[
Beaverstock, M., Greenwood, A.G., Lavery, E., Nordgren, B., 2012. Applied Simulation: Modeling and Analysis Using FlexSim. FlexSim Software Products.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drbúl, M., Stančeková, D., Babík, O., Holubjak, J., Görögová, I., Varga, D., 2016. Simulation Possibilities of 3D Measuring in Progressive Control of Production. Manufacturing Technology, 16(1), 53–58. DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/MT/16/1/53.10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/MT/16/1/53
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FlexSim: User manual, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garrido, J.M., 2009. Object Oriented Simulation: A Modeling and Programming Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer US.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ingaldi, M., 2020. A new approach to quality management: conceptual matrix of service attributes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22(2), 187–200. DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2020.22.2.13.10.17512/pjms.2020.22.2.13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jelonek, D., Mesjasz-Lech, A., Stępniak, C., Turek, T., Ziora, L., 2020. The Artificial Intelligence Application in the Management of Contemporary Organization: Theoretical Assumptions, Current Practices and Research Review. W: K. Arai & R. Bhatia (red.), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems: volume 69-70. Advances in Information and Communication. Proceedings of the 2019 Future of Information and Communication Conference (FICC) (nr. 69, s. 319–327). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12388-8_23.10.1007/978-3-030-12388-8_23
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jędrzejczyk, Z., Kukuła, K., Skrzypek, J., Walkosz, A., 2020. Badania opera-cyjne w przykładach i zadaniach (Wydanie siódme, zmienione). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaczmar, I., 2015. Cost optimization of blend preparation with the use of the flexsim environment. Agricultural Engineering, 4(156), 51–60. DOI: 10.14654/ir.2015.156.151.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaczmar, I., 2016. The use of simulation and optimization in managing the manufacturing process — case study. Gospodarka Materiałowa i Logistyka, 2016(4), 21–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaczmar, I., 2019. Komputerowe modelowanie i symulacje procesów logistycznych w środowisku flexsim. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karcz, J., Ślusarczyk, B., 2021. Criteria of quality requirements deciding on choice of the logistic operator from a perspective of his customer and the end recipient of goods. Production Engineering Archives, 27(1), 58–68. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2021.27.8.10.30657/pea.2021.27.8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klimecka-Tatar, D., 2018. Context of production engineering in management model of Value Stream Flow according to manufacturing industry. Production Engineering Archives, 21(21), 32–35. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2018.21.07.10.30657/pea.2018.21.07
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klimecka-Tatar, D., Ingaldi, M., 2020. Assessment of the Technological Position of a Selected Enterprise in the Metallurgical Industry. Materials Research Proceedings, 2020(17), 72–78. DOI: 10.21741/9781644901038-11.10.21741/9781644901038-11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klimecka-Tatar, D., Ingaldi, M., Obrecht, M., 2021. Sustainable Developement in Logistic – A Strategy for Management in Terms of Green Transport. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 29(2), 91–96. DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2021-0012.10.2478/mspe-2021-0012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knop, K., 2019. Evaluation of quality of services provided by transport & logistics operator from pharmaceutical industry for improvement purposes. Transportation Research Procedia, 40, 1080–1087. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.151.10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knop, K., 2020a. Importance of visual management in metal and automotive branch and its influence in building a competitive advantage. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22(1), 263–278. DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2020.22.1.17.10.17512/pjms.2020.22.1.17
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knop, K., 2020b. Indicating and analysis the interrelation between terms – visual: management, control, inspection and testing. Production Engineering Archives, 26(3), 110–120. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.22.10.30657/pea.2020.26.22
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kolda, T.G., Lewis, R.M., Torczon, V., 2003. Optimization by Direct Search: New Perspectives on Some Classical and Modern Methods. SIAM Review, 45(3), 385–482. DOI: 10.1137/S003614450242889.10.1137/S003614450242889
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krenczyk, D., Kempa, W.M., Kalinowski, K., Grabowik, C., Paprocka, I., 2017. Production planning and scheduling with material handling using modelling and simulation. MATEC Web of Conferences, 112, 9015. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201711209015.10.1051/matecconf/201711209015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krynke, M., Mielczarek, K., 2018. Applications of linear programming to optimize the cost-benefit criterion in production processes. MATEC Web of Conferences, 183, 4004. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201818304004.10.1051/matecconf/201818304004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krynke, M., Mielczarek, K., Vaško, A., 2019. Analysis of the Problem of Staff Allocation to Work Stations. Quality Production Improvement - QPI, 1(1), 545–550. DOI: 10.2478/cqpi-2019-0073.10.2478/cqpi-2019-0073
