[
ADHIKARI, R. 2002. Impact of biogas programme on forest conservation. Institute of Forestry, Pokhara Tribhuvan University, Nepal, 2002. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262675001_Impact_of_biogas_programme_on_forest_conservation
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AGARWALA, M. – GHOSHAL, S. – VERCHOT, L. – MARTIUS, C. – AHUJA, R. – DEFRIES, R. 2017. Impact of biogas interventions on forest biomass and regeneration in southern India. In Global Ecology and Conservation, vol. 11, 2017, pp. 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.06.00510.1016/j.gecco.2017.06.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AGNOLETTI, M. – SANTORO, A. 2015. Cultural values and sustainable forest management: The case of Europe. In Journal of Forest Research, vol. 20, 2015, no. 5, pp. 438–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-015-0500-710.1007/s10310-015-0500-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AMACHER, G. – OLLIKAINEN, M. – KOSKELA, E. A. 2009. Economics of Forest Resources. 1st ed. The MIT Press, 2009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BAUER, H. 1996. Automotive handbook. 4th ed., Robert Bosch Gmbtt, 1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BHUTIA, K. D. 2021. Trees as Village Protectors, Guru Rinpoche’s Wayfinders and Adopted Family Members: Arboreal Imagination, Agency and Relationality in Sikkim. In Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, vol. 25, 2021, no. 2, pp. 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685357-0250200610.1163/15685357-02502006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BRAHMA, B. – NATH, A. J. – DEB, C. – SILESHI, G. W. – SAHOO, U. K. – KUMAR DAS, A. 2021. A critical review of forest biomass estimation equations in India. In Trees, Forests and People, vol. 5, 2021, 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.10009810.1016/j.tfp.2021.100098
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BROWN, G. – TOLSMA, A. – MURPHY, S. – MIEHS, A. – MCNABB, E. – YORK, A. 2009. Ecological impacts of firewood collection – a literature review to inform firewood management on public land in Victoria. Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BULTE, E. – VAN SOEST, D. 1996. A Note on High Discount Rates and Depletion of Primary Forests. In Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, vol. 21, 1996, no. 2, pp. 341–350..
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CLARK, C. W. (1990). The Mathematical bioeconomics. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, 1990.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DANIEL, T. C. – MUHAR, A. – ARNBERGER, A. – AZNAR, O. – BOYD, J. W. – CHAN, K. M. A. – COSTANZA, R. – ELMQVIST, T. – FLINT, C. G. – GOBSTER, P. H. – GRÊT-REGAMEY, A. – LAVE, R. – MUHAR, S. – PENKER, M. – RIBE, R. G. – SCHAUPPENLEHNER, T. – SIKOR, T. – SOLOVIY, I. – SPIERENBURG, M. ... – VON DER DUNK, A. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, 2012, no. 23, pp. 8812–8819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.111477310910.1073/pnas.1114773109338414222615401
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DURUAKU, J. I. – AJIWE, V. I. E. – OKOYE, N. H. – ARINZE, R. U. 2016. An Evaluation of the Calorific Values of the Branches and Stems of 11 Tropical Trees. In Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, vol. 6, 2016, no. 44. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2016.6200510.4236/jsbs.2016.62005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FAUSTMANN, M. 1849. Calculation of value which forest land and immature stand possess. In Reprinted in Journal of Forest Economics, vol. 1, 1849, pp. 89–114.10.4324/9781315182681-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GAN, J. – KOLISON, S. H. – COLLETTI, J. P. 2001. Optimal forest stock and harvest with valuing non-timber benefits: A case of US coniferous forests. In Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 2, 2001, no. 2, pp. 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00051-X10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00051-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GOMPIL, B. – TSEVEEN, B. – ALMASBEK, J. 2022. Modeling and control of Mongolian forest utilization: Impact of illegal logging. In Natural Resource Modeling, vol. 35, 2022, no. 1, e12333. https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.1233310.1111/nrm.12333
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GREĢE-STALTMANE, E. – TUHERM, H. 2010. Importance of Discount Rate in Latvian Forest Valuation. In Baltic Forestry, vol. 16, 2010, no. 2, pp. 303–311.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HARTMAN, R. 1976. The Harvesting Decision Whena Standing Forest Has Valuea. In Economic Inquiry, vol. 14, 1976, no. 1, pp. 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00377.x10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00377.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HELTBERG, R. – ARNDT, T. C. – SEKHAR, N. U. 2000. Fuelwood Consumption and Forest Degradation: A Household Model for Domestic Energy Substitution in Rural India. In Land Economics, vol. 76, 2000, no. 2, pp. 213–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/314722510.2307/3147225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IHEMEZIE, E. J. – NAWRATH, M. – STRAUß, L. – STRINGER, L. C. – DALLIMER, M. 2021. The influence of human values on attitudes and behaviours towards forest conservation. In Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 292, 2021, 112857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11285710.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11285734051474
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JAGGER, P. – KITTNER, N. 2017. Deforestation and biomass fuel dynamics in Uganda. In Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 105, 2017, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.00510.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JOSHEE, B. R. – AMACHER, G. S. – HYDE, W. F. 2000. Household fuelwood production and consumption, substitution and innovation in two districts of Nepal in Economics of forestry and rural development: An empirical introduction from Asia. The University of Michigan press, Michigan, 2000.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KALLIO, M. – DYKSTRA, D. – BINKLEY, C. Z. 1987. The global forest sector: An analytical perspective. In The Global Forest Sector: An Analytical Perspective, 1987. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19880621285
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KANT, S. 2000. A dynamic approach to forest regimes in developing economies. In Ecological Economics, vol. 32, 2000, no. 2, pp. 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00100-710.1016/S0921-8009(99)00100-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LAIRD, S. A. 1999. 9. Forests, Culture and Conservation. In Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity, vol. 1–0, 1999, pp. 345–396. Practical Action Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780445434.00910.3362/9781780445434.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEE, S. M. – KIM, Y.-S. – JAUNG, W. – LATIFAH, S. – AFIFI, M. – FISHER, L. A. 2015. Forests, fuelwood and livelihoods – Energy transition patterns in eastern Indonesia. In Energy Policy, vol. 85, 2015, pp. 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.03010.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEFEVRE, T. – TODOC, J. L. – TIMILSINA, G. R. 1997. Implications for the forestry sector, conclusions and recommendations. In Trossero, M. A. – Department, F. – Nations, F. – A. O. In The role of wood energy in Asia. Of the United & I. Rome (Eds.), 1997. http://www.fao.org/docrep/W7519E/W7519e00.htm#
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LOWMAN, M. D. – SINU, P. A. 2017. Can the Spiritual Values of Forests Inspire Eff ective Conservation? In BioScience, vol. 67, 2017, no. 8, pp. 688–690. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix05710.1093/biosci/bix057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LYON, K. 2004. Modeling Timber Supply, Fuel-Wood, and Atmospheric Carbon Mitigation. Utah State University, 2004. Department of Economics, Working Papers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23696669_Modeling_Timber_Supply_Fuel-Wood_and_Atmospheric_Carbon_Mitigation
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NSSO (National Sample Survey Organization). 2012. Energy sources of Indian households for cooking and lighting (NSS 66th Round, July 2009–June 2010, Report no. 542 (66/1.0/4)). National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PANDEY, D. 2002. Fuelwood Studies in India: Myth and Reality. Center for International Forestry Research. JSTOR, 2002. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep02013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PATTANAYAK, S. K. – SILLS, E. O. – KRAMER, R. A. 2004. Seeing the forest for the fuel. In Environment and Development Economics, vol. 9, 2004, no. 2, pp. 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X0300122010.1017/S1355770X03001220
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RANJAN, R. 2018. What drives forest degradation in the central Himalayas? Understanding the feedback dynamics between participatory forest management institutions and the species composition of forests. In Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 95, 2018, pp. 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.01010.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RASQUINHA, D. N. – MISHRA, D. R. 2021. Impact of wood harvesting on mangrove forest structure, composition and biomass dynamics in India. In Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 248, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.10697410.1016/j.ecss.2020.106974
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROBINSON, E. J. Z. – ALBERS, H. J. – WILLIAMS, J. C. 2008. Spatial and temporal modeling of community non-timber forest extraction. In Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 56, 2008, no. 3, pp. 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.04.00210.1016/j.jeem.2008.04.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROY, B. C. S. 2008. Connecting communities and conservation: Collaborative management of protected areas in Bangladesh. In Fuelwood, alternative energy and forest user groups in Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, 2008. USAID. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303079164_Connecting_Communities_and_Conservation_Co-management_Initiatives_Implemented_by_IPAC_in_Wetlands_and_Forests_of_Bangladesh
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SASSEN, M. – SHEIL, D. – GILLER, K. E. 2015. Fuelwood collection and its impacts on a protected tropical mountain forest in Uganda. In Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 354, 2015, pp. 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.03710.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHODDO, G. H. 2022. The contribution of Gudo forest conservation culture is key to biodiversity conservation the case of Sheka Zone, southwest Ethiopia. In Land Use Policy, vol. 113, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.10587210.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105872
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SINGH, D. – ZERRIFFI, H. – BAILIS, R. – LEMAY, V. 2021. Forest, farms and fuelwood: Measuring changes in fuelwood collection and consumption behavior from a clean cooking intervention. In Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 61, 2021, pp. 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2021.02.00210.1016/j.esd.2021.02.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SINGH, M. – BABANNA, S. K. – KUMAR, D. – DWIVEDI, R. P. – DEV, I. – KUMAR, A. – TEWARI, R. K. – CHATURVEDI, O. P. – DAGAR, J. C. 2021. Valuation of fuelwood from agroforestry systems: A methodological perspective. In Agroforestry Systems, vol. 95, 2021, no. 5, pp. 977–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00580-910.1007/s10457-020-00580-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SPÎRCHEZ, C. – LUNGULEASA, A. – CROITORU, C. 2017. The importance of the wood biomass in environment protection. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1918 (1), 020007. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.501850 210.1063/1.5018502
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TORRES, P. C. – MORSELLO, C. – PARRY, L. – PARDINI, R. 2016. Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia. In PLOS ONE, vol. 11, 2016, no. 12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.016769110.1371/journal.pone.0167691515286127942038
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TRONCOSO, K. – CASTILLO, A. – MASERA, O. – MERINO, L. 2007. Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking: Case study in rural Mexico. In Energy Policy, vol. 35, 2007, no. 5, pp. 2799–2810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.01110.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ULLAH, S. – NOOR, R. S. – ABID, A. – MENDAKO, R. K. – WAQAS, M. M. – SHAH, A. N. – TIAN, G. 2021. Socio-Economic Impacts of Livelihood from Fuelwood and Timber Consumption on the Sustainability of Forest Environment: Evidence from Basho Valley, Baltistan, Pakistan. In Agriculture, vol. 11, 2021, no. 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture1107059610.3390/agriculture11070596
]Search in Google Scholar