Historical building dating: A multidisciplinary study of the Convento de São Francisco (Coimbra, Portugal)
, , , , , und
04. Juli 2018
Über diesen Artikel
Artikel-Kategorie: Regular Articles
Online veröffentlicht: 04. Juli 2018
Seitenbereich: 119 - 129
Eingereicht: 12. Mai 2017
Akzeptiert: 20. Feb. 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/geochr-2015-0089
Schlüsselwörter
© 2017 G. Stella, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Color data in the CIELAB 1976 space both rectangular L*, a*, b* (respectively Lightness, red-green color component and yellow-blue color component) and cylindrical, C*, h (respectively chroma and hue angle) coordinates with the related uncertainties_
Sample | L* | a* | b* | C* | h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSFL3 | 66.10 ± 1.67 | 4.63 ± 0.12 | 22.73 ± 0.58 | 23.19 ± 0.82 | 78.52 ± 2.77 |
CSLF7 | 55.67 ± 1.54 | 8.21 ± 0.23 | 25.57 ± 0.71 | 26.86 ± 1.01 | 72.25 ± 2.72 |
CSFL14 | 59.63 ± 1.33 | 11.45 ± 0.25 | 32.88 ± 0.73 | 34.82 ± 1.12 | 70.83 ± 2.28 |
CSFL12 | 56.72 ± 1.60 | 9.23 ± 0.26 | 26.69 ± 0.75 | 28.24 ± 1.08 | 70.95 ± 2.71 |
CSFL11 | 64.25 ± 1.52 | 3.46 ± 0.08 | 20.32 ± 0.48 | 20.62 ± 0.69 | 80.39 ± 2.70 |
Dating of bricks: k-value, Qβ e qβ values obtained by TL measurements_
Sample | k-value | Qβ (Gy) | qβ (Gy) |
---|---|---|---|
CSLF2 | 0.259 ± 0.011 | 2.09 ± 0.19 | 0.13 ± 0.02 |
CSLF6 | 0.232 ± 0.018 | 2.87 ± 0.23 | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
CSLF10 | 0.220 ± 0.010 | 3.18 ± 0.28 | 0.09 ± 0.02 |
Dating of samples: Sample name, sample material, technique, method with ED, annual dose rate, the individual dating results (referred to the year of the TL measurements) and the corresponding calendar dates obtained for both bricks and mortars_
Sample | Material | Technique | Method | ED (Gy) | Annual dose rate (mGy/a) | Age/2016 (a) | Age (AD) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSFL2 | TL | Added dose | 2.22 ± 0.19 | 11.43 ± 0.85 | 194 ± 22 | 1822 ±22 | |
CSFL3 | OSL | SAR | 1.17 ± 0.10 | 5.41 ± 0.37 | 216 ± 24 | 1800 ±24 | |
CSFL6 | TL | Added dose | 2.92 ± 0.23 | 8.62 ± 0.66 | 339 ± 37 | 1677 ± 37 | |
CSFL7 | OSL | SAR | 2.03 ± 0.21 | 6.67 ± 0.47 | 304 ± 38 | 1712 ± 38 | |
CSFL10 | TL | Added dose | 3.27 ± 0.28 | 9.44 ± 0.63 | 346 ± 38 | 1670 ± 38 | |
CSFL11 | OSL | SAR | 1.13 ± 0.11 | 5.76 ± 0.37 | 196 ± 23 | 1820 ± 23 | |
CSFL12 | OSL | SAR | 2.41 ± 0.15 | 7.47 ± 0.44 | 322 ± 28 | 1694 ± 28 | |
CSFL14 | OSL | SAR | 2.61 ± 0.18 | 7.81 ± 0.48 | 344 ± 31 | 1672 ± 31 |
Contributions to the annual dose rate: Sample name, sample material, porosity factor W, alpha and beta internal dose rates (Dαint and Dβint) and environmental component (Denv)_
Sample | Material | W | Dαint(mGy/a) | Dβint(mGy/a) | Denv(mGy/a) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSFL2 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 29.65 ± 1.25 | 3.22 ± 0.08 | 1.22 ± 0.05 | |
CSFL3 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 22.71 ± 0.93 | 1.71 ± 0.04 | ||
CSFL6 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 22.24 ± 0.95 | 2.53 ± 0.06 | 1.37 ± 0.05 | |
CSFL7 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 22.36 ± 0.90 | 2.18 ± 0.05 | ||
CSFL10 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 24.95 ± 1.01 | 2.94 ± 0.07 | 1.57 ± 0.05 | |
CSFL11 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 21.38 ± 0.89 | 1.80 ± 0.05 | ||
CSFL12 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 23.31 ± 0.39 | 2.87 ± 0.06 | 1.75 ± 0.05 | |
CSFL14 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 24.78 ± 0.28 | 2.86 ± 0.05 | 1.65 ± 0.05 |
XRD semi-quantitative mineralogical composition of mortars (%) and aggregate/binder ratio (Qz – quartz; K-felds – potassium feldspars; Na-plag – sodium plagioclases; Cal – calcite; Dolo – dolomite; Phyl – phyllossilicates; * – traces)_
Sample | Qz | K-felds | Na-plag | Cal | Dolo | Phyl | Aggregate (A) | Binder (B) | A/B Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSFL3 | 65 | 21 | 1 | 13 | * | * | 86 | 13 | 6.62 |
CSFL7 | 65 | 5 | * | 26 | 2 | 2 | 70 | 26 | 2.69 |
CSFL11 | 71 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 1 | * | 85 | 13 | 6.54 |
CSFL12 | 59 | 12 | 10 | 18 | 1 | * | 71 | 18 | 3.94 |
CSFL14 | 66 | 11 | 1 | 21 | 1 | * | 77 | 21 | 3.67 |
Details of the samples studied in this work with ID number, material and sampling point description_
Sampling point (floor 2) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Sample | Material | Architectural element | Height height above planking level |
CSLF2 | Brick | Arc (east) | 350 |
CSLF3 | Mortar | ||
CSLF6 | Brick | Arc (south) | 80 |
CSLF7 | Mortar | ||
CSLF10 | Brick | Arc (west) | 235 |
CSLF11 | Mortar | ||
CSLF12 | Mortar | Wall (west) | 145 |
CSLF14 | Mortar | Wall (north) | 150 |
Plateau temperature range and preheating (Ph) temperature choose for ED evaluation_
Sample | Plateau ED range (°C) | Ph temperature (°C) |
---|---|---|
CSLF3 | 180–220 | 200 |
CSLF7 | 180–240 | 210 |
CSLF11 | 180–220 | 200 |
CSLF12 | 180–220 | 200 |
CSLF14 | 180–240 | 210 |
Number of aliquots (n), luminescence efficiency coefficient (k-value), Equivalent Dose (ED) Value and relative standard deviations (SD) obtained, respectively, by radial plot (ED Central Value, see Fig_ 2) and from ED frequency distributions (Mean ED) for mortar samples_
Sample | Number of aliquots ( | k-value | ED Central Value from Radial Plot | Mean ED from ED frequency distributions |
---|---|---|---|---|
CSFL3 | 39 | 0.125 ± 0.010 | 1.17 0.10 | 1.18 0.18 |
CSFL7 | 47 | 0.161 ± 0.012 | 2.03 0.21 | 2.02 0.26 |
CSFL11 | 41 | 0.134 ± 0.010 | 1.13 0.11 | 1.12 0.17 |
CSFL12 | 38 | 0.148 ± 0.010 | 2.41 0.15 | 2.42 0.22 |
CSFL14 | 44 | 0.157 ± 0.010 | 2.61 0.18 | 2.63 0.25 |
Radioactive measurements: Sample name, sample material with U, Th, K contents obtained by high gamma spectrometry and 238U/226Ra ratio_
Sample | Material | 238U/226Ra | U (ppm) | Th (ppm) | K (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSFL2 | 1.03 ± 0.11 | 4.54 ± 0.22 | 23.26 ± 1.49 | 2.46 ± 0.07 | |
CSFL3 | 0.97 ± 0.08 | 3.76 ± 0.18 | 16.57 ± 1.07 | 0.90 ± 0.03 | |
CSFL6 | 1.02 ± 0.12 | 3.26 ± 0.16 | 18.00 ± 1.15 | 2.00 ± 0.06 | |
CSFL7 | 0.97 ± 0.09 | 3.91 ± 0.19 | 15.70 ± 1.00 | 1.51 ± 0.05 | |
CSFL10 | 0.98 ± 0.10 | 4.30 ± 0.21 | 17.75 ± 1.14 | 2.33 ± 0.07 | |
CSFL11 | 1.05 ± 0.08 | 3.40 ± 0.16 | 16.30 ± 1.04 | 1.10 ± 0.03 | |
CSFL12 | 0.99 ± 0.08 | 3.52 ± 0.06 | 18.48 ± 0.49 | 2.37 ± 0.07 | |
CSFL14 | 0.97 ± 0.10 | 3.70 ± 0.06 | 19.80 ± 0.31 | 2.27 ± 0.07 |