Artificial Intelligence and Inventorship Under the Patent Law Regime: Practical Development from Common Law Jurisdictions

[1] Commissioner of Patents v Thaler [2022] FCAFC 62 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Thaler v. Vidal, 43 F.4th 1207 (Fed. Cir. 2022) Search in Google Scholar

[3] Australian Patent Office Decision In re Application of Application No: 2019363177, Stephen L. Thaler [2021] APO 5. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs And Trade Marks [2021] EWCA Civ 1374 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Thaler v. Hirshfeld, 558 F. Supp. 3d 238 (E.D. Va. 2021) Search in Google Scholar

[7] Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs And Trade Marks [2020] EWHC 2412 (Pat) (21 September 2020) Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kafataris v Davis (2016) 120 IPR 206 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Univ. of Utah v. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Wissenschaften E.V., 734 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2013) Search in Google Scholar

[10] Mohamad v. Palestinian Auth., 566 U.S. 449, 132 S. Ct. 1702, 182 L. Ed. 2d 720 (2012) Search in Google Scholar

[11] University of Western Australia v Gray (2009) 179 FCR 346 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Polwood Pty Ltd v Foxworth Pty Ltd (2008) 165 FCR 527 Search in Google Scholar

[13] JMVB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Camoflag Pty Ltd (2006) 154 FCR 348 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Henry Brothers (Magherafelt) Ltd v. The Ministry of Defence and the Northern Ireland Office [1999] RPC 442 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Bosies v. Benedict, 27 F.3d 539, 543, 30 USPQ2d 1862, 1865 (Fed. Cir. 1994) Search in Google Scholar

[16] Beech Aircraft Corp. v. EDO Corp., 990 F.2d 1237 (Fed. Cir. 1993) Search in Google Scholar

[17] Abbott R. (2016), ‘I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law’, 57(4) Boston College Law Review Search in Google Scholar

[18] Anantrasirichai N., Bull D. (2021), ‘Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review’, 55(1) Artificial Intelligence Review Search in Google Scholar

[19] Copeland B. J. (2022), ‘Artificial intelligence’, Encyclopedia Britannica, 24 August 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence [accessed 25 August 2022] Search in Google Scholar

[20] Comer A. C. (2021), ‘AI: Artificial Inventor or the Real Deal?’, 22 NC JL & Tech Search in Google Scholar

[21] Committee on Technology (2016), ‘Executive Office of the President National Science and Technology Council, Preparing for the future of artificial intelligence’, Washington D.C. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Davison M. J., Monotti A. L. and Wiseman L. (2020), Australian Intellectual Property Law, 4th edn, Cambridge University Press Search in Google Scholar

[23] Degnan D. A., Huskey L. A. (2006), ‘Inventorship: What Happens When You Don’t Get It Right?’, Holland Art. Retrieved from: https://www.hollandhart.com/files/InventorshipWhatHappens.pdf [accessed 29 September 2022] Search in Google Scholar

[24] Ellis M., ‘Inventorship and Ownership’. Retrieved from: https://www.mewburn.com/law-practice-library/inventorship-and-ownership#:~:text=The%20inventors%20are%20the%20%E2%80%9Cactual,determine%20who%20actually%20devised%20it [accessed 27 September 2022] Search in Google Scholar

[25] Gattari P. G. (2005), ‘Determining Inventorship for US Patent Applications’, 17(5) Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal Search in Google Scholar

[26] George A., Walsh T. (2022), ‘Artificial intelligence is breaking patent law’, (Nature, 24 May 2022). Retrieved from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01391-x [accessed 7 October 2022] Search in Google Scholar

[27] Graham S. J.H., Merges R. P., Samuelson P. and Sichelman T. (2009), ‘High Technology Entrepreneurs and the Patent System: Results of the 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Mathew B. R. (2020), ‘Dr. Stephen Thaler speaks on how DABUS can invent’, The Artificial Inventor Project, 15 July 2020. Retrieved from: https://artificialinventor.com/467-2/ [accessed 22 September 2022] Search in Google Scholar

[29] Marr B. (2020), ‘Can Machines And Artificial Intelligence Be Creative?’, Forbes, 28 February 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2020/02/28/can-machines-and-artificial-intelligence-be-creative/?sh=64c9c19e4580 [accessed 21 September 2022] Search in Google Scholar

[30] McCarthy J., Minsky M. L., Shannon C. E., Rochester N. (1955), A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, Dartmouth College Search in Google Scholar

[31] Mueller J. and Massaron L. (2018), Artificial intelligence for dummies, 1st edn, John Wiley & Sons Search in Google Scholar

[32] Naidoo M. (2021), ‘In a world first, South Africa grants patent to an artificial intelligence system’, The Conversation, 5 August 2021. Retrieved from: https://theconversation.com/in-a-world-first-south-africa-grants-patent-to-an-artificial-intelligence-system-165623 [accessed 7 October 2022] Search in Google Scholar

[33] Rich E., Knight K. (1991), Artifical Intelligence, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill Search in Google Scholar

[34] Schwein R. L. (2021), ‘Patentability and Inventorship of AI-Generated Inventions’, 60 Washburn LJ Search in Google Scholar

[35] Stim R. (2022), Patent, Copyright & Trademark: An Intellectual Property Desk Reference, 17th edn, NOLO Search in Google Scholar

[36] Thaler S. (2019), ‘DABUS in a nutshell’, 19(1) APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers Search in Google Scholar

[37] Thanh K. T. (2009), Implementing the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights in Vietnam, PhD thesis, Victoria University Search in Google Scholar

[38] Van A. L. (2021), ‘Is it time to recognise AI inventorship in patent law?’, Intellectual Property Law et al., November 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.vananhle.net/?p=907#_ftn3 [accessed 7 October 2022] Search in Google Scholar