1. bookVolume 5 (2012): Issue 2 (December 2012)
    The Politics of Agency Governance
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Agencies in Three South Eastern European Countries: Politics, Expertise and Law

Published Online: 16 May 2013
Volume & Issue: Volume 5 (2012) - Issue 2 (December 2012) - The Politics of Agency Governance
Page range: 17 - 44
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Agencies are an organisational form with regulatory, expert or executive tasks that may ensure better usage of expertise compared to traditional administrative organisations. However, there are certain unintentional effects of the agency model, which are more obvious in transitional countries. Coordination and policy coherence gaps may raise the question of political accountability, provoke robust political interventions, and undermine the level of autonomy and expertise, especially where a firm legal framework does not limit the influence of politics. Another problem is the effective legal control over agencies. Traditional, bureaucratic legal procedures of internal control and courts’ supervision in certain transition countries, like those researched in the paper (Slovenia, Croatia and Montenegro), are not fully suitable and effective for agencies, opening significant room for politicisation hidden behind expertise. The recent proliferation of agencies in those countries causes many new problems of public administration and enhances old ones. Interview-based research conducted in three countries in January 2012 has the purpose to establish the main problems and issues in the functioning of agencies, especially with regard to the legal aspect of agency and politics / policy relations. Basic findings confirm the hypothesis that the agency model in those countries has not been stabilised yet. Professionalism, autonomy and expertise of the agencies are in a precarious position. The legal framework for agencies should be fine-tuned and strengthened, to ensure proper steering within the agency model.

Keywords

Bohinc, Rado. 2005. Osebe javnega prava: Javni zavodi, javna podjetja, javne agencije,javni skladi. Ljubljana: GV Založba.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, D. R. 2010. “Institutional Development in Small States: Evidence from the Commonwealth Caribbean.” Halduskultuur - Administrative Culture 11, 44 - 65.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, Tom and Per Lagreid (eds). 2006. Autonomy and Regulation: Copingwith Agencies in the Modern State. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

Goetz, Klaus. 2005. “The New Member States and the EU: Responding to Europe.” In Simon Bulmer and Christian Lequesne (eds). The Member States of theEuropean Union. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 254 - 280.Search in Google Scholar

Interviews (January 2012), with managers and board members of the Securities Market Agency (ATVP), The Agency of the Republic of Slovenia for Public Legal Records and Related Services (AJPES), Agency for Public Oversight of Auditing (ANR), Energy Agency (AGEN-RS), Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS), Slovenian Traffic Safety Agency (AVP), Slovenian Book Agency (JAK), Ministry of the economy, Ministry of transport, Ministry of high education, science and technology and Administrative Court in Republic of Slovenia.Search in Google Scholar

Interviews (January 2012) with managers and board members of Croatian Post and Electronic Communication Agency, the Railway Market Regulatory Agency, Croatian Competition Agency, Agency for Science and Higher Education, Croatian Agency for Compulsory Oil Stocks, Croatian Financial Services Supervisory Agency, judges of the Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia, public officials and highly ranked civil servants in Ministry of labour and the Ministry of Public Administration.Search in Google Scholar

Interviews (January 2012), with managers of the Agency for Electronic Communications and Postal Services, Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices, Tobacco Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, the president, a judge, and a court advisor of the Administrative Court of Montenegro, two assistant ministers (for public administration, Ministry of Internal Affairs; and for internal market and competition, Ministry of Economy).Search in Google Scholar

Koprić, Ivan. 2012. “Managing Public Affairs in SouthEastern Europe: Muddled Governance.” In Ann Marie Bissessar (ed.). Governance: Is It for Everyone ? New York: Nova Publishers (forthcoming).Search in Google Scholar

Koprić, Ivan. 2011a. “Contemporary Croatian Public Administration on the Reform Waves.” Yearbook of Croatian Academy of Legal Sciences 2(1), 1 - 39.Search in Google Scholar

Koprić, Ivan. 2011b. “Administrative Technology and General Administrative Procedure: Challenges and Changes in South-Eastern Europe.” Hrvatska i komparativnajavna uprava - Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 11(2), 435 - 454.Search in Google Scholar

Koprić, Ivan, Anamarija Musa and Goranka Lalić Novak. 2012. Europski upravniprostor - European Administrative Space. Zagreb: Institut za javnu upravu.Search in Google Scholar

Kovač, Polonca. 2011. “The Public Administration Reform Agenda in Slovenia: Two Decades of Challenges and Results.” Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava 11(3), 627 - 650. Kovač, Polonca. 2006. Pravni in sociološki vidiki javnih pooblastil v Sloveniji. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za upravo Univerze v Ljubljani.Search in Google Scholar

Kovač, Polonca and Gregor Virant (eds). 2011. Razvoj slovenske javne uprave1991 - 2011. Ljubljana: Uradni list Republike Slovenije.Search in Google Scholar

Lilić, Stevan. 2010. “Pravci unapređenja državne uprave Crne Gore: Ekspertska vizija.” In Mijat Šuković (ed.). Crna Gora u XXI stoljeću: U eri kompetitivnosti. Podgorica: Crnogorska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, 324 - 345.Search in Google Scholar

Marković, Milan. 2007. Savremena javna uprava. Podgorica: Pravni fakultet, Fakultet političkih nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Musa, Anamarija and Ivan Koprić. 2011. “What Kind of Agencification in Croatia ? Trends and Future Directions.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, Special Issue, November 2011, 50 - 72.Search in Google Scholar

Olsen, Johan P. 2003. “Towards A European Administrative Space.” Journal of EuropeanPublic Policy 10(4), 506 - 531.Search in Google Scholar

Parrado, Salvador and Miquel Salvador. 2011. “The Institutionalizing of Meritocracy in Latin American Regulatory Agencies.” International Review of AdministrativeSciences 77, 687 - 712.Search in Google Scholar

Pirnat, Rajko. (ed.). 2004. Komentar zakonov s področja uprave. Ljubljana: Inštitut za javno upravo pri Pravni fakulteti.Search in Google Scholar

Pirnat, Rajko. 2000. “Nekatera vprašanja postopkov neodvisnih upravnih agencij.” Podjetje in delo (6 / 7), 1393 - 1402.Search in Google Scholar

Polidano, Charles. 1999. “The Bureaucrat Who Fell Under a Bus: Ministerial Responsibility, Executive Agencies and The Derek Lewis Affair in Britain.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 12(2), 201 - 229.Search in Google Scholar

Pollitt, Christopher. 2004. “Clarifying Convergence: Striking Similarities and Durable Differences in Public Management Reform.” Public Management Review 4(1), 471 - 472.Search in Google Scholar

Pollitt, Christopher and C. Talbot (eds). 2004. Unbundled Government: A CriticalAnalysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualization. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203507148Search in Google Scholar

Randma-Liiv, Tiina. 2002. “Small States and Bureaucracy: Challenges for Public Administration.” TRAMES 6(4), 374 - 389.Search in Google Scholar

Sarapuu, Kulli. 2010. “Comparative Analysis of State Administrations: The Size of State as an Independent Variable.” Halduskultuur - Administrative Culture 11(1), 30 - 43. Search in Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, Frank and Ulrich Sedelmeier (eds). 2005. The Europeanization ofCentral and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Šević, Željko. 2001. “Politico-Administrative Relationship in Small States.” Bank ofValetta Review 23, 63 - 76.Search in Google Scholar

Van Thiel, Sandra. 2012. “Comparing Agencies across Countries.” In K. Verhoest, S. van Thiel, G. Bouckaert and P. Lagreid (eds). Government Agencies: Practicesand Lessons from 30 Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 18 - 26.Search in Google Scholar

Verhoest, Koen, Sandra van Thiel, Geert Bouckaert and Per Lagreid. 2012. GovernmentAgencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Verhoest, Koen, Sandra van Thiel, Geert Bouckaert and Per Lagreid. 2011. GoverningPublic Agencies in the 21st Century, COST Policy Brief. Leuven: K. U.Search in Google Scholar

Leuven, Public Management Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Virant, Grega. 2004. “Prenos nalog javne uprave na nedržavne organizacije: Primerjalni in teoretični okviri.” Podjetje in delo (6 - 7), 1411 - 1418.Search in Google Scholar

Vlada RS / Government of the Republic of Slovenia. 2011. Izhodišča za nadaljnji razvojin organizacijsko ter normativno urejanje javnega sektorja [The Origins of further development and organisational and normative regulation of the public sector], internal unpublished materials. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo