[Brick, J.M. 2013. “Unit Nonresponse and Weighting Adjustments: A Critical Review.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 329–353. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0026.10.2478/jos-2013-0026]Search in Google Scholar
[Deville, J.C. and Y. Tillé. 2004. “Efficient Balanced Sampling. The Cube Method.” Biometrika 91: 893–912. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/91.4.893.10.1093/biomet/91.4.893]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 169: 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Haziza, D. and É. Lesage. 2016. “A Discussion of Weighting Procedures for Unit Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 32: 129–145. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0006.10.1515/jos-2016-0006]Search in Google Scholar
[Heckman, J.J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 153–161. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912352.10.2307/1912352]Search in Google Scholar
[Legg, J.C. and C.L. Yu. 2010. “A Comparison of Sample Set Restriction Procedures.” Survey Methodology 36: 69–79.]Search in Google Scholar
[Little, R.J.A. and S. Vartivarian. 2005. “Does Weighting for Nonresponse Increase the Variance of Survey Means?” Survey Methodology 31: 161–168.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lundquist, P. and C.E. Särndal. 2013. “Aspects of Responsive Design – With Applications to the Swedish Living Conditions Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 557–582. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040.10.2478/jos-2013-0040]Search in Google Scholar
[Matei, A. and M.G. Ranalli. 2015. “Dealing with Non-Ignorable Nonresponse in Survey Sampling: A Latent Modeling Approach.” Survey Methodology 41: 145–164.]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.E., K. Lumiste, and I. Traat. 2016. “Reducing the Response Imbalance: Is the Accuracy of the Survey Estimates Improved?” Survey Methodology 42: 219–238.]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.E. and P. Lundquist. 2014. “Accuracy in Estimation with Nonresponse: A Function of Degree of Imbalance and Degree of Explanation.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2: 361–387. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smu014.10.1093/jssam/smu014]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., F. Cobben, P. Lundquist, and J. Wagner. 2016. “Does More Balanced Survey Response Imply Less Non-Response Bias?” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 179: 727–748. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12152.10.1111/rssa.12152]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B. 2015. “Statistical Inference Based on Randomly Generated Auxiliary Variables.” Discussion Paper. Statistics Netherlands, The Hague.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013. “Optimizing Quality of Response Through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39: 29–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 231–253.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35: 101–113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., J.M. Brick, S. Lohr, and J. Li. 2017. “Adaptive and Responsive Survey Designs: a Review and Assessment.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 180: 203–223. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12186.10.1111/rssa.12186]Search in Google Scholar
[Vartivarian, S. and R.J.A. Little. 2002. “On the Formation of Weighting Adjustment Cells for Unit Nonresponse.” In proceedings of American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section, 3553–3558.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vella, F. 1998. “Estimating Models With Sample Selection Bias.” Journal of Human Resources 33: 127–169. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/146317.10.2307/146317]Search in Google Scholar