Open Access

A Novel Bioflocculant Produced by Cobetia marina MCCC1113: Optimization of Fermentation Conditions by Response Surface Methodology and Evaluation of Flocculation Performance when Harvesting Microalgae


Cite

Fig. 1

Temporal courses of the a) bioflocculant, b) yield of biomass, and c) consumption of glucose, under different initial levels of glucose.
Temporal courses of the a) bioflocculant, b) yield of biomass, and c) consumption of glucose, under different initial levels of glucose.

Fig. 2

a) Effects of the N source alone on the biomass and bioflocculant production, b) effect of the ratio of combined N source on the biomass and bioflocculant production. A/YE – yeast extract, B/Glu – glutamate, C – tryptone, D – ammonium nitrate, E – ammonia chloride, F – urea. The control group was cultured in a minimal medium.
a) Effects of the N source alone on the biomass and bioflocculant production, b) effect of the ratio of combined N source on the biomass and bioflocculant production. A/YE – yeast extract, B/Glu – glutamate, C – tryptone, D – ammonium nitrate, E – ammonia chloride, F – urea. The control group was cultured in a minimal medium.

Fig. 3

The change curve of pH for the a) biomass and b) bioflocculant.
The change curve of pH for the a) biomass and b) bioflocculant.

Fig. 4

RSM and contour plots illustrating the interplaying effects of various factors on bioflocculant production; a–b) glucose (g/l) and yeast extract (g/l), c–d) glucose (g/l) and glutamate (g/l), e–f) yeast extract (g/l) and glutamate (g/l).
RSM and contour plots illustrating the interplaying effects of various factors on bioflocculant production; a–b) glucose (g/l) and yeast extract (g/l), c–d) glucose (g/l) and glutamate (g/l), e–f) yeast extract (g/l) and glutamate (g/l).

Fig. 5

Temporal courses of cellular growth, bioflocculant production, and pH for C. marina MCCC1113 cultivated in the optimal medium inside a rotary shaker at 150 rpm and 28°C for 72 h.
Temporal courses of cellular growth, bioflocculant production, and pH for C. marina MCCC1113 cultivated in the optimal medium inside a rotary shaker at 150 rpm and 28°C for 72 h.

Flocculation efficiency of bioflocculant produced by C. marina on various microalgae.

Flocculation time (min) Group H. pluvialis C. vulgaris S. platensis
FE (%)
5 Treatment 32.1 69.4
Control 26.4 32.9

Effect analysis of independent variables in Plackett-Burman design.

Factor Level p Significant
–1 1
Glucose 25 35 0.0022 ++
Yeast extract 5 15 0.004 ++
Glutamate 1 3 0.025 +
Culture time 28 36 0.85
pH 7 8 0.861

ANOVA for response surface quadratic model.

Source Sum of square DF Mean square F-value Prob > F
Model 0.76   9 0.084 7.02 0.0088
Residual   0.084   7 0.012
Lack of fit   0.039   3 0.013 1.16 0.4282
Pure error   0.045   4
Cor total 0.84 16
R2 = 0.9803 R2adj = 0.7721 R2pred = 0.1744 CV = 13.53 Adeq. precision = 7.526

Determination of the optimum ratio of bioflocculant/microalgae (v/v).

FE (%) of different algae Amount of BF/algae added (%)
0 5 10 15 20
H. pluvialis 20 34.8 36.7 47.2 63
S. platensis 32.9 86.4 87.8 89.4 93.9
C. vulgaris 29.1 48.1 53.2 53.1 51.1

Box-Behnken design arrangement and responses.

RUN Glucose Yeast extract Glutamate Bioflocculant
(g/l) (g/l) (g/l) (g/l)
1 30 10 2 1.30
2 30 10 2 1.19
3 30 5 1 0.9
4 35 5 2 0.65
5 30 15 3 0.95
6 30 10 2 0.89
7 35 10 3 0.79
8 25 15 2 0.57
9 30 5 3 0.87
10 25 10 1 0.32
11 25 5 2 0.54
12 35 10 1 0.79
13 30 10 2 1.22
14 30 10 2 1.28
15 30 15 1 0.92
16 25 10 3 0.58
17 35 15 2 0.65
eISSN:
2544-4646
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Microbiology and Virology