[1. Friedland GW, Chang P. The role of imaging in the management of the impalpable undescended testis. Am J Roentgenol. 1988; 151:1107-11.10.2214/ajr.151.6.1107]Search in Google Scholar
[2. John Radcliffe Hospital Cryptorchidism Study Group. Cryptorchidism: a prospective study of 7500 consecutive male births, 1984-8. Arch Dis Child. 1992; 67:892-9.10.1136/adc.67.7.892]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Scorer CG. The descent of the testis. Arch Dis Child. 1964; 39:605-9.10.1136/adc.39.208.605]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Christensen JD, Dogra VS. The undescended testis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007; 28:307-16.10.1053/j.sult.2007.05.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Frush DP, Sheldon CA. Diagnostic imaging for pediatric scrotal disorders. Radiographics. 1998; 18:969-85.10.1148/radiographics.18.4.9672981]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Guvenc BH, Sozubir S, Ekingen G, Senel U. Advantages of video-assisted approach in detecting epididymal anomalies and treatment of nonpalpable testis. Urol Int. 2005; 74:127-34.10.1159/000083283]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. Gearhart JP, Jeffs RD. Diagnostic maneuvers in cryptorchidism. Semin Urol. 1988; 6:79-83.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Elder JS. Ultrasonography is unnecessary in evaluating boys with a nonpalpable testis. Pediatrics. 2002; 10:748-51.10.1542/peds.110.4.748]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Nijs SM, Eijsbouts SW, Madern GC, Leyman PM, Lequin MH, Hazebroek FW. Nonpalpable testes: is there a relationship between ultrasonographic and operative findings? Pediatr Radiol. 2007; 37:374-9.10.1007/s00247-007-0425-1]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Wolverson MK, Houttuin E, Heiberg E, Sundaram M, Shields JB. Comparison of computed tomography with high-resolution real-time ultrasound in the localization of the impalpable undescended testis. Radiology. 1983; 146:133-6.10.1148/radiology.146.1.6129677]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Graif M, Czerniak A, Avigad I, Strauss S, Wolfstein I, Itzchak Y. High-resolution sonography of the undescended testis in childhood: an analysis of 45 cases. Isr J Med Sci. 1990; 26:382-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Cain MP, Garra B, Gibbons MD. Scrotal-inguinal ultrasonography: a technique for identifying the nonpalpable inguinal testis without laparoscopy. J Urol. 1996; 156(2 Pt 2):791-4.10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65817-8]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Kanemoto K, Hayashi Y, Kojima Y, Maruyama T, Ito M, Kohri K. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of non-palpable testis. Int J Urol. 2005; 12:668-72.10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01102.x16045560]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[14. Maghnie M, Vanzulli A, Paesano P, Bragheri R, Palladini G, Preti P, et al. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography compared with surgical findings in the localization of the undescended testis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994; 148:699-703.10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170070037006]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Weiss RM, Carter AR, Rosenfield AT. High resolution real-time ultrasonography in the localization of the undescended testis. J Urol. 1986; 135:936-8.10.1016/S0022-5347(17)45928-3]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Kullendorff CM, Hederstrom E, Forsberg L. Preoperative ultrasonography of the undescended testis. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1985; 19:13-5.10.3109/00365598509180215]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Malone PS, Guiney EJ. A comparison between ultrasonography and laparoscopy in localising the impalpable undescended testis. Br J Urol. 1985; 57: 185-6.10.1111/j.1464-410X.1985.tb06418.x]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Pekkafali MZ, Sahin C, Ilbey YO, Albayrak S, Yildirim S, Basekim CC. Comparison of ultrasonographic and laparoscopic findings in adult nonpalpable testes cases. Eur Urol. 2003; 44:124-7.10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00145-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Hrebinko RL, Bellinger MF. The limited role of imaging techniques in managing children with undescended testes. J Urol. 1993; 150(2 Pt 1):458-60.10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35510-6]Search in Google Scholar