods. 2015 12 931 4 Search in Google Scholar

[39] Oscanoa J, Sivapalan L, Gadaleta E, Dayem Ullah AZ, Lemoine NR, Chelala C. SNPnexus: a web server for functional annotation of human genome sequence variation (2020 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48:W185–W92. OscanoaJ SivapalanL GadaletaE Dayem UllahAZ LemoineNR ChelalaC SNPnexus: a web server for functional annotation of human genome sequence variation (2020 update) Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 48 W185 W92 Search in Google Scholar

[40] Haeussler M, Zweig AS, Tyner C, Speir ML, Rosenbloom KR, Raney BJ, et al. The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(D1):D853–D8. HaeusslerM ZweigAS TynerC SpeirML RosenbloomKR RaneyBJ The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2019 update Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 47 D1 D853 D8 Search in Google Scholar

[41] GTEx Consortium. Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science. 2015; 348:648–60. GTEx Consortium Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans Science. 2015 348 648 60 Search in Google Scholar

[42] O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, McVeigh R, et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44(D1):D733–45. O’LearyNA WrightMW BristerJR CiufoS HaddadD McVeighR Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 44 D1 D733 45 Search in Google Scholar

[43] Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016; 536:285–91. LekM KarczewskiKJ MinikelEV SamochaKE BanksE FennellT Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans Nature. 2016 536 285 91 Search in Google Scholar

[44] Karolchik D, Hinrichs AS, Kent WJ. The UCSC genome browser. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2009; Chapter 1:Unit1. 4. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0104s28 KarolchikD HinrichsAS KentWJ The UCSC genome browser Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2009 Chapter 1:Unit1. 4. 10.1002/0471250953.bi0104s28 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[45] Tate JG, Bamford S, Jubb HC, Sondka Z, Beare DM, Bindal N, et al. COSMIC: the Catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(D1):D941–D7. TateJG BamfordS JubbHC SondkaZ BeareDM BindalN COSMIC: the Catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 47 D1 D941 D7 Search in Google Scholar

[46] Jubb HC, Saini HK, Verdonk ML, Forbes SA. COSMIC-3D provides structural perspectives on cancer genetics for drug discovery. Nat Genet. 2018; 50:1200–2. JubbHC SainiHK VerdonkML ForbesSA COSMIC-3D provides structural perspectives on cancer genetics for drug discovery Nat Genet. 2018 50 1200 2 Search in Google Scholar

[47] Forbes SA, Bhamra G, Bamford S, Dawson E, Kok C, Clements J, et al. The catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer (COSMIC). Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2008;Chapter 10:Unit 10. 11. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg1011s57 ForbesSA BhamraG BamfordS DawsonE KokC ClementsJ The catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer (COSMIC) Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2008 Chapter 10:Unit 10. 11. 10.1002/0471142905.hg1011s57 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[48] Stephanou C, Kountouris P, Tamana S, Minaidou A, Lederer CW, Kleanthous M. ITHANET: an information and database community portal for hemoglobinopathies. Hemoglobin. 2019; 43:363. StephanouC KountourisP TamanaS MinaidouA LedererCW KleanthousM ITHANET: an information and database community portal for hemoglobinopathies Hemoglobin. 2019 43 363 Search in Google Scholar

[49] Kountouris P, Lederer CW, Fanis P, Feleki X, Old J, Kleanthous M. IthaGenes: an interactive database for haemoglobin variations and epidemiology. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e103020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103020 KountourisP LedererCW FanisP FelekiX OldJ KleanthousM IthaGenes: an interactive database for haemoglobin variations and epidemiology PLoS One. 2014 9 e103020 10.1371/journal.pone.0103020 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[50] Braschi B, Denny P, Gray K, Jones T, Seal R, Tweedie S, et al. Genenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(D1):D786–D92. BraschiB DennyP GrayK JonesT SealR TweedieS Genenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2019 Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 47 D1 D786 D92 Search in Google Scholar

[51] Seal RL, Gordon SM, Lush MJ, Wright MW, Bruford EA. genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39(Database issue):D514–9. SealRL GordonSM LushMJ WrightMW BrufordEA genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2011 Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 39 Database issue D514 9 Search in Google Scholar

[52] Tweedie S, Braschi B, Gray K, Jones TEM, Seal RL, Yates B, Bruford EA. Genenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(D1):D939–D46. TweedieS BraschiB GrayK JonesTEM SealRL YatesB BrufordEA Genenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2021 Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 49 D1 D939 D46 Search in Google Scholar

[53] Zhang J, Bajari R, Andric D, Gerthoffert F, Lepsa A, Nahal-Bose H, et al. The international cancer genome consortium data portal. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 37:367–9. ZhangJ BajariR AndricD GerthoffertF LepsaA Nahal-BoseH The international cancer genome consortium data portal Nat Biotechnol. 2019 37 367 9 Search in Google Scholar

[54] Turnbull C, Scott RH, Thomas E, Jones L, Murugaesu N, Pretty FB, et al. The 100 000 genomes project: bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHS. BMJ. 2018; 361:k1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1687 TurnbullC ScottRH ThomasE JonesL MurugaesuN PrettyFB The 100 000 genomes project: bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHS BMJ. 2018 361 k1687 10.1136/bmj.k1687 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[55] Frankish A, Diekhans M, Ferreira AM, Johnson R, Jungreis I, Loveland J, et al. GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D766–D73. FrankishA DiekhansM FerreiraAM JohnsonR JungreisI LovelandJ GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 47 D1 D766 D73 Search in Google Scholar

[56] Frankish A, Diekhans M, Jungreis I, Lagarde J, Loveland JE, Mudge JM, et al. GENCODE 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(D1): D916–D23. FrankishA DiekhansM JungreisI LagardeJ LovelandJE MudgeJM GENCODE 2021 Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 49 D1 D916 D23 Search in Google Scholar

[57] Harrow J, Frankish A, Gonzalez JM, Tapanari E, Diekhans M, Kokocinski F, et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project. Genome Res. 2012; 22:1760–74. HarrowJ FrankishA GonzalezJM TapanariE DiekhansM KokocinskiF GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project Genome Res. 2012 22 1760 74 Search in Google Scholar

[58] Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015; 17:405–24. RichardsS AzizN BaleS BickD DasS Gastier-FosterJ Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology Genet Med. 2015 17 405 24 Search in Google Scholar

[59] Shotelersuk V, Wichadakul D, Ngamphiw C, Srichomthong C, Phokaew C, Wilantho A, et al. The Thai reference exome (T-REx) variant database. Clin Genet. 2021; 100:703–12. ShotelersukV WichadakulD NgamphiwC SrichomthongC PhokaewC WilanthoA The Thai reference exome (T-REx) variant database Clin Genet. 2021 100 703 12 Search in Google Scholar

[60] Fattahi Z, Beheshtian M, Mohseni M, Poustchi H, Sellars E, Nezhadi SH, et al. Iranome: a catalog of genomic variations in the Iranian population. Hum Mutat. 2019; 40:1968–84. FattahiZ BeheshtianM MohseniM PoustchiH SellarsE NezhadiSH Iranome: a catalog of genomic variations in the Iranian population Hum Mutat. 2019 40 1968 84 Search in Google Scholar

[61] Lee JM, Thong MK. Genetic counseling services and development of training programs in Malaysia. J Genet Couns. 2013; 22:911–6. LeeJM ThongMK Genetic counseling services and development of training programs in Malaysia J Genet Couns. 2013 22 911 6 Search in Google Scholar

[62] Halim-Fikri H, Etemad A, Abdul Latif AZ, Merican AF, Baig AA, Annuar AA, et al. The first Malay database toward the ethnic-specific target molecular variation. BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8:176. Halim-FikriH EtemadA Abdul LatifAZ MericanAF BaigAA AnnuarAA The first Malay database toward the ethnic-specific target molecular variation BMC Res Notes. 2015 8 176 Search in Google Scholar

[63] Plazzer JP, Macrae F. DNA variant databases: current state and future directions. Methods Mol Biol. 2014; 1168:263–73. PlazzerJP MacraeF DNA variant databases: current state and future directions Methods Mol Biol. 2014 1168 263 73 Search in Google Scholar

[64] Teo YY, Sim X, Ong RT, Tan AK, Chen J, Tantoso E, et al. Singapore genome variation project: a haplotype map of three Southeast Asian populations. Genome Res. 2009; 19:2154–62. TeoYY SimX OngRT TanAK ChenJ TantosoE Singapore genome variation project: a haplotype map of three Southeast Asian populations Genome Res. 2009 19 2154 62 Search in Google Scholar

[65] Wong E, Bertin N, Hebrard M, Tirado-Magallanes R, Bellis C, Lim WK, et al. The Singapore national precision medicine strategy. Nat Genet. 2023; 55:178–86. WongE BertinN HebrardM Tirado-MagallanesR BellisC LimWK The Singapore national precision medicine strategy Nat Genet. 2023 55 178 86 Search in Google Scholar

[66] Indonesia MoHotRo. Pedoman Nasional Pelayanan Kedokteran Tata laksana Thalasemia. Indonesia: MHRI; 2018. Indonesia MoHotRo Pedoman Nasional Pelayanan Kedokteran Tata laksana Thalasemia Indonesia MHRI 2018 Search in Google Scholar

[67] Rujito L, Basalamah M, Mulatsih S, Sofro AS. Molecular scanning of beta-thalassemia in the southern region of Central Java, Indonesia; a step towards a local prevention program. Hemoglobin. 2015; 39:330–3. RujitoL BasalamahM MulatsihS SofroAS Molecular scanning of beta-thalassemia in the southern region of Central Java, Indonesia; a step towards a local prevention program Hemoglobin. 2015 39 330 3 Search in Google Scholar

[68] Rujito L. Talasemia: genetik dasar dan pengelolaan terkini. Indonesia Universitas Jenderal Soedirman; 2019. RujitoL Talasemia: genetik dasar dan pengelolaan terkini Indonesia Universitas Jenderal Soedirman 2019 Search in Google Scholar

[69] Joseph L, Cankovic M, Caughron S, Chandra P, Emmadi R, Hagenkord J, et al. The spectrum of clinical utilities in molecular pathology testing procedures for inherited conditions and cancer: a report of the association for molecular pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2016; 18:605–19. JosephL CankovicM CaughronS ChandraP EmmadiR HagenkordJ The spectrum of clinical utilities in molecular pathology testing procedures for inherited conditions and cancer: a report of the association for molecular pathology J Mol Diagn. 2016 18 605 19 Search in Google Scholar

[70] Schrijver I, Farkas DH, Gibson JS, Lyon E, Committee AMPE. The evolving role of the laboratory professional in the age of genome sequencing: a vision of the association for molecular pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2015; 17:335–8. SchrijverI FarkasDH GibsonJS LyonE CommitteeAMPE The evolving role of the laboratory professional in the age of genome sequencing: a vision of the association for molecular pathology J Mol Diagn. 2015 17 335 8 Search in Google Scholar

[71] Harrison SM, Biesecker LG, Rehm HL. Overview of specifications to the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2019; 103:e93. doi: 10.1002/cphg.93 HarrisonSM BieseckerLG RehmHL Overview of specifications to the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2019 103 e93 10.1002/cphg.93 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[72] Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:793–5. CollinsFS VarmusH A new initiative on precision medicine N Engl J Med. 2015 372 793 5 Search in Google Scholar

[73] Lin JZ, Long JY, Wang AQ, Zheng Y, Zhao HT. Precision medicine: in need of guidance and surveillance. World J Gastroenterol. 2017; 23:5045–50. LinJZ LongJY WangAQ ZhengY ZhaoHT Precision medicine: in need of guidance and surveillance World J Gastroenterol. 2017 23 5045 50 Search in Google Scholar

[74] Gavan SP, Thompson AJ, Payne K. The economic case for precision medicine. Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev. 2018; 3:1–9. GavanSP ThompsonAJ PayneK The economic case for precision medicine Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev. 2018 3 1 9 Search in Google Scholar

[75] Alzu’bi AA, Zhou L, Watzlaf VJM. Genetic variations and precision medicine. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2019; 16(Spring):1a. Alzu’biAA ZhouL WatzlafVJM Genetic variations and precision medicine Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2019 16 Spring 1a Search in Google Scholar

[76] Wynn RM, Adams KT, Kowalski RL, Shivega WG, Ratwani RM, Miller KE. The patient in precision medicine: a systematic review examining evaluations of patient-facing materials. J Healthc Eng. 2018; 2018:9541621. doi: 10.1155/2018/9541621 WynnRM AdamsKT KowalskiRL ShivegaWG RatwaniRM MillerKE The patient in precision medicine: a systematic review examining evaluations of patient-facing materials J Healthc Eng. 2018 2018 9541621 10.1155/2018/9541621 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[77] Boyapati RK, Kalla R, Satsangi J, Ho GT. Biomarkers in search of precision medicine in IBD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111:1682–90. BoyapatiRK KallaR SatsangiJ HoGT Biomarkers in search of precision medicine in IBD Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 111 1682 90 Search in Google Scholar

[78] Hoffman JM, Dunnenberger HM, Kevin Hicks J, Caudle KE, Whirl Carrillo M, Freimuth RR, et al. Developing knowledge resources to support precision medicine: principles from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 23:796–801. HoffmanJM DunnenbergerHM Kevin HicksJ CaudleKE Whirl CarrilloM FreimuthRR Developing knowledge resources to support precision medicine: principles from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 23 796 801 Search in Google Scholar

[79] Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, Schiettecatte F, Scott AF, Hamosh A. OMIM.org: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM ^®), an online catalog of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(Database issue):D789–98. AmbergerJS BocchiniCA SchiettecatteF ScottAF HamoshA OMIM.org: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM ^®), an online catalog of human genes and genetic disorders Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 43 Database issue D789 98 Search in Google Scholar

[80] Najafzadeh M, Davis JC, Joshi P, Marra C. Barriers for integrating personalized medicine into clinical practice: a qualitative analysis. Am J Med Genet A. 2013; 161A:758–63. NajafzadehM DavisJC JoshiP MarraC Barriers for integrating personalized medicine into clinical practice: a qualitative analysis Am J Med Genet A. 2013 161A 758 63 Search in Google Scholar

[81] Gubatan J, Levitte S, Patel A, Balabanis T, Wei MT, Sinha SR. Artificial intelligence applications in inflammatory bowel disease: emerging technologies and future directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2021; 27:1920–35. GubatanJ LevitteS PatelA BalabanisT WeiMT SinhaSR Artificial intelligence applications in inflammatory bowel disease: emerging technologies and future directions World J Gastroenterol. 2021 27 1920 35 Search in Google Scholar

[82] Jiang X, Coffee M, Bari A, Wang J, Jiang X, Huang J, et al. Towards an artificial intelligence framework for data-driven prediction of coronavirus clinical severity. Comput Mater Contin. 2020; 63:537–51. JiangX CoffeeM BariA WangJ JiangX HuangJ Towards an artificial intelligence framework for data-driven prediction of coronavirus clinical severity Comput Mater Contin. 2020 63 537 51 Search in Google Scholar

[83] Rivera-Muñoz EA, Milko LV, Harrison SM, Azzariti DR, Kurtz CL, Lee K, et al. Clingen variant curation expert panel experiences and standardized processes for disease and gene-level specification of the ACMG/AMP guidelines for sequence variant interpretation. Hum Mutat. 2018; 39:1614–22. Rivera-MuñozEA MilkoLV HarrisonSM AzzaritiDR KurtzCL LeeK Clingen variant curation expert panel experiences and standardized processes for disease and gene-level specification of the ACMG/AMP guidelines for sequence variant interpretation Hum Mutat. 2018 39 1614 22 Search in Google Scholar

[84] Easteal S, Arkell RM, Balboa RF, Bellingham SA, Brown AD, Calma T, et al. Equitable expanded carrier screening needs indigenous clinical and population genomic data. Am J Hum Genet. 2020; 107:175–82. EastealS ArkellRM BalboaRF BellinghamSA BrownAD CalmaT Equitable expanded carrier screening needs indigenous clinical and population genomic data Am J Hum Genet. 2020 107 175 82 Search in Google Scholar

[85] Kessler MD, Yerges-Armstrong L, Taub MA, Shetty AC, Maloney K, Jeng LJB, et al. Challenges and disparities in the application of personalized genomic medicine to populations with African ancestry. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:12521. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12521 KesslerMD Yerges-ArmstrongL TaubMA ShettyAC MaloneyK JengLJB Challenges and disparities in the application of personalized genomic medicine to populations with African ancestry Nat Commun. 2016 7 12521 10.1038/ncomms12521 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar