This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Durmaz AA, Karaca E, Demkow U, Toruner G, Schoumans J, Cogulu O. Evolution of genetic techniques: past, present, and beyond. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:461524. doi: 10.1155/2015/461524DurmazAAKaracaEDemkowUTorunerGSchoumansJCoguluOEvolution of genetic techniques: past, present, and beyondBiomed Res Int.2015201546152410.1155/2015/461524Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Steward CA, Parker APJ, Minassian BA, Sisodiya SM, Frankish A, Harrow J. Genome annotation for clinical genomic diagnostics: strengths and weaknesses. Genome Med. 2017; 9:49. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0441-1StewardCAParkerAPJMinassianBASisodiyaSMFrankishAHarrowJGenome annotation for clinical genomic diagnostics: strengths and weaknessesGenome Med.201794910.1186/s13073-017-0441-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Miller JE, Veturi Y, Ritchie MD. Innovative strategies for annotating the “relationSNP” between variants and molecular phenotypes. Bio Data Min. 2019; 12:10. doi: 10.1186/s13040-019-0197-9MillerJEVeturiYRitchieMDInnovative strategies for annotating the “relationSNP” between variants and molecular phenotypesBio Data Min.2019121010.1186/s13040-019-0197-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ramos EM, Hoffman D, Junkins HA, Maglott D, Phan L, Sherry ST, et al. Phenotype-Genotype Integrator (PheGenI): synthesizing genome-wide association study (GWAS) data with existing genomic resources. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014; 22:144–7.RamosEMHoffmanDJunkinsHAMaglottDPhanLSherrySTPhenotype-Genotype Integrator (PheGenI): synthesizing genome-wide association study (GWAS) data with existing genomic resourcesEur J Hum Genet.2014221447Search in Google Scholar
Samuels DC, Yu H, Guo Y. Is it time to reassess variant annotation? Trends Genet. 2022; 38:521–3.SamuelsDCYuHGuoYIs it time to reassess variant annotation?Trends Genet.2022385213Search in Google Scholar
Hebbar P, Sowmya SK, editors. Genomic variant annotation: a comprehensive review of tools and techniques. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022.HebbarPSowmyaSKeditors.Genomic variant annotation: a comprehensive review of tools and techniquesChamSpringer International Publishing2022Search in Google Scholar
Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, Jang W, Rubinstein WS, Church DM, Maglott DR. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D980–5.LandrumMJLeeJMRileyGRJangWRubinsteinWSChurchDMMaglottDRClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotypeNucleic Acids Res.201442D9805Search in Google Scholar
MacArthur JA, Morales J, Tully RE, Astashyn A, Gil L, Bruford EA, et al. Locus reference genomic: reference sequences for the reporting of clinically relevant sequence variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D873–8.MacArthurJAMoralesJTullyREAstashynAGilLBrufordEALocus reference genomic: reference sequences for the reporting of clinically relevant sequence variantsNucleic Acids Res.201442D8738Search in Google Scholar
Sosnay PR, Cutting GR. Interpretation of genetic variants. Thorax. 2014; 69:295–7.SosnayPRCuttingGRInterpretation of genetic variantsThorax.2014692957Search in Google Scholar
Li MM, Datto M, Duncavage EJ, Kulkarni S, Lindeman NI, Roy S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of sequence variants in cancer: a joint consensus recommendation of the association for molecular pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists. J Mol Diagn. 2017; 19:4–23.LiMMDattoMDuncavageEJKulkarniSLindemanNIRoySStandards and guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of sequence variants in cancer: a joint consensus recommendation of the association for molecular pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American PathologistsJ Mol Diagn.201719423Search in Google Scholar
Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, Kantarci S, Kearney H, Patel A, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2020; 22:245–57.RiggsERAndersenEFCherryAMKantarciSKearneyHPatelATechnical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen)Genet Med.20202224557Search in Google Scholar
Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, Kantarci S, Kearney H, Patel A, et al. Correction: technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2021; 23:2230. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01150-9RiggsERAndersenEFCherryAMKantarciSKearneyHPatelACorrection: technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen)Genet Med.202123223010.1038/s41436-021-01150-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thusberg J, Olatubosun A, Vihinen M. Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction methods on missense variants. Hum Mutat. 2011; 32:358–68.ThusbergJOlatubosunAVihinenMPerformance of mutation pathogenicity prediction methods on missense variantsHum Mutat.20113235868Search in Google Scholar
Chaitankar V, Karakülah G, Ratnapriya R, Giuste FO, Brooks MJ, Swaroop A. Next generation sequencing technology and genomewide data analysis: perspectives for retinal research. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016; 55:1–31.ChaitankarVKarakülahGRatnapriyaRGiusteFOBrooksMJSwaroopANext generation sequencing technology and genomewide data analysis: perspectives for retinal researchProg Retin Eye Res.201655131Search in Google Scholar
Serin EA, Nijveen H, Hilhorst HW, Ligterink W. Learning from co-expression networks: possibilities and challenges. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:444. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00444SerinEANijveenHHilhorstHWLigterinkWLearning from co-expression networks: possibilities and challengesFront Plant Sci.2016744410.3389/fpls.2016.00444Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Asplund A, Edqvist PH, Schwenk JM, Ponten F. Antibodies for profiling the human proteome-the human protein atlas as a resource for cancer research. Proteomics. 2012; 12:2067–77.AsplundAEdqvistPHSchwenkJMPontenFAntibodies for profiling the human proteome-the human protein atlas as a resource for cancer researchProteomics.201212206777Search in Google Scholar
Lee CY, Chattopadhyay A, Chiang LM, Juang JJ, Lai LC, Tsai MH, et al. VariED: the first integrated database of gene annotation and expression profiles for variants related to human diseases. Database (Oxford). 2019; 2019:baz075. doi: 10.1093/database/baz075LeeCYChattopadhyayAChiangLMJuangJJLaiLCTsaiMHVariED: the first integrated database of gene annotation and expression profiles for variants related to human diseasesDatabase (Oxford).20192019baz07510.1093/database/baz075Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liu X, Li C, Mou C, Dong Y, Tu Y. dbNSFP v4: a comprehensive database of transcript-specific functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVs. Genome Med. 2020; 12:103. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00803-9LiuXLiCMouCDongYTuYdbNSFP v4: a comprehensive database of transcript-specific functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVsGenome Med.20201210310.1186/s13073-020-00803-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ramos EM, Din-Lovinescu C, Berg JS, Brooks LD, Duncanson A, Dunn M, et al. Characterizing genetic variants for clinical action. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014; 166C:93–104.RamosEMDin-LovinescuCBergJSBrooksLDDuncansonADunnMCharacterizing genetic variants for clinical actionAm J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet.2014166C93104Search in Google Scholar
Riggs ER, Ledbetter DH, Martin CL. Genomic variation: lessons learned from whole-genome CNV analysis. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2014; 2:146–50.RiggsERLedbetterDHMartinCLGenomic variation: lessons learned from whole-genome CNV analysisCurr Genet Med Rep.2014214650Search in Google Scholar
Dahary D, Golan Y, Mazor Y, Zelig O, Barshir R, Twik M, et al. Genome analysis and knowledge-driven variant interpretation with TGex. BMC Med Genomics. 2019; 12:200. doi: 10.1186/s12920-019-0647-8DaharyDGolanYMazorYZeligOBarshirRTwikMGenome analysis and knowledge-driven variant interpretation with TGexBMC Med Genomics.20191220010.1186/s12920-019-0647-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Arnold M, Raffler J, Pfeufer A, Suhre K, Kastenmüller G. SNiPA: an interactive, genetic variant-centered annotation browser. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31:1334–6.ArnoldMRafflerJPfeuferASuhreKKastenmüllerGSNiPA: an interactive, genetic variant-centered annotation browserBioinformatics.20153113346Search in Google Scholar
Sayers EW, Beck J, Brister JR, Bolton EE, Canese K, Comeau DC, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(D1):D9–D16.SayersEWBeckJBristerJRBoltonEECaneseKComeauDCDatabase resources of the National Center for Biotechnology InformationNucleic Acids Res.202048D1D9D16Search in Google Scholar
Sayers EW, Beck J, Bolton EE, Bourexis D, Brister JR, Canese K, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(D1):D10–D7.SayersEWBeckJBoltonEEBourexisDBristerJRCaneseKDatabase resources of the National Center for Biotechnology InformationNucleic Acids Res.202149D1D10D7Search in Google Scholar
Sayers EW, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Canese K, Chan J, Comeau DC, et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 50(D1):D20–D6.SayersEWBoltonEEBristerJRCaneseKChanJComeauDCDatabase resources of the national center for biotechnology informationNucleic Acids Res.202250D1D20D6Search in Google Scholar
Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Evans K, Hayden M, Heywood S, et al. The human gene mutation database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies. Hum Genet. 2017; 136:665–77.StensonPDMortMBallEVEvansKHaydenMHeywoodSThe human gene mutation database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studiesHum Genet.201713666577Search in Google Scholar
Fokkema IF, Taschner PE, Schaafsma GC, Celli J, Laros JF, den Dunnen JT. LOVD v.2.0: the next generation in gene variant databases. Hum Mutat. 2011; 32:557–63.FokkemaIFTaschnerPESchaafsmaGCCelliJLarosJFden DunnenJTLOVD v.2.0: the next generation in gene variant databasesHum Mutat.20113255763Search in Google Scholar
Fokkema IFAC, Kroon M, López Hernández JA, Asscheman D, Lugtenburg I, Hoogenboom J, den Dunnen JT. The LOVD3 platform: efficient genome-wide sharing of genetic variants. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021; 29:1796–803.FokkemaIFACKroonMLópez HernándezJAAsschemanDLugtenburgIHoogenboomJden DunnenJTThe LOVD3 platform: efficient genome-wide sharing of genetic variantsEur J Hum Genet.2021291796803Search in Google Scholar
Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29:308–11.SherrySTWardMHKholodovMBakerJPhanLSmigielskiEMSirotkinKdbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variationNucleic Acids Res.20012930811Search in Google Scholar
Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Sayers EW. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(D1):D41–D7.BensonDACavanaughMClarkKKarsch-MizrachiIOstellJPruittKDSayersEWGenBankNucleic Acids Res.201846D1D41D7Search in Google Scholar
Sayers EW, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Pruitt KD, Schoch CL, Sherry ST, et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(D1):D92–D6.SayersEWCavanaughMClarkKPruittKDSchochCLSherrySTGenBankNucleic Acids Res.202149D1D92D6Search in Google Scholar
Rehm HL, Berg JS, Brooks LD, Bustamante CD, Evans JP, Landrum MJ, et al. ClinGen – the clinical genome resource. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:2235–42.RehmHLBergJSBrooksLDBustamanteCDEvansJPLandrumMJClinGen – the clinical genome resourceN Engl J Med.2015372223542Search in Google Scholar
Yang H, Robinson PN, Wang K. Phenolyzer: phenotype-based prioritization of candidate genes for human diseases. Nat Methods. 2015; 12:841–3.YangHRobinsonPNWangKPhenolyzer: phenotype-based prioritization of candidate genes for human diseasesNat Methods.2015128413Search in Google Scholar
Desvignes JP, Bartoli M, Delague V, Krahn M, Miltgen M, Béroud C, Salgado D. VarAFT: a variant annotation and filtration system for human next generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(W1):W545–W53.DesvignesJPBartoliMDelagueVKrahnMMiltgenMBéroudCSalgadoDVarAFT: a variant annotation and filtration system for human next generation sequencing dataNucleic Acids Res.201846W1W545W53Search in Google Scholar
Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al. Variation across 141,456 human exomes and genomes reveals the spectrum of loss-of-function intolerance across human protein-coding genes. bioRxiv. 2019:531210. doi: 10.1101/531210KarczewskiKJFrancioliLCTiaoGCummingsBBAlföldiJWangQVariation across 141,456 human exomes and genomes reveals the spectrum of loss-of-function intolerance across human protein-coding genesbioRxiv201953121010.1101/531210Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yates AD, Achuthan P, Akanni W, Allen J, Allen J, Alvarez-Jarreta J, et al. Ensembl 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(D1):D682–D8.YatesADAchuthanPAkanniWAllenJAllenJAlvarez-JarretaJEnsembl 2020Nucleic Acids Res.202048D1D682D8Search in Google Scholar
Birney E, Andrews TD, Bevan P, Caccamo M, Chen Y, Clarke L, et al. An overview of Ensembl. Genome Res. 2004; 14:925–8.BirneyEAndrewsTDBevanPCaccamoMChenYClarkeLAn overview of EnsemblGenome Res.2004149258Search in Google Scholar
Zhou J, Troyanskaya OG. Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model. Nat Methods. 2015; 12:931–4.ZhouJTroyanskayaOGPredicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence modelNat Methods.2015129314Search in Google Scholar
Oscanoa J, Sivapalan L, Gadaleta E, Dayem Ullah AZ, Lemoine NR, Chelala C. SNPnexus: a web server for functional annotation of human genome sequence variation (2020 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48:W185–W92.OscanoaJSivapalanLGadaletaEDayem UllahAZLemoineNRChelalaCSNPnexus: a web server for functional annotation of human genome sequence variation (2020 update)Nucleic Acids Res.202048W185W92Search in Google Scholar
Haeussler M, Zweig AS, Tyner C, Speir ML, Rosenbloom KR, Raney BJ, et al. The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(D1):D853–D8.HaeusslerMZweigASTynerCSpeirMLRosenbloomKRRaneyBJThe UCSC Genome Browser database: 2019 updateNucleic Acids Res.201947D1D853D8Search in Google Scholar
GTEx Consortium. Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science. 2015; 348:648–60.GTEx ConsortiumHuman genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humansScience.201534864860Search in Google Scholar
O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, McVeigh R, et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44(D1):D733–45.O’LearyNAWrightMWBristerJRCiufoSHaddadDMcVeighRReference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotationNucleic Acids Res.201644D1D73345Search in Google Scholar
Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016; 536:285–91.LekMKarczewskiKJMinikelEVSamochaKEBanksEFennellTAnalysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humansNature.201653628591Search in Google Scholar
Karolchik D, Hinrichs AS, Kent WJ. The UCSC genome browser. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2009; Chapter 1:Unit1. 4. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0104s28KarolchikDHinrichsASKentWJThe UCSC genome browserCurr Protoc Bioinformatics.2009Chapter 1:Unit1. 4.10.1002/0471250953.bi0104s28Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tate JG, Bamford S, Jubb HC, Sondka Z, Beare DM, Bindal N, et al. COSMIC: the Catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(D1):D941–D7.TateJGBamfordSJubbHCSondkaZBeareDMBindalNCOSMIC: the Catalogue of somatic mutations in cancerNucleic Acids Res.201947D1D941D7Search in Google Scholar
Jubb HC, Saini HK, Verdonk ML, Forbes SA. COSMIC-3D provides structural perspectives on cancer genetics for drug discovery. Nat Genet. 2018; 50:1200–2.JubbHCSainiHKVerdonkMLForbesSACOSMIC-3D provides structural perspectives on cancer genetics for drug discoveryNat Genet.20185012002Search in Google Scholar
Forbes SA, Bhamra G, Bamford S, Dawson E, Kok C, Clements J, et al. The catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer (COSMIC). Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2008;Chapter 10:Unit 10. 11. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg1011s57ForbesSABhamraGBamfordSDawsonEKokCClementsJThe catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer (COSMIC)Curr Protoc Hum Genet.2008Chapter 10:Unit 10. 11.10.1002/0471142905.hg1011s57Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stephanou C, Kountouris P, Tamana S, Minaidou A, Lederer CW, Kleanthous M. ITHANET: an information and database community portal for hemoglobinopathies. Hemoglobin. 2019; 43:363.StephanouCKountourisPTamanaSMinaidouALedererCWKleanthousMITHANET: an information and database community portal for hemoglobinopathiesHemoglobin.201943363Search in Google Scholar
Kountouris P, Lederer CW, Fanis P, Feleki X, Old J, Kleanthous M. IthaGenes: an interactive database for haemoglobin variations and epidemiology. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e103020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103020KountourisPLedererCWFanisPFelekiXOldJKleanthousMIthaGenes: an interactive database for haemoglobin variations and epidemiologyPLoS One.20149e10302010.1371/journal.pone.0103020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Braschi B, Denny P, Gray K, Jones T, Seal R, Tweedie S, et al. Genenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(D1):D786–D92.BraschiBDennyPGrayKJonesTSealRTweedieSGenenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2019Nucleic Acids Res.201947D1D786D92Search in Google Scholar
Seal RL, Gordon SM, Lush MJ, Wright MW, Bruford EA. genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39(Database issue):D514–9.SealRLGordonSMLushMJWrightMWBrufordEAgenenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2011Nucleic Acids Res.201139Database issueD5149Search in Google Scholar
Tweedie S, Braschi B, Gray K, Jones TEM, Seal RL, Yates B, Bruford EA. Genenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(D1):D939–D46.TweedieSBraschiBGrayKJonesTEMSealRLYatesBBrufordEAGenenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2021Nucleic Acids Res.202149D1D939D46Search in Google Scholar
Zhang J, Bajari R, Andric D, Gerthoffert F, Lepsa A, Nahal-Bose H, et al. The international cancer genome consortium data portal. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 37:367–9.ZhangJBajariRAndricDGerthoffertFLepsaANahal-BoseHThe international cancer genome consortium data portalNat Biotechnol.2019373679Search in Google Scholar
Turnbull C, Scott RH, Thomas E, Jones L, Murugaesu N, Pretty FB, et al. The 100 000 genomes project: bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHS. BMJ. 2018; 361:k1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1687TurnbullCScottRHThomasEJonesLMurugaesuNPrettyFBThe 100 000 genomes project: bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHSBMJ.2018361k168710.1136/bmj.k1687Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Frankish A, Diekhans M, Ferreira AM, Johnson R, Jungreis I, Loveland J, et al. GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D766–D73.FrankishADiekhansMFerreiraAMJohnsonRJungreisILovelandJGENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomesNucleic Acids Res.201947D1D766D73Search in Google Scholar
Frankish A, Diekhans M, Jungreis I, Lagarde J, Loveland JE, Mudge JM, et al. GENCODE 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(D1): D916–D23.FrankishADiekhansMJungreisILagardeJLovelandJEMudgeJMGENCODE 2021Nucleic Acids Res.202149D1D916D23Search in Google Scholar
Harrow J, Frankish A, Gonzalez JM, Tapanari E, Diekhans M, Kokocinski F, et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project. Genome Res. 2012; 22:1760–74.HarrowJFrankishAGonzalezJMTapanariEDiekhansMKokocinskiFGENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE ProjectGenome Res.201222176074Search in Google Scholar
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015; 17:405–24.RichardsSAzizNBaleSBickDDasSGastier-FosterJStandards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular PathologyGenet Med.20151740524Search in Google Scholar
Shotelersuk V, Wichadakul D, Ngamphiw C, Srichomthong C, Phokaew C, Wilantho A, et al. The Thai reference exome (T-REx) variant database. Clin Genet. 2021; 100:703–12.ShotelersukVWichadakulDNgamphiwCSrichomthongCPhokaewCWilanthoAThe Thai reference exome (T-REx) variant databaseClin Genet.202110070312Search in Google Scholar
Fattahi Z, Beheshtian M, Mohseni M, Poustchi H, Sellars E, Nezhadi SH, et al. Iranome: a catalog of genomic variations in the Iranian population. Hum Mutat. 2019; 40:1968–84.FattahiZBeheshtianMMohseniMPoustchiHSellarsENezhadiSHIranome: a catalog of genomic variations in the Iranian populationHum Mutat.201940196884Search in Google Scholar
Lee JM, Thong MK. Genetic counseling services and development of training programs in Malaysia. J Genet Couns. 2013; 22:911–6.LeeJMThongMKGenetic counseling services and development of training programs in MalaysiaJ Genet Couns.2013229116Search in Google Scholar
Halim-Fikri H, Etemad A, Abdul Latif AZ, Merican AF, Baig AA, Annuar AA, et al. The first Malay database toward the ethnic-specific target molecular variation. BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8:176.Halim-FikriHEtemadAAbdul LatifAZMericanAFBaigAAAnnuarAAThe first Malay database toward the ethnic-specific target molecular variationBMC Res Notes.20158176Search in Google Scholar
