[
Atari-Khan, R. et al., 2021. Concepts of resilience among trauma-exposed Syrian refugees. Counseling Psychologist, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 233-268.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baker, P., Hardie, A. and McEnery, T., 2006. Glossary of corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bondarenko, E.V., 2017. Mem i antimem v politicheskom media-diskurse: opyt kognitivnogo modelirovaniya [Meme and antimeme in political media discourse: Сognitive modeling experience]. In: N.V. Petlyuchenko, ed. Koncepty i kontrasty [Concepts and contrasts]. Odessa: Gelvetika, pp. 347-354.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borghetti, F. et al, 2021. Multi-level approach to assessing the resilience of road network infrastructure. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 97-132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bratus, T.V., 2009. Henderna spetsyfika obiektyvatsii kontseptu SHCHASTIA u suchasnomu anhlomovnomu khudozhniomu dyskursi [Gender specificity of objectifying the HAPPINESS concept in the modern English fiction discourse]. PhD in Philology thesis. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brigham Young University. British National Corpus (BNC). www.english-corpora.org/bnc [Accessed 10 July 2022]. Available at: https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brigham Young University. Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). www.english-corpora.org/coca [Accessed 10 July 2022]. Available at: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davies, M., 2009. The 385+ million-word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990-2008+): Design, architecture and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 159-190.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dordzhieva, D.V., 2010. Lingvokul'turnyj koncept PODVIG v russkom, kalmyckom i anglijskom georicheskih eposah [The DEED linguocultural concept in the Russian, Kalmyk and English heroic epic poetry]. PhD in Philology thesis. Volgograd State Pedagogical University, Volgograd, Russia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ermolova, M.V., 2011. Koncept ZAPRET v nemeckom yazyke: soderzhanie, struktura, sredstva verbalizacii [The PROHIBITION concept in the German language: Concepts, structure, verbalizing means]. PhD in Philology thesis. G.R. Derzhavin Tambov State University, Tambov, Russia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flowerdew, L., 2004. The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional settings. In: U. Connor, T. Upton, eds. Discourse in the professions: perspectives from corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 11-33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gasser, P. et al., 2021. A review on resilience assessment of energy systems. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 273-299.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haldane, V. et al., 2021. Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from 28 countries. Nature Medicine, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 964-980.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hrynina, E.N., 2009. Lingvokul'turnaya specifika koncepta USPEKH [The linguocultural specificity of the SUCCESS concept]. PhD in Philology thesis. Stavropol State University, Stavropol, Russia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hunston, S., 2008. Collection strategies and design decisions. In: A. Lüdeling, M. Kytö, eds. Corpus linguistics: an international handbook (Volume 1). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 154-168.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iacobucci, D. and Perugini, F., 2021. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and economic resilience at local level. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, vol. 33, nos. 9-10, pp. 689-716.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Janssens, K.M.E. et al., 2021. Resilience among police officers: A critical systematic review of used concepts, measures and predictive values of resilience. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 24-40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koester, A., 2010. Building small specialized corpora. In: A. O’Keeffe, M. McCarthy, eds. The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 66-79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuzembaeva, G.A., 2017. Polevaya organizaciya koncepta NOBILITY v anglijskom yazyke [The field organization of the NOBILITY concept in the English language]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice], no. 11 (77), part 3, pp. 127-129.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, R.W., 2008. Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lopez, L.J.R. and Castro, A.I.G., 2021. Sustainability and resilience in smart city planning: A review. Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martyniuk, A.P., 2011. Dyskurs [Discourse]. In: A.P. Martyniuk, ed. Slovnyk osnovnykh terminiv kohnityvno-dyskursyvnoi linhvistyky [The dictionary of main terms of the cognitive-discourse linguistics]. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, pp. 11-21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martyniuk, A.P., 2017. Individualnyy kontsept: priroda i metod analiza [Individual concept: Ontology and analyzing method]. In: N.V. Petlyuchenko, ed. Koncepty i kontrasty [Concepts and contrasts].Odessa: Gelvetika, pp. 41-46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martyniuk, A.P., 2010. Opyt modusnogo modelirovaniya koncepta (na primere koncepta ZNAMENITOST’, aktualizirovannogo v angloyazychnom gazetnom diskurse) [Experience of the modus concept modelling (case of the CELEBRITY concept in the English newspaper discourse)]. Kogniciya, kommunikaciya, diskurs [Cognition, Communication, Discourse], no. 1, pp. 93-100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McEnery, T. and Hardie, A., 2012. Corpus linguistics: Theory, method, practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mena, C., Karatzas, A. and Hansen, C., 2022. International trade resilience and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research, vol. 138, pp. 77-91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merkel, W. and Lührmann, A., 2021. Resilience of democracies: Responses to illiberal and authoritarian challenges. Democratization, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 869-884.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morozova, E.I., 2006. Operacional'nye modusy koncepta LOZH’ [Operational modi of the LIE concept]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia “Romano-hermanska filolohiia” [Bulletin of Kharkiv National University. Section “Romanic and Germanic Languages”], no. 741, pp. 23-26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nelson, M., 2010. Building a written corpus: What are the basics? In: A. O’Keeffe, M. McCarthy, eds. The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 53-65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newsinger, J. and Serafini, P., 2021. Performative resilience: How the arts and culture support austerity in post-crisis capitalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 589-605.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nikitin, M.V., 2007. Kurs lingvisticheskoj semantiki [The course of linguistic semantics]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatelstvo RGPU imeni A.I. Gercena.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pamukcu-Albers, P. et al., 2021. Building green infrastructure to enhance urban resilience to climate change and pandemics. Landscape Ecology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 665-673.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paskova, N.A., 2004. Koncept ZHENSHCHINA v tekstah sredneanglijskogo perioda (opyt semanticheskoj rekonstrukcii na osnove proizvedenij Dzh. Chosera) [The WOMAN concept in texts of the Middle-English period (semantic reconstruction in works by Geoffrey Chaucer)]. PhD in Philology thesis. Irkutsk State Linguistic University, Irkutsk, Russia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plimmer, G. et al., 2022. Resilience in public sector managers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 338-367.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Popova, Z.D. and Sternin, I.A., 2007. Kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitive linguistics]. Moscow: AST: Vostok – Zapad.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prikhodko, A., 2013. Kontsepty i kontseptosistemy [Concepts and their systems]. Dnepropetrovsk: Belaya E.A.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reppen, R., 2010. Building a corpus: What are the key considerations? In: A. O’Keeffe, M. McCarthy, eds. The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 31-37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sinclair, J., 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Starceva, N.N. and Saprun, I.R., 2017. Koncept BIZNESMEN v lingval’nyh setyah (na materiale anglijskogo yazyka) [The BUSINESSMAN concept in lingual networks (on the basis of the English language)]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriia “Inozemna filolohiia” [Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Section “Foreign Philology”], no. 86, pp. 95-102.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stepanov, V.N., 2016. Setevaya konceptual'naya model’ sily («Kraft») kak filosofskogo koncepta [The network conceptual model of force (“Kraft”) as a philosophical concept]. Jaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin], no. 5, pp. 279-287.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tatsenko, N., 2018. Empatiia v suchasnomu anhlomovnomu dyskursi: kohnityvno-synerhetychnyi vymir [Empathy in the modern English discourse: Cognitive and synergetic dimensions]. Doctoral thesis in Philology. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The AntConc corpus manager by Laurence Anthony. www.laurenceanthony.net [Accessed 10 July 2022]. Available at: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tymochko, L.M., 2014. Freimovyi analiz kontseptu UHODA v anhlomovnomu dyplomatychnomu dyskursi [Frame analysis of the AGREEMENT concept in the English diplomatic discourse]. Mova i kultura [Language and Culture], vol. 7 (175), no. 17, pp. 138-145.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vasilova, A.Sh., 2006. Lingvokul’turnyj koncept TOSKA v tatarskoj yazykovoj kartine mira [The ANGUISH linguocultural concept in the Tatar world language picture]. PhD in Philology thesis. G. Ibragimov Institute of Language, Literature and Arts of the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wieland, A. and Durach, C.F., 2021. Two perspectives on supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 315-322.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zalevskaya, A., 2005. Kontsept kak dostoyanie individa [Concept as an individual’s heritage]. In: A. Zalevskaya, ed. Psiholingvisticheskie issledovaniya. Slovo. Tekst [Psycholinguistic studies. Word. Text]. Moscow: Gnozis, pp. 234-244.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhabotinskaya, S.A., 2013. Imya kak tekst: konceptual’naya set’ leksicheskogo znacheniya (analiz imeni emocii) [Name as a text: a conceptual network of lexical meaning (analysis of the name of emotion)]. Kognicija, kommunikacija, diskurs [Cognition, Communication, Discourse], no. 6, pp. 47-76.
]Search in Google Scholar
