The Financial and Economic Aspects of Transport Infrastructure Development in Latvia

1. Barfod, M.B., Salling K.B., Leleur, S. (2011) Composite decision support by combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria decision analysis, Decision Support Systems, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp.167-175.10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.005Search in Google Scholar

2. Daehre K.-H., (2012) Zukunft der Verkehrsinfrastrukturfinanzierung. Final Report, Federal and State Commission, Magdeburg, p. 37.Search in Google Scholar

3. Goodwin, P., Wright, G. (2009) Decision Analysis for Management Judgments, 4 Editions, Wiley, p. 468.Search in Google Scholar

4. Investment and Development Agency of Latvia, LIAA (2015) Business Infrastructure, Available from: http://www.liaa.gov.lv/en/invest-latvia/investor-business-guide/business-infrastructureSearch in Google Scholar

5. Investment and Development Agency of Latvia, LIAA (2016) Transit and Logistics, Available from: http://www.liaa.gov.lv/en/trade/industry-profiles/transit-and-logisticsSearch in Google Scholar

6. Investment and Development Agency of Latvia, LIAA (2018) Transport and Storage, Available from: http://www.liaa.gov.lv/node/626Search in Google Scholar

7. Ferrari, C., Bottasso, A., Conti, M., Tei, A. (2018) Economic Role of Transport Infrastructure: Theory and Models. Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-813096-4.00002-0Search in Google Scholar

8. Kuzmina-Merlino, I., O.Skorobogatova, N. Schmidtke, F.Behrendt (2018) Mechanism for Investment in the Transport Infrastructure Development in Latvia, The Proceedings of the 17^th International Multidisciplinary Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication (RelStat-2017) in: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Volume 36, Springer, pp. 507-518.10.1007/978-3-319-74454-4_49Search in Google Scholar

9. LDZ (2015) Latvijas dzelzceļš Annual report 2015, Available from: https://www.ldz.lv/en/annual-reportsSearch in Google Scholar

10. Leleur, S., Petersen, N.B., Barfod, M.B. (2007) The COSIMA Approach to Transport Decision Makung: Combining Cost-benefit and Multi-criteria Analysis for Comprehensive Project Appraisal, Korean Development Institute & World Bank Conference, Seoul, pp. 2-5.Search in Google Scholar

11. LR FM (2017a) Latvijas Republikas Finanšu ministrija, ES fondu ieguldījums pa reģioniem un nozarēm. Available from: http://www.esfondi.lv/es-fondu-investiciju-progress-latvijas-regionos-un-pasvaldibasSearch in Google Scholar

12. LR FM (2017b) Latvijas Republikas Finanšu ministrija, Rezultāti, Available from: http://www.esfondi.lv/es-fondu-uzraudzibas-raditaju-progressSearch in Google Scholar

13. Macharis, C.; Bernardini, A. (2015) Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects, Time for a multi-actor approach, Transport Policy, Volume 37, pp.177–186.10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.002Search in Google Scholar

14. Ministry of Transport of Latvia (2016) Izaicinājumi publiskās autoceļu un dzelzceļa infrastruktūras finansēšanā – regulējums, resursu piesaiste, iespējamie finansēšanas modeļi. Available from: http://www.sam.gov.lv/images/modules/items/PDF/item_6440_Dins_Merirands_20.10.2016.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

15. Nadiri, Ish. and Banani, N. (1997) The Changing Structure of Cost and Demand for the U.S. Telecommunications Industry, Information Economics and Policy, vol. 9(4), pp. 319-347.10.1016/S0167-6245(97)00017-6Search in Google Scholar

16. Oxford Economics (2015) Assessing the global transport infrastructure market: Outlook to 2025, Available from: www.pwc.com/outlook2025Search in Google Scholar

17. Panayiotou, A., Medda, F.R. (2014) Attracting Private Sector Participation in Transport Investment. Procedia- Social Behavioural Sciences, volume 111, pp. 424-431.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.075Search in Google Scholar

18. Rodrigue, J.-P., Comtois, C., Slack, B. (2017) The Geography of Transport System, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315618159Search in Google Scholar

19. Saaty, T.L. (2008) Decision making with the analytical hierarchy process. Int. J. Services, University of Pittsburgh, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 83-9810.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590Search in Google Scholar

20. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia (2010) Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 203, Available from: https://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/B7A5865F-0D1B-42AE-A838-FBA4CA31674D/0/Latvia_2010.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

21. Satiksmes ministrija (2017) Activity Strategy 2017.-2019.gadam, Available from: http://www.sam.gov.lv/images/modules/items/PDF/item_6713_SM_IDS_2017-19_07_03_2017.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

22. Skorobogatova, O., Kuzmina-Merlino, I. (2017) Transport Infrastructure Development Performance, 6th Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, RelStat’2016, 19-22 October, 2016, Riga, Latvia, Volume 178, pp. 319-329.10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.056Search in Google Scholar

23. Schmidtke, N. and Behrendt, F. (2017) Impact analysis of freight transport scenarios on the German transport system - an indicator based approach, In: MultiScience - XXXI. microCAD International Multidisplinary Scientific Conference, 20-21 April, 2017, University of Miskolc, Miskolc, Hungary10.26649/musci.2017.047Search in Google Scholar

24. The Global Innovation Index (2017) Analysis. Available from: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator/Search in Google Scholar

25. The World Bank (2018) Doing Business Available from: http://www.doingbusiness.org/about-usSearch in Google Scholar

26. Zhan, J. (2015) Investment, Infrastructure and Financing the Sustainable Development Goals, WTO. Workshop on Aid for Trade and Infrastructure: Financing the Gap. Available from: http://unctad.org/Sections/dite_dir/docs/diae_stat_2015-02-16_WTO-aid-for-Trade_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar