Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Realized Gains from Block-Plot Coastal Douglas-Fir Trials in the Northern Oregon Cascades


Zitieren

ADAMS, J. P., S. B. LAND JR., K. L. BELLI and T. G. MATNEY (2008): Comparison of 17-year realized plot volume gains with selection for early trait for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). For. Ecol. Manag. 255: 1781-1788.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.041Search in Google Scholar

ADAMS, W. T., G. JOHNSON, D. L. COPES, R. G. QUAM, J. C. HEAMAN and J. WEBER (1990): Is research keeping up with the needs of the Douglas-fir tree improvement programs? West. J. Appl. For. 5: 135-137.Search in Google Scholar

BANCROFT, T. A. (1968): Topics in Intermediate Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. Search in Google Scholar

BARBATO, G. F. (1991): Genetic architecture of growthcurve parameters in chickens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 24-32.Search in Google Scholar

BOZIVICH, H., T. A. BANCROFT and H. O. HARTLEY (1956): Power of analysis of variance test procedures for certain incompletely specified models, I. Ann. Math. Statist. 27: 1017-1043.10.1214/aoms/1177728071Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

CAMPBELL, R. K., R. M. ECHOLS and R. W. STONECYPHER (1986): Genetic variances and interaction in 9-year-old Douglas-fir grown at narrow spacings. Silvae Genet. 35: 24-32.Search in Google Scholar

CANNELL, M. G. (1978): Improving per hectare forest productivity. P. In: Proceedings of 5th North American Forest Biology Workshop, University of Florida, Gainsville, Florida.Search in Google Scholar

CANNELL, M. G. R. (1982): “Crop” and “Isolation” ideotypes: evidence for progeny differences in nurserygrown Picea sitchensis. Silvae Genet. 31: 60-66.Search in Google Scholar

CARSON, S. D., O. GARCIA and J. D. HAYES (1999): Realized gain and prediction of yield with genetically improved Pinus radiata in New Zealand. For. Sci. 45: 186-200.Search in Google Scholar

CHEW, V. (1958): Experimental Designs in Industry. John Wiley & Sons, New York.10.1097/00010694-195809000-00015Search in Google Scholar

CLUTTER, J. L., J. C. FORTSON, L. V. PIENAAR, G. H. BRISER and R. L. BAILEY (1983): Timber Management: A Quantitative Approach. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Search in Google Scholar

DONALD, C. M. (1968): The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17: 385-403.10.1007/BF00056241Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

DONALD, C. M. and J. HAMBLIN (1976): The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Adv. Agron. 28: 361-405.10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60559-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

FOSTER, G. S. (1989): Inter-genotypic competition in forest trees and its impact on realized gain from family selection. P. 21-35. In: Proc. 20th So. For. Tree Improv. Conf., Charleston, SC.Search in Google Scholar

FOSTER, G. S. (1992): Estimating yield: beyond breeding values. In: Handbook of quantitative forest genetics. (Ed. L. FINNS and S. T. B. FRIEDMAN, J. V.) pp. 229-269. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-015-7987-2_7Search in Google Scholar

FRANKLIN, E. C. (1979): Model relating levels of genetic variance to stand development for four North American conifers. Silvae Genet. 28: 207-212.Search in Google Scholar

GILMOUR, A. R., B. J. GOGEL, B. R. CULLIS and R. THOMPSON (2006): ASReml User Guide Release 2.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK.Search in Google Scholar

GWAZE, D. P., F. E. BRIDGWATER and C. G. WILLIAMS (2002): Genetic analysis of growth curves for a woody perennial species, Pinus taeda L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 526-531.Search in Google Scholar

HAMILTON JR., D. A. and G. E. REHFELDT (1994): Using individual tree growth projection models to estimate stand-level gains attributable to genetically improved stock. For. Ecol. Manag. 68: 189-207.Search in Google Scholar

HART, J. D. (1986): Intergenotypic competition among several families of loblolly pine. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Forestry, Mississippi State University, 60 pp.Search in Google Scholar

HARTER, H. L. (1961): On the analysis of split-plot experiments. Biometrics 17: 144-14910.2307/2527501Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

HOWE, G. T., K. JAYAWICKRAMA, M. CHERRY, G. R. JOHNSON and N. C. WHEELER (2006): Breeding Douglas-fir, Volume 27. In: Plant Breed. Rev. (Ed. J. Janick.) pp. 245-353. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.10.1002/9780470650349.ch6Search in Google Scholar

JAYAWICKRAMA, K. J. S., A. J. SMITH and M. S. CRAWFORD (2009): Establishment of coastal Douglas-fir orchards. Tree Planters Notes 53: (in press).Search in Google Scholar

LAMBETH, C. (2000): Realized genetic gains for first generation improved loblolly pine in 45 tests in coastal North Carolina. South. J. Appl. For. 24: 140-144.Search in Google Scholar

LAMBETH, C. C., J. P. VAN BUIJTENEN, S. D. DUKE and R. B. MCCULLOUGH (1983): Early selection is effective in 20- year-old genetic tests of loblolly pine. Silvae Genet. 32: 210-215.Search in Google Scholar

LOPEZ-UPTON, J., T. L. WHITE and D. A. HUBER (2000): Species differences in early growth and rust incidence of loblolly and slash pine. For. Ecol. Manag. 132: 211-222.Search in Google Scholar

MAGNUSSEN, S. (1987): Early testing of jack pine. I. Phenotypic response to spacing. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 354-459.Search in Google Scholar

MAGNUSSEN, S. and A. KREMER (1993): Selection for the optimum tree growth curve. Silvae Genet. 42: 322-335.Search in Google Scholar

NAMKOONG, G., R. A. USANIS and R. R. SILEN (1972): Agerelated variation in genetic control of height growth in Douglas-fir. Theor. Appl. Genet. 42: 151-159.10.1007/BF0028079124430894Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

NANCE, W. L., S. B. LAND JR. and R. F. DANIELS (1983): Concepts for analysis of intergenotypic competition in forest trees. P. 131-145. In: Proceedings of the 17th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, Athens, GA.Search in Google Scholar

SAKAI, K.-I. (1961): Competitive ability in plants: its inheritance and some related problems. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 15: 245-263.Search in Google Scholar

SILEN, R. R. and J. G. WHEAT (1979): Progressive tree improvement program in coastal Douglas-fir. J. For. 77: 78-83.Search in Google Scholar

ST. CLAIR, J. B. and W. T. ADAMS (1991): Relative family performance and variance structure of open-pollinated Douglas-fir seedlings grown in three competitive environments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81: 541-550.Search in Google Scholar

ST. CLAIR, J. B., N. L. MANDEL and K. J. S. JAYAWICKRAMA (2004): Early realized genetic gains for coastal Douglasfir in the Northern Oregon Cascades. West. J. Appl. For. 19: 195-201.Search in Google Scholar

STOEHR, M. and K. BIRD (2003): Coastal Douglas-fir. P.7.In: Forest Genetics Council of B.C. Tree Improvement Program Project Report 2002/2003, B.C. Ministry Forests, Victoria.Search in Google Scholar

VERGARA, R., T. L. WHITE, D. A. HUBER, B. D. SHIVER and D. L. ROCKWOOD (2004): Estimated realized gains for first-generation slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. elliottii) tree improvement in the southeastern United States. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 2587-2600.Search in Google Scholar

WHITE, T. W., W. T. ADAMS and D. B. NEALE (2007): Forest Genetics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.10.1079/9781845932855.0000Search in Google Scholar

WILLIAMS, C. G., F. E. BRIDGWATER and C. C. LAMBETH (1983): Performance of single family versus mixed family plantation blocks of loblolly pine. P. 194-202. In: Proceedings of 17th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.Search in Google Scholar

WOODS, J. H., T. WANG and S. N. AITKEN (2001): Effects of inbreeding on coastal Douglas-fir: nursery performance. Silvae Genet. 51: 163-170.Search in Google Scholar

YE, T. Z. and K. J. S. JAYAWICKRAMA (2008): Efficiency of using spatial analysis in first-generation costal Douglas- fir progeny tests in the US Pacific Northwest. Tree Genet. Genomes. 4: 677-692.10.1007/s11295-008-0142-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ZOBEL, B. and J. TALBERT (1984): Applied Forest Tree Improvement. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2509-8934
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
Volume Open
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Biologie, Molekularbiologie, Genetik, Biotechnologie, Botanik