This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Al Alo v. Slovakia, 32084/19 (ECtHR February 10, 2022). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-215746Search in Google Scholar
Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom, 26766/05 and 22228/06 (ECHR [GC] December 15, 2011). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108072Search in Google Scholar
Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647 (U.S. Supreme Court June 23, 2011).Search in Google Scholar
Butkevich v. Russia, 5865/07 (ECtHR February 13, 2018). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-180832Search in Google Scholar
Chernika v. Ukraine, 53791/11 (ECtHR March 12, 2020). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201641Search in Google Scholar
Code of Criminal Procedure of Slovakia. (2005, May 24). Law. Slovakia. Retrieved from https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/document/svk/2005/code_of_criminal_procedure_html/Code_of_Criminal_Procedure_of_Slovakia_English.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (1950, November 4). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. European Convention on Human Rights, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11, 14 and 15.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. (2024). North Macedonia 2024 Report. Brussels: European Commission. doi:https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/north-macedonia-report-2024_enSearch in Google Scholar
G. Kalajdžiev, G. Lažetić Bužarovska. (2013). Acceleration of proceedings – one of the aims of criminal procedure reform in the Republic of Macedonia. In I. J. Stanisavljević, & I. J. Stanisavljević (Ed.), Simplified Forms of Procedure in Criminal Matters: regional criminal procedure legislation and experiences in application (pp. 108-123). Belgrade: OSCEMissiontoSerbia. Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/3/d/103129.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
G. Lažetic, G. Kalajdziev, B. Misoski, D. Ilić Dimoski. (2020). The Pre-Trial Procedure in Republic of North Macedonia. In R. E. Edward Johnston (Ed.), A comparative analysis of pre-trial procedure in Europe: the search for an ideal model (pp. 133-156). Istanbul: Istanbul University Press. doi:10.26650/B/SS26.2020.014.07Search in Google Scholar
Keskin v. The Netherlands, 2205/16 (ECtHR January 19, 2021). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207365Search in Google Scholar
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (U.S. Supreme Court June 25, 2009).Search in Google Scholar
Mirilashvili v. Russia, 6293/04 (ECtHR December 11, 2008). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90099Search in Google Scholar
Paić v. Croatia, 47082/12 (ECHR March 29, 2016). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-161752Search in Google Scholar
Papdakis v. FYROM, 50254/07 (ECtHR February 26, 2013). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116827Search in Google Scholar
Pichugin v. Russia, 38623/03 (ECtHR October 23, 2012). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-114074Search in Google Scholar
Satlanis, C. (2022). The free objective evaluation of the evidence in European criminal law. In Yearbook of International & European Criminal and Procedural Law (Vol. 1, pp. 342-404). CEIJ. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10576939Search in Google Scholar
Schatschaschwili v. Germany, 9154/10 (ECHR [GC] December 15, 2015). doi:https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159566Search in Google Scholar