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krynke, M., Mielczarek, K., Kiriliuk, O., 2021. Cost Optimization and Risk Minimization During Teamwork Organization. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 29(2), 145–150. DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2021-0019.10.2478/mspe-2021-0019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krynke, M., 2020. Risk Management in the Process of Personnel Allocation to Jobs. 8th International Conference System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment (CzOTO 2019), 82–90.10.2478/czoto-2020-0011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kyncl, J., 2016. Digital Factory Simulation Tools. Manufacturing Technology, 16(2), 371–375. DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/MT/16/2/371.10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/MT/16/2/371
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kyncl, J., Kellner, T., Kubiš, R., 2017. Tricanter Production Process Optimization by Digital Factory Simulation Tools. Manufacturing Technology, 17(1), 49–53. DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2017/a/1213-2489/MT/17/1/49.10.21062/ujep/x.2017/a/1213-2489/MT/17/1/49
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Le, T.D.C., Nguyen, D.D., Oláh, J., Pakurár, M., 2020. Optimal vehicle route schedules in picking up and delivering cargo containers considering time windows in logistics distribution networks: A case study. Production Engineering Archives, 26(4), 174–184. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.31.10.30657/pea.2020.26.31
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matuszny, M., 2020. Building decision trees based on production knowledge as support in decision-making process. Production Engineering Archives, 26(2), 36–40. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.08.10.30657/pea.2020.26.08
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazur, M., Momeni, H., 2019. LEAN Production issues in the organization of the company - results. Production Engineering Archives, 22(22), 50–53. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2019.22.10.10.30657/pea.2019.22.10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niciejewska, M., Idzikowski, A., Škurková, K.L., 2021. Impact of Technical, Organizational and Human Factors on Accident Rate of Small-Sized Enterprises. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 29(2), 139–144. DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2021-0018.10.2478/mspe-2021-0018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pietraszek, J., Radek, N., Goroshko, A.V., 2020. Challenges for the DOE methodology related to the introduction of Industry 4.0. Production Engineering Archives, 26(4), 190–194. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.33.10.30657/pea.2020.26.33
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Setamanit, S., 2019. Improving transportation contract management using simulation. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(2), 466–477. DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2019.20.2.39.10.17512/pjms.2019.20.2.39
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Staniszewska, E., Klimecka-Tatar, D., Obrecht, M., 2020. Eco-design processes in the automotive industry. Production Engineering Archives, 26(4), 131–137. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.25.10.30657/pea.2020.26.25
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sujová, E., Střihavková, E., Čierna, H., 2018. An Analysis of the Assembly Line Modernization by Using Simulation Software. Manufacturing Technology, 18(5), 839–845. DOI: 10.21062/ujep/187.2018/a/1213-2489/MT/18/5/839.10.21062/ujep/187.2018/a/1213-2489/MT/18/5/839
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sujová, E., Vysloužilová, D., Čierna, H., Bambura, R., 2020. Simulation Models of Production Plants as a Tool for Implementation of the Digital Twin Concept into Production. Manufacturing Technology, 20(4), 527–533. DOI: 10.21062/mft.2020.064.10.21062/mft.2020.064
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ulewicz, R., 2014. Practical Application of Quality Tools in the Cast Iron Foundry. Manufacturing Technology, 14(1), 104–111. DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2014/a/1213-2489/MT/14/1/104.10.21062/ujep/x.2014/a/1213-2489/MT/14/1/104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ulewicz, R., Blaskova, M., 2018. Sustainable development and knowledge management from the stakeholders’ point of view. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(2), 363–374. DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.29.10.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.29
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ulewicz, R. Kleszcz, D. Ulewicz M. 2021. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 29(3), 203-207. DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2021-002510.2478/mspe-2021-0025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhuang, C., Liu, J., Xiong, H., 2018. Digital twin-based smart production management and control framework for the complex product assembly shop-floor. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. (96), 1149–1163. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-1617-6.10.1007/s00170-018-1617-6
]Search in Google Scholar
