Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Understanding Contextual and Social Meaning in Typically Developing Finnish-Speaking Four- To Eight-Year-Old Children


Zitieren

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596Search in Google Scholar

Angeleri, R., & Airenti, G. (2014). The development of joke and irony understanding: A study with 3-to 6-year-old children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 68(2), 133. Doi:10.1037/cep000001110.1037/cep0000011Search in Google Scholar

Angeleri, R., Gabbatore, I., Bosco, F. M., Sacco, K., & Colle, L. (2016). Pragmatic abilities in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A study with the ABaCo battery. Minerva Psichiatrica, 57(3), 93-103. Search in Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (2nd ed.), (pp. 3-20). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Bezuidenhout, A., & Sroda, M. S. (1998). Children’s use of contextual cues to resolve referential ambiguity: An application of relevance theory. Pragmatics and Cognition, 6, 265-299. Doi:10.1075/pc.6.1-2.14bez 10.1075/pc.6.1-2.14bezSearch in Google Scholar

Bosco, F. M., Angeleri, R., Colle, L., Sacco, K., & Bara, B. G. (2013). Communicative abilities in children: An assessment through different phenomena and expressive means. Journal of Child Language, 40, 741-778. Doi:10.1017/S0305000913000081 10.1017/S0305000913000081Search in Google Scholar

Bosco, F. M., & Gabbatore, I. (2017a). Theory of mind in recognizing and recovering communicative failures. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 57-88. Doi:10.1017/S0142716416000047 10.1017/S0142716416000047Search in Google Scholar

Bosco, F. M., & Gabbatore, I. (2017b). Sincere, Deceitful, and Ironic Communicative Acts and the Role of the Theory of Mind in Childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 21. Doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00021 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00021Search in Google Scholar

Bosco, F. M., Gabbatore, I., & Tirassa, M. (2014). A broad assessment of theory of mind in adolescence: the complexity of mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition, 24, 84-97. Doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.003 10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Bucciarelli, M., Colle, L., & Bara, B. G. (2003). How children comprehend speech acts and communicative gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 207-241. Doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00099-1 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00099-1Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1992). Quantative methods in psychology. A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159. Doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155Search in Google Scholar

Conti-Ramsden, G., & Botting, N. (2004). Social difficulties and victimization in children with SLI at 11 years of age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 145-161. Doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/013) 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/013)Search in Google Scholar

Cummings, L. (2009). Clinical pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cummings, L. (2014). Pragmatic Disorders. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 3. London: Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-7954-9Search in Google Scholar

Diamond, A. (2002). Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: Cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. In D. Stuss & R. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function, (pp. 466-503). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Donaldson, M. L. (1986). Children’s explanations: A psycholinguistic study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519796Search in Google Scholar

Dunn, K. (1987). Understanding feelings: the early stages. In J. Bruner & H. Haste (Eds.), Making Sense: The Child’s Construction of the World, (pp. 17-26). London: Methuen. Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1986). Context and continuity: Classroom discourse and the development of shared knowledge. In Durkin, K. (Ed.), Language Development in School Years, (pp. 172-203). London: Croom Helm. Search in Google Scholar

Filippova, E. & Astington, J. (2010). Children’s understanding of social-cognitive and social-communicative aspects of discourse irony. Child Development, 81, 913-928. Doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01442.x 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01442.xSearch in Google Scholar

German, D. J. (2000). Test of Word Finding (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson [Translation and standardization of the Finnish version: Niilo Mäki Instituutti, 2007]. Search in Google Scholar

Gertner, B. L., Rice, M. L., & Hadley, P. A. (1994). Influence of communicative competence on peer preferences in a preschool classroom. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37, 913-923. 10.1044/jshr.3704.913Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. I. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139168779Search in Google Scholar

Glenwright, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2010). Development of children's ability to distinguish sarcasm and verbal irony. Journal of Child Language, 37, 429-451. Doi:10.1017/S0305000909009520 10.1017/S0305000909009520Search in Google Scholar

Happé F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism. A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101-109. 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-RSearch in Google Scholar

