[Aczel A. D. 1996. Complete Business Statistics. Columbus, USA: McGraw Hill Companies, 428-436.]Search in Google Scholar
[Al-Marzooqi W., Wiseman J. 2009. Effect of extrusion under controlled temperature and moisture conditions on ileal apparent amino acid and starch digestibility in peas determined with young broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 153: 113-130.[DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.05.004]10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.05.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Alonso R., Grant G., Dewey P., Marzo F. 2000. Nutritional Assessment in Vitro and in Vivo of Raw and Extruded Peas (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48(6): 2286-2290. [DOI: 10.1021/jf000095o]10.1021/jf000095o]Search in Google Scholar
[AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed., ed. A. O. A. C. Arlington, VA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biel W., Bobko K., Maciorowski R. 2009. Chemical composition and nutritive value of husked and naked oats grain. Journal of Cereal Science 49: 413-418. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcs.2009.01.009.]10.1016/j.jcs.2009.01.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Boisen S., Hvelplund T., Weisbjerg M. R. 2000. Ideal amino acid profiles as a basis for feed protein evaluation. Livestock Production Science 64: 239-251. [DOI: 0301-6226(99)00146-3]10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00146-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Castell A. G., Guenter W., Igbasan F. A. 1996. Nutritive value of peas for non-ruminant diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 60: 209-227. [DOI:10.1016/0377-8401(96)00979-0]10.1016/0377-8401(96)00979-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Chrastil J. 1986. Spectrophotometric determination of tryptophan and tyrosine in peptides and proteins based on new color reactions. Analytical Biochemistry 158(2): 443-446. [DOI:10.1016/0003-2697(86)90573-7]10.1016/0003-2697(86)90573-7]Search in Google Scholar
[COBORU 2008. Wyniki porejestrowych doświadczeń odmianowych (WPDO). [in Polish]]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies D. R. 1985. Pea (Pisum sativum L.). Grain Legume Crops, (ed. D. R. Davies, et al.) London, UK: Collins., pp. 147-198.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dobosz M. 2001. Wspomagana komputerowo statystyczna analiza wyników badań. Warsaw: AOW EXIT, 231-232. ISBN 83-87674-29-X.]Search in Google Scholar
[FAO. 2007. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. Report of Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series, 935. ISSN 0512-3054.]Search in Google Scholar
[FAO/WHO. 1991. Protein Quality Evaluation. Report of a Joint FAO-WHO Expert Consultation FAO. Food and Nutrition, Rome, 51. ISBN: 9251030979 9789251030974.]Search in Google Scholar
[Foster-Powell K., Holt S., Brand-Mille J. C. 2002. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 76: 5-56. ISSN: 00029165.10.1093/ajcn/76.1.512081815]Search in Google Scholar
[Frias J., Giacomino S., Peñas E., Pellegrino N., Ferreyra V., Apro N., Olivera Carrión M., Vidal-Valverde C. 2011. Assessment of the nutritional quality of raw and extruded Pisum sativum L. var. laguna seeds. LWT - Food Science and Technology 44: 1303-1308. [DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2010.12.025]10.1016/j.lwt.2010.12.025]Search in Google Scholar
[Han H., Baik B. K. 2008. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of lentils (Lens culinaris), chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.), peas (Pisum sativum L.) and soybeans (Glycine max) and their quantitative changes during processing. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 43: 1971-1978. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2008.01800.x]10.1111/j.1365-2621.2008.01800.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenkins A. L. 2007. The glycemic index: Looking back 25 years. Cereal Foods World 52: 50-53. [DOI: 10.1094/CFW-52-1-0050]10.1094/CFW-52-1-0050]Search in Google Scholar
[Kraus T. E. C., Dahlgren R.A, Zasoski R. J. 2003. Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems - a review. Plant and Soil 256: 41-66. [DOI: 10.1023/A:1026206511084]10.1023/A:1026206511084]Search in Google Scholar
[Martínez-Villaluenga C., Gulewicz P., Frias J., Gulewicz K., Vidal-Valverde C. 2008. Assessment of protein fractions of three cultivars of Pisum sativum L.: effect of germination. European Food Research and Technology 226: 1465-1478. [DOI: 10.1007/s00217-007-0678-9]10.1007/s00217-007-0678-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Martins J. M., Riottot M., de Abreu M. C., Lanca M., Viegas-Crespo A. M., Almeida J. A., Freire J. B., Bento O. P. 2004. Dietary Raw Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Reduce Plasma Total and LDL Cholesterol and Hepatic Esterified Cholesterol in Intact and Ileorectal Anastomosed Pigs Fed Cholesterol-Rich Diets. Journal of Nutrition 134: 3305-3312. ISSN: 00223166.10.1093/jn/134.12.330515570030]Search in Google Scholar
[Mcdonough F. E., Bodwell C. E., Hitchins A. D., Staples R. S. 1989. Bioavailability of lysine in selected foods by rat growth assay. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 39: 67-75. [DOI: 10.1007/BF01092403]10.1007/BF010924032496403]Search in Google Scholar
[Millward D. J. 1999. The nutritional value of plant-based diets in relation to human amino acid and protein requirements. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58: 249-260. [DOI: 10.1017/S0029665199000531]10.1017/S0029665199000531]Search in Google Scholar
[Nikolopoulou D., Grigorakis K., Stasini M., Alexis M. N., Iliadis K. 2007. Differences in chemical composition of field pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars: Effect of cultivation area and year. Food Chemistry 103: 847-852. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.035]10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.035]Search in Google Scholar
