1. bookVolume 10 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
03 Oct 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Reconciling the Irreconcilable: A Property Rights Approach to Resolving the Animal Rights Debate

Published Online: 20 Nov 2021
Page range: 36 - 65
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
03 Oct 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Libertarianism is understood to be a “deontological theory of law” that purportedly applies exclusively to humans. According to some libertarians, however, “one of the greatest weaknesses of libertarian theory” is that there are no provisions outlawing the abuse and torture of animals even though this seems to be one of “the most heinous acts it is possible to do”. Moreover, a few of these libertarians go even further and claim that this legal philosophy of non-aggression should actually be extended to include other animals. The purpose of this paper is to reconcile this seemingly irreconcilable situation by arguing that it is a “continuum problem” and offering a principled, libertarian compromise that resolves the animal rights debate using the non-aggression principle (NAP) and private property rights.

Keywords

1. Block, W. Libertarianism, Positive Obligations and Property Abandonment: Children’s Rights, International Journal of Social Economics 31 (3), 2004, pp. 275-286. Search in Google Scholar

2. Block, W., and R. Whitehead. Compromising the Uncompromisable: A Private Property Rights Approach to Resolving the Abortion Controversy, Appalachian Journal of Law 4 (1), 2005, pp. 1-45. Search in Google Scholar

3. Block, W., and W. Barnett II. Continuums. Ethics and Politics 10 (1), 2008, pp. 151-166. Search in Google Scholar

4. Block, W. A Libertarian Perspective on the Stem Cell Debate: Compromising the Uncompromisable, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35, 2010, pp. 429-448. Search in Google Scholar

5. Block, W. Evictionism Is Libertarian; Departurism Is Not: Critical Comment On Parr, Libertarian Papers 3 (36), 2011, pp. 1-15. Search in Google Scholar

6. Block, W. David Friedman and Libertarianism: A Critique, Libertarian Papers 3 (35), 2011, pp. 1-33. Search in Google Scholar

7. Block, W. Rejoinder To Parr On Evictionism, The Journal of Peace, Prosperity, and Freedom, 2(Summer), 2013, pp. 125-138. Search in Google Scholar

8. Block, W. Toward a Libertarian Theory of Evictionism. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 35 (2), 2013, pp. 290-294. Search in Google Scholar

9. Block, W. Should Abortion be Criminalized? Rejoinder to Akers, Davies and Shaffer on Abortion, FBIM Transactions 2 (1), 2014, pp. 33-44. Search in Google Scholar

10. Block, W. The Natural Rights of Children, International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2 (2), 2014, pp. 85-89. Search in Google Scholar

11. Block, W. Rejoinder to Wisniewski on Evictionism, Round Four. FBIM Transactions 2 (2), 2014, pp. 1-14. Search in Google Scholar

12. Block, W. Specific performance contracts; voluntary slavery. Lew Rockwell, 2015; https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/specific-performance-contracts-voluntary-slavery/. Search in Google Scholar

13. Block, W., and S. Montgomery. Animal Torture: A Critique of Thick Libertarianism. The Review of Social and Economic Issues 1 (2), 2016, pp. 105-116. Search in Google Scholar

14. Block, W., and S. Craig. Animal Torture, The Review of Social and Economic Issues 1 (4), 2017, pp. 82-95. Search in Google Scholar

15. Block, W., and K. Williamson. Is Libertarianism Thick or Thin? Thin! The Italian Law Journal 3 (1), 2017, pp. 1-17. Search in Google Scholar

16. Block, W. On Huemer on Ethical Veganism, Studia Humana 9 (2), 2020, pp. 53-68. Search in Google Scholar

17. Hoppe, H. A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, New York City, NY: Springer, 1989. Search in Google Scholar

18. Huemer, M. Dialogues on Ethical Vegetarianism, Routledge, Taylor and Francis, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

19. Huemer, M. Reply to Walter Block on Ethical Vegetarianism, Studia Humana 10 (1), 200, pp. 41-50. Search in Google Scholar

20. Raskin, T. Animal Torture Violates Rights: A Response to Walter Block, Center For A Stateless Society, 2017; https://c4ss.org/content/49736. Search in Google Scholar

21. Rothbard, M. Ethics of Liberty, New York City, NY: New York University Press, 1998 [1982]. Search in Google Scholar

22. Rothbard, M. Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution. Cato Journal 2 (1), 1982, pp. 55-99. Search in Google Scholar

23. Steigerwald, L. Animal Rights?: A Debate Between Walter Block and Thomas Raskin. Youtube, 2017; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEtbzIKPKQI. Search in Google Scholar

24. Thornton, A. This Is How Many Animals We Eat Each Year. World Economic Forum, 2019; https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/02/chart-of-the-day-this-is-how-many-animals-we-eat-each-year/. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo