Inconsistent Regression and Nonresponse Bias: Exploring Their Relationship as a Function of Response Imbalance

Brick, J.M. 2013. “Unit Nonresponse and Weighting Adjustments: A Critical Review.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 329–353. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0026.10.2478/jos-2013-0026Search in Google Scholar

Deville, J.C. and Y. Tillé. 2004. “Efficient Balanced Sampling. The Cube Method.” Biometrika 91: 893–912. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/91.4.893.10.1093/biomet/91.4.893Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 169: 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.xSearch in Google Scholar

Haziza, D. and É. Lesage. 2016. “A Discussion of Weighting Procedures for Unit Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 32: 129–145. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0006.10.1515/jos-2016-0006Search in Google Scholar

Heckman, J.J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 153–161. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912352.10.2307/1912352Search in Google Scholar

Legg, J.C. and C.L. Yu. 2010. “A Comparison of Sample Set Restriction Procedures.” Survey Methodology 36: 69–79.Search in Google Scholar

Little, R.J.A. and S. Vartivarian. 2005. “Does Weighting for Nonresponse Increase the Variance of Survey Means?” Survey Methodology 31: 161–168.Search in Google Scholar

Lundquist, P. and C.E. Särndal. 2013. “Aspects of Responsive Design – With Applications to the Swedish Living Conditions Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 557–582. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040.10.2478/jos-2013-0040Search in Google Scholar

Matei, A. and M.G. Ranalli. 2015. “Dealing with Non-Ignorable Nonresponse in Survey Sampling: A Latent Modeling Approach.” Survey Methodology 41: 145–164.Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.E., K. Lumiste, and I. Traat. 2016. “Reducing the Response Imbalance: Is the Accuracy of the Survey Estimates Improved?” Survey Methodology 42: 219–238.Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.E. and P. Lundquist. 2014. “Accuracy in Estimation with Nonresponse: A Function of Degree of Imbalance and Degree of Explanation.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2: 361–387. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smu014.10.1093/jssam/smu014Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., F. Cobben, P. Lundquist, and J. Wagner. 2016. “Does More Balanced Survey Response Imply Less Non-Response Bias?” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 179: 727–748. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12152.10.1111/rssa.12152Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B. 2015. “Statistical Inference Based on Randomly Generated Auxiliary Variables.” Discussion Paper. Statistics Netherlands, The Hague.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013. “Optimizing Quality of Response Through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39: 29–58.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 231–253.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35: 101–113.Search in Google Scholar

Tourangeau, R., J.M. Brick, S. Lohr, and J. Li. 2017. “Adaptive and Responsive Survey Designs: a Review and Assessment.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 180: 203–223. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12186.10.1111/rssa.12186Search in Google Scholar

Vartivarian, S. and R.J.A. Little. 2002. “On the Formation of Weighting Adjustment Cells for Unit Nonresponse.” In proceedings of American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section, 3553–3558.Search in Google Scholar

Vella, F. 1998. “Estimating Models With Sample Selection Bias.” Journal of Human Resources 33: 127–169. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/146317.10.2307/146317Search in Google Scholar