1. bookVolumen 64 (2015): Heft 3 (December 2015)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2336-3207
Erstveröffentlichung
14 Jul 2011
Erscheinungsweise
3 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Determinants of occurrence of epiphytic mosses in the urban environment; a case study from Katowice city (S Poland)

Online veröffentlicht: 22 Jan 2016
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 64 (2015) - Heft 3 (December 2015)
Seitenbereich: 275 - 286
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2336-3207
Erstveröffentlichung
14 Jul 2011
Erscheinungsweise
3 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch

Adams K.L. (1990): Proposal for a 5-km2 mapping scheme for eastern England. – Bulletin of the British Bryological Society 55: 14-17.Search in Google Scholar

Adams K.L. & Preston C.D. (1992): Evidence for the effects of atmospheric pollution on bryophytes from national and local recording. In: Harding P.T. (ed.): Biological recording of changes in British wildlife, pp. 31-43, HMSO, London.Search in Google Scholar

Barkman J.J. (1958): Phytososiology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Van Gorcum, Assen.Search in Google Scholar

Basile A., Giordano S., Spagnuolo V., Alfano F. & Castaldo Cobianchi R. (1995): Effect of lead and colchicine on morphogenesis in protonemata of the moss Funaria hygrometrica. – Annals of Botany 76: 597-606.10.1006/anbo.1995.1137Search in Google Scholar

Bates J.W. (2008): Mineral nutrition and substratum ecology. In: Goffinet B. & Shaw A.J. (eds): Bryophyte biology; second edition, pp. 299-356, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511754807.009Search in Google Scholar

Bates J.W., Bell J.N.B. & Massara A.C. (2001): Loss of Lecanora conizaeoides and other fluctuations of epiphytes on oak in S.E. England over 21 years with declining SO2 concentrations. – Atmospheric Environment 35: 2557-2568.10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00402-7Search in Google Scholar

Bates J.W., Roy D.B. & Preston C.D. (2004): Occurrence of epiphytic bryophytes in a „tetrad” transect across southern Britain. 2. Analysis and modelling of epiphyte-environmental relationships. – Journal of Bryology 26: 181-197.10.1179/037366804X5288Search in Google Scholar

Bergkvist B., Folkeson L. & Berggren D. (1989): Fluxes of Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd, Cr, and Ni in temperate forest ecosystems. – Water, Air and Soil Pollution 47: 217-286.10.1007/BF00279328Search in Google Scholar

Brown D.H. (1982): Mineral nutrition. In: Smith A.J.E. (ed.): Bryophyte ecology, pp. 383-444, Chapman & Hall, London.10.1007/978-94-009-5891-3_11Search in Google Scholar

Brys T., Caputa Z., Wibigl J., Brys K. & Fortuniak K. (2003): Humidity gradients in urban environments on the example of Wroclaw, Sosnowiec and Lodz. In: Kłysik K., Oke T.R., Fortuniak K., Grimmond C.S.B. & Wibig J. (eds): Fifth International Conference on Urban Climate, 1-5 September 2003, Proceedings, 1: 41-45, Łódź, Poland.Search in Google Scholar

Degórska A., Gendolla T., Iwanek J., Karska L., Kobus D., Liana E., Mitosek G., Śnieżek T. & Toczko B. (2011): Zanieczyszczenie powietrza w Polsce w 2009 roku na tle wielolecia. Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska (Air pollution in Poland in 2009 against a background of last years). Inspekcja Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa.Search in Google Scholar

Dudek S., Kuśmierek R. & Żarski J. (2008): Porównanie wybranych elementów meteorologicznych w Bydgoszczy i jej okolicy (Comparison of some meteorological factors in Bydgoszcz and surroundings). – Przegląd Naukowy Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska 18(1): 35-41.Search in Google Scholar

During H.J. (1992): Endangered bryophytes in Europe. – Tree 7.8: 253-255.10.1016/0169-5347(92)90169-CSearch in Google Scholar

Dymytrova L. (2009): Epiphytic lichens and bryophytes as indicators of air pollution in Kyiv city (Ukraine). – Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 46: 33-44.Search in Google Scholar

