[
1. Abolhassani, L., Afghari, A.P. and Borzadaran, H.M. (2019) Public preferences towards bicycle sharing system in developing countries: The case of Mashhad, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 763–773. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.032.10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Alsabi, E., Alrwais, L., Alosimai, R. et al. (2016) Benchmark for Smart Cities. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2016, pp. 166–177. IOS Press. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-611-8-166.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Bamwesigye, D. and Hlavackova, P. (2019) Analysis of sustainable transport for smart cities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(7). MDPI AG. DOI: 10.3390/SU11072140.10.3390/su11072140
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Bevir, M., Rhodes, R.A.W. and Weller, P. (2003) Traditions of governance: Interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration, 81(1), 1–17. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00334.10.1111/1467-9299.00334
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Bissix, G. (2015) A multidimensional framework for assessing the acceptability of recreational all-terrain vehicle access on community trails and local public highways. Leisure/Loisir, 39(3–4), 345–359. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/14927713.2015.1116202.10.1080/14927713.2015.1116202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Bocken, N., Boons, F. and Baldassarre, B. (2019) Sustainable business model experimentation by understanding ecologies of business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1498–1512. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.159.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.159
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Böcker, L., Dijst, M. and Faber, J. (2016) Weather, transport mode choices and emotional travel experiences. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 360–373. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.021.10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Boons, F. and Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013) Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G.G., Loeffler, E. et al. (2015) Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. Journal of Social Policy. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/S0047279414000567.10.1017/S0047279414000567
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Brdulak, A., Chaberek, G. and Jagodziński, J. (2020) Determination of Electricity Demand by Personal Light Electric Vehicles (PLEVs): An Example of e-Motor Scooters in the Context of Large City Management in Poland. Energies 13(1), 194. DOI: 10.3390/en13010194.10.3390/en13010194
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Caggiani, L., Camporeale, R., Marinelli, M. et al. (2019) User satisfaction based model for resource allocation in bike-sharing systems. Transport Policy, 80, 117–126. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.003.10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Caggiani, L., Colovic, A. and Ottomanelli, M. (2020) An equality-based model for bike-sharing stations location in bicycle-public transport multimodal mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 140, 251–265. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.08.015.10.1016/j.tra.2020.08.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Chi, C.F., Chen, P.L., Saleh, W. et al. (2019) Helmet non-use by users of bikeshare programs, electric bicycles, racing bicycles, and personal bicycles: An observational study in Taipei, Taiwan. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(2), 93–99. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2018.1441470.10.1080/15568318.2018.1441470
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Dudziak, A., Stoma, M., Rydzak, L. et al. (2018) Wybór środka komunikacji w opinii mieskańców lubelszczyzny. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, 130, 127–138.10.29119/1641-3466.2018.130.12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Eren, E. and Uz, V.E. (2020) A review on bike-sharing: The factors affecting bike-sharing demand. Sustainable Cities and Society. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882.10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Fishman, E. and Schepers, P. (2016) Global bike share: What the data tells us about road safety. Journal of Safety Research, 56, 41–45. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.11.007.10.1016/j.jsr.2015.11.00726875164
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Fishman, E., Washington, S. and Haworth, N. (2013) Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature. Transport Reviews, 33(2), 148–165. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2013.775612.10.1080/01441647.2013.775612
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Font Vivanco, D., Kemp, R. and Van Der Voet, E. (2015) The relativity of eco-innovation: environmental rebound effects from past transport innovations in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 71–85. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.019.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Garrard, J., Rose, G. and Lo, S.K. (2008) Promoting transportation cycling for women: The role of bicycle infrastructure. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 55–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.010.10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.01017698185
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Geels, F.W., Schwanen, T., Sorrell, S. et al. (2018) Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates. Energy Research and Social Science. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.003.10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Grönroos, C. (2008) Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates? European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/09555340810886585.10.1108/09555340810886585
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Guo, Y., Zhou, J., Wu, Y. et al. (2017) Identifying the factors affecting bike-sharing usage and degree of satisfaction in Ningbo, China. PLOS ONE, Liu J-G (ed.), 12(9), e0185100. Public Library of Science. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185100.10.1371/journal.pone.0185100560832028934321
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Hazen, B., Overstreet, R. and Wang, Y. (2015) Predicting Public Bicycle Adoption Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability, 7(11), 14558–14573. MDPI AG. DOI: 10.3390/su71114558.10.3390/su71114558
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Hsu, C.C., Liou, J.J.H., Lo, H.W. et al. (2018) Using a hybrid method for evaluating and improving the service quality of public bike-sharing systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 1131–1144. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.193.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.193
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Jain, D. and Tiwari, G. (2016) How the present would have looked like? Impact of non-motorized transport and public transport infrastructure on travel behavior, energy consumption and CO2 emissions - Delhi, Pune and Patna. Sustainable Cities and Society, 22, 1–10. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2016.01.001.10.1016/j.scs.2016.01.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Kaspi, M., Raviv, T. and Tzur, M. (2017) Bike-sharing systems: User dissatisfaction in the presence of unusable bicycles. IISE Transactions, 49(2), 144–158. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2016.1224960.10.1080/0740817X.2016.1224960
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Kim, J., Choi, K., Kim, S. et al. (2017) How to promote sustainable public bike system from a psychological perspective? International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(4), 272–281. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2016.1252450.10.1080/15568318.2016.1252450
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Kwiatkowski, M.A. (2018) Bike-sharing-boom – rozwój nowych form zrównoważonego transportu w Polsce na przykładzie roweru publicznego. Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 21(2), 60–69. Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego. DOI: 10.4467/2543859xpkg.18.017.10142.10.4467/2543859XPKG.18.017.10142
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Lan, J., Ma, Y., Zhu, D. et al. (2017) Enabling Value Co-Creation in the Sharing Economy: The Case of Mobike. Sustainability, 9(9), 1504. MDPI AG. DOI: 10.3390/su9091504.10.3390/su9091504
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Lin, J.J., Wang, N.L. and Feng, C.M. (2017) Public bike system pricing and usage in Taipei. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(9), 633–641. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1301601.10.1080/15568318.2017.1301601
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Liu, Y., Huang, D., Wang, M. et al. (2020) How do service quality, value, pleasure, and satisfaction create loyalty to smart dockless bike-sharing systems? Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 22(3), 705–728. Fundacao Escola de Comercio Alvares Penteado. DOI: 10.7819/rbgn.v22i3.4070.10.7819/rbgn.v22i3.4070
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Loeffler, E. and Bovaird, T. (2019) Co-commissioning of public services and outcomes in the UK: Bringing co-production into the strategic commissioning cycle. Public Money and Management, 39(4), 241–252. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592905.10.1080/09540962.2019.1592905
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Lopez-Carreiro, I. and Monzon, A. (2018) Evaluating sustainability and innovation of mobility patterns in Spanish cities. Analysis by size and urban typology. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 684–696. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.029.10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Lu, M., Hsu, S.C., Chen, P.C. et al. (2018) Improving the sustainability of integrated transportation system with bike-sharing: A spatial agent-based approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 44–51. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.023.10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Machiba, T. (2010) Eco-innovation for enabling resource efficiency and green growth: development of an analyticalframework and preliminary analysis of industryand policy practices. International Economics & Economic Policy, 7, 357–370.10.1007/s10368-010-0171-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Maioli, H.C., de Carvalho, R.C. and de Medeiros, D.D. (2019) SERVBIKE: Riding customer satisfaction of bicycle sharing service. Sustainable Cities and Society. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101680.10.1016/j.scs.2019.101680
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Manzi, G. and Saibene, G. (2018) Are they telling the truth? Revealing hidden traits of satisfaction with a public bike-sharing service. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(4), 253–270. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1353186.10.1080/15568318.2017.1353186
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Martin, E.W. and Shaheen, S.A. (2014) Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: A tale of two U.S. cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 315–324. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.026.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Mátrai, T. and Tóth, J. (2016) Comparative Assessment of Public Bike Sharing Systems. In: Transportation Research Procedia, January 2016, 2344–2351. Elsevier B.V. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.261.10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.261
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Médard de Chardon, C., Caruso, G. and Thomas, I. (2017) Bicycle sharing system ‘success’ determinants. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100, 202–214. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.020.10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Miranda-Moreno, L. and Nosal, T. (2011) Weather or not to cycle: Temporal trends and impact of weather on cycling in an urban environment. Transportation Research Record. DOI: 10.3141/2247-06.10.3141/2247-06
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Munkácsy, A. and Monzón, A. (2018) Diffusion of Bike Sharing as an Innovation Vector in the City: The Case of BiciMAD (Madrid). Journal of Urban Technology, 25(3), 1–26. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2018.1483679.10.1080/10630732.2018.1483679
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Nosal, K. (2014) TransporT miejski i regionalny. Transport Miejski i Regionalny.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Oostendorp, R. and Gebhardt, L. (2018) Combining means of transport as a users’ strategy to optimize traveling in an urban context: empirical results on intermodal travel behavior from a survey in Berlin. Journal of Transport Geography, 71, 72–83. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.07.006.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.07.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Osborne, S.P. and Brown, L. (2011) Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Otero, I., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. and Rojas-Rueda, D. (2018) Health impacts of bike sharing systems in Europe. Environment International, 115, 387–394. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.014.10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.01429669687
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Pamuła, A. and Gontar, B. (2017) Rower miejski w Łodzi – ocena użytkowników. Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy, 52(4), 490–499. University of Rzeszow. DOI: 10.15584/nsawg.2017.4.36.10.15584/nsawg.2017.4.36
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Pellicer-Chenoll, M., Pans, M., Seifert, R. et al. (2020) Gender differences in bicycle sharing system usage in the city of Valencia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 102556. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102556.10.1016/j.scs.2020.102556
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Podgórniak-Krzykacz, A. and Trippner-Hrabi, J. (2021) Motives and factors that determine city residents’ use of public bicycles. The case of Lodz, Poland. Case Studies on Transport Policy. Elsevier BV. DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.03.003.10.1016/j.cstp.2021.03.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Pucher, J. and Buehler, R. (2008) Making cycling irresistible: Lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28(4), 495–528. DOI: 10.1080/01441640701806612.10.1080/01441640701806612
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Puello, L.L.P. and Geurs, K. (2015) Modelling observed and unobserved factors in cycling to railway stations: Application to transit-oriented-developments in the Netherlands. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 15(1), 27–50. Editorial Board EJTIR. DOI: 10.18757/ejtir.2015.15.1.3057.10.18757/EJTIR.2015.15.1.3057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Shaheen, S.A., Guzman, S. and Zhang, H. (2010) Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143(1), 159–167. SAGE PublicationsSage CA: Los Angeles, CA. DOI: 10.3141/2143-20.10.3141/2143-20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Shin, E.J. (2020) A comparative study of bike-sharing systems from a user’s perspective: An analysis of online reviews in three U.S. regions between 2010 and 2018. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2020.1830320.10.1080/15568318.2020.1830320
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Sojkin, B. and Michalak, S. (2019) Innowacyjność zachowań mieszkańców aglomeracji poznańskiej na rynku usług transportowycy. MINIB, 33(3), 71–98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Sopjani, L., Stier, J.J., Ritzén, S. et al. (2019) Involving users and user roles in the transition to sustainable mobility systems: The case of light electric vehicle sharing in Sweden. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 71, 207–221. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.011.10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Sumaedi, S., Bakti, I.G.M.Y., Rakhmawati, T. et al. (2016) Factors influencing public transport passengers’ satisfaction: a new model. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 27(5), 585–597. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. DOI: 10.1108/MEQ-05-2015-0084.10.1108/MEQ-05-2015-0084
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Tłuczak, A. (2013) Determinanty wyboru środka komunikacji miejskiej na przykładzie Opola. Studia Miejskie, 10, 37–45. Uniwersytet Opolski.10.25167/sm.2362
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Tokody, D. and Mezei, I.J. (2017) Creating smart, sustainable and safe cities. In: SISY 2017 - IEEE 15th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Proceedings, October 2017, 141–145. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. DOI: 10.1109/SISY.2017.8080541.10.1109/SISY.2017.8080541
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. van Waes, A., Farla, J., Frenken, K. et al. (2018) Business model innovation and socio-technical transitions. A new prospective framework with an application to bike sharing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1300–1312. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.223.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.223
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2008) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6.10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Wang, M. and Zhou, X. (2017) Bike-sharing systems and congestion: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 65, 147–154. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.022.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Winslow, J. and Mont, O. (2019) Bicycle Sharing: Sustainable Value Creation and Institutionalisation Strategies in Barcelona. Sustainability, 11(3), 728. MDPI AG. DOI: 10.3390/su11030728.10.3390/su11030728
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Xu, S.J. and Chow, J.Y.J. (2020) A longitudinal study of bike infrastructure impact on bikesharing system performance in New York City. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(11), 886–902. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2019.1645921.10.1080/15568318.2019.1645921
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Yan, S., Lu, C.C. and Wang, M.H. (2018) Stochastic fleet deployment models for public bicycle rental systems. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(1), 39–52. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1324586.10.1080/15568318.2017.1324586
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. Zarząd Dróg i Transportu Urzędu Miasta Łodzi (2018) Plan zrównoważonego rozwoju publicznego transportu zbiorowego dla miasta Łodzi do roku 2025.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. Zhang, D., Xu, X. and Yang, X. (2015) User Satisfaction and Its Impacts on the Use of a Public Bicycle System. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2512(1), 56–65. National Research Council. DOI: 10.3141/2512-07.10.3141/2512-07
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. Zhang, Y. and Mi, Z. (2018) Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis. Applied Energy, 220, 296–301. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.101.10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
68. Zhou, J. (2012) Sustainable transportation in the US: A review of proposals, policies, and programs since 2000. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 1, 150–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2012.02.012.10.1016/j.foar.2012.02.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
69. Zhou, Z. and Zhang, Z. (Justin) (2019) Customer satisfaction of bicycle sharing: studying perceived service quality with SEM model. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 22(5), 437–448. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2018.1513468.10.1080/13675567.2018.1513468
]Search in Google Scholar
[
70. Zimon, D., Makara, M. and Gajewska, T. (2015) Stosunek mieszkańców wybranego miasta do zrównoważonych rozwiązań w transporcie. Logistyka-nauka 4.
]Search in Google Scholar
