1. bookVolume 10 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)
Journal Details
First Published
03 Oct 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

Exploring Perceptions of Religion and Science among Turkish Academics

Published Online: 20 Nov 2021
Page range: 18 - 35
Journal Details
First Published
03 Oct 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

The religiosity of academics has been studied for over a decade. With few exceptions, this research has been conducted on American “elite” scientists, and data from non-Western countries is lacking. Drawing from psychological and sociological literature, the present exploratory study investigates the religiosity of Turkish academics (N = 361) and their perceptions on the relationship between religion and science, and associated variables such as interpretation of the Quran, and belief in evolution and creationism. Moreover, we address criticism directed at previous research by probing for different God concepts among believing academics. Although cultural differences can be identified, the results generally support the idea that academics are less religious with 54% identifying as “less religious” or “not religious,” compared to 24.2% self-identifying as “religious” or “extremely religious.”


1. Altınlı-Macić, M., and Thomas J. C. III. Spirituality and religion: an empirical study using a Turkish Muslim sample, In Z. Ağılkaya-Şahin, H. Streib, A. Ayten, and R. W. Hood (eds.), Psychology of Religion in Turkey, Leiden: Brill, 2015, pp. 160-176. Search in Google Scholar

2. Asghar, A., S. Hameed, and N. K. Farahani. Evolution in biology textbooks: a comparative analysis of 5 Muslim countries, Religion & Education 41 (1), 2014, pp. 1-15.10.1080/15507394.2014.855081 Search in Google Scholar

3. Baker, J. O., and B. G. Smith. The nones: social characteristics of the religiously unaffiliated, Social Forces 87 (3), 2009, pp. 1251-1263.10.1353/sof.0.0181 Search in Google Scholar

4. Baker, J. O. Public perceptions of incompatibility between “science and religion”, Public Understanding of Science 21 (3), 2012, pp. 340-353.10.1177/0963662511434908 Search in Google Scholar

5. Barash, D. Atheism and Darwinism, The Oxford Handbook of Atheism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199644650.013.026 Search in Google Scholar

6. Barbour, I. G. Issues in Science and Religion, London: Prentice Hall, 1966. Search in Google Scholar

7. Barbour, I. G. When Science Meets Religion, SPCK, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

8. Becker, L. B. Predictors of change in religious beliefs and behaviors during college, Sociological Analysis 38 (1), 1967.10.2307/3709838 Search in Google Scholar

9. Beit-Hallahmi, B. Explaining the secularity of academics: historical questions and psychological findings, Science, Religion and Culture 2 (3), 2015, pp. 104-119.10.17582/journal.src/2015/ Search in Google Scholar

10. Bello, F. The young scientists, Fortune 49, 1954, pp. 142-143. Search in Google Scholar

11. Bourget, D., and D.J. Chalmers. 2014. What do philosophers believe? Philosophical Studies 170 (3), 2014, pp. 465-500. Search in Google Scholar

12. Boyer, P. 2008. Being human: religion: bound to believe?, Nature 455 (7216), 2008, pp. 1038-1039. Search in Google Scholar

13. Brown, C. Religion and State: The Muslim Approach to Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, 2000. Search in Google Scholar

14. Bruce, S. Secular Beats Spiritual: The Westernization of the Easternization of the West, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017.10.1093/oso/9780198805687.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

15. Coleman III, T. J., C. F. Silver, and J. Holcombe. Focusing on horizontal transcendence: much more than a “non-belief”, Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 21 (2), 2013, pp. 1-18.10.1558/eph.v21i2.1 Search in Google Scholar

16. Coleman III, T. J. Review of J. David Pleins, The evolving God: Charles Darwin on the naturalness of religion, Science, Religion and Culture 2 (2), 2015, pp. 39-41. Search in Google Scholar

17. Coleman III, T. J. Review of James W. Jones: Can science explain religion?—the cognitive science debate, Review of Religious Research 58 (3), 2016, pp. 459-461.10.1007/s13644-016-0257-2 Search in Google Scholar

18. Cragun, R. T., B. Kosmin, A. Keysar, J. H. Hammer, and M. Nielsen. 2012. On the receiving end: discrimination toward the non-religious in the united states, Journal of Contemporary Religion 27 (1), 2012, pp. 105-127. Search in Google Scholar

