[
1. Justus Hofmeyr G, Say L, Metin Gülmezoglu A. Systematic review: WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;112:1221–8.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Saǧlamtas M, Vicdan K, Yalcin H, Yilmaz Z, Yeşilyurt H, Gökmen O. Rupture of the uterus. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1995;49:9–15.10.1016/0020-7292(95)02333-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Endres LK, Barnhart K. Spontaneous second trimester uterine rupture after classical cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:806–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Pontis A, Prasciolu C, Litta P, Angioni S. Uterine rupture in pregnancy: two case reports and review of literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2016;43:304–9.10.12891/ceog3066.2016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Walsh CA, Baxi L V. Rupture of the primigravid uterus: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007;62:327–34.10.1097/01.ogx.0000261643.11301.5617425811
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Deneux-Tharaux C. [Women with previous caesarean or other uterine scar: epidemiological features]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2012;41:697–707. doi:10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.022.10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.02223123080
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Kucuk M. Obstetrician perceptions of the causes of high cesarean delivery rates in Turkey. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;138:100–6. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12172.10.1002/ijgo.1217228387945
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Abdalla N, Reinholz-Jaskolska M, Bachanek M, Cendrowski K, Stanczak R, Sawicki W. Hemoperitoneum in a patient with spontaneous rupture of the posterior wall of an unscarred uterus in the second trimester of pregnancy. BMC Res Notes 2015;8:603.10.1186/s13104-015-1575-0462001526498591
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Öry F, De Vries JIP, Bloemenkamp KWM, Van Roosmalen J. Uterine rupture in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;116:1069–80.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02136.x19515148
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Colmorn LB, Petersen KB, Jakobsson M, et al. The Nordic Obstetric Surveillance Study: a study of complete uterine rupture, abnormally invasive placenta, peripartum hysterectomy, and severe blood loss at delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94:734–44. doi:10.1111/aogs.12639.10.1111/aogs.1263925828911
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Vilchez G, Nazeer S, Kumar K, Warren M, Dai J, Sokol RJ. Contemporary epidemiology and novel predictors of uterine rupture: a nationwide population-based study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;296:869–75. doi:10.1007/s00404-017-4508-4.10.1007/s00404-017-4508-428864930
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Teguete I, Traore Y, Sissoko A, et al. Determining factors of cesarean delivery trends in developing countries: lessons from point G National Hospital (Bamako-Mali). Cesarean Deliv., InTech; 2012.10.5772/47914
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Landon MB, Lynch CD. Optimal timing and mode of delivery after cesarean with previous classical incision or myomectomy: a review of the data. Semin. Perinatol., vol. 35, Elsevier; 2011, p. 257–61.10.1053/j.semperi.2011.05.00821962624
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton EF, Harel F, Gauthier RJ. The impact of a single-layer or double- layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1326–30.10.1067/mob.2002.12241612066117
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Ankara: 2003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2008. Ankara: 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Ankara: 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Köse MR, Bora Başara B, Soytutan Çağlar İ, et al. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. Health Statistics Yearbook 2016. Ankara: 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
