Open Access

Inheritance of Sensitivity to Fenthion in Resistant and Susceptible to Bacterial Speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) Tomato Genotypes


Cite

Bashan Y., Okon Y., Henis Y. 1978. Infection studies of Pseudomonas tomato, causal agent of bacterial speck of tomato. Phytoparasitica6: 135-144.Search in Google Scholar

Carland F. M., Staskawicz B. J. 1993. Genetic characterization of the Pto locus of tomato: semi-dominance and cosegregation of resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato and sensitivity to the insecticide fenthion. Molecular and General Genetics239: 1-2, 17-27.Search in Google Scholar

Gitaitis R. D., Phatak S. C., Jaworski C. A., Smith M. W. 1982. Resistance in tomato transplants to bacterial speck. Plant Dis.66 (3): 210-211.10.1094/PD-66-210Search in Google Scholar

Kozik E. U. 2002. Studies on resistance to bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) in tomato cv. Ontario 7710. Plant Breeding121: 526-530.10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00766.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kozik E. U., Sobiczewski P. 2000. Response of tomato genotypes to bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato). A. Physiol. Plant.22(3): 243-246.Search in Google Scholar

Kozik E. U., Sobiczewski P. 2007. Assessment of inoculation techniques suitability for determination of tomato plants resistance to bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato). Phytopathol. Polonica44: 17-25.Search in Google Scholar

Laterrot H. 1985. Susceptibility of the Pto plants to lebaycid insecticide: a tool for plant breeders? Tomato Genet. Research Coop. Newslett.35: 6.Search in Google Scholar

Lawson V. F., Summers W. L. 1984. Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato in wild Lycopersicon species.Plant Dis.68: 139-141.10.1094/PD-68-139Search in Google Scholar

Martin G. B., Williams J., Tanskley S. D. 1991. Rapid identification of markers linked to Pseudomonas resistance gene in tomato by using random primers and near-isogenic lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA88: 2336-234010.1073/pnas.88.6.2336Search in Google Scholar

Martin G. B., Brommonschenkel S. H., Chunwongse J., Earle S. D., Tanskley S. D. 1994. A member of tomato Pto gene family confers sensitivity to fenthion resulting in rapid cell death. Plant Cell.6: 1543-1552.10.1105/tpc.6.11.1543Search in Google Scholar

Milijasevic S., Todorovic B. 2006: Susceptibility of tomato genotypes to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato in greenhouse conditions. Pestic. Phytomed (Belgrad)21: 113-120.Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell R. E., Hale C. N., Shanks J. C. 1983. Production of different pathogenic symptoms and different toxins by strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato not distinguishable by gel-immunodiffusion assay. Physiol. Plant Pathol.23: 315-322.10.1016/0048-4059(83)90017-6Search in Google Scholar

Pilovsky M., Zutra D. 1982. Screening wild tomatoes for resistance to bacterial speck pathogen (Pseudomonas tomato). Plant Dis.66(1): 46-47.10.1094/PD-66-46Search in Google Scholar

Pitblado R. E., Kerr E. A. 1980. Resistance to bacterial speck (Pseudomonas tomato) in tomato. Acta Hort.100: 379-382.10.17660/ActaHortic.1980.100.40Search in Google Scholar

Pitblado R. E., MacNeill B. H. 1983. Genetic basis of resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato in field tomatoes. Can. Jour. Plant Pathol.5: 251-255.10.1080/07060668309501606Search in Google Scholar

Srb A. M., Owen R. D. 1955. General Genetics. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California.Search in Google Scholar

Yunis H., Bashan Y., Okon Y., Henis Y. 1980. Two sources of resistance to bacterial speck of tomato caused by Pseudomonas tomato.Plant Dis.64: 937-939.10.1094/PD-64-937Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1231-0948
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Plant Science, other