[
A. PAGLIAROLI, V.A., 2018. Assessment of site effects in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal, during the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake sequence using 1D and 2D numerical modelling. Engineering Geology, 239, 50-62. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AL-AZAZMEH, A., & MAHLER, A., 2024. Development of CPT-Vs correlations for soft Quaternary clays of Szeged city, Hungary. In Geotechnical Engineering Challenges to Meet Current and Emerging Needs of Society. CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9781003431749-25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BERGAMO, P.F., 2023. A site amplification model for Switzerland based on site-condition indicators and incorporating local response as measured at seismic stations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 5831–5865. doi:10.1007/s10518-023-01766-z.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CELEBI M, P.J., 1987. The Culprit in Mexico City—Amplification of Motions. Earthquake Spectra, 3(2), 315-328. doi:10.1193/1.1585431
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DARENDELI, M.B., 2001. Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DATAWRAPPER (n.d.). Create a map. Forrás: https://app.datawrapper.de/select/map
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HASHASH, Y.M., 2010. PALM – Recent Advances in Non-Linear Site Response Analysis. 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HASHASH, Y.M., MUSGROVE, M.I., HARMON, J.A., GROHOLSKI, D.R., PHILIPS, C.A., & PARK, D. 2016. DEEPSOIL 2016, Version 7.0, User Manual. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. Forrás: https://deepsoil.cee.illinois.edu
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JAYARAM N, L.T., 2011. A Computationally Efficient Ground-Motion Selection Algorithm for Matching a Target Response Spectrum Mean and Variance. Earthquake Spectra, 27(3), 797-815. doi:10.1193/1.3608002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JULIE RÉGNIER, L.-F. B. - Y., 2018. International Benchmark on 1D Nonlinear Site‐Response Analysis—Validation Phase Exercise. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(2), 876-900. doi:10.1785/0120170210
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KEGYES-BRASSAI, O.W., 2017. Effects of local ground conditions on site response analysis results in Hungary. Seoul, South Korea: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KRAMER, S.L., 1996. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PENG X-B, R.W.-J.-Q.-Y.-S.-Y., 2024. Seismic response of deep soft soil sites with varying shear wave velocities. Front. Earth Sci. doi:10.3389/feart.2024.1488519
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PIERRE-YVES BARD, N.K., 2025. From Site Response to Site-city Interaction: a Case Study in the Tokyo Area. 18th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, June 2024, Milan, Italy. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.09976
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SEISMOSOFT, 2021. SeismoMatch – A computer program for spectrum matching of earthquake records. Forrás: https://www.seismosoft.com
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHARE, 2013. Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe (SHARE). Engineering Geology, Forrás: https://www.share-eu.org/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHAWN C. GRIFFITHS. B.R., 2016. Challenges associated with site response analyses for soft soils subjected to high-intensity input ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.03.008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STANDARDIZATION, E.C., 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: CEN.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SZILVÁGYI, Z., PANUSKA, J., KEGYES-BRASSAI, O., WOLF, Á., TILDY, P., & RAY, R. 2017. Ground Response Analyses in Budapest Based on Site Investigations and Laboratory Measurements. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Int. J. Environ. Chem. Ecol. Geol. Geophys. Eng.(11), 307-317.
]Search in Google Scholar
