A Low-Cost Anechoic Chamber for Rotor Aeroacoustics Research: Design and Validation

[1] Rizzi SA, Huff DL, Boyd DD Jr, Bent P, Henderson BS, Pascioni KA, et al. Urban air mobility noise: current practice, gaps, and recommendations. NASA/TP–2020-5007433. 2020. RizziSA HuffDL BoydDDJr BentP HendersonBS PascioniKA Urban air mobility noise: current practice, gaps, and recommendations NASA/TP–2020-5007433 2020 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Barbara O, Seth L, Roalt A, Schreckenberg D, van Miltenburg M. Association between short-term annoyance and several physiological parameters during different amounts of nocturnal aircraft noise exposure. Trans Aerosp Res. 2020;(4):1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/tar-2020-0018 BarbaraO SethL RoaltA SchreckenbergD van MiltenburgM Association between short-term annoyance and several physiological parameters during different amounts of nocturnal aircraft noise exposure Trans Aerosp Res 2020 4 1 12 https://doi.org/10.2478/tar-2020-0018 Search in Google Scholar

[3] European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Off J Eur Union. 2002. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise Off J Eur Union 2002 Search in Google Scholar

[4] European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) No 598/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at Union airports within a Balanced Approach and repealing Directive 2002/30/EC. Off J Eur Union. 2014. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union Regulation (EU) No 598/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at Union airports within a Balanced Approach and repealing Directive 2002/30/EC Off J Eur Union 2014 Search in Google Scholar

[5] European Commission. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945 of 12 March 2019 on unmanned aircraft systems and on third-country operators of unmanned aircraft systems. Off J Eur Union. 2019. European Commission Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945 of 12 March 2019 on unmanned aircraft systems and on third-country operators of unmanned aircraft systems Off J Eur Union 2019 Search in Google Scholar

[6] European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/947 of 24 May 2019 on the rules and procedures for the operation of unmanned aircraft (Text with EEA relevance.). Off J Eur Union. 2019. European Commission Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/947 of 24 May 2019 on the rules and procedures for the operation of unmanned aircraft (Text with EEA relevance.) Off J Eur Union 2019 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Christian A, Cabell R. Initial investigation into the psychoacoustic properties of small unmanned aerial system noise. 23rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference; 2017 Jun 5–9; Denver, CO, USA. Paper No. AIAA 2017-4051. ChristianA CabellR Initial investigation into the psychoacoustic properties of small unmanned aerial system noise 23rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2017 Jun 5–9 Denver, CO, USA Paper No. AIAA 2017-4051. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Leylekian L, Lebrun M, Lempereur P. An overview of aircraft noise reduction technologies. Aerosp Lab. 2014;(6):1–15. https://doi.org/10.12762/2014.AL07-01 LeylekianL LebrunM LempereurP An overview of aircraft noise reduction technologies Aerosp Lab. 2014 6 1 15 https://doi.org/10.12762/2014.AL07-01 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Candeloro P, Ragni D, Pagliaroli T. Small-scale rotor aeroacoustics for drone propulsion: a review of noise sources and control strategies. Fluids. 2022;7(8):279. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7080279 CandeloroP RagniD PagliaroliT Small-scale rotor aeroacoustics for drone propulsion: a review of noise sources and control strategies Fluids 2022 7 8 279 https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7080279 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Casalino D, Grande E, Romani G, Ragni D, Avallone F. Definition of a benchmark for low Reynolds number propeller aeroacoustics. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2021;113:106707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106707 CasalinoD GrandeE RomaniG RagniD AvalloneF Definition of a benchmark for low Reynolds number propeller aeroacoustics Aerosp Sci Technol 2021 113 106707 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106707 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Di Pasquale D, Rona A, Garrett SJ. A selective review of CFD transition models. 39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference; 2009 Jun 22–25; San Antonio, TX, USA. Paper No. AIAA 2009-3812. Di PasqualeD RonaA GarrettSJ A selective review of CFD transition models 39th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference 2009 Jun 22–25 San Antonio, TX, USA Paper No. AIAA 2009-3812. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Zarri A, Dell’Erba E, Munters W, Schram C. Aeroacoustic installation effects in multirotorcraft: numerical investigations of a small-size drone model. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2022;128:107762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107762 ZarriA Dell’ErbaE MuntersW SchramC Aeroacoustic installation effects in multirotorcraft: numerical investigations of a small-size drone model Aerosp Sci Technol 2022 128 107762 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107762 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Grande E, Romani G, Ragni D, Avallone F, Casalino D. Aeroacoustic investigation of a propeller operating at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA J. 2022;60(2):860–71. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060611 GrandeE RomaniG RagniD AvalloneF CasalinoD Aeroacoustic investigation of a propeller operating at low Reynolds numbers AIAA J 2022 60 2 860 71 https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060611 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Sinibaldi G, Marino L. Experimental analysis on the noise of propellers for small UAV. Appl Acoust. 2013;74(1):79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.06.011 SinibaldiG MarinoL Experimental analysis on the noise of propellers for small UAV Appl Acoust 2013 74 1 79 88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.06.011 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Gojon R, Jardin T, Parisot-Dupuis H. Experimental investigation of low Reynolds number rotor noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021;149(6):3813–29. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0005068 GojonR JardinT Parisot-DupuisH Experimental investigation of low Reynolds number rotor noise J Acoust Soc Am 2021 149 6 3813 29 https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0005068 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Wu H, Jiang H, Zhou P, Zhong S, Zhang X, Zhou G, et al. On identifying the deterministic components of propeller noise. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2022;130:107948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107948 WuH JiangH ZhouP ZhongS ZhangX ZhouG On identifying the deterministic components of propeller noise Aerosp Sci Technol 2022 130 107948 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107948 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Podsędkowski M, Konopiński R, Lipian M. Sound noise properties of variable pitch propeller for small UAV. 2022 Int Conf Unmanned Aircraft Syst (ICUAS); 2022 Jun 21–24; Dubrovnik, Croatia. p. 1025–9. PodsędkowskiM KonopińskiR LipianM Sound noise properties of variable pitch propeller for small UAV 2022 Int Conf Unmanned Aircraft Syst (ICUAS) 2022 Jun 21–24 Dubrovnik, Croatia 1025 9 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Podsędkowski M, Konopiński R, Lipian M. Acoustic stall detection of variable pitch propeller for unmanned aerial vehicles. J Intell Robot Syst. 2023;109(3):70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-023-01997-x PodsędkowskiM KonopińskiR LipianM Acoustic stall detection of variable pitch propeller for unmanned aerial vehicles J Intell Robot Syst 2023 109 3 70 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-023-01997-x Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kekus-Kumor P, Sieradzki A. Experimental investigation of unmanned air vehicle rotor aeroacoustics using benchmark geometries. 52nd Int Congr Noise Control Eng (Inter-noise 2023); 2023 Aug 20–23; Chiba, Japan. Kekus-KumorP SieradzkiA Experimental investigation of unmanned air vehicle rotor aeroacoustics using benchmark geometries 52nd Int Congr Noise Control Eng (Inter-noise 2023) 2023 Aug 20–23 Chiba, Japan Search in Google Scholar

[20] Vesa JH. Design of an anechoic chamber for aeroacoustic testing and analysis of large UAS propellers [master’s thesis]. Mississippi State (MS): Mississippi State University; 2020. VesaJH Design of an anechoic chamber for aeroacoustic testing and analysis of large UAS propellers [master’s thesis]. Mississippi State (MS) Mississippi State University 2020 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Whiteside S, Zawodny N, Fei X, Pettingill NA, Patterson MD, Rothhaar P. An exploration of the performance and acoustic characteristics of UAV-scale stacked rotor configurations. AIAA Sci Technol Forum; 2019 Jan 7–11; San Diego, CA, USA. Paper No. AIAA 2019-1071. WhitesideS ZawodnyN FeiX PettingillNA PattersonMD RothhaarP An exploration of the performance and acoustic characteristics of UAV-scale stacked rotor configurations AIAA Sci Technol Forum 2019 Jan 7–11 San Diego, CA, USA Paper No. AIAA 2019-1071. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Simon F, Schiller NH, Zawodny NS, Pettingill NA, Galles MB. Fundamental noise characterization of a ducted propeller in hover. 51st Int Congr Noise Control Eng (Inter-noise 2022); 2022 Aug 21–24; Glasgow, UK. SimonF SchillerNH ZawodnyNS PettingillNA GallesMB Fundamental noise characterization of a ducted propeller in hover 51st Int Congr Noise Control Eng (Inter-noise 2022) 2022 Aug 21–24 Glasgow, UK Search in Google Scholar

[23] Malgoezar AM, Vieira A, Snellen M, Simons DG, Veldhuis LL. Experimental characterization of noise radiation from a ducted propeller of an unmanned aerial vehicle. Int J Aeroacoust. 2019;18(4–5):372–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475472X19852952 MalgoezarAM VieiraA SnellenM SimonsDG VeldhuisLL Experimental characterization of noise radiation from a ducted propeller of an unmanned aerial vehicle Int J Aeroacoust 2019 18 4–5 372 91 https://doi.org/10.1177/1475472X19852952 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Guo J, Zhou T, Fang Y, Zhang X. Experimental study on a compact lined circular duct for small-scale propeller noise reduction. Appl Acoust. 2021;179:108062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108062 GuoJ ZhouT FangY ZhangX Experimental study on a compact lined circular duct for small-scale propeller noise reduction Appl Acoust 2021 179 108062 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108062 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Wang Z, Henricks Q, Zhuang M, Pandey A, Sutkowy M, Harter B, et al. Impact of rotor–airframe orientation on the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic characteristics of small unmanned aerial systems. Drones. 2019;3(3):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3030056 WangZ HenricksQ ZhuangM PandeyA SutkowyM HarterB Impact of rotor–airframe orientation on the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic characteristics of small unmanned aerial systems Drones 2019 3 3 56 https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3030056 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Zawodny NS, Boyd DD. Investigation of rotor–airframe interaction noise associated with small-scale rotary-wing unmanned aircraft systems. J Am Helicopter Soc. 2020;65(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.65.012007 ZawodnyNS BoydDD Investigation of rotor–airframe interaction noise associated with small-scale rotary-wing unmanned aircraft systems J Am Helicopter Soc 2020 65 1 1 17 https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.65.012007 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Wiedemann AD, Fuller C, Pascioni KA. Reducing rotor-airframe interaction noise in drones using a curved support rod. AIAA J. Forthcoming 2025;Article in Advance:1–5. WiedemannAD FullerC PascioniKA Reducing rotor-airframe interaction noise in drones using a curved support rod AIAA J Forthcoming 2025 Article in Advance: 1 5 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Wei Y, Xu F, Bian S, Kong D. Noise reduction of UAV using biomimetic propellers with varied morphologies leading-edge serration. J Bionic Eng. 2020;17:767–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0054-z WeiY XuF BianS KongD Noise reduction of UAV using biomimetic propellers with varied morphologies leading-edge serration J Bionic Eng 2020 17 767 79 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0054-z Search in Google Scholar

[29] Intaratep N, Alexander WN, Devenport WJ, Grace SM, Dropkin A. Experimental study of quadcopter acoustics and performance at static thrust conditions. 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conf; 2016 May 30–Jun 1; Lyon, France. Paper No. AIAA 2016-2873. IntaratepN AlexanderWN DevenportWJ GraceSM DropkinA Experimental study of quadcopter acoustics and performance at static thrust conditions 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conf 2016 May 30–Jun 1 Lyon, France Paper No. AIAA 2016-2873. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Whelchel J, Alexander WN, Intaratep N. Propeller noise in confined anechoic and open environments. AIAA Sci Technol Forum; 2020 Jan 6–10; Orlando, FL, USA. Paper No. AIAA 2020-1252. WhelchelJ AlexanderWN IntaratepN Propeller noise in confined anechoic and open environments AIAA Sci Technol Forum 2020 Jan 6–10 Orlando, FL, USA Paper No. AIAA 2020-1252. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Lu Z, Debiasi M, Khoo BC. Acoustic characteristics of a multi-rotor MAV and its noise reduction technology. 45th Int Congr Noise Control Eng (Inter-noise 2016); 2016 Aug 21–24; Hamburg, Germany. p. 393–403. LuZ DebiasiM KhooBC Acoustic characteristics of a multi-rotor MAV and its noise reduction technology 45th Int Congr Noise Control Eng (Inter-noise 2016) 2016 Aug 21–24 Hamburg, Germany 393 403 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Ma Z, Wu H, Mao J, Liu G, Zhou P, Zhong S. Noise measurement of a quadrotor drone in an anechoic chamber. 52nd Int Congr Noise Control Eng (Inter-noise 2023); 2023 Aug 20–23; Chiba, Japan. p. 4659–70. MaZ WuH MaoJ LiuG ZhouP ZhongS Noise measurement of a quadrotor drone in an anechoic chamber 52nd Int Congr Noise Control Eng (Inter-noise 2023) 2023 Aug 20–23 Chiba, Japan 4659 70 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Zhou T, Jiang H, Huang B. Quad-copter noise measurements under realistic flight conditions. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2022;124:107542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107542 ZhouT JiangH HuangB Quad-copter noise measurements under realistic flight conditions Aerosp Sci Technol 2022 124 107542 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107542 Search in Google Scholar

[34] International Organization for Standardization. ISO 3745:2012. Acoustics – Determination of sound power levels and sound energy levels of noise sources using sound pressure – Precision methods for anechoic rooms and hemi-anechoic rooms. Geneva: ISO; 2012. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 3745:2012 Acoustics – Determination of sound power levels and sound energy levels of noise sources using sound pressure – Precision methods for anechoic rooms and hemi-anechoic rooms Geneva ISO 2012 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Weitsman D, Stephenson JH, Zawodny NS. Effects of flow recirculation on acoustic and dynamic measurements of rotary-wing systems operating in closed anechoic chambers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020;148(3):1325–36. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001901 WeitsmanD StephensonJH ZawodnyNS Effects of flow recirculation on acoustic and dynamic measurements of rotary-wing systems operating in closed anechoic chambers J Acoust Soc Am 2020 148 3 1325 36 https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001901 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Ma Z, Zhou P, Zhang X, Zhong S. Experimental assessment of the flow recirculation effect on the noise measurement of a free-flying multi-rotor UAS in a closed anechoic chamber. Acoust Aust. 2024;52:313–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-024-00327-x MaZ ZhouP ZhangX ZhongS Experimental assessment of the flow recirculation effect on the noise measurement of a free-flying multi-rotor UAS in a closed anechoic chamber Acoust Aust 2024 52 313 22 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-024-00327-x Search in Google Scholar