AI Implementation in ODR: A Game-Changer or a Troublemaker of Data Protection

[1] Mutnick v. Clearview AI, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-01778 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 11, 2020) Search in Google Scholar

[2] Case 284/16 Slovak Republic v. Achmea, EU:C:2018:158. Retrieved from: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/celex.jsf?celex=62016CJ0284&lang1=en&type=TXT&ancre [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[3] Case No 2018-54 Tennant Energy, LLC v Government of Canada, Tribunal’s Communication to the Parties (Perm Ct Arb, 2019). Retrieved from: https://www.italaw.com/cases/7250 [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[4] Case No. 2012-12 Philip Morris v. Australia, PCA, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility dated December 17, 2015. Retrieved from: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7303_0.pdf [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[5] Esso Australia Res. Ltd. v. Plowman (1995) 128 A.L.R 391, 183 C.L.R. 10 (Austl.) Search in Google Scholar

[6] Case No. T 1881-99 Bulgarian Foreign Trade Bank Ltd. v. AI Trade Finance Inc (Swedish Sup. Ct. 27 Oct. 2000). Retrieved from https://www.arbitration.sccinstitute.com/views/pages/getfile.ashx?portalId=89&docId=1083535&propId=1578 [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[7] Abitration Intelligence. Retrieved from: https://arbitratorintelligence.com [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[8] Alexander, N Alexander N. (2006), ‘Mobile mediation: How technology is driving the globalization of ADR’, Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy, Vol. 27, No. 2 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Almaguer A. E. and Baggott III R. W. (1998), ‘Shaping New Legal Frontiers: Dispute Resolution for the Internet’, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 13 Search in Google Scholar

[10] American Bar Association (2002), ‘Task Force on Electronic Commerce and Alternative Dispute, Addressing Disputes in Electronic Commerce’, Final Report, p.132. Retrieved from: http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/dispute/documents/FinalReport102802.authcheckdam.pdf [accessed 12 Mar 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[11] Bartl M. (2017), ‘Facebook, Big Data, and Privatization of Justice in the Digital Age’. Retrieved from: https://www.fljs.org/facebook-big-data-and-privatization-justice-digital-age [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[12] Bidgoli H. (2004), The Internet Encyclopedia, USA: John wiley & Sons Search in Google Scholar

[13] Casey B., Farhangi A. and Vogl R. (2019), ‘Rethinking Explainable Machines: The GDPR’s “Right to Explanation” Debate and the Rise of Algorithmic Audits in Enterprise’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 34 Search in Google Scholar

[14] China Daily (2019), ‘Beijing Internet Court Launches AI judge’, 28 June 2019. Retrieved from: http://www.china-daily.com.cn/a/201906/28/WS5d156cada3103dbf1432ac74.html [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[15] Diakopoulos N. (2014), ‘Algorithmic Accountability Reporting: On the Investigation of Black Boxes’. Retrieved from: https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8ZK5TW2 [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[16] Elite Data Science (2019), ‘Overfitting in Machine Learning: What It Is and How to Prevent It’. Retrieved from: https://elitedatascience.com/overfitting-in-machine-learning [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[17] European Commission (2011), ‘Commission Staff Working Paper: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Alternative Dispute Resolution for consumer disputes (Directive on consumer ADR) (COM(2011) 793 final) and Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Online Dispute Resolution for consumer disputes (Regulation on consumer ODR) (SEC(2011) 1409 final)’. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201204/20120425ATT43950/20120425ATT43950EN.pdf [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[18] Gellman A. J. (n.d.), ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Overview’, National Consumer ADR Advisory Council. Retrieved from: https://www.umass.edu/dispute/ncair/gellman.htm [accessed 12 Mar 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[19] Gizem Halis Kasap (2021), ‘Can Artifificial Intelligence (“AI”) Replace Human Arbitrators? Technological Concerns and Legal Implications’, Journal of Dispute Resolution, Vol. 2021, No. 2 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hattotuwa S. & Conley Tyler M. (2006), ‘An Asian Perspective on Online Mediation’, Asian Journal of Mediation, Feb. 2. Retrieved from: http://hellsdireagent.blogsome.com/2006/02/02/an-asian-perspective-on-online-mediation/ [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[21] Hess B., Bergström M., & Storskrubb E. (2016), EU Civil Justice: Current Issues and Future Outlook, Bloomsbury Publishing Search in Google Scholar

[22] Hildebrandt M. (2017), ‘Law As Computation in the Era of Artificial Legal Intelligence’, Speaking Law to the Power of Statistics Search in Google Scholar

[23] Hörnle J. (2002), ‘Online dispute resolution in business to consumer e-commerce Transactions’, JILT 2, p. 169. Retrieved from: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2002_2/hornle/#a2 [accessed 12 Mar 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[24] Hornle J. (2003), ‘Online dispute resolution: the emperor’s new clothes? The benefits and pitfalls of online dispute resolution and its application to commercial arbitration’, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 17, No. 1 Search in Google Scholar

[25] International Council for Commercial Arbitration, Report No. 6: ICCA-NYC Bar-CPR Protocol on Cybersecurity in International Arbitration. Retrieved from: https://cdn.arbitration-icca.org/s3fs-public/document/media_document/icca-nyc_bar-cpr_cybersecurity_protocol_for_internationalarbitration_-_print_version.pdf [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[26] Investment Policy Hub (2022), ‘Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator: Argentina’. Retrieved from: https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/country/8/argentina/investor [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[27] Jenner A. (2017), ‘The future of dispute resolution: AI’, Kennedys Law, 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.kennedyslaw.com/thought-leadership/article/the-future-of-dispute-resolution-ai [accessed 12 Mar 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[28] Jhusiwala R. (2010), ‘Online dispute resolution: a step in the right direction’, Dispute Resolution Bulletin, Issue V Search in Google Scholar

[29] Kathleen P. & Edna S. (2018), ‘Artificial Intelligence Challenges and Opportunities for International Arbitration’, NYSBA New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer, Vol. 11, No. 1 Search in Google Scholar

[30] Katsh E. & Rifkin J. (2001), Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Search in Google Scholar

[31] Katz D. M., Bommarito II, M. J., Blackman J., & Cai L. (2017), ‘A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States’, PLOS ONE, Vol. 12, No. 4, e0174698. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174698 [accessed 12 March 2023]. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Kaufmann-Kolher G. & Schultz T. (2004), ‘Online Dispute Resolution: Challenges for Contemporary Justice’, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International Search in Google Scholar

[33] Klaas P. (2017), ‘International Commercial Arbitration’ Retrieved from: https://www.ccarbitrators.org/wp-content/uploads/International-Commercial-Arbitration.pdf [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[34] Lee J. (2022), ‘Investment arbitration in Asia: navigating the challenges of a diverse region’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 13, No. 1 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Lide E. C. (1996), ‘ADR and Cyberspace: The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Online Commerce, Intellectual Property and Defamation’, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 12, No. 6 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Lodder A. (2006), ‘The Third Party and Beyond: An Analysis of the Different Parties, in particular The Fifth, Involved in Online Dispute Resolution’, Information and Communications Technology Law, Vol. 15 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Mahnoor W. (2022), ‘The Use of AI in Arbitral Proceedings’, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 37, No. 3 Search in Google Scholar

[38] New York City Bar Association (2014), ‘International Commercial Disputes Committee: Publication of International Awards and Decisions’. Retrieved from: https://www2.nycbar.org/pdf/report/uploads/20072645-PublicationofInternationalArbitrationAwardsandDecisions.pdf [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[39] Niiler E. (2019), ‘Can AI Be a Fair Judge in Court? Estonia Thinks So’, Wired Magazine, 25 March 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.wired.com/story/can-ai-be-fair-judge-court-estonia-thinks-so/ [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[40] Orr D. & Rule C. (2017), ‘Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Online Dispute Resolution’, Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 10 Search in Google Scholar

[41] Paul B. M., Mansi K., Steven K. (2019), ‘Artificial Intelligence and Arbitration: The Computer as an Arbitrator—Are We There Yet?’, Dispute Resolution Journal, Vol. 74,, No. 4 Search in Google Scholar

[42] Penn State Law News (2018), ‘Arbitrator Intelligence Launches Questionnaire and Signs Agreement with Singapore’. Retrieved from: https://pennstatelaw.psu.edu/news/arbitrator-intelligence-launches-questionnaire-signs-agreement-singapore [accessed 12 Mar 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[43] Peters S. (2021), ‘The evolution of alternative dispute resolution and online dispute resolution and online dispute resolution in the European Union’, En: Revista CES Derecho, Vol. 12, No. 1 Search in Google Scholar

[44] Peterson L. E. (2015), ‘Permanent Court of Arbitration Website Goes Offline, With Cyber-Security Firm Contending That Security Flaw Was Exploited in Concert With China-Philippines Arbitration’. Retrieved from: https://www.iareporter.com/articles/permanent-court-of-arbitration-goes-offline-with-cyber-security-firm-contending-that-security-flaw-was-exploited-in-lead-up-to-china-philippines-arbitration/ [accessed 12 Mar 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[45] Rhim Y.-Y. & Park K. (2019), ‘The Applicability of Artificial Intelligence in International Law’, Journal of East Asia & International Law, Vol. 12, No. 1 Search in Google Scholar

[46] Rojas C. P. (2021), ‘The Application of Artificial Intelligence and its Implications on the Right to a Fair Trial: A Critical Analysis’, International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 19-38. Retrieved from: https://www.elevenjournals.com/tijdschrift/ijodr/2021/2/IJODR_2352-5002_2021_008_002_002 [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[47] Scherer M. (2019), ‘Artificial Intelligence and Legal Decision-Making: The Wide Open?’, Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 36, No. 5 Search in Google Scholar

[48] Smith T. (2017), ‘The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Law: The New Frontier of Legal Practice’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 12, No. 7. Retrieved from: https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/c.php?g=557240&p=3832247 [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[49] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2021), ‘Public Goods’. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/public-goods/#DefiPublGoodDistBetwDiffKindPublGood [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[50] Sternlight J. R. (2005), ‘Creeping Mandatory Arbitration: Is It Just?’, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 57 Search in Google Scholar

[51] Tackbery J., Marriott A. & Sweet H. (2001), Bernstein’s Handbook of Arbitration Dispute Resolution Practic, 4th ed, London: Sweet & Maxell Search in Google Scholar

[52] The Guardian (2019), ‘Alexa, Florida death witness: Amazon Echo may hold key to what happened in man’s final moments’, November 1, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/01/alexa-florida-death-witness-amazon-echo [accessed 12 March 2023] Search in Google Scholar

[53] Varian H. R. (1992), Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd edition, New York: Norton Search in Google Scholar

[54] Wei D. (2017), ‘Consumer Protection in the Global Context: The Present Status and Some New Trend’, in Marques C. and Wei D. (eds.), Consumer Law and Socioeconomic Development: National and International Dimensions, Springer Search in Google Scholar

[55] Wei D. and Tian Z., ‘Comparison of Online Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the European Union, the United States and China: Suggestions on Possible Future Work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)’ Search in Google Scholar