Plazzer JP, Macrae F. DNA variant databases: current state and future directions. Methods Mol Biol. 2014; 1168:263–73.PlazzerJPMacraeFDNA variant databases: current state and future directionsMethods Mol Biol.2014116826373Search in Google Scholar
Teo YY, Sim X, Ong RT, Tan AK, Chen J, Tantoso E, et al. Singapore genome variation project: a haplotype map of three Southeast Asian populations. Genome Res. 2009; 19:2154–62.TeoYYSimXOngRTTanAKChenJTantosoESingapore genome variation project: a haplotype map of three Southeast Asian populationsGenome Res.200919215462Search in Google Scholar
Wong E, Bertin N, Hebrard M, Tirado-Magallanes R, Bellis C, Lim WK, et al. The Singapore national precision medicine strategy. Nat Genet. 2023; 55:178–86.WongEBertinNHebrardMTirado-MagallanesRBellisCLimWKThe Singapore national precision medicine strategyNat Genet.20235517886Search in Google Scholar
Indonesia MoHotRo. Pedoman Nasional Pelayanan Kedokteran Tata laksana Thalasemia. Indonesia: MHRI; 2018.Indonesia MoHotRoPedoman Nasional Pelayanan Kedokteran Tata laksana ThalasemiaIndonesiaMHRI2018Search in Google Scholar
Rujito L, Basalamah M, Mulatsih S, Sofro AS. Molecular scanning of beta-thalassemia in the southern region of Central Java, Indonesia; a step towards a local prevention program. Hemoglobin. 2015; 39:330–3.RujitoLBasalamahMMulatsihSSofroASMolecular scanning of beta-thalassemia in the southern region of Central Java, Indonesia; a step towards a local prevention programHemoglobin.2015393303Search in Google Scholar
Rujito L. Talasemia: genetik dasar dan pengelolaan terkini. Indonesia Universitas Jenderal Soedirman; 2019.RujitoLTalasemia: genetik dasar dan pengelolaan terkiniIndonesia Universitas Jenderal Soedirman2019Search in Google Scholar
Joseph L, Cankovic M, Caughron S, Chandra P, Emmadi R, Hagenkord J, et al. The spectrum of clinical utilities in molecular pathology testing procedures for inherited conditions and cancer: a report of the association for molecular pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2016; 18:605–19.JosephLCankovicMCaughronSChandraPEmmadiRHagenkordJThe spectrum of clinical utilities in molecular pathology testing procedures for inherited conditions and cancer: a report of the association for molecular pathologyJ Mol Diagn.20161860519Search in Google Scholar
Schrijver I, Farkas DH, Gibson JS, Lyon E, Committee AMPE. The evolving role of the laboratory professional in the age of genome sequencing: a vision of the association for molecular pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2015; 17:335–8.SchrijverIFarkasDHGibsonJSLyonECommitteeAMPEThe evolving role of the laboratory professional in the age of genome sequencing: a vision of the association for molecular pathologyJ Mol Diagn.2015173358Search in Google Scholar
Harrison SM, Biesecker LG, Rehm HL. Overview of specifications to the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2019; 103:e93. doi: 10.1002/cphg.93HarrisonSMBieseckerLGRehmHLOverview of specifications to the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelinesCurr Protoc Hum Genet.2019103e9310.1002/cphg.93Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:793–5.CollinsFSVarmusHA new initiative on precision medicineN Engl J Med.20153727935Search in Google Scholar
Lin JZ, Long JY, Wang AQ, Zheng Y, Zhao HT. Precision medicine: in need of guidance and surveillance. World J Gastroenterol. 2017; 23:5045–50.LinJZLongJYWangAQZhengYZhaoHTPrecision medicine: in need of guidance and surveillanceWorld J Gastroenterol.201723504550Search in Google Scholar
Gavan SP, Thompson AJ, Payne K. The economic case for precision medicine. Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev. 2018; 3:1–9.GavanSPThompsonAJPayneKThe economic case for precision medicineExpert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev.2018319Search in Google Scholar
Alzu’bi AA, Zhou L, Watzlaf VJM. Genetic variations and precision medicine. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2019; 16(Spring):1a.Alzu’biAAZhouLWatzlafVJMGenetic variations and precision medicinePerspect Health Inf Manag.201916Spring1aSearch in Google Scholar