Farmer A.M., Bates J.W. & Bell J.N.B. (1991): Seasonal variation in acidic pollutant inputs and their effects on the chemistry of stemflow, bark and epiphyte tissues in three oak (Quercus petraea) woodlands in N.W. Britain. – New Phytologist 118: 441-451.10.1111/j.1469-8137.1991.tb00026.xSearch in Google Scholar

Fojcik B. (2011): Mosses of the Cracow-Częstochowa Upland in relations to anthropogenic transformations of the plant cover. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice.Search in Google Scholar

Fojcik B. & Stebel A. (2001): Ecological and spatial structure of bryoflora of Katowice town. – Materiały Opracowania 5: 1-128. Centrum Dziedzictwa Przyrody Górnego Śląska, Katowice.Search in Google Scholar

Fudali E. (2011): Zmiany zachodzące współcześnie w brioflorze miast – na przykładzie parków Wrocławia (obserwacje z lat 2000, 2006 i 2011) (Contemporary changes in urban bryophytes; a case study of Wrocław parks carried out in 2000, 2006 and 2011). – Acta Botanica Silesiaca 6: 81-95.Search in Google Scholar

Fudali E. (2012): Recent tendencies in distribution of epiphytic bryophytes in urban areas: a Wrocław case study (South-West Poland). – Polish Botanical Journal 57(1): 231-241.Search in Google Scholar

Gilbert O.L. (1968): Bryophytes as indicators of air pollution in the Tyne Valley. – New Phytologist 67: 15-30.10.1111/j.1469-8137.1968.tb05450.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gilbert O.L. (1969): The effect of SO2 on lichen and bryophytes around Newcastle upon Tyne. Air Pollution Proceedings of the first European Congress on the Influence of Air Pollution on Plants and Animals, pp. 223-235, Wageningen, Pudoc.Search in Google Scholar

Giordano S., Sorbo S., Adamo P., Basile A., Spagnuolo V. & Cobianchi R.C. (2004): Biodiversity and trace element content of epiphytic bryophytes in urban and extraurban sites of southern Italy. – Plant Ecology 170: 1-14.10.1023/B:VEGE.0000019025.36121.5dSearch in Google Scholar

Glime J.M. (2007): Bryophyta Ecology. Volume 1. Physiological ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologist. Accessed on 14.05.2013. http://www.bryoecol.mtu.eduSearch in Google Scholar

Govindapyari H., Leleeka M., Nivedita M. & Uniyal P.L. (2010): Bryophytes: indicators and monitoring agents of pollution. – NeBIO 1(1): 35-41.Search in Google Scholar

Gunn J., Keller W., Negusanti J., Potvin R., Beckett P. & Winterhalder K. (1995): Ecosystem recovery after emission reductions: Sudbury, Canada. – Water, Air and Soil Pollution 85: 1783-1788.10.1007/BF00477238Search in Google Scholar

Hallingbäck T. (1992): The effect of air pollution on mosses in southern Sweden. – Biological Conservation 59: 163-170.10.1016/0006-3207(92)90577-ASearch in Google Scholar

Hazell P., Kellner O., Rydin H. & Gustafsson L. (1998): Presence and abundance of four epiphytic bryophytes in relation to density of aspen Populus tremula and other stand characteristics. – Forest Ecology and Management 107: 147-158.10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00330-7Search in Google Scholar

Kabata-Pendias A. & Pendias H. (1999): Pierwiastki śladowe w środowisku naturalnym (Trace elements in natural environment). Wydawnictwa Geologiczne, Warszawa.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer A. (1937): Das Stadtklima. – Die Wissenschaft 90: 143.Search in Google Scholar

Krupińska I. (1976): Influence of lead tetraethyl on the growth of Funaria hygrometrica L. and Marchantia polymorpha L. – Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 45: 421-432.10.5586/4991Search in Google Scholar

Krzesłowska M., Pustelnik L. & Woźny A. (1994): Differentiated lead-induced inhibition of growth rate of Funaria hygrometrica Hedw. protonema. – Bulletin de la Société des Amis des Sciences et des Lettres de Poznan 30: 33-36.Search in Google Scholar

LeBlanc F. & De Sloover J. (1970): Relations between industrialization and the distribution and growth of epiphytic lichens and mosses in Montreal. – Canadian Journal of Botany 48: 1485-1496.10.1139/b70-224Search in Google Scholar

Longton R.E. (1997): Reproductive biology and life-history strategies. – Advances in Bryology 6: 65-101.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips E.A. (1951): The associations of bark-inhabiting bryophytes in Michigan. – Ecological Monographs 21: 301-316.10.2307/1948653Search in Google Scholar

Poikolainen J. (2004): Mosses, epiphytic lichens and tree bark as biomonitors for air pollutants – specifically for heavy metals in regional surveys. Oulu University Press, Oulu.Search in Google Scholar

Proctor M.C.F. & Tuba Z. (2002): Poikilohydry and homoihydry: antithesis or spectrum of possibilities. – New Phytologist 156: 327-349.10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00526.xSearch in Google Scholar

Rao D.N. (1982): Responses of bryophytes to air pollution. In: Smith A.J.E. (ed.): Bryophyte ecology, pp. 445-571, Chapman & Hall, London – New York.10.1007/978-94-009-5891-3_12Search in Google Scholar

Robitaille G., LeBlanc F. & Rao D.N. (1977): Acid rain: a factor contributing to the paucity of epiphytic cryptogams in the vicinity of a copper smelter. – Revue Bryologique et Lichenologique 43: 53-66.Search in Google Scholar

Rose F. (1992): Temperate forest management: its effect on bryophyte and lichen floras and habitats. – In: Bates J.W. & Farmer A.M. (eds): Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment, pp. 211-233, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Rydzak J. (1958): Influence of small towns on the lichen vegetation. Part VII. Discussion and general conclusions. – Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sect. C 13: 275.Search in Google Scholar

Seaward H.R.D. (1979): Lower plants and the urban landscape. – Urban Ecology 4: 217-225.10.1016/0304-4009(79)90003-2Search in Google Scholar

Shaw J., Antonovics J. & Anderson L.E. (1987): Inter- and intraspecific variation of mosses in tolerance to copper and zinc. – Evolution 41(6): 1312-1325.Search in Google Scholar

Smith A.J.E. (1982): Epiphytes and epiliths. In: Smith A.J.E. (ed.): Bryophyte ecology, pp. 191-227, London, Chapman & Hall.10.1007/978-94-009-5891-3_7Search in Google Scholar

Stapper N.J., Franzen I., Gohrband S. & Frahm J.-P. (2000): Epiphyten kehren ins Ruhrgebiet zurück. Ergebnisse einer Moos- und Flechtenkartierung im Revier. – LÖBF-Mitteilungen 2: 12-21.Search in Google Scholar

Stebel A. (2010): Rediscovery of Orthotrichum rogeri Brid. (Bryophyta) in Poland. – Opole Scientific Society Nature Journal 43: 23-27.Search in Google Scholar

Vanderpoorten A. (1997): A bryological survey of the Brussels Capital Region (Belgium). – Scripta Botanica Belgica 14: 1-83.Search in Google Scholar

Vanderpoorten A. & Engels P. (2002): The effects of environmental variation on bryophytes at a regional scale. – Ecography 25: 513-522.10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250501.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wiklund K. & Rydin H. (2004): Ecophysiological constrains on spore establishment in bryophytes. – Functional Ecology 18: 907-913.10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00906.xSearch in Google Scholar

Zechmeister H.G. & Hohenwallner D. (2006): A comparison of biomonitoring methods for the estimation of atmospheric pollutants in an industrial town in Austria. – Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 117: 245-259.10.1007/s10661-006-0991-y16917710Search in Google Scholar

Zot G. & Vollrath B. (2003): The epiphyte vegetation of the palm Socratea exorrhiza – correlations with tree size, tree age and bryophyte cover. – Journal of Tropical Ecology 19: 81-90.10.1017/S0266467403003092Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo