About this article
Article Category: Original scientific article
Published Online: Jun 25, 2020
Page range: 189 - 194
Received: Apr 04, 2020
Accepted: Jun 09, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0024
Keywords
© 2020 Valentina Prevolnik Rupel et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Comparison of the Slovenian EQ-5D-3L and Slovenian EQ-5D-5L crosswalk value sets_
243 | 3125 | |
−0.495 to 1 | −0.495 to 1 | |
0.18±0.324 | 0.258±0.27 | |
0.190 | 0.304 | |
0.070 | −0.419 | |
2.170 | 2.450 | |
82 (33.745%) | 653 (20.896%) | |
4 (1.646%) | 16 (0.512%) |
Selected health states, 3L and 5L values_
11111 | 1.000 | |
11211 | 0.894 | |
11112 | 0.885 | |
12111 | 0.879 | |
11121 | 0.836 | |
21111 | 0.747 | |
11222 | 0.741 | |
12221 | 0.738 | |
22211 | 0.666 | |
22222 | 0.580 | |
23332 | 0.555 | |
22333 | 0.554 | |
33322 | 0.543 | |
33333 | 0.524 | |
44433 | 0.392 | |
34443 | 0.315 | |
33444 | 0.277 | |
44444 | 0.208 | |
44555 | −0.075 | |
45554 | −0.102 | |
55544 | −0.351 | |
55555 | −0.495 |