Heart disease is a crucial cause of death worldwide and one of the top three causes of mortality in Thailand after cancers, and accidents including poisoning [1]. Therefore, the prevention of heart disease, its medical management, or surgery is of paramount importance. Additionally, patients who have undergone cardiac surgery usually experience various quality of life postoperatively depending on their medical conditions before or after the surgery. A patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is defined as not only the absence of disease, but also the presence of physical, mental, and social well-being from a patient perspective [2, 3]. Two common approaches to measuring HRQoL include generic and disease specific health status instruments. The generic instrument can provide a single outcome score, e.g., health utility (HU), or a profile of domain scores, such as health profile (HP). The HU approach can incorporate HRQoL into a cost-effectiveness analysis or cost-utility analysis, of which commonly used outcomes are quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained [4, 5]. The QALY is a measure of life expectancy weighted by a HU score that is usually between 0 (death) and 1 (full health).
In 2007, the Thai government initiated a heart surgery project to celebrate the 80th birthday anniversary of His Majesty the King that was funded by the National Health Security Office. The purpose of this project was to provide the patients with a holistic and continuous care in order to improve their quality of life. It was therefore necessary to investigate the HRQoL of patients after their heart surgery. Some evidence of HRQoL has been reported in patients after heart surgery in western countries [6-8], but little was known about HRQoL in Thai patients after heart surgery. This study was therefore intended to assess the HRQoL of patients after heart surgery using health profile (HP) and health utility (HU) as measures, and to examine the relationships between HP, HU, and patient characteristics.
This quality of life study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ramathibodi Hospital (MURA2008/962). It was conducted in patients joining the heart surgery project during June–November 2008.
In the heart surgery project, 7,863 children and adult Thai patients living across the country were chosen without payment for cardiac surgery, i.e., the valve replacement/repair, operation of atrial and/or ventricular septa, or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), as shown in
Study flowFigure 1
Two generic instruments were used because, unlike disease specific tools, they are more flexible in terms of patient population and interventions. The first one was the health profile measure “12-item Short Form, version 2” (SF-12v2; Quality Metric Inc, Lincoln, RI, USA). This health survey, which is the short form of the widely used SF-36, is a brief and reliable measure of overall health status [9]. The Thai version of SF-12v2 was used with the permission from the Quality Metric Inc. It measures eight health domains: physical functioning (PF), role limitations because of physical health (role-physical: RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role limitations because of emotional problems (role-emotional: RE) and mental health (MH). To complete the tool, the recall period for the SF-12v2 was within the past four weeks. The SF-12v2 responses were scored from 0 to 100 on each of the domains, together with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) scale and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scale. Higher scores indicated a better HRQoL. To simplify comparisons with the general population, the norm-based scoring was used, i.e., scores being linearly transformed to a scale with the mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 for the general US population [10]. In this study, Cronbach’s alpha values for PCS and MCS were 0.73 and 0.77, respectively. Values >0.7 indicate that the SF-12v2 has an acceptable internal consistency reliability [11].
The second instrument was a measure of HU, i.e., EuroQoL (EQ-5D) and Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS). The EQ-5D consists of five attributes: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/ depression [12]. Each attribute has three levels: no problem, some problems, and major problems. Its Thai version was obtained from the EuroQoL Group and the Thai value set was employed to calculate EQ-5D utility scores [13]. A resulting EQ-5D score is usually between −0.45 and 1.00, where 1.00 and 0 represent perfect health and death, respectively. Higher EQ-5D scores indicate better health, but negative values signify the states worse than death. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha value of the EQ-5D was 0.61, which is considered moderately reliable. The second part of EQ-5D is a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) that asks respondents to rate their current health states with scores starting from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health). EQ-VAS scores were obtained by dividing the number rated on the scale by 100.
All 386 patients with postoperative heart surgery were interviewed on the phone by trained research assistants using the two generic measures. The telephone interview was conducted for approximately half an hour for each patient in the academic office at the Ramathibodi Hospital. The data gathered were entered into Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for analysis.
