[
Amadasi, S., & Holliday, A. R. (2017). Block and thread intercultural narratives and positioning: conversations with newly arrived postgraduate students. Language & Intercultural Communication, 17(3), 254–269.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amadasi, S., & Holliday, A. R. (2018). ‘I already have a culture.’ Negotiating competing grand and personal narratives in interview conversations with new study abroad arrivals. Language & Intercultural Communication, 18(12), 241–256.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amadasi, S., & Holliday, A. R. (forthcoming). The yin-yang relationship between essentialist and non-essentialist discourses related to the participation of children of migrants, and its implication for how to research. Migration Studies.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baraldi, C. (2019). The child-centred approach of CHILD-UP project. Paper presented at the Migrant Children and Communities in a Transforming Europe: Migrant children’s integration and education in Europe, Barcelona, 24th–25th October 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.) (1986). Writing culture: the poetica of politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delanty, G. (2006). The cosmopolitan imagination: critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 25–47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duan, Y. P. (2007). Yin and yang: the discourse politics of the Chinese university entrance examinations (the Gao Kao) [PhD Thesis]. Canterbury: Canterbury Christ Church University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hall, S. (1991). The local and the global: globalisation and ethnicity. In A. D. King (Ed.), Culture, globalisation and the world-system (pp. 19–39). New York: Palgrave.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R. (2005). How is it possible to write? Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 4(4), 304–309.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R. (2011). Intercultural communication and ideology. London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R. (2012). Interrogating researcher participation in an interview study of intercultural contribution in the workplace. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(6), 504–515.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R. (2015). Talking about cultural difference – blocks and threads. Retrieved from http://adrianholliday.com/blog.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R. (2018). Native-speakerism. In J. Liontas (Ed.), TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Bognor Regis: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R. (2019). Understanding intercultural communication: negotiating a grammar of culture (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R. (2020). Blogs 2013–2020: How it is possible to write – Issues with culture. Retrieved from adrianholliday.com/books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R. (2021a). Linguaculture, cultural travel, native-speakerism and small culture formation on the go. In R. Rubdy, R. Tupas (Eds.), Bloomsbury world Englishes (Vol. III, Ideologies, pp. 101–113). London: Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R. (2021b). Recovering unrecognised deCentred experience. In M. Kumar, T. Welikala (Eds.), The context of being, interculturality and new knowledge systems for teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 185–195). Bingley: Emerald.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R. (forthcoming). A deCentred architecture of intercultural travel: applying the grammar. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R., & Amadasi, S. (2020). Making sense of the intercultural: finding deCentred threads. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holliday, A. R., & MacDonald, M. N. (2020). Researching the intercultural: intersubjectivity and the problem with postpositivism. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 621–639.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ogden, T. H. (2004). The analytic third: implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 167–195.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rajagopalan, K. (2012). Colonial hangover and the new ‘hybrid’ Englishes. In R. K. Agnihotri, R. Singh (Eds.), Indian English: towards a new paradigm (pp. 206–215). New Delhi: Orient Black Swan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Risager, K. (2020). Linguaculture and transnationality. In J. Jackson (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 109–123). London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saraceni, M. (2015). World Englishes: a critical analysis. London: Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider, E. W. (2016). Hybrid Englishes: An exploratory survey. World Englishes, 35(3), 339–354.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simmel, G. (1908/1950). The stranger (K. Wolff, trans.). In K. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of George Simmel (pp. 402–408). New York: Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
]Search in Google Scholar