<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This study analyses the feasibility of China’s One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative from an institutionalist perspective. The initiative is undertaken as a ‘geo-functional institutionalist’ project, and this strengthens its feasibility. Firstly, the initiative aims to institutionalize a new international structure paralleling the existing Western-dominated one through which China could re-organize its position as an ‘agenda entrepreneur’ in the world without any clash with the West. Secondly, the initiative follows a functionalist strategy. It offers a ‘win-win’ functionalist framework without any hegemonic ambition; thus, the initiative attracts the attention of the rest of the world. China also follows a pure functionalist and bilateral/regional way to deal with the heterogeneity problem among the target countries. However, China’s institutionalization attempt might be isomorphic with the existing Western-dominated system in terms of its hegemonic structure due to the cognitive limitations in finding alternatives, and this might ruin the feasibility of the initiative.</p></abstract>

This study analyses the feasibility of China’s One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative from an institutionalist perspective. The initiative is undertaken as a ‘geo-functional institutionalist’ project, and this strengthens its feasibility. Firstly, the initiative aims to institutionalize a new international structure paralleling the existing Western-dominated one through which China could re-organize its position as an ‘agenda entrepreneur’ in the world without any clash with the West. Secondly, the initiative follows a functionalist strategy. It offers a ‘win-win’ functionalist framework without any hegemonic ambition; thus, the initiative attracts the attention of the rest of the world. China also follows a pure functionalist and bilateral/regional way to deal with the heterogeneity problem among the target countries. However, China’s institutionalization attempt might be isomorphic with the existing Western-dominated system in terms of its hegemonic structure due to the cognitive limitations in finding alternatives, and this might ruin the feasibility of the initiative.

China’s OBOR as a Geo-Functional Institutionalist Project

TalTech Journal of European Studies

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

{"article-title":"China\u2019s OBOR as a Geo-Functional Institutionalist Project"}

This study analyses the feasibility of China’s One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative from an institutionalist perspective. The initiative is undertaken as a...

China’s OBOR as a Geo-Functional Institutionalist Project

Online veröffentlicht: 08. Juli 2017

Seitenbereich: 7 - 23

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0002

Schlüsselwörter
China, functionalism, institutionalism, New Silk Road, One Belt, One Road initiative

© by Yilmaz Kaplan

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

China’s OBOR as a Geo-Functional Institutionalist Project

Online veröffentlicht: 08. Juli 2017

Seitenbereich: 7 - 23

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0002

SchlüsselwörterChina, functionalism, institutionalism, New Silk Road, One Belt, One Road initiative

© by Yilmaz Kaplan

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
China, functionalism, institutionalism, New Silk Road, One Belt, One Road initiative