Harris, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). Children’s perceptions of the social functions of verbal irony. Discourse Processes, 36, 147-165. Doi:10.1207/ S15326950DP3603_1 10.1207/S15326950DP3603_1Search in Google Scholar

Heiphetz, L., Spelke, E. S., Harris, P. L. & Banaji, M. R. (2013). The development of reasoning about beliefs: Fact, preference, and ideology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 559-565. Doi:10.1016/j. jesp.2012.09.005 Search in Google Scholar

Hoehl, S. & Striano, T. (2010). Infant’s neural processing of positive emotions and eye gaze. Social Neuroscience, 5, 30-39. Doi:10.1080/17470910903073232 10.1080/17470910903073232Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, J. A., & Slackman, E. A. (1990). Children’s use of scripts in inferential text processing. Discourse Processes, 13, 375-386. Doi:10.1080/01638539009544766 10.1080/01638539009544766Search in Google Scholar

Hyter, Y. (2017). Pragmatic Assessment and Intervention in Children. In L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in Clinical Pragmatics (pp. 493-526). Series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, Vol. 11, Cham, Switzerland: Springer-Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Jones, L. B., Rothbart, M. K., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Development of executive attention in preschool children. Developmental Science, 6, 498-504. Doi:10.1111/1467-7687.0030710.1111/1467-7687.00307Search in Google Scholar

Leinonen, E., Letts, C., & Smith, B. R. (2000). Children’s Pragmatic Communication Difficulties. London: Whurr Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Leinonen, E., Ryder, N., Ellis, M., & Hammond, C. (2003). The use of context in pragmatic comprehension by specifically language-impaired and control children. Linguistics, 41-2, 407-423. Doi:10.1515/ling.2003.014 10.1515/ling.2003.014Search in Google Scholar

Letts, C., & Leinonen, E. (2001). Comprehension of inferential meaning in language-impaired and language normal children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorder, 36, 307-328. Doi:10.1080/13682820110045829 10.1080/13682820110045829Search in Google Scholar

Lohmann, H., Tomasello, M., & Meyer, S. (2005). Linguistic communication and social understanding. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird. Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 245-265). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Loukusa, S. (2017). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in Clinical Pragmatics, (pp. 85-107), Series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, Vol. 11, Cham: Springer-Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Loukusa, S., & Leinonen, E. (2008). Development of comprehension of ironic utterances in 3- to 9-year-old Finnish-speaking children. Psychology of Language and Communication, 12, 55-69. Doi:10.2478/v10057-008-0003-0 10.2478/v10057-008-0003-0Search in Google Scholar

Loukusa, S., Leinonen, E., & Ryder, N. (2007). Development of pragmatic language comprehension in Finnish-speaking children. First Language, 27, 281-298. Doi:10.1177/0142723707076568 10.1177/0142723707076568Search in Google Scholar

Loukusa, S., & Moilanen, I. (2009). Pragmatic inference abilities in individuals with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. A review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 890-904. Doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2009.05.002 10.1016/j.rasd.2009.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Loukusa, S., Ryder, N., & Leinonen, E. (2008). Answering questions and explaining answers: A study of Finnish-speaking children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 219-241. Doi:10.1007/s10936-007-9067-6 10.1007/s10936-007-9067-6Search in Google Scholar

Mackie, L., & Law, J. (2010). Pragmatic language and the child with emotional/ behavioural difficulties (EBD): A pilot study exploring the interaction between behaviour and communication disability. International journal of language & communication disorders, 45, 397-410. Doi:10.3109/ 13682820903105137 10.3109/13682820903105137Search in Google Scholar

McGhee, R., Ehrler, D. J., & DiSimoni, F. (2007). Token test for children (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Miller, C. A. (2006). Developmental relationships between language and theory of mind (tutorial). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 142−154. Doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/014) 10.1044/1058-0360(2006/014)Search in Google Scholar

Milosky, L. M. (1992). Children listening: The role of world knowledge in language comprehension. In R. S. Chapman (Ed.), Processes in language acquisition and disorders, (pp. 20-44). St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book.Search in Google Scholar

Morton, J. B. & Trehub, S. E. (2001). Children’s understanding of emotion in speech. Child Development, 72, 834-43. Doi:10.1111/1467-8624.0031810.1111/1467-8624.00318Search in Google Scholar

Mäkinen, L., Loukusa, S., Nieminen, L., Leinonen, E., & Kunnari, S. (2014). The development of narrative productivity, syntactic complexity, referential cohesion, and event content in four- to eight-year-old Finnish children. First Language, 34, 24-42. Doi:10.1177/0142723713511000 10.1177/0142723713511000Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, K., (2005). Language pathways into the community of minds. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind (pp. 26-49). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Nilsen, E. S., Glenwright, M., & Huyder, V. (2011). Children and adults understand that verbal irony interpretation depends on listener knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12, 374-409. Doi:10.1080/152483 72.2010.544693 Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, D. K. (2014). Assessing pragmatic language functioning in young children: Its importance and challenges. In D. Matthews (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 363-386). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, D. K. (2012). Components of pragmatic ability and children’s pragmatic language development. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive pragmatics (pp. 261-287). Berlin: De Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Perkins, M. R. (2011) Clinical pragmatics. In J-O Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Pragmatics in Practice (pp. 66-92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.9.04perSearch in Google Scholar

Perkins, M. (2007). Pragmatic impairment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486555Search in Google Scholar

Premack, D. & Woodroff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a "theory of mind"? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515-526. Doi:10.1017/ S0140525X00076512 Search in Google Scholar

Prutting, C. A. (1982). Pragmatics as social competence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 123-134. Doi:10.1044/jshd.4702.123 10.1044/jshd.4702.123Search in Google Scholar

Ryder, N., & Leinonen, E. (2003). Use of context in question answering by 3-, 4- and 5-year-old children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 397-415. Doi:10.1023/A:1024847529077 10.1023/A:1024847529077Search in Google Scholar

Ryder, N., Leinonen, E., & Schulz, J. A. (2008). Cognitive approach to assessing pragmatic language comprehension in children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43, 427-447. Doi:10.1080/13682820701633207 10.1080/13682820701633207Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, H.-J. (2012). Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable. Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive pragmatics (pp. 3-22). Berlin: De Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds). Syntax and Semantics. Volume 3: Speech Acts, (pp. 59-82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Siegal, M. & Beattie, K. (1991). Where to look first for children’s knowledge of false beliefs. Cognition, 38, 1-12. Doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90020-510.1016/0010-0277(91)90020-5Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, K. D. (2001). Broadening the units of analysis in communication: speech and nonverbal behaviours in pragmatic comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 28, 325-349. Doi:10.1017/S0305000901004664 10.1017/S0305000901004664Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2012). Introduction: pragmatics. In D. Wilson & S. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 1-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Talwar, V., Gordon, H. M., & Lee, K. (2007). Lying in the elementary school years: verbal deception and its relation to second-order belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 43, 804-810. Doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.804 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.804Search in Google Scholar

Vieiro, P., & García-Madruga, J. A. (1997). An analysis of story comprehension through spoken and written summaries in school-age children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 41-53. Doi:10.1023/A:1007932429184 10.1023/A:1007932429184Search in Google Scholar

Väisänen, R., Loukusa, S., Moilanen, I., & Yliherva, A. (2014). Language and pragmatic profile in children with ADHD measured by Children’s Communication Checklist 2nd edition. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 39, 179-187. Doi:10.3109/14015439.2013.784802 10.3109/14015439.2013.784802Search in Google Scholar

Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655-684. Doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00304 10.1111/1467-8624.00304Search in Google Scholar

Wellman, H. M., & Lagattuta, K. H. (2000). Developing understanding of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (2nd ed.), 21-49. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., Hogrefe, G.-J., & Perner, J. (1988). Children’s understanding of informational access as source of knowledge. Child Development, 59, 386-396. Doi:10.2307/1130318 10.2307/1130318Search in Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103-128. Doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, D. (2012). Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In D. Wilson & S. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 230-258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, D. (2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 40-56. Doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.01610.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016Search in Google Scholar

World Health Organisation (2016). International Classification of Diseases, 11th revision (ICD-11). Retrieved June 6, 2016, from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/revision/en/Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2083-8506
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
Volume Open
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Sozialwissenschaften, Psychologie, Angewandte Psychologie