Fibroglandular tissue and quantitative background parenchymal enhancement on magnetic resonance breast images are inversely correlated with menopause in Thai women
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Yaffe MJ. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res. 2008; 10: 209.10.1186/bcr210218598375YaffeMJMammographic density. Measurement of mammographic densityBreast Cancer Res200810209Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, Gilliland FD, Wiest PW, Kelsey CA, et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology. 1998; 209:511-8.10.1148/radiology.209.2.98075819807581RosenbergRDHuntWCWilliamsonMRGillilandFDWiestPWKelseyCAet alEffects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New MexicoRadiology19982095118Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138:168-75.10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-0000812558355CarneyPAMigliorettiDLYankaskasBCKerlikowskeKRosenbergRRutterCMet alIndividual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammographyAnn Intern Med200313816875Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
del Carmen MG, Halpern EF, Kopans DB, Moy B, Moore RH, Goss PE, et al. Mammographic breast density and race. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188: 1147-50.10.2214/AJR.06.061917377060delCarmen MGHalpernEFKopansDBMoyBMooreRHGossPEet alMammographic breast density and raceAJR Am J Roentgenol2007188114750Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maskarinec G, Meng L, Ursin G. Ethnic differences in mammographic densities. Int J Epidemiol. 2001; 30: 959-65.10.1093/ije/30.5.95911689504MaskarinecGMengLUrsinGEthnic differences in mammographic densitiesInt J Epidemiol20013095965Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kawashima H, Matsui O, Suzuki M, Kadoya M, Tawara M, Nonomura A, et al. Breast cancer in dense breast: detection with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 11:233-43.10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200003)11:3<233::AID-JMRI1>3.0.CO;2-X10739554KawashimaHMatsuiOSuzukiMKadoyaMTawaraMNonomuraAet alBreast cancer in dense breast: detection with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imagingJ Magn Reson Imaging20001123343Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology. 2007; 244:356-78.10.1148/radiol.244205162017641361KuhlCThe current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practiceRadiology200724435678Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ko ES, Lee BH, Choi HY, Kim RB, Noh WC. Background enhancement in breast MR: correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasound. Euro J Radiol. 2011; 80:719-23.10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.019KoESLeeBHChoiHYKimRBNohWCBackground enhancement in breast MR: correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasoundEuro J Radiol20118071923Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J, Kreft BP, Sommer T, Lutterbey G, et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology. 1997; 203:137-44.912238210.1148/radiology.203.1.9122382KuhlCKBielingHBGiesekeJKreftBPSommerTLutterbeyGet alHealthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependencyRadiology199720313744Search in Google Scholar
Cubuk R, Tasali N, Narin B, Keskiner F, Celik L, Guney S. Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography. La Radiol Medica. 2010; 115:434-41.10.1007/s11547-010-0513-4CubukRTasaliNNarinBKeskinerFCelikLGuneySCorrelation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammographyLa Radiol Medica201011543441Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jansen SA, Lin VC, Giger ML, Li H, Karczmar GS, Newstead GM. Normal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breast. Euro Radiol. 2011; 21:1374-82.10.1007/s00330-011-2080-zJansenSALinVCGigerMLLiHKarczmarGSNewsteadGMNormal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breastEuro Radiol20112113748221327872Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Muller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhauser K, Stoll P, Dietz K, Claussen CD. Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. Radiology. 1997; 203:145-9.912238310.1148/radiology.203.1.9122383Muller-SchimpfleMOhmenhauserKStollPDietzKClaussenCDMenstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breastRadiology199720314599122383Search in Google Scholar
Scaranelo AM, Carrillo MC, Fleming R, Jacks LM, Kulkarni SR, Crystal P. Pilot study of quantitative analysis of background enhancement on breast MR images: association with menstrual cycle and mammographic breast density. Radiology. 2013; 267: 692-700.2341800510.1148/radiol.13120121ScaraneloAMCarrilloMCFlemingRJacksLMKulkarniSRCrystalPPilot study of quantitative analysis of background enhancement on breast MR images: association with menstrual cycle and mammographic breast densityRadiology201326769270023418005Search in Google Scholar
King V, Gu Y, Kaplan JB, Brooks JD, Pike MC, Morris EA. Impact of menopausal status on background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRI. Euro Radiol. 2012; 22:2641-7.10.1007/s00330-012-2553-8KingVGuYKaplanJBBrooksJDPikeMCMorrisEAImpact of menopausal status on background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on breast MRIEuro Radiol2012222641722752463Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DeMartini WB, Liu F, Peacock S, Eby PR, Gutierrez RL, Lehman CD. Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: impact on diagnostic performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198: W373-80.2245157610.2214/AJR.10.6272DeMartiniWBLiuFPeacockSEbyPRGutierrezRLLehmanCDBackground parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: impact on diagnostic performanceAJR Am J Roentgenol2012198W3738022451576Search in Google Scholar
Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J. Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer?. Euro Radiol. 2011; 21:2261-7.10.1007/s00330-011-2175-6UematsuTKasamiMWatanabeJDoes the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer?Euro Radiol2011212261721688006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Morris EA, Comstock CE, Lee CH, Lehman CD, Ikeda DM, Newstead GM, et al. ACR BI-RADS Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA : American College of Radiology. 2013.MorrisEAComstockCELeeCHLehmanCDIkedaDMNewsteadGMet alACR BI-RADS Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemReston, VA : American College of Radiology2013Search in Google Scholar
Molleran V, Mahoney MC. The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2010; 18:171-85.10.1016/j.mric.2010.02.00120494304MolleranVMahoneyMCThe BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexiconMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am2010181718520494304Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Esserman L, Hylton N, George T, Weidner N. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to assess tumor histopathology and angiogenesis in breast carcinoma. Breast J. 1999; 5:13-21.1134825010.1046/j.1524-4741.1999.005001013.xEssermanLHyltonNGeorgeTWeidnerNContrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to assess tumor histopathology and angiogenesis in breast carcinomaBreast J19995132111348250Search in Google Scholar
Checka CM, Chun JE, Schnabel FR, Lee J, Toth H. The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198:W292-5.2235802810.2214/AJR.10.6049CheckaCMChunJESchnabelFRLeeJTothHThe relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screeningAJR Am J Roentgenol2012198W292522358028Search in Google Scholar
Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S. Mammographic density: a hormonally responsive risk factor for breast cancer. J Brit Menopause Soc. 2006; 12:186-93.10.1258/136218006779160436BoydNFMartinLJYaffeMJMinkinSMammographic density: a hormonally responsive risk factor for breast cancerJ Brit Menopause Soc2006121869317178021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Sun L, Guo H, Chiarelli A, Hislop G, et al. Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15:2086-92.10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-034517119032BoydNFMartinLJSunLGuoHChiarelliAHislopGet alBody size, mammographic density, and breast cancer riskCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev20061520869217119032Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Khazen M, Warren RM, Boggis CR, Bryant EC, Reed S, Warsi I, et al. A pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17:2268-74.10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-254718768492KhazenMWarrenRMBoggisCRBryantECReedSWarsiIet alA pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imagingCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev200817226874258297518768492Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thompson DJ, Leach MO, Kwan-Lim G, Gayther SA, Ramus SJ, Warsi I, et al. Assessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer, the UK MARIBS study. Breast Cancer Res. 2009; 11:R80.10.1186/bcr2447ThompsonDJLeachMOKwan-LimGGaytherSARamusSJWarsiIet alAssessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer, the UK MARIBS studyBreast Cancer Res200911R80281554219903338Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Graham SJ, Bronskill MJ, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF. Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammography. Brit J Cancer. 1996; 73:162-8.10.1038/bjc.1996.30GrahamSJBronskillMJByngJWYaffeMJBoydNFQuantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammographyBrit J Cancer199673162820743148546901Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lee NA, Rusinek H, Weinreb J, Chandra R, Toth H, Singer C, et al. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20–83 years old: comparison of x-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168:501-6.10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016235LeeNARusinekHWeinrebJChandraRTothHSingerCet alFatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20–83 years old: comparison of x-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imagingAm J Roentgenol199716850169016235Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Iacconi C, Thakur SB, Dershaw DD, Brooks J, Fry CW, Morris EA. Impact of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging of breast lesions. Euro J Radiol. 2014; 83:2137-43.10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.004IacconiCThakurSBDershawDDBrooksJFryCWMorrisEAImpact of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging of breast lesionsEuro J Radiol20148321374325445896Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA. Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology. 2011; 260:50-60.10.1148/radiol.1110215621493794KingVBrooksJDBernsteinJLReinerASPikeMCMorrisEABackground parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer riskRadiology20112605060693997921493794Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