The characteristics of patients were analyzed using descriptive statistics, e.g. percentages, means, and standard deviations (SD). A one-sample
Patient characteristics are summarized in
Patients’ characteristics (n = 386) Patients may have more than one underlying diseaseCharacteristics Value Age (years) mean ± SD 50.4 ± 13.7 median 52 range 17–82 Sex, male; n (%) 191 (49.5) Employment status, employed; n (%) 230 (59.6) Monthly income (US$) mean ± SD 226 ± 352 median 121 range 3–3,030 Underlying diseases hypertension; n (%) 90 (23.3) hyperlipidemia; n (%) 43 (11.1) diabetes; n (%) 40 (10.4) stroke; n (%) 7 (1.8) kidney disease; n (%) 5 (1.3) asthma; n (%) 5 (1.3) other diseases; n (%) 84 (21.8) Number of comorbidities mean ± SD 0.7 ± 1.0 median 0 range 0–5
Descriptive statistics of SF-12v2, EQ-5D, and EQ-VASDomain/instrument Mean SD Median Range % Floor % Ceiling Physical functioning 80.96 24.38 100.00 0.00–100.00 2.3 51.8 Role physical 70.01 25.10 75.00 0.00–100.00 1.6 26.2 Bodily pain 79.40 21.92 75.00 0.00–100.00 0.5 44.6 General health 62.30 24.88 60.00 0.00–100.00 0.3 8.5 Vitality 75.52 23.28 75.00 25.00–100.00 0.0 39.9 Social functioning 90.35 19.63 100.00 0.00–100.00 0.8 76.4 Role emotional 85.17 19.31 100.00 0.00–100.00 0.3 51.0 Mental health 76.17 19.08 75.00 25.00–100.00 2.1 21.8 Physical component summary 46.91 7.99 47.83 17.41–69.88 0 0 Mental component summary 54.44 8.41 55.68 20.04–68.89 0 0 EQ-5D 0.81 0.19 0.74 0.10–1.00 0 43.0 EQ-VAS 0.84 0.13 0.80 0.50–1.00 0 23.3
Comparison of 8 domains and 2 summary scores of SF-12v2 between the Thai sample and the US general population [ref. 9] Bold values indicate Thai patients had higher scores than people in the U.S. general populationDomain/summary component Thai sample after heart surgery U.S. general population Difference (Thai – US) Physical functioning 80.96 ± 24.38 81.18 ± 29.10 −0.22 Role physical 70.01 ± 25.10 80.53 ± 27.13 −10.52 Bodily pain 79.40 ± 21.92 81.74 ± 24.53 −2.34 General health 62.31 ± 24.89 72.20 ± 23.19 −9.89 Vitality 75.51 ± 23.28 55.59 ± 24.84 Social functioning 90.35 ± 19.63 83.74 ± 24.76 Role emotional 85.17 ± 19.31 86.41 ± 22.35 −1.24 Mental health 76.17 ± 19.08 70.18 ± 20.50 5.99 Physical component summary 46.91 ± 7.99 50 ± 10 −3.09 Mental component summary 54.44 ± 8.41 50 ± 10
Thai patients after heart surgery possessed a higher EQ-5D score (0.81 in
Comparison of EQ-5D domains between Thai patients after the heart surgery and the Thai general population [ref. 13] Calculated by collapsing cells to compare ‘no problems’ vs. ‘with problems’.Domain Thai patients after heart surgery (n = 386) Thai general population (n = 1,409) No problem walking 349 (90.4%) 1038 (73.6%) 0.000 Some problem walking 37 (9.6%) 364 (25.8%) Confined to bed 0 7 (0.6%) No problem 371 (96.1%) 1287 (91.4%) 0.002 Some problems washing or dressing self 14 (3.6%) 104 (7.4%) Unable to wash or dress self 1 (0.3%) 18 (1.3%) No problem 242 (62.7%) 1089 (77.3%) 0.000 Some problem 137 (35.5%) 281 (19.9%) Unable to perform 7 (1.8%) 39 (2.8%) No pain or discomfort 245 (63.5%) 493 (35.0%) 0.000 Moderate 140 (36.3%) 885 (62.8%) Extreme 1 (0.3%) 31 (2.2%) Not anxious or depressed 310 (80.3%) 741 (52.6%) 0.000 Moderate 73 (18.9%) 633 (44.9%) Extreme 3 (0.8%) 35 (2.5%)
As for the subgroup analysis in
Analysis of EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, Physical and Mental Component Summary scores based on patient characteristics PCS = Physical Component Summary, MCS = Mental Component SummaryCharacteristic n = 386 EQ-5D EQ-VAS PCS MCS mean ± SD mean ± SD mean ± SD mean ± SD ≤52 years 201 0.81 ± 0.17 0.86 ± 0.12 48.73 ± 7.08 54.15 ± 8.35 >52 years 185 0.80 ± 0.20 0.81 ± 0.14 44.94 ± 8.46 54.75 ± 8.49 female 195 0.77 ± 0.18 0.84 ± 0.14 45.81 ± 8.34 53.72 ± 8.18 male 191 0.84 ± 0.19 0.83 ± 0.13 48.03 ± 7.47 55.17 ± 8.61 unemployed 156 0.76 ± 0.21 0.79 ± 0.14 44.31 ± 8.87 53.20 ± 8.83 employed 230 0.84 ± 0.16 0.86 ± 0.12 48.68 ± 6.81 55.28 ± 8.03 no 215 0.84 ± 0.17 0.86 ± 0.13 48.15 ± 7.82 55.31 ± 8.22 yes 171 0.77 ± 0.19 0.81 ± 0.14 45.35 ± 7.95 53.33 ± 8.54
Relationships between eight domains and two component summary scores of SF-12v2 and EQ-5D and EQ-VAS PCS = Physical Component Summary, MCS = Mental Component Summary.Predictor EQ-5D EQ-VAS Unstandardized coefficient Unstandardized coefficient Constant 0.156 0.000 0.432 0.000 Physical functioning 0.001 0.000 0.002 0.001 Role physical 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.296 Bodily pain 0.002 0.000 0.001 0.048 General health 0.002 0.004 0.001 0.000 Vitality 0.001 0.020 0.001 0.000 Social functioning 0.000 0.795 0.000 0.190 Role emotional 0.001 0.062 0.001 0.135 Mental health 0.001 0.006 0.000 0.626 0.000 0.000 Constant −0.317 0.000 0.118 0.015 PCS 0.014 0.000 0.009 0.000 MCS 0.009 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.000 0.000
To our knowledge this is the first reported study of the health-related quality of life of Thai patients after the heart surgery for diverse heart diseases. The findings reflect the responses of mostly middle-aged Thai patients with some underlying heart diseases. After the heart surgery, the patients asserted their quality of life was improved, as explained by the high percentages of ceiling effects (>15%) in most domains of SF-12v2 and EQ-5D and EQ-VAS. Compared with the U.S. general population [9], the Thai patients seemed to have higher mental health, but lower physical health. A possible explanation may be that the survey was made just one year after their surgery; and they might feel better, but needed more time to recover fully and gain their physical health. This is consistent with findings that indicated the mental and emotional health of patients after CABG appeared to gradually improve over time [6].
The patients had the marginally lower EQ-5D utility score, but slightly higher EQ-VAS score than those of the Thai general population [13]. This finding confirmed that their HRQoL corresponded to those of the general Thai population. Moreover, when compared with Thai patients with heart diseases [15, 16], this patient group showed significantly higher EQ-5D scores. Although the EQ-5D was not measured before the heart surgery, the EQ-VAS scores did imply that the health of patients was improved after their heart surgery. The results of this study were consistent with other studies that reported patients’ HRQoL after coronary artery bypass surgery [7] or transcatheter aortic valve implantation [8] was considerably improved.
When considering the characteristics of patients, lower physical health and health utility were found in patients with older age (>52 years), female sex, unemployment, or some comorbidity. Both physical and mental health was rather decreased in patients who were unemployed or who had some comorbidity. These findings were in accordance with those of Terashima et al. [17] and Kurlansky et al. [18] who determined the four main variables affecting patients’ HRQoL. These determinants might be useful for healthcare providers to pay more attention to patients after heart surgery. Furthermore, the present study delineated the relationships between SF-12v2 and EQ-5D and EQ-VAS with 50% of prediction. It was likely that EQ-5D and EQ-VAS utility scores could be derived from SF-12v2 for use in health economics. The present study also demonstrated the validity of SF-12v2 and EQ-5D instruments in Thai patients, which is evidence for the quality of life study.
The present study has some limitations. First, HRQoL of patients with a specific type of heart surgery could not be reported because of the unavailability of such data. Second, the telephone interview possibly caused more social desirability with some ‘Hawthorn effects’ than other methods, i.e., the face-to-face interview or self-administration [19], thus partly affecting the favorable results. Third, a recall bias might occur when the patients were questioned about the EQ-VAS before the heart surgery. And further, this study measured HRQoL for just one point in time after the operation, but in reality postoperative HRQoL may fluctuate over time.
Overall, the HRQoL of Thai patients after the heart surgery was satisfactory. EQ-5D and EQ-VAS scores can be predicted by SF-12v2 data up to 50% that would be of help for further analysis. Further studies should be conducted to assess the outcomes of specific types of heart surgery and apply a pre- and post-intervention study design or a consecutive longitudinal study as appropriate.