[
Andersson, L. G. and Trudgill, P., 2007. Swearing. In: L. Monaghan and J. Goodman, eds. A Cultural approach to interpersonal communication. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 195-199.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Attardo, S., 1994. Linguistic theories of humour. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Archard, D., 2014. Insults, free speech and offensiveness. Journal of Applied Philosophy, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 127-141.10.1111/japp.12048
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Avgerinakou, A., 2003. ‘Flaming’ in computer-mediated interactions. In: C.B. Grant, ed. Rethinking communicative interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 273-293.10.1075/pbns.116.18avg
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baron, R. A., 1977. Human aggression. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4615-7195-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baruch, Y. and Jenkins, S., 2006. Swearing at work and permissive leadership culture: When antisocial becomes social and incivility is acceptable. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, vol. 28, pp. 492-507.10.1108/01437730710780958
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beers Fägersten, K. A., 2001. A descriptive analysis of the social functions of swearing in American English. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 61, 3142–A.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernal, M., 2008. Do insults always insult? Genuine impoliteness versus non-genuine impoliteness in colloquial Spanish. Pragmatics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 775-802.10.1075/prag.18.4.10ber
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolinger, R., 2015. The pragmatics of slurs. Noûs, vol. 51, no.3, pp. 439-462.10.1111/nous.12090
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bousfield, D., 2007. Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 39, pp. 2185-2216.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bousfield, D., 2008. Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.167
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bousfield, D. and Locher, M., eds., 2008. Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208344
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berkovski, Y. S., 2017. A contextual analysis of insults. In: Dey, A. Kokinov, Leake, D. and Turner, R. eds. Modeling and using context. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp 661-674.10.1007/978-3-319-57837-8_53
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biber, D. et al. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blunt, J., 2020. How to be a complete and utter blunt: Diary of a reluctant social media sensation. Constable.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boxer, D. and Cortés-Conde, F., 1997. From bonding to nipping to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 27, pp. 275-294.10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bredle, K. et al. 2014. Twitter and social TV: Microblogging as a new approach to audience research. In: G. Patriarche, H. Bilandzic, J. L. Jensen and J. Jurišič, eds. Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation, New York: Routledge, pp. 196-211.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, P. and Levinson, S., 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In: E. Goody, ed. Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56-311.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brzozowska, D., 2006. Funny or aggressive? Pragmatic analysis of national stereotypes in an advertisement – a case study. Stylistyka, pp. 385-398.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burgers, C., van Mulken, M. and Schellens, P. J., 2011. Finding irony: An introduction of verbal irony procedure. Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 186-205.10.1080/10926488.2011.583194
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, G. M., 2017. Online incivility and public debate: Nasty talk. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-56273-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chishire, J., 1982. Variation in an English dialect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chetty, N. and Alathur, S., 2018. Hate speech review in the context of online social networks. Aggression and Violent Behavior, vol. 40, pp. 108-118.10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christie, C., 2007. Relevance theory and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 269-294.10.1515/PR.2007.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coesemans, R. and De Cock, B., 2017. Self-reference by politicians on Twitter: Strategies to adapt to 140 characters. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 116, pp. 37-50.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cole, R. W., 1975. Ribbin’, jivin’, and playin’ the dozens. The Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 56, no. 3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croom, A. M., 2014. The semantics of slurs: the refutation of pure expressivism. Language Sciences, vol. 41, pp. 227-242.10.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, J., 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakerst Link. Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35-72.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, J., 2008, Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. In: D. Bousfield and M. Locher, eds. Impoliteness in language. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, pp. 17-44.10.1515/9783110208344.1.17
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, J., 2009. The metalanguage of impoliteness: using Sketch Engine to explore the Oxford English Corpus. In: P. Baker, ed. Contemporary corpus linguistics. London: Continuum, pp. 64-86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, J., 2011a. Impoliteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, J., 2011b. Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 179, pp. 4-11.10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, J., 2021. Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics, no volume number, pp. 4-11.10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D. and Wichmann, A., 2003. Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 35, no. 10-11, pp. 1545-1579.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culpeper, J. and Haugh, M., 2021. The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English: A corpus-based metapragmatic approach. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 185-214.10.1075/jlac.00035.cul
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daly, N. et al. 2004. Expletives as solidarity signals in FTAs on the factory floor. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 36, pp. 945-964.10.1016/j.pragma.2003.12.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Danet, B., 2013. Flaming and linguistic impoliteness on a list-serve. In: C.H. Herring, D. Stein, T. Virtanen, eds. Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication, pp. 639-664.10.1515/9783110214468.639
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dayter, D., 2014. Self-praise in microblogging. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 61, pp. 91-102.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dayter, D., 2016. Discursive self in microblogging. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.260
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeCapua, A. and Boxer, D., 1999. Bragging, boasting and bravado: Male banter in a brokerage house. Women and Language, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5-12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Klerk, V., 1997. The role of expletives in the construction of masculinity. In: S. Johnson, U. H. Meinhof, eds. Language and masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 144-158.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dollard, J., 1939. The dozens: Dialectic of insult. American Imago, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3-25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Douglas, K. M., 2019. Deindividuation. Encyclopaedia Britannica. [Accessed 27 August 2021]. Availabe at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/deindividuation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drasovean, A. and Tagg, C., 2015. Evaluative language and its solidarity-building role on TED.com: An appraisal and corpus analysis. Language@Internet, vol. 12, article 1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drew, P., 1987. Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, vol. 25, pp. 219-253.10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dürscheid, C. and Frehner, C., 2013. Email communication. In: S. C. Herring, D. Stein and T. Virtanen, eds. Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. Berlin: DeGruyter, pp. 35-45.10.1515/9783110214468.35
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dynel, M., 2016. “Trolling is not stupid”: Internet trolling as the art of deception serving entertainment. Intercultural Pragmatics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 353-381.10.1515/ip-2016-0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dynel, M. and Poppi, F., 2019. Risum teneatis, amici? The socio-pragmatics of RoastMe humour. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 139, pp. 1-21.10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S., 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 21, pp. 461-490.10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ede, L. and Lunsford, A., 1984. Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 155-171.10.2307/358093
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feinberg, J., 1985. Offense to others, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fine, G. A., 1981. Friends, impression management, and preadolescent behavior. In: S. Asher and J. Gottman, eds. The development of children’s friendships. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29-52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frege, G.,1956. The thought: a logical inquiry. Mind, New Series, vol. 65, pp. 289-311.10.1093/mind/65.1.289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gabriel, Y., 1998. An introduction to the social psychology of insults in organizations. Human Relations, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1329-1354.10.1177/001872679805101101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P., 2010. A genre approach to the study of impoliteness. International Review of Pragmatics, vol. 2, pp. 46-94.10.1163/187731010X491747
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilpin, D. R., 2011. Working the Twitterspace. In: Z. Papacharissi, ed. A networked self. London: Routledge, pp. 232-250.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goffman, E., 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodwin, M. H., 2006. The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status, and exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470773567
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Graham, S. L., 2008. A manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in electronic communities of practice. In: Derek Bousfield and M. A. Locher, eds. Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 281-304.10.1515/9783110208344.5.281
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Graham, S. L. and Hardaker, C., 2017. (Im)politeness in digital communication. In: J. Culpeper, M. Haugh and D, Kádár, eds. The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness. London: Palgrave, pp. 785-814.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_30
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gregory, C., 2006. Among the dockhands: Another look at working-class male culture. Men and Masculinities, vol. 9, pp. 252-260.10.1177/1097184X05277692
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grundy, P., 2000. Doing pragmatics. London: Arnold.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haiman, J., 1998. Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation and the evolution of language. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195115246.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hardaker, C., 2010. h. Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 215-242.10.1515/jplr.2010.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hardaker, C., 2017. Flaming and trolling. Pragmatics of Social Media, vol. 11, pp. 495-522.10.1515/9783110431070-018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasund, I. K. and Stenström, A.-B., 1997. Conflict talk: A comparison of the verbal disputes between adolescent females in two corpora. In: Magnus Ljung, ed. Corpus-based studies in English: Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17). Stockholm, May 15–19, 1996. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 119-133.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haugh, M., 2007. The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 95-317.10.1515/PR.2007.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haugh, M., 2013. Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 58, pp. 52-72.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haugh, M., 2014. Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 76-99.10.1080/07268602.2014.875456
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haugh, M. and Culpeper, J., 2018. Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In: C. Ilie and N. R. Norrick, eds. Pragmatics and its interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 213-240.10.1075/pbns.294.10hau
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haugh, M. and Sinkeviciute, V., 2019. Offence and conflict talk. In: M. Evans, L. Jeffries and J. O’Driscoll, eds. The Routledge handbook of language in conflict, Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge, pp. 196-214.10.4324/9780429058011-12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hill, W. F. and Öttchen, C. J., 1995. Shakespeare’s insults. New York: Three Rivers Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hom, C., 2008. The semantics of racial epithets. Journal of Philosophy, vol. 105, pp. 416-440.10.5840/jphil2008105834
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hom, C. and May, R., 2018. Pejoratives as fiction. In: D. Sosa, ed. Bad words, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108-131.10.1093/oso/9780198758655.003.0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hornsby, J., 2001. Meaning and uselessness: how to think about derogatory words. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 25, pp. 512-522.10.1111/1475-4975.00042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ilie, C., 2001. Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms of ideological confrontation. In: R. Dirven, R. Frank and C. Ilie, eds, Language and ideology. Volume II: Descriptive cognitive approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 255-264.10.1075/cilt.205.14ili
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jay, T., 2000. Why we curse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.91
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeshion, R., 2013. Expressivism and the offensiveness of slurs. Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 27, pp. 231-259.10.1111/phpe.12027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeshion, R., 2021. Varieties of pejoratives. In: J. Khoo and R. Sterken, eds. The Routledge handbook of social and political philosophy of language. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003164869-17
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jucker, A., 2000. Slanders, slurs and insults on the road to Canterbury: Forms of verbal aggression in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. In: I. Taavitsainen, T. Nevalainen, P. Pahta, M. Rissanen, eds. Placing Middle English in context. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 369-389.10.1515/9783110869514.369
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jucker, A. and Taavitsainen, I., 2000. Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67-95.10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kádár, D., 2013. Relational rituals and communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230393059
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kampf, Z., 2015. The politics of being insulted: The uses of hurt feelings in Israeli public discourse. In: M. Kopytowska ed. Contemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres Special issue of Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 149-169.10.1075/jlac.3.1.05kam
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kennedy, R., 2003. Nigger: The strange career of a troublesome word. New York: Vintage Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaplan, A. M. and Haenlein, M., 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media”. Business Horizons, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 59-68.10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kienpointer, M., ed., 1999. Ideologies of politeness. Special Issue of Pragmatics, vol. 9, no. 1.10.1075/prag.9.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. and McGuire, T. W., 1984. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1123-1134.10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kotthoff, H., 1996. Impoliteness and conversational joking: On relational politics. Folia Linguistica, vol. 30, no. 3-4, pp. 299-326.10.1515/flin.1996.30.3-4.299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Labov, W., 1972. Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lachenicht, L. G., 1980. Aggravating language: A study of abusive and insulting language. International Journal of Human Communication, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 607-688.10.1080/08351818009370513
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Landert, D., 2017. Participation as user involvement. In: C. R. Hoffmann and W. Bublitz, eds. Pragmatics of social media. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 31-59.10.1515/9783110431070-002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Law, N., Lee, Y. and Wong-Loke, C., 2018. Determinants of school level success in design-based innovation networks. In: J. Kay and R. Luckin, eds. Rethinking learning in the digital Age. Making the learning sciences count. 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (23-27 June 2018). London: UCL, pp. 97-103.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lefever, H. G., 1981. “Playing the dozens”: A mechanism for social control. Phylon, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 73-85.10.2307/274886
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leggit, J. S. and Gibbs, R. W., 2000. Emotional reactions to verbal irony. Discourse Processes, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-24.10.1207/S15326950dp2901_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., 2017. Incivility and confrontation. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, vol.13, no. 2, pp. 347-363.10.1515/lpp-2017-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. et al. 2021. LOD-connected offensive language ontology and tag set enrichment. Workshop on Sentiment Analysis and Linguistics Linked Data, Zaragoza, Spain, 1 September.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Litt, E., 2012. Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 330-345.10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maibauer, J., 2014. Bald-faced lies as acts of verbal aggression. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 127-150.10.1075/jlac.2.1.05mei
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marwick, A. E., and boyd, d., 2010. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society, vol 13, no. 1, pp. 114-133.10.1177/1461444810365313
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mateo, J. and Yus, F., 2013. Towards a cross-cultural pragmatic taxonomy of insults. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 87-114.10.1075/jlac.1.1.05mat
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McVittie, C., Sambaraju, R. and Bain, F., 2021. ‘I love James Blunt as much as I love herpes’ – ‘I love that you’re not ashamed to admit you have both’: Attempted insults and responses on Twitter, Language and Communication, vol. 76, pp. 23-34.10.1016/j.langcom.2020.10.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mendelson, A. L. and Papacharissi, Z., 2010. Look At Us: Collective Narcissism in College Student Facebook Photo Galleries. In: Z. Papacharissi, ed. A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 251-273.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milić, I., 2018. What counts as an insult? Acta Analytica, vol. 33, pp. 539-552.10.1007/s12136-018-0353-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mill, S., 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mills, S., 2017. Sociocultural approach to (im)politeness. In: J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, and D. Kádar, eds. The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 41-61.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muddiman, A., 2017. Personal and public levels of political incivility. International Journal of Communication, vol. 11, pp. 3182-3202.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mullany, L., 2011. Frontstage and backstage: Gordon Brown, the ‘bigoted woman’ and im/politeness in the 2010 UK General Election. In: LPRG, eds. Discursive approaches to politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 133-165.10.1515/9783110238679.133
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neu, J., 2008. Sticks and stones. The philosophy of insults. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195314311.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norman, K., 1994. The ironic body: Obscene joking among Swedish working-class women. Ethnos, vol. 59: 187-211.10.1080/00141844.1994.9981499
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Obana, Y. and Haugh, M., 2021. (Non-)propositional irony in Japanese - impoliteness behind honorifics. Lingua, vol. 260, 103119, no pagination.10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103119
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Orwin, C., 1992. Citizenship and civility as components of liberal democracy. In: E.C. Banfield, ed. Civility and citizenship in liberal democratic societies. New York: Paragon House, pp. 75-94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Padilla Cruz, M., 2019. Qualifying insults, offensive epithets, slurs and expressive expletives. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 156-181.10.1075/jlac.00023.cru
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papacharissi, Z., 2004. Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media and Society, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 259-283.10.1177/1461444804041444
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Partridge, E., 1957. Usage and abusage: A guide to good English. London: H. Hamilton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parvaresh. V. and Tayebi, T., 2021. Taking offence at the (un)said: Towards a more radical contextualist approach. In: D. Z. Kadar, V. Parvaresh and R. Marquez Reiter, eds. Journal of politeness research, vol. 17, no. 1, special issue: Alternative approaches to politeness and impoliteness, pp. 111-131.10.1515/pr-2020-0032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavlenko, A., 2008. Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 147-164.10.1017/S1366728908003283
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poletto, F. et al. 2020. Resources and benchmark corpora for hate speech detection: A systematic review. Language Resources and Evaluation, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1-47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rockwell, P., 2000. Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol. 29, pp. 483-495.10.1023/A:1005120109296
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schnurr, S., Marra, M. and Holmes, J., 2008. Impoliteness as a means of contesting power relations in the workplace. In: D. Bousfield and M.A. Locher, eds. Impoliteness in language, pp. 211-230.10.1515/9783110208344.4.211
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott, K., 2021. The pragmatics of rebroadcasting content on Twitter: How is retweeting relevant? Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 184, pp. 52-60.10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Searle, J. R., 1979. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609213
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sennet, A., 2016. Ambiguity. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sifianou, M., 2019. Im/politeness and in/civility: A neglected relationship? Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 147, pp. 49-64.10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stapleton, K., 2010. Swearing. In: M. Locher, S. Graham, eds. Interpersonal pragmatics. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, pp. 289-305.10.1515/9783110214338.2.289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stenström, A-B., 2006. Taboo words in teenage talk. Spanish in Context, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 115-138.10.1075/sic.3.1.08ste
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Slugoski, B. R. and Turnbull, W., 1988. Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 102-121.10.1177/0261927X8800700202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terkourafi, M., 2005. Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 1, pp. 237-262.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terkourafi, M., 2008. Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In: D. Bousfield and M. A. Locher, eds. Impoliteness in language. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, pp. 45-74.10.1515/9783110208344.1.45
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trudgill, P. J., 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vandergriff, I., 2010. Humour and play in CMC. In: R. Taiwo, ed. Handbook of research on discourse behavior and digital communication. Hershey: ICI Global, pp. 235-251.10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wajnryb, R., 2005. Expletive deleted. New York: Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watts, R. J., 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wyrwoll, C., 2014. Social media. fundamentals, models, and ranking of user generated content. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg.10.1007/978-3-658-06984-1_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yus, F., 2011. Cyberpragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.213
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zampieri, M. et al. 2019. Predicting the type and target of offensive posts in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human language technologies, Vol. 1. Stroudsburg: The Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1415-1420.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhao, D. and Rosson, M. B., 2009. How and why people Twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International conference on supporting group work, Sanibel Island. GROUP ’09. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 243-252.10.1145/1531674.1531710
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zappavigna, M., 2014. CoffeeTweets: Bonding around the bean on Twitter. In: P. Seargeant and C. Tagg, eds. The language of social media. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 139-160.10.1057/9781137029317_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zappavigna, M., 2017. Twitter. In: C.R. Hoffmann and W. Bublitz, eds. Pragmatics of social media. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 201-224.10.1515/9783110431070-008
]Search in Google Scholar
