[
Ädel, A., 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.24
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Altenberg, B. and Tapper, M., 1998. The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. In: S. Granger, ed. Learner English on computer. London: Longman, pp. 80-93.10.4324/9781315841342-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anthony, L., 2019. AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available at: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finnegan, E., 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bondi, M., 2020. Academics online: Code glosses across research genres and public communication. In: G. Maurizio, S. Maci and M. Sala, eds. Scholarly pathways. Knowledge transfer and knowledge exchange in academia. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 57-82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brezina, V., 2018. Statistics in corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316410899
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bunton, D., 1999. The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 18, pp. S41-S56.10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cao, F. and Hu, G., 2014. Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 66, pp. 15-31.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crismore, A., 1989. Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dal Negro, S. and Fiorentini, I., 2014. Reformulation in bilingual speech: Italian cioè in German and Ladin. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 74, pp. 94-108.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Del Saz Rubio, M. M., 2011. A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of agricultural sciences. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 30, pp. 258-271.10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Del Saz Rubio, M. M. and Fraser, B., 2003. Reformulation in English. (unpublished manuscript). [Accessed 15 December 2021]. Available at: https://people.bu.edu/bfraser/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., 2021. Engaging with the reader in research articles in English: Variation across disciplines and linguacultural backgrounds. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 63, pp. 18-32.10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Granger, S. and Tyson, S., 1996. Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 17-27.10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00089.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gray, B., 2015. Linguistic variation in research articles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.71
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guziurová, T., 2018. Metadiscourse in undergraduate textbooks and research articles in linguistics. Ostrava: University of Ostrava.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guziurová, T., 2020. Discourse reflexivity in written academic English as lingua franca: Code glosses in research articles. Discourse and Interaction, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 36-54.10.5817/DI2020-2-36
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hardie, A., 2014. Log ratio – an informal introduction. cass.lancs.ac.uk [Accessed 19 April 2022]. Available at: http://cass.lancs.ac.uk/log-ratio-an-informal-introduction/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, G. and Cao, F., 2015. Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 39, pp. 12-25.10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. 2004a. Disciplinary discourses. Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbour: The University of Michigan Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. 2004b. Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 13, pp. 133-151.10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K., 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London and New York: Continuum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K., 2007. Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 266-285.10.1093/applin/amm011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K., 2012. Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic writing. Cambridge: Cambridge Applied Linguistics.10.1017/9781009406512
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K., 2014. Engagement and disciplinarily: The other side of evaluation. In: G. Del Lungo Camiciotti and E. Tognini Bonelli, eds. Academic discourse – new insights into evaluation. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 13-30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K., 2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 113, pp. 16-29.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. K., 2016. “We must conclude that.”: A diachronic study of academic engagement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 24, pp. 29-42.10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. K., 2021. A bibliometric study of EAP research: Who is doing what, where and when? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 49, [100929].10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100929
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. and Tse, P., 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 156-177.10.1093/applin/25.2.156
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kawase, T., 2015. Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 20, pp. 114-124.10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lei, L. and Liu, D., 2019. Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 540-561.10.1093/applin/amy003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mauranen, A., 1993. Cultural differences in academic rhetoric: a textlinguistic study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mauranen, A., 2012. Exploring ELF. Academic English shaped by non-native speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGrath, L. and Kuteeva, M., 2012. Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 31, pp. 161-173.10.1016/j.esp.2011.11.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mu, C., Zhang, L.J., Ehrich, J. and Hong, H., 2015. The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 20, pp. 135-148.10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mur Dueñas, P., 2011. An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 43, no. 13, pp. 3068-3079.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murillo, S., 2012. The use of reformulation markers in Business Management research articles: An intercultural analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 64-90.10.1075/ijcl.17.1.03mur
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murillo, S., 2018. Not the same, but how different? Comparing the use of reformulation markers in ELF and in ENL research articles. In: P. Mur-Dueñas and J. Šinkūnienė, eds. Intercultural perspectives on research writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 237-253.10.1075/aals.18.11mur
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murillo, S., 2019. Reformulation and its markers in unpublished research articles: Some evidence on the rhetorical patterns of written academic ELF. LFE: Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 26-43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neff-van Aertselaer, J., 2015. Learner corpora and discourse. In: S. Granger, G. Gilquin and F. Meunier, eds. The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 255-280.10.1017/CBO9781139649414.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paltridge, B. and Starfield, S., 2020. Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315170022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paquot, M., 2008. Exemplification in learner writing: A cross-linguistic perspective. In: F. Meunier and S. Granger, eds. Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 101-119.10.1075/z.138.09paq
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rayson, P., 2008. Log-likelihood and effect size calculator. ucrel.lancs.ac.uk [Accessed 19 April 2022]. Available at: http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Triki, N., 2019. Revisiting the metadiscursive aspect of definitions in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 37, pp. 104-116.10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Triki, N., 2021. Exemplification in research articles: Structural, semantic and metadiscursive properties across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 54, [101039].10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101039
]Search in Google Scholar
