1. bookVolume 22 (2021): Issue 1 (February 2021)
Journal Details
First Published
20 Mar 2000
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

Sustainable Maritime Fleet Management in the Context of Global Sulphur Cap 2020

Published Online: 22 Feb 2021
Page range: 53 - 66
Journal Details
First Published
20 Mar 2000
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

Since the implementation of Emission Control Areas (ECA) in 2015, investment decisions related to abatement technologies represent a crucial task in the maritime industry. Currently, the focus in the maritime sector is on Sulphur reductions due to SECA regulations and the legislative of Global Sulphur Cap that started in 2020. A special challenge appears in maritime fleet management where sets of ships have to be considered, representing portfolios of assets that have to be equipped with a variety of different options of abatement technologies.


1. Acciaro, M. (2014) Real option analysis for environmental compliance: LNG and emission control areas. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, 41-50.Search in Google Scholar

2. Albrecht, J. (2015) Stakeholder involvement in developing LNG as a ship fuel in the Baltic Sea region.Search in Google Scholar

3. Allwright, G. (2018) Commercial Wind Propulsion Solutions: Putting the ‘Sail’ Back into Sailing. In Trends and Challenges in Maritime Energy Management, pp. 433-443. Springer, Cham.Search in Google Scholar

4. Atari, S., Bakkar, Y., Olaniyi, E. O., & Prause, G. (2019) Real options analysis of abatement investments for sulphur emission control compliance. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), 1062-1087.Search in Google Scholar

5. Atari, S., & Prause, G. (2017) Risk assessment of emission abatement technologies for clean shipping. In: International Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, pp. 93-101. Springer, Cham.Search in Google Scholar

6. Bendall, H., & Stent, A. F. (2003) Investment strategies in market uncertainty. Maritime Policy & Management, 30(4), 293-303.Search in Google Scholar

7. Bezemer, P. J., Maassen, G. F., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2007) Investigating the Development of the Internal and External Service Tasks of Non-executive Directors: the case of the Netherlands (1997–2005). Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1119-1129.Search in Google Scholar

8. Blume, M. E. (1970) Portfolio theory: a step toward its practical application. The Journal of Business, 43(2), 152-173.Search in Google Scholar

9. Carter, D. A., Dare, W.H. & Elliott, W.B. (2002) Determination of Mean-Variance Efficient Portfolios Using an Electronic Spreadsheet, Journal of Financial Education, 28(3), 63-78.Search in Google Scholar

10. Chen, N. F., Roll, R., & Ross, S. A. (1986). Economic forces and the stock market. Journal of Business, 383-403.Search in Google Scholar

11. Cox, J. C., & Rubinstein, M. (1985) Options markets. Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

12. Danilov, R., Arabyan, M., & Usov, D. (2019) Influence of technologies on LNG market development. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 537(4), p. 042030. IOP Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

13. DNV, G. (2018) Current price development oil and gas.Search in Google Scholar

14. Drobetz, W., Schilling, D., & Tegtmeier, L. (2010) Common risk factors in the returns of shipping stocks. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(2), 93-120.Search in Google Scholar

15. Drobetz, W., Gounopoulos, D., Merikas, A., & Schröder, H. (2013) Capital structure decisions of globally-listed shipping companies. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 52, 49-76.Search in Google Scholar

16. Eurostat (2019) Natural gas price statistics. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Natural_gas_price_statistics#Natural_gas_prices_for_non-household_consumers.Search in Google Scholar

17. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 33(1), 3-56.Search in Google Scholar

18. Friend, I., & Blume, M. (1970) Measurement of portfolio performance under uncertainty. The American Economic Review, 60(4), 561-575.Search in Google Scholar

19. Gibbs, D. (2009) Sustainability entrepreneurs, ecopreneurs and the development of a sustainable economy. Greener Management International, 55.Search in Google Scholar

20. Grammenos, C. T., & Arkoulis, A. G. (2002) Macroeconomic factors and international shipping stock returns. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 4(1), 81-99.Search in Google Scholar

21. Hansson, J., Månsson, S., Brynolf, S., & Grahn, M. (2019) Alternative marine fuels: Prospects based on multi-criteria decision analysis involving Swedish stakeholders. Biomass and Bioenergy, 126, 159-173.Search in Google Scholar

22. Hilmola, O. P. (2018) The Sulphur Cap in Maritime Supply Chains: Environmental Regulations in European Logistics. Springer.Search in Google Scholar

23. Hunke, K.; Prause, G. (2013) Management of Green Corridor Performance. Transport and Telecommunication, 14 (4), 292−299. DOI 10.2478/ttj-2013-0025.Search in Google Scholar

24. Karakitsos, E., & Varnavides, L. (2014) Maritime economics: A macroeconomic approach. Springer.Search in Google Scholar

25. Kavussanos, M. G., & Marcoulis, S. N. (2005) Cross industry comparisons of the behaviour of stock returns in shipping, transportation and other industries. Research in Transportation Economics, 12(4), 107-142.Search in Google Scholar

26. Kavussanos, M. G., Marcoulis, S. N., & Arkoulis, A. G. (2002) Macroeconomic factors and international industry returns. Applied Financial Economics, 12(12), 923-931.Search in Google Scholar

27. Kavussanos, M. G., & Visvikis, I. D. (Eds.). (2016) the international handbook of shipping finance: theory and practice. Springer.Search in Google Scholar

28. King, A. J. (1993) Asymmetric risk measures and tracking models for portfolio optimization under uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research, 45(1), 165-177.Search in Google Scholar

29. Leibowitz, M. L., Sorensen, E. H., Arnott, R. D., & Hanson, H. N. (1989) A total differential approach to equity duration. Financial Analysts Journal, 45(5), 30-37.Search in Google Scholar

