Are Polish CLIL learners more willing to communicate in English than non-CLIL learners?

1Amiryousefi, M. (2018). Willingness to communicate, interest, motives to communicate with the instructor, and L2 speaking: A focus on the role of age and gender. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2016.1170838Search in Google Scholar

2Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 53(S1), 65–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00224Search in Google Scholar

3Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002Search in Google Scholar

4Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why … and why not. System, 41(3), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001Search in Google Scholar

5Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002Search in Google Scholar

6Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0Search in Google Scholar

7Czura, A., & Papaja, K. (2013). Curricular models of CLIL education in Poland. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777388Search in Google Scholar

8Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092Search in Google Scholar

9Dewaele, J.-M., & Dewaele, L. (2018). Learner-internal and learner-external predictors of Willingness to Communicate in the FL Classroom. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 2(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.37Search in Google Scholar

10Donovan, L. A., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2004). Age and sex differences in willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived competence. Communication Research Reports, 21(4), 420–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090409360006Search in Google Scholar

11Gardner, R. C. (2012). Integrative motivation and global language (English) acquisition in Poland. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 215–226.Search in Google Scholar

12Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20, 29–70.Search in Google Scholar

13Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2015). The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541736Search in Google Scholar

14Horwitz, E. K. (1986). Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of a Foreign Language Anxiety Scale. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 559–562. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586302Search in Google Scholar

15International education. (n.d.). International Baccalaureate®. Retrieved July 10, 2022, from https://www.ibo.org/Search in Google Scholar

16Khajavy, G. H., MacIntyre, P. D., & Barabadi, E. (2018). Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate: Applying doubly latent multilevel analysis in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000304Search in Google Scholar

17Kuutila, N. (2014). Teachers’ effect on learners’ willingness to communicate in L2. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/44833Search in Google Scholar

18Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2017). A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on affective factors. Applied Linguistics, 38(5), 688–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv059Search in Google Scholar

19Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 4–17.Search in Google Scholar

20Levine, G. S. (2003). Student and instructor beliefs and attitudes about target language use, first language use, and anxiety: Report of a questionnaire study. The Modern Language Journal, 87(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00194Search in Google Scholar

21Lialikhova, D. (2018). Triggers and constraints of lower secondary students’ willingness to communicate orally in English in a CLIL setting in the Norwegian context. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.16013.liaSearch in Google Scholar

22Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2015). An A–Z of applied linguistics research methods. Macmillan International Higher Education.Search in Google Scholar

23MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099409359951Search in Google Scholar

24MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.xSearch in Google Scholar

25MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003a). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school french immersion students. Language Learning, 53(S1), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00226Search in Google Scholar

26MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. (2003b). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.589Search in Google Scholar

27MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960151001Search in Google Scholar

28MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–388.Search in Google Scholar

29MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.xSearch in Google Scholar

30MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System, 38(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.013Search in Google Scholar

31McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement [Conference presentation]. 71st Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.Search in Google Scholar

32McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. Southern Communication Journal, 56(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949009372817Search in Google Scholar

33McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (2013). Willingness to communicate (WTC). Measurement instrument database for the social science. http://www.midss.org/sites/default/files/willingness_to_communicate.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

34Mearns, T., Graaff, R. de, & Coyle, D. (2020). Motivation for or from bilingual education? A comparative study of learner views in the Netherlands. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(6), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1405906Search in Google Scholar

35Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan Education.Search in Google Scholar

36Menezes, E., & Juan-Garau, M. (2015). English learners’ willingness to communicate and achievement in CLIL and formal instruction contexts. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 221–236). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11496-5_13Search in Google Scholar

37Muñoz, C. (2015). Time and timing in CLIL: A comparative approach to language gains. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 87–102). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11496-5_6Search in Google Scholar

38Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2014). Fluctuations in learners’ willingness to communicate during communicative task performance: Conditions and tendencies. Research in Language, 12(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2014-0019Search in Google Scholar

39Navarro Pablo, M., & García Jiménez, E. (2018). Are CLIL students more motivated?: An analysis of affective factors and their relation to language attainment. Porta Linguarum, 29, 71–90.Search in Google Scholar

40Otwinowska, A. (2013). CLIL lessons in the upper-primary: The interplay of affective factors and CALP. In D. Gabryś-Barker & J. Bielska (Eds.), Affectivity in second language acquisition (pp. 211–225). Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

41Otwinowska, A., & Foryś, M. (2017). They learn the CLIL way, but do they like it? Affectivity and cognition in upper-primary CLIL classes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(5), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1051944Search in Google Scholar

42Papaja, K. (2014). Focus on CLIL: A qualitative evaluation of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in Polish secondary education. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

43Pawlak, M. (2015). Edukacja dwujęzyczna w polskich szkołach. Raport ewaluacyjny [Bilingual education in Polish schools. Evaluation report]. Ośrodek Rozwoju Edukacji.Search in Google Scholar

44Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2015). Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 50, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.02.001Search in Google Scholar

45Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Bielak, J. (2016). Investigating the nature of classroom willingness to communicate (WTC): A micro-perspective. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 654–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815609615Search in Google Scholar

46Plonsky, L., & Derrick, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research. The Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12335Search in Google Scholar

47R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/Search in Google Scholar

48Reid, K. T., & Trofimovich, P. (2018). Exploring the influence of community volunteerism on adult L2 learners’ willingness to communicate. System, 74, 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.02.002Search in Google Scholar

49Rumlich, D. (2013). Students’ general English proficiency prior to CLIL. In S. Breidbach & B. Viebrock (Eds.), Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in Europe. Research perspectives on policy and practice (pp. 181–202). Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

50Ryan, S. (2009). Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of English. Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, 120, 143.Search in Google Scholar

51Sylvén, L. K., & Thompson, A. S. (2015). Language learning motivation and CLIL: Is there a connection? Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.1.02sylSearch in Google Scholar

52Thompson, A. S., & Sylvén, L. K. (2015). “Does English make you nervous?” Anxiety profiles of CLIL and non-CLIL students in Sweden. Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/47529 Search in Google Scholar

53Wang, H., Peng, A., & Patterson, M. M. (2021). The roles of class social climate, language mindset, and emotions in predicting willingness to communicate in a foreign language. System, 99, 102529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102529Search in Google Scholar

54Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00136Search in Google Scholar

55Yashima, T. (2009). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (Vol. 86, pp. 144–163). Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

56Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2018). Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816657851Search in Google Scholar

57Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00250.xSearch in Google Scholar

58Zarobe, Y. R. de, & Lasagabaster, D. (2010). CLIL in Spain: implementation, results and teacher training. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar