[1. Barfod, M.B., Salling K.B., Leleur, S. (2011) Composite decision support by combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria decision analysis, Decision Support Systems, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp.167-175.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Daehre K.-H., (2012) Zukunft der Verkehrsinfrastrukturfinanzierung. Final Report, Federal and State Commission, Magdeburg, p. 37.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Goodwin, P., Wright, G. (2009) Decision Analysis for Management Judgments, 4 Editions, Wiley, p. 468.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Investment and Development Agency of Latvia, LIAA (2015) Business Infrastructure, Available from: http://www.liaa.gov.lv/en/invest-latvia/investor-business-guide/business-infrastructure]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Investment and Development Agency of Latvia, LIAA (2016) Transit and Logistics, Available from: http://www.liaa.gov.lv/en/trade/industry-profiles/transit-and-logistics]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Investment and Development Agency of Latvia, LIAA (2018) Transport and Storage, Available from: http://www.liaa.gov.lv/node/626]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Ferrari, C., Bottasso, A., Conti, M., Tei, A. (2018) Economic Role of Transport Infrastructure: Theory and Models. Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-813096-4.00002-0]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Kuzmina-Merlino, I., O.Skorobogatova, N. Schmidtke, F.Behrendt (2018) Mechanism for Investment in the Transport Infrastructure Development in Latvia, The Proceedings of the 17th International Multidisciplinary Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication (RelStat-2017) in: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Volume 36, Springer, pp. 507-518.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. LDZ (2015) Latvijas dzelzceļš Annual report 2015, Available from: https://www.ldz.lv/en/annual-reports]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Leleur, S., Petersen, N.B., Barfod, M.B. (2007) The COSIMA Approach to Transport Decision Makung: Combining Cost-benefit and Multi-criteria Analysis for Comprehensive Project Appraisal, Korean Development Institute & World Bank Conference, Seoul, pp. 2-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. LR FM (2017a) Latvijas Republikas Finanšu ministrija, ES fondu ieguldījums pa reģioniem un nozarēm. Available from: http://www.esfondi.lv/es-fondu-investiciju-progress-latvijas-regionos-un-pasvaldibas]Search in Google Scholar
[12. LR FM (2017b) Latvijas Republikas Finanšu ministrija, Rezultāti, Available from: http://www.esfondi.lv/es-fondu-uzraudzibas-raditaju-progress]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Macharis, C.; Bernardini, A. (2015) Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects, Time for a multi-actor approach, Transport Policy, Volume 37, pp.177–186.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Ministry of Transport of Latvia (2016) Izaicinājumi publiskās autoceļu un dzelzceļa infrastruktūras finansēšanā – regulējums, resursu piesaiste, iespējamie finansēšanas modeļi. Available from: http://www.sam.gov.lv/images/modules/items/PDF/item_6440_Dins_Merirands_20.10.2016.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Nadiri, Ish. and Banani, N. (1997) The Changing Structure of Cost and Demand for the U.S. Telecommunications Industry, Information Economics and Policy, vol. 9(4), pp. 319-347.10.1016/S0167-6245(97)00017-6]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Oxford Economics (2015) Assessing the global transport infrastructure market: Outlook to 2025, Available from: www.pwc.com/outlook2025]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Panayiotou, A., Medda, F.R. (2014) Attracting Private Sector Participation in Transport Investment. Procedia- Social Behavioural Sciences, volume 111, pp. 424-431.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.075]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Rodrigue, J.-P., Comtois, C., Slack, B. (2017) The Geography of Transport System, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315618159]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Saaty, T.L. (2008) Decision making with the analytical hierarchy process. Int. J. Services, University of Pittsburgh, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 83-98]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia (2010) Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 203, Available from: https://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/B7A5865F-0D1B-42AE-A838-FBA4CA31674D/0/Latvia_2010.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Satiksmes ministrija (2017) Activity Strategy 2017.-2019.gadam, Available from: http://www.sam.gov.lv/images/modules/items/PDF/item_6713_SM_IDS_2017-19_07_03_2017.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Skorobogatova, O., Kuzmina-Merlino, I. (2017) Transport Infrastructure Development Performance, 6th Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, RelStat’2016, 19-22 October, 2016, Riga, Latvia, Volume 178, pp. 319-329.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Schmidtke, N. and Behrendt, F. (2017) Impact analysis of freight transport scenarios on the German transport system - an indicator based approach, In: MultiScience - XXXI. microCAD International Multidisplinary Scientific Conference, 20-21 April, 2017, University of Miskolc, Miskolc, Hungary10.26649/musci.2017.047]Search in Google Scholar
[24. The Global Innovation Index (2017) Analysis. Available from: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator/]Search in Google Scholar
[25. The World Bank (2018) Doing Business Available from: http://www.doingbusiness.org/about-us]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Zhan, J. (2015) Investment, Infrastructure and Financing the Sustainable Development Goals, WTO. Workshop on Aid for Trade and Infrastructure: Financing the Gap. Available from: http://unctad.org/Sections/dite_dir/docs/diae_stat_2015-02-16_WTO-aid-for-Trade_en.pdf]Search in Google Scholar