Wynn RM, Adams KT, Kowalski RL, Shivega WG, Ratwani RM, Miller KE. The patient in precision medicine: a systematic review examining evaluations of patient-facing materials. J Healthc Eng. 2018; 2018:9541621. doi: 10.1155/2018/9541621WynnRMAdamsKTKowalskiRLShivegaWGRatwaniRMMillerKEThe patient in precision medicine: a systematic review examining evaluations of patient-facing materialsJ Healthc Eng.20182018954162110.1155/2018/9541621Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boyapati RK, Kalla R, Satsangi J, Ho GT. Biomarkers in search of precision medicine in IBD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111:1682–90.BoyapatiRKKallaRSatsangiJHoGTBiomarkers in search of precision medicine in IBDAm J Gastroenterol.2016111168290Search in Google Scholar
Hoffman JM, Dunnenberger HM, Kevin Hicks J, Caudle KE, Whirl Carrillo M, Freimuth RR, et al. Developing knowledge resources to support precision medicine: principles from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 23:796–801.HoffmanJMDunnenbergerHMKevin HicksJCaudleKEWhirl CarrilloMFreimuthRRDeveloping knowledge resources to support precision medicine: principles from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC)J Am Med Inform Assoc.201623796801Search in Google Scholar
Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, Schiettecatte F, Scott AF, Hamosh A. OMIM.org: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM ®), an online catalog of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(Database issue):D789–98.AmbergerJSBocchiniCASchiettecatteFScottAFHamoshAOMIM.org: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM ®), an online catalog of human genes and genetic disordersNucleic Acids Res.201543Database issueD78998Search in Google Scholar
Najafzadeh M, Davis JC, Joshi P, Marra C. Barriers for integrating personalized medicine into clinical practice: a qualitative analysis. Am J Med Genet A. 2013; 161A:758–63.NajafzadehMDavisJCJoshiPMarraCBarriers for integrating personalized medicine into clinical practice: a qualitative analysisAm J Med Genet A.2013161A75863Search in Google Scholar
Gubatan J, Levitte S, Patel A, Balabanis T, Wei MT, Sinha SR. Artificial intelligence applications in inflammatory bowel disease: emerging technologies and future directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2021; 27:1920–35.GubatanJLevitteSPatelABalabanisTWeiMTSinhaSRArtificial intelligence applications in inflammatory bowel disease: emerging technologies and future directionsWorld J Gastroenterol.202127192035Search in Google Scholar
Jiang X, Coffee M, Bari A, Wang J, Jiang X, Huang J, et al. Towards an artificial intelligence framework for data-driven prediction of coronavirus clinical severity. Comput Mater Contin. 2020; 63:537–51.JiangXCoffeeMBariAWangJJiangXHuangJTowards an artificial intelligence framework for data-driven prediction of coronavirus clinical severityComput Mater Contin.20206353751Search in Google Scholar
Rivera-Muñoz EA, Milko LV, Harrison SM, Azzariti DR, Kurtz CL, Lee K, et al. Clingen variant curation expert panel experiences and standardized processes for disease and gene-level specification of the ACMG/AMP guidelines for sequence variant interpretation. Hum Mutat. 2018; 39:1614–22.Rivera-MuñozEAMilkoLVHarrisonSMAzzaritiDRKurtzCLLeeKClingen variant curation expert panel experiences and standardized processes for disease and gene-level specification of the ACMG/AMP guidelines for sequence variant interpretationHum Mutat.201839161422Search in Google Scholar
Easteal S, Arkell RM, Balboa RF, Bellingham SA, Brown AD, Calma T, et al. Equitable expanded carrier screening needs indigenous clinical and population genomic data. Am J Hum Genet. 2020; 107:175–82.EastealSArkellRMBalboaRFBellinghamSABrownADCalmaTEquitable expanded carrier screening needs indigenous clinical and population genomic dataAm J Hum Genet.202010717582Search in Google Scholar
Kessler MD, Yerges-Armstrong L, Taub MA, Shetty AC, Maloney K, Jeng LJB, et al. Challenges and disparities in the application of personalized genomic medicine to populations with African ancestry. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:12521. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12521KesslerMDYerges-ArmstrongLTaubMAShettyACMaloneyKJengLJBChallenges and disparities in the application of personalized genomic medicine to populations with African ancestryNat Commun.201671252110.1038/ncomms12521Open DOISearch in Google Scholar