[
Antas, J. (2013). Semantyczność ciała. Gesty jako znaki myślenia. Łódź: Primum Verbum.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Antas, J., Gembalczyk S. (2018). Człowiek negujący – multimodalne studium cielesnych wyrazów negacji towarzyszących mowie. In: Winiarska J., Zała-zińska, A. (Eds.). Multimodalność komunikacji. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Body – Language – Communication, vol. I 2013, vol. II 2014, Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., Teßendorf, S. (Eds.). Berlin: de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of Meaning in Gestures. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cienki, A. (2008). Why study metaphor and gesture? In: Cienki, A., Müller, C. (Eds.). Metaphor and Gesture, 5–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cienki, A. (2013). Conceptual metaphor theory in light of research on speakers’ gestures. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 349–366. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.349/html.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cienki, A. (2015). Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. In: Pinar Sanz, M.J. (Ed.), Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistic, Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 195–209.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cienki, A. (2016). Analysing metaphor in gesture. A set of metaphor identification guidelines for gesture (MIG-G). In: Semino, E., Demjén, Z. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cienki, A., Müller C. (2008). Metaphor, gestures, and thought. In: Gibbs, R.W. (Ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans, V. (2009). Leksykon językoznawstwa kognitywnego. Kraków: Universitas.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbs, R.W. (Ed.). 2008, The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grady, J.E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes, https://escholarship.org/content/qt3g9427m2/qt3g9427m2_noSplash_87927e5c56786241d4df549fe0a0b4b4.pdf?t=p3dkmc.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jarmołowicz-Nowikow, E. (2019). Intencjonalność komunikacyjna gestów wskazujących. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jarząbek, K. (2016). Słownik mowy ciała Polaków. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jelec, A., Fabiszak, M. (2019). Micronarrative: Unit of Analysis for Quantitative Studies of Gesture in Focus Interviews. Lingua 229: 102710.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jelec, A., Kraśnicka, I. (2022). Co jest metaforycznego w geście metaforycznym? “Socjolingwistyka” 36, nr 1, s. 281–299, DOI: 10.17651/SOCJOLING.36.16, https://socjolingwistyka.ijp.pan.pl/index.php/SOCJO/article/view/352/304.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, M. (1990). The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kraśnicka, I. (2020). Meaning in multisemiotic messages: functions of gestures accompanying speech as elements of utterance structure, “Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies”, (31), pp. 7–22. DOI: 10.15290/CR.2020.31.4.01; https://czasopisma.filologia.uwb.edu.pl/index.php/c/article/view/1531.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kraśnicka, I. (2021). Gdzie jest metafora? Sposoby reprezentowania gestów metaforycznych w dialogu, “Polonica” 41 (1), s. 23–37, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17651/POLON.41.2.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kraśnicka, I. (2023). Mówiące ręce. Interakcyjna funkcja gestów towarzyszących mowie. In: Przestrzenie komunikacji. Tom jubileuszowy dedykowany Profesor Jolancie Antas, red. J. Winiarska, A. Załazińska, s. 209–224.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karpiński, M. (2007). Selected quasi-lexical and non-lexical units in Polish map task dialogues. Archives of Acoustics 32, 1, 51–65.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karpiński, M., Jarmołowicz-Nowikow, E. (2023). Dzielenie gestu na czworo. Intuicyjne i eksperckie określanie granic frazy gestowej. In: Przestrzenie komunikacji. Tom jubileuszowy dedykowany Profesor Jolancie Antas. Kraków: Wydawnictwo akademickie, s. 147–164, https://doi.org/10.12797/9788381388351.09.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance, https://(15) (PDF) Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance in M (researchgate.net).]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kendon, A. (2005). Gestures: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, R. (2008). Metaphoric gesture and cognitive linguistic. In: Cienki A., Müller, C. (Eds.). Metaphor and Gesture, 219–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lhommet, M., Marsela, S. (2016). From embodied metaphors to metaphoric gestures, https://www.ccs.neu.edu/˜marsella/publications/pdf/16-Cogsci-Lhommet.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Libura, A. (2019). Metafora multimodalna. Interakcje słowa i obrazu. In: J. Winiarska, A. Załazińska (Eds.). Widzieć – rozumieć – komunikować. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.]Search in Google Scholar
[
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind. What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
McNeill, D. (2013). The growth point hypothesis of language and gesture as a dynamic and integrated system. In: Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke E. et al. (Eds.). Body, Language, Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, vol. 1 (38.1), 135–155, Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[
McNeill, D. (2013a). The co-evolution of gesture and speech, and downstream consequences. In: Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke E., et al. (Eds.). Body, Language, Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, vol. 1 (38.1), 480–512. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[
McNeill, D. (2014). The emblem as metaphor. In: Seyfeddinipur M., Gullberg M. (Eds.). From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance. Essays in honor of Adam Kendon. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[
McNeill, D. (2016). Why We Gesture: The Surprising Role of Hand Movements in Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[
McNeill, D., Duncan, S. (2000). Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In: McNeill, D. (Ed.). Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–161.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mittelberg, I., (2014). Gesture and iconicity, In: Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke E., et al. (Eds.). Body, Language, Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, vol. 2 (38.2), 1712–1732, Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mittelberg, I., Waugh L.R. (2009). Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In: Forceville, Ch., Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 329–356.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller, C. (2008). What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In: Cienki, A., Müller, C. (Eds.), Metaphor and Gesture, 219–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller, C. (2014). Gesture as “deliberate expressive movement”. In: Seyfeddinipur M., Gullberg, M. (Eds.). From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance, 127–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller, C., Cienki, A. (2009). Words, gestures, and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In: Forceville, Ch.J., Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.5.297, 297–328.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Slobin, D. (1987). Thinking for Speaking. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 435–445, (PDF) Thinking for Speaking | Dan Slobin – Academia.edu.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft. The Manu-facture of Meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Załazińska, A. (2001). Schematy myśli wyrażane w gestach: gesty metaforyczne obrazujące abstrakcyjne relacje i zasoby podmiotu mówiącego. Kraków: Universitas.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zlatev, J. (2007). Intersubjectivity, mimetic schemas and the emergence of language, “Intellectica” 2–3, 46–48, 123–152.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zlatev, J. (2014). Image schema, mimetic schema and children’s gestures, “Cognitive Semiotics” 7(1), 3–29.]Search in Google Scholar