[Nikolopoulou D., Grigorakis K., Stasini M., Alexis M., Iliadis, K. 2006. Effects of cultivation area and year on proximate composition and antinutrients in three different kabuli-type chickpea (Cicer arientinum) varietes. European Food Research Technology, 23: 737-741. [DOI: 10.1007/s00217-006-0261-9]10.1007/s00217-006-0261-9]Search in Google Scholar
[NRC. 1989. Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th ed. Protein and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. ISBN-10: 0-309-04633-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press. Washington, DC, 19-34. ISBN-10: 0-309-04892-3.]Search in Google Scholar
[Paczocha S. 2010. Wyniki porejestrowych doświadczeń odmianowych w woj. świętokrzyskim. Świętokrzyski Zespół Porejestrowego Doświadczalnictwa Odmianowego, pp.79-90. [in Polish]]Search in Google Scholar
[Palander S., Laurinen P., Perttilä S., Valaja J., Partanin K. 2006. Protein and amino acid digestibility and metabolizable energy value of pea (Pisum sativum), faba bean (Vicia faba) and lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) seeds for turkeys of different age. Animal Feed Science and Technology 127: 89-100. [DOI: 10. 1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.07.003]10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Rizkalla S. W., Bellisle F., Slama G. 2002. Health benefits of low glycemic index foods, such as pulses, in diabetic patients and health individuals. British Journal of Nutrition 88: 255-262. [DOI: 10.1079/BJN 2002715]]Search in Google Scholar
[Salgado P., Montagne L., Freire J. P. B., Ferreira R. B., Teixeira A., Bento O., Abreu M. C., Toullec R., Lallès J.-P. 2002. Legume grains enhance ileal losses of specific endogenous serine-protease proteins in weaned pigs. Journal of Nutrition 132(7): 1913-1920. ISSN: 00223166.10.1093/jn/132.7.191312097670]Search in Google Scholar
[Schumacher H., Paulsen H. M., Gau A. E., Link W., Jürgens H. U., Sass O., Dieterich R. 2011. Seed protein amino acid composition of important local grain legumes Lupinus angustifolius L., Lupinus luteus L., Pisum sativum L. and Vicia faba L. Plant Breeding 130: 156-164. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01832.x]10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01832.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanek M., Zdunczyk Z., Purwin C., Florek S. 2004. Chemical composition and nutritive value of seeds of selected pea varieties. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika 28(50): 71-73. ISSN 1392-2130.]Search in Google Scholar
[StatSoft, Inc. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 9.0. 2009. www.statsoft.com]Search in Google Scholar
[Sujak A., Kotlarz A., Strobel W. 2006. Compositional and nutritional evaluation of several lupin seeds. Food Chemistry 98: 711-719. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.036]10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.036]Search in Google Scholar
[Szwejkowska B. 2005. [Effect of cultivation intensity on protein content and yields in field pea]. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura 4(1): 153-161. ISSN:1664-0625. [in Polish with English summary].]Search in Google Scholar
[Tyczkowska K. 1977. Metoda oznaczania kwasu taninowego w ziarnie sorga. Biuletyn Informacyjny Przemysłu Paszowego 4: 40-45. ISSN: 0137-1568. [in Polish]]Search in Google Scholar
[Urbano G., López-Jurado M., Frejnagel S., Gómez-Villalva E., Porres J. M., Frías J., Vidal-Valverde C., Aranda, P. 2005. Nutritional assessment of raw and germinated pea (Pisum sativum L.) protein and carbohydrate by in vitro and in vivo techniques. Nutrition 21: 230-239. [DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2004.04.025]10.1016/j.nut.2004.04.02515723753]Search in Google Scholar
[Valencia D. G., Serrano M. P., Centeno C., Lázaro R., Mateos G. G. 2008. Pea protein as a substitute of soya bean protein in diets for young pigs: Effects on productivity and digestive traits. Livestock Science 118: 1-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.01.018]10.1016/j.livsci.2008.01.018]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Soest P. J., Robertson B. J., Lewis B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583. ISSN:00220302.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang N., Daun J. K. 2004. Effect of variety and crude protein content on nutrients and certain antinutrients in field peas (Pisum sativum). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84: 1021-1029. [DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1742]10.1002/jsfa.1742]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang N., Hatcher D. W., Gawalko E. J. 2008. Effect of variety and processing on nutrients and certain antinutrients in field peas (Pisum sativum). Food Chemistry 111: 132-138. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.047]10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.047]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang N., Hatcher D. W., Warkentin T. D., Toews R. 2010. Effect of cultivar and environment on physicochemical and cooking characteristics of field pea (Pisum sativum). Food Chemistry 118: 109-115. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.082]10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.082]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang X., Warkentin T. D., Briggs C. J., Oomah B. D., Campbell C. G., Woods S. 1998. Total phenolics and condensed tannins in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Euphytica 101: 97-102. [DOI: 10.1023/A:1018371604056]10.1023/A:1018371604056]Search in Google Scholar
[Zdunczyk Z., Godycka I., Amarowicz R. 1997. Chemical composition and content of antinutritional factors in Polish cultivars of peas. Plant Food for Human Nutrition 50: 37-45. [DOI: 10.1007/BF02436041]10.1007/BF024360419198113]Search in Google Scholar