30. Lin, C. M., Phillips, R. D., & Smith, S. D. (2008) Hedging, financing, and investment decisions: Theory and empirical tests. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(8), 1566-1582.Search in Google Scholar

31. Markowitz, H. (1952) Portfolio Selection, The Journal of Finance, 7(1), p. 77-91.Search in Google Scholar

32. Markowitz, H. (1959) Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments, 16. New York: John Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

33. McDonnell, P. (2008) Optimal Portfolio Modeling: Models to Maximize Returns and Control Risk in Excel and R, 306. John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

34. Mohseni, S. A., van Hassel, E., Sys, C., & Vanelslander, T. (2019) Economic evaluation of alternative technologies to mitigate Sulphur emissions in maritime container transport from both the vessel owner and shipper perspective. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 4(1), 15.Search in Google Scholar

35. Mokhtar, M., Shuib, A., & Mohamad, D. (2014) Mathematical programming models for portfolio optimization problem: A review. International Journal of Social, Management, Economics and Business Engineering, 8(2), 443-450.Search in Google Scholar

36. Moreira, P. J. P. (2019) Shipping and sustainability liquefied natural gas as an alternative fuel: evidence from Portugal.Search in Google Scholar

37. Olaniyi, E. O., & Gerlitz, L. (2019) LNG maritime energy contracting model. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 574-594.Search in Google Scholar

38. Olaniyi, E. O.; Prause, G. (2019) SECA regulatory impact assessment: Administrative burden costs in the Baltic Sea Region. Transport and Telecommunication, 20 (1), 62−73. DOI 10.2478/ttj-2019-0006.Search in Google Scholar

39. Olaniyi, E. O., Prause, G., & Boyesen, J. (2018) The Impact of SECA Regulations on Clean Shipping in the Baltic Sea Region. In: Trends and challenges in maritime energy management, pp. 309-323. Springer, Cham.Search in Google Scholar

40. Olaniyi, E. O., Atari, S., & Prause, G. (2018) Maritime energy contracting for clean shipping. Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 19(1), 31-44.Search in Google Scholar

41. Prause, G.; Olaniyi, E. O. (2019) A compliance cost analysis of the seca regulation in the Baltic Sea. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 1907−1921. DOI 10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(26).Search in Google Scholar

42. Rachev, S., Ortobelli, S., Stoyanov, S., Fabozzi, F. J., & Biglova, A. (2008) Desirable properties of an ideal risk measure in portfolio theory. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 11(1), 19-54.Search in Google Scholar

43. Rahm, S. (2015) The costly future of green shipping. London: Schroders.Search in Google Scholar

44. Raza, Z., Woxenius, J., & Finnsgård, C. (2019) Slow Steaming as Part of SECA Compliance Strategies among RoRo and RoPax Shipping Companies. Sustainability, 11(5), 1435.Search in Google Scholar

45. Reinhold, K., Järvis, M., & Prause, G. (2019) Occupational health and safety aspects of green shipping in the Baltic Sea. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 10-24.Search in Google Scholar

46. Sachs, J. D., Woo, W. T., Yoshino, N., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2019) Handbook of Green Finance: Energy Security and Sustainable Development.Search in Google Scholar

47. Schinas, O., & Metzger, D. (2019) A pay-as-you-save model for the promotion of greening technologies in shipping. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 69, 184-195.Search in Google Scholar

48. Sharples, J. (2019) LNG supply chains and the development of LNG as a shipping fuel in Northern Europe.Search in Google Scholar

49. Shenoi, R.A., Bowker, J.A., Dzielendziak, A.S., Lidtke, A.K., Zhu, G., Cheng, F., Argyos, D., Fang, I., Gonzalez, J., Johnson, S. and Ross, K., (2015) Global Marine Technology Trends 2030.Search in Google Scholar

50. Stopford, M. (2008) Maritime Economics/М. Stopford.Search in Google Scholar

51. Team, C. P. (2017) How much trade transits the South China Sea? China Power.Search in Google Scholar

52. Thomas, J. F., Sluder, C. S., Kass, M. D., & Theiss, T. (2019) A Guide to Fuel, Lubricant, and Engine Concerns Relative to the IMO 2020 Fuel Oil Sulfur Reduction Mandate. ORNL, 1406.Search in Google Scholar

53. Todd, D. (2019) The world shipbuilding industry. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

54. Varian, H. (1993) A portfolio of Nobel laureates: Markowitz, Miller and Sharpe. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(1), 159-169.Search in Google Scholar

55. Veritas, D. N. (2018) Global Sulphur Cap 2020-extended and updated.Search in Google Scholar

56. Wang, H. (2014) The end of the era of heavy fuel oil in maritime shipping. The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). Retrieved from: http://www.theicct.org/blogs/staff/endera-heavy-fuel-oil-maritime-shipping (accessed: 17.08.15).Search in Google Scholar

57. Wang, S., & Notteboom, T. (2014) The adoption of liquefied natural gas as a ship fuel: A systematic review of perspectives and challenges. Transport Reviews, 34(6), 749-774.Search in Google Scholar

58. Westgaard, S., Frydenberg, S., Mitter, K. W., & Jensen, E. F. (2007) Economic and Financial Risk Factors and Tanker Shipping Stock Returns. Available at SSRN 969910.Search in Google Scholar

59. Wijnolst, N., & Wergeland, T. (1996) Shipping. Delft University Press.Search in Google Scholar

60. Yu, C. K., Yip, T. L., & Choy, S. K. (2019) Optimal portfolio choice for ship leasing investments. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(7), 884-900.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo