1. bookVolume 14 (2017): Issue 14 (March 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Mar 2018
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Additional components of risk assessment and their impact on the probability parameter

Published Online: 28 Jan 2020
Page range: 11 - 14
Received: 10 Jan 2017
Accepted: 15 Mar 2017
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
30 Mar 2018
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The article raises the issue of risk assessment and its impact on the quality and safety of work. During the assessment of the turning lathe position additional components associated with the jobs personalization were taken into account. Paragraph 2 item 7 of the Regulation of the Minister of Laborr and Social Policy of 26 September 1997 on general safety regulations defines occupational risk as the likelihood of an adverse event. The authors drew attention to the reality of the accident, which sometimes depends on the predisposition of the employee. It turns out that a correct estimation of the probability of occurrence of the accident to be able to react in a timely way seems extremely important.. This parameter will be assessed more accurately if we take into account a number of additional components resulting from the characteristics of the employee. The results of the personalized assessment of risk may allow appropriate planning of corrective and preventive actions.

Keywords

1. Constantin S. 2012. Industrial Health, Safety and Environmental Management, epubli, Berlin, 3rd edition.Search in Google Scholar

2. Greenwood R. 2006..Reader: Job Safety Analysis Occupational Health and Safety Practitioner. Safetyline InstituteSearch in Google Scholar

3. Ordysiński S. 2014. Wiek, staż pracy oraz stan zdrowia jako czynniki wpływające na percepcję zagrożeń związanych z pracą, Bezpieczeństwo Pracy. Nauka i Praktyka, 9(519), 16-19.Search in Google Scholar

4. Pacana A., Woźny A, Dobosz M., Saja P. 2016. Additional determinants of occupational risk assessment on the example of the HGV driver - Technika, Eksploatacja, Systemy Transportowe 14/6, 488-492Search in Google Scholar

5. Roughton J., Crutchfield N. 2008. Job Hazard Analysis, A Guide for Voluntary Compliance and Beyond.http://emeetingplace.com/Search in Google Scholar

6. Joanne O Crawford, Richard A Graveling, Hilary Cowie, Ken Dixon and Laura MacCalman Research Committee, Institute of Occupational Medicine, IOSH 2009, The health, safety and health promotion needs of older workers, An evidence-based review and guidance, Report submitted to the IOSHSearch in Google Scholar

7. Ulewicz R., Klimecka-Tatar D., Mazur M., Niciejewska M. 2015. Wybrane aspekty zarządzania bezpieczeństwem i higieną pracy, Oficyna Wydawnicza Stowarzyszenia Menedżerów Jakości i Produkcji, Częstochowa.Search in Google Scholar

8. Woźny A., Pacana A. 2013. Ocena Ryzyka zawodowego, OWPRz, Rzeszów.Search in Google Scholar

9. Załuski W. 2008. Skłonnościowa interpretacja prawdopodobieństwa. Ośrodek Badań Interdyscyplinarnych przy Wydziale Filozoficznym Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej.Search in Google Scholar

10. Zawieska M. 2007. Ryzyko zawodowe. Metodyczne postawy oceny, Wydawnictwo CIOP, Warszawa.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo