[
Ahangari S., & Dogolsara, S. A. (2015). Comparing the effect of using monolingual versus bilingual dictionary on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p14110.5539/elt.v8n6p141
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alanazi, M. (2017). The comprehension of synonyms by Saudi EFL learners: Acquisition and pedagogical implications. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(3), 58–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.5810.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.58
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ansarin, A. A., & Khojasteh, M. R. B. (2013). Retention in meaning-based vocabulary instruction. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 26, 7–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cambridge English Dictionary. (n.d.). Cambridge University Press. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carter, R. (2012). Vocabulary. Applied linguistic perspectives. Routledge.10.4324/9780203124659-11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (1988). Vocabulary and language teaching. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cruse, A. (2004). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DiMarco, C., Hirst, G., & Stede, M. (1993). The semantic and stylistic differentiation of synonyms and near-synonyms. AAAI Technical Report, 120–127.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edmonds, P., & Hirst, G. (2002). Near-synonymy and lexical choice. Computational Linguistic, 28(2), 105–144. http://www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Edmonds+Hirst-2002.pdf10.1162/089120102760173625
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Estonian speaking countries. (n.d.). Worlddata. https://www.worlddata.info/languages/estonian.php
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hazenberg, S., & Hulstijn, J. H. (1996). Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for non-native university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.2.14510.1093/applin/17.2.145
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hilton, H. (2008). The link between vocabulary knowledge and spoken L2 fluency. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0957173080238998310.1080/09571730802389983
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hirst, G. (1995). Near-synonymy and the structure of lexical knowledge. AAAI Technical Report, 51–56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Islamiyah, M., & Muchamad, A. A. F. (2019). Skinny, slim, and thin: A corpus-based study of synonymous adjectives and its implication for English language teaching. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v8i1.89410.26499/rnh.v8i1.894
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khazaal, E. (2019). Investigating and analyzing ESP college students’ errors in using synonyms. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(5), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n5p32810.5539/ijel.v9n5p328
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krebt, D. M. (2017). An assessment of Iraqi EFL learners’ performance in using synonymy and antonymy. Arab World English Journal, 8(2), 183–191. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no2.1310.24093/awej/vol8no2.13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, D., & Shouman, Z. (2016). L2 vs. L1 use of synonymy: An empirical study of synonym use/acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu02210.1093/applin/amu022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGeoch, J., & McDonald, W. (1931). Meaningful relation and retroactive inhibition. The American Journal of Psychology, 43(4), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.2307/141515910.2307/1415159
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miso, K. (2020). A qualitative analysis of EFL learners’ discrimination of near-synonyms in a data-driven learning task. English Teaching, 75(3), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.75.3.202009.2510.15858/engtea.75.3.202009.25
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mohammed, N. M. A. (2014). The reasons behind the errors made by EFL learners in using English synonyms [Master’s thesis, University of Gezira].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy and other paradigms. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486494
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524759
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petcharat, N., & Phoocharoensil, S. (2017). A corpus-based study of English synonyms: Appropriate, proper, and suitable. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 10(2), 10–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Porter, D. (2007). Check your vocabulary for academic English. A & C Black.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saussure, F. D. (1959). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). The Philosophical Library.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shen, Y. (2010). EFL learners’ synonymous errors: A case study of glad and happy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.1.1-710.4304/jltr.1.1.1-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sotoudehnama, E., & Soleimanifard, F. (2013). The effect of teaching vocabulary through synonymous, semantically unrelated, and hyponym sets on EFL learners’ retention. Language Teaching, 2(2), 27–56. http://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_1362.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Staehr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0957173080238997510.1080/09571730802389975
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Statistics Estonia. (2020). Population by sex, ethnic nationality and county (RV0222U) [Data set]. http://andmebaas.stat.ee/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=RV0222U&lang=en
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Storjohann, P. (2009). Plesionomy: A case of synonymy or contrast? Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2140–2158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.03610.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sun, X. (2011). Analysis on the function of cultural connotation in vocabulary teaching and learning of English majors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(9), 1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.9.1207-121210.4304/tpls.1.9.1207-1212
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tajik, F. (2018). The impact of teaching English synonym and antonym pairs adjacently and non-adjacently on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning and retention. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 8(3), 200–225. https://doi.org/10.26655/mjltm.2018.3.1010.26655/mjltm.2018.3.10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Near-synonyms as co-extensive categories: High and tall revisited. Language Sciences, 25(3), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(02)00018-910.1016/S0388-0001(02)00018-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, Q. (2019). A corpus-based contrastive study on semantic prosody of English near-synonyms: A case study of motive and motivation. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1–15. https://theartsjournal.org/index.php/site/article/view/1552
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of synonymy on second-language vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19(2), 120–136. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/item/144
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilkins, D. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. Edward Arnold.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wongkhan, P., & Thienthong, A. (2020). EFL learners’ acquisition of academic collocation and synonymy: Does their academic experience matter? RELC Journal, 1(16), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0033688219895046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yazdi, S. S. H. (2014). Iranian EFL learners’ perceptions about monolingual dictionaries and their vocabulary proficiency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.46110.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.461
]Search in Google Scholar