19. Çelik, C. Şehirleşme ve Din, Konya: Çizgi Kitanevi, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

20. Dagher, Z. R., and S. BouJaoude. Science education in arab states: bright future or status quo? Studies in Science Education 47 (1), 2011, pp. 73-101.10.1080/03057267.2011.549622 Search in Google Scholar

21. Davie, G. Religion in Britain Since 1945: Believing Without Belonging, 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1994. Search in Google Scholar

22. Day, A. Believing in Belonging, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

23. Dennett, D. C. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and The Meaning of Life, Penguin, 1996. Search in Google Scholar

24. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı. Türkiye’de Dini Hayat Araştırması, Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

25. Düzgüner, S. Maneviyat Algısı ve Yansımaları, İstanbul: Çamlıca Yayınları, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

26. Ecklund, E. H., and C. P. Scheitle. Religion among academic scientists: distinctions, disciplines, and demographic, Social Problems 54 (2), 2007, pp. 289-30710.1525/sp.2007.54.2.289 Search in Google Scholar

27. Ecklund, E. H., and J. Z. Park. Conflict between religion and science among academic scientists? Journal for The Scientific Study of Religion 48 (2), 2009, pp. 276-292.10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01447.x Search in Google Scholar

28. Ecklund, E. H., D. R. Johnson, C. P. Scheitle, K. R. W. Matthews, and S. W. Lewis. Religion among scientists in international context, Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 2: 237802311666435, 2016.10.1177/2378023116664353 Search in Google Scholar

29. Ecklund, E. H. Science Vs. Religion, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2010.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195392982.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

30. European Commission. Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010. https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_archive/europeans-biotechnology-in-2010_en.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

31. Fırat, E. Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Allah İnancı ve Benlik Saygısı İlişkisi, Doctoral dissertation, Uludağ University, 1977. Search in Google Scholar

32. Freud, S. The Future of an Illusion, Civilization and its Discontents and Other Works, London, UK: The Hogarth Press: The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1961. Search in Google Scholar

33. Funder, D. C., J. M. Levine, D. M. Mackie, C. C. Morf, C. Sansone, S. Vazire, and S. G. West. Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Review 18 (1), 2013, pp. 3-12.10.1177/1088868313507536 Search in Google Scholar

34. Galen, L. 2017. Overlapping mental magisteria: implications of experimental psychology for a theory of religious belief as misattribution, Method & Theory in The Study of Religion 29 (3), 2017, pp. 221-267. Search in Google Scholar

35. Gould, S. Jay. Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life, Ballantine Publishing Group, 1999. Search in Google Scholar

36. Gross, N., and S. Simmons. The religiosity of American college and university professors, Sociology of Religion 70 (2), 2009, pp. 101-129.10.1093/socrel/srp026 Search in Google Scholar

37. Henrich, J., S. J. Heine, and A. Norenzayan. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3), 2010, pp. 61-83.10.1017/S0140525X0999152X Search in Google Scholar

38. Hornbeck, R., and J. L. Barrett. A Christian response to Tooby and Cosmides’ “evolutionary psychology: a primer”, Blog. Biologos, 2014. https://biologos.org/blogs/archive/a-christian-response-to-tooby-and-cosmides-evolutionary-psychology-a-primer. Search in Google Scholar

39. Hunsberger, B. E. Apostasy: a social learning perspective, Review of Religious Research 25 (1), 1983, p. 21.10.2307/3511309 Search in Google Scholar

40. International Social Survey Programme. Religion Questionnaire, 2008. https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/file.asp?file=ZA4950_bq.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

41. Johnson, D. C. Formal education vs. Religious belief: soliciting new evidence with multinomial logit modeling, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36 (2), 1997, pp. 231.10.2307/1387555 Search in Google Scholar

42. Jones, J. W. Can Science Explain Religion?: The Cognitive Science Debate, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2016.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190249380.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

43. Jupp, V. The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods, London: SAGE, 200610.4135/9780857020116 Search in Google Scholar

44. Kayıklık, H. Orta Yaş ve Yaşlılıkta Dinsel Eğilimler, Adana: Baki Kitabevi, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

45. Keysar, A., and J. Navarro-Rivera. A world of atheism: global demographics, The Oxford Handbook of Atheism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 553-58610.1093/oxfordhb/9780199644650.013.011 Search in Google Scholar

46. Keysar, A. Religious/non-religious demography and religion vs. Science: a global perspective, The Oxford Handbook of Secularism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199988457.013.3 Search in Google Scholar

47. Kirman, M. A. Din ve Sekülerleşme: Üniversite Gençliği Üzerinde Sosyolojik Bir Araştırma, Adana: Karahan Kitabevi, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

48. Kitzmiller V. Dover Area School District. 2005. En.Wikipedia.Org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District. Search in Google Scholar

49. Köse, A. Popular religiosity, Psychology of Religion in Turkey. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

50. Ladd, E. C., and S. M. Lipset. The Divided Academy, New York: Norton, 1975. Search in Google Scholar

51. Langston, J., D. Speed, and T. J. Coleman III. Predicting age of atheism: credibility enhancing displays and religious importance, choice, and conflict in family of upbringing, Religion, Brain & Behavior, 2018, pp. 1-19. doi:10.1080/2153599x.2018.1502678.10.1080/2153599X.2018.1502678 Search in Google Scholar

52. Larson, E. J., and L. Witham. Leading scientists still reject god, Nature 394 (6691), 1998, pp. 313-313. Search in Google Scholar

53. Larson, E. J., and L. Witham. Scientists are still keeping the faith, Nature 386 (6624), 1997, pp. 435-436. Search in Google Scholar

54. Legare, C. H., E. M. Evans, K. S. Rosengren, and P. L. Harris. The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development, Child Development 83 (3), 2012, pp. 779-793.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01743.x Search in Google Scholar

55. Lehman, E. C. The scholarly perspective and religious commitment, Sociology of Religion 33 (4), 1972, pp. 199-216.10.2307/3710580 Search in Google Scholar

56. Leuba, J.H. God or Man? A Study of the Value of God to Man, London, UK: Kegan Paul, Trench, Truber & Co, 1934. Search in Google Scholar

57. Leuba, J.H. The Belief in God and Immortality: A Psychological, Anthropological and Statistical Study, Boston, MA: Sherman, French & Company, 1916. Search in Google Scholar

58. Lindholm, J. A., and H. S. Astin. Understanding the ‘interior’ life of faculty: how important is spirituality? Religion & Education 33 (2), 2006, pp. 64-90.10.1080/15507394.2006.10012377 Search in Google Scholar

59. Martín-Baró, I. Writings for a Liberation Psychology, Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1996. Search in Google Scholar

60. McCauley, R. N. Why Religion is Natural and Science is Not, New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

61. Mercier, H., and S. Dan. The Enigma of Reason: A New Theory of Human Understanding, London, UK: Penguin Books, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

62. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. Mufredat.Meb.Gov.Tr, 2017. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx. Search in Google Scholar

63. Nesse, R. M., and S. C. Stearns. The great opportunity: evolutionary applications to medicine and public health, Evolutionary Applications 1 (1), 2008, pp. 28-48.10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00006.x Search in Google Scholar

64. Oprisko, R. Superpowers: the American academic elite, Georgetown Public Policy Review, 2012. http://gppreview.com/2012/12/03/superpowers-the-american-academic-elite/. Search in Google Scholar

65. Pew Research Center. In America, Does More Education Equal Less Religion? 2018. http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2017/04/25115302/Religion-and-education-FULL-REPORT.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

66. Pew Research Center. Public Opinion on Religion and Science in The United States, 2009. http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/public-opinion-on-religion-and-science-in-the-united-states/. Search in Google Scholar

67. Pew Research Center. The Global Religious Landscape, 2012. Search in Google Scholar

68. Pew Research Center. The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society, 2013. http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2013/04/worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-full-report.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

69. Pew Research Center. Religion in America: U.S. religious data, demographics and statistics, Pew Research Center’s Religion & Public Life Project, 2014. http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/educational-distribution/. Search in Google Scholar

70. Preston, J. L., and F. Shin. Spiritual experiences evoke awe through the small self in both religious and non-religious individuals, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70, 2017, pp. 212-221.10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.006 Search in Google Scholar

71. Provine, W. B. Evolution, religion, and science, The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 667-680.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279272.003.0040 Search in Google Scholar

72. Quillen, E. G. Discourse analysis and the definition of atheism, Science, Religion and Culture 2 (3), 2015, pp. 25-35.10.17582/journal.src/2015/ Search in Google Scholar

73. Ragan, C., H. N. Malony, and B. Beit-Hallahmi. Psychologists and religion: professional factors and personal belief, Review of Religious Research 21 (2), 1980, pp. 208-217.10.2307/3509885 Search in Google Scholar

74. Roe, A. The Making of a Scientist, New York: Dodd, Mead, 1952. Search in Google Scholar

75. Roizen, J., O. Fulton, and M. A. Trow. Technical report: 1975 Carnegie council national surveys of higher education, Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California, 1978. Search in Google Scholar

76. Rothman, S., S. R. Lichter, and N. Nevitte. Politics and professional advancement among college faculty, The Forum 3 (1), 2005.10.2202/1540-8884.1067 Search in Google Scholar

77. Schleifer, C., S. G Brauer, and V. R Patel. Patterns of conservative religious belief and religious practice across college majors, Sociology of Religion 79 (3), 2018, pp. 299-322.10.1093/socrel/srx034 Search in Google Scholar

78. Schwadel, P. Does higher education cause religious decline?: a longitudinal analysis of the within- and between-person effects of higher education on religiosity, The Sociological Quarterly 57 (4), 2016, pp. 759-786.10.1111/tsq.12153 Search in Google Scholar

79. Sevinç, K., and Z. Ağılkaya-Şahin. Past and present of psychology of religion in turkey, In Z. Ağılkaya-Şahin, H. Streib, A. Ayten, and R. W. Hood (eds.), Psychology of Religion in Turkey, Leiden: Brill, 2015, pp. 3-30.10.1163/9789004290884 Search in Google Scholar

80. Sevinç, K., R. W. Hood Jr., and T. J. Coleman III. Secularism in Turkey, The Oxford Handbook of Secularism, P. Zuckerman and J.R. Shook (eds.), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 155-171.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199988457.013.10 Search in Google Scholar

81. Sevinç, K., T. J. Coleman III, and R. W. Hood Jr. Non-belief: an Islamic perspective, Secularism and Nonreligion 7, 2018.10.5334/snr.111 Search in Google Scholar

82. Sevinç, K. İnançsızlık Psikolojisi, İstanbul: Çamlıca Yayınları, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

83. Shook, J.R. The God Debates, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.10.1002/9781444328042 Search in Google Scholar

84. Stark, R., L. R. Iannaccone, and R. Finke. Religion, science, and rationality, The American Economic Review 86 (2), 1996, pp. 433-437. Search in Google Scholar

85. Stark, R. Secularization, R.I.P., Sociology of Religion 60 (3), 1999, p. 249.10.2307/3711936 Search in Google Scholar

86. Streib, H., and R. W Hood Jr. Semantics and Psychology of Spirituality, Springer, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-21245-6 Search in Google Scholar

87. Stubager, R. Education effects on authoritarian–libertarian values: a question of socialization, The British Journal of Sociology 59 (2), 2016, pp. 327-350.10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00196.x Search in Google Scholar

88. Taplamacıoğlu, M. Yaşlara göre dini hayatın şiddet ve kesafeti üzerine bir anket denemesi, Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 10, 1962, pp. 141-151.10.1501/Ilhfak_0000001240 Search in Google Scholar

89. Vaughan, T. R., D. H. Smith, and G. Sjoberg. The religious orientations of american natural scientists, Social Forces 44 (4), 1966, p. 519-526.10.2307/2575087 Search in Google Scholar

90. Warner, J., and A. Clauset. The academy’s dirty secret, Slate Magazine, 2015. http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2015/02/university_hiring_if_you_didn_t_get_your_p h_d_at_an_elite_university_good.html. Search in Google Scholar

91. Weber, M. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, London, UK: Routledge, 1930. Search in Google Scholar

92. Winseman, A. L. Does more educated really = less religious?, 2003. https://news.gallup.com/poll/7729/does-more-educated-really-less-religious.aspx. Search in Google Scholar

93. Yapıcı, A. Geleneksellik ile modernlik arasına sıkışan din anlayışları ve dindarlık, DEM Dergi 1 (2), 2007, pp. 24-29. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo