[
Aoun, Joseph & Yen-hui Audrey Li. 1993. Whinsitu: SStructure or LF? Linguistic Inquiry 24. 199–238.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aoun, Joseph & Yen-hui Audrey Li. 2008. Ellipsis and missing objects. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 251–274. Boston: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14(1). 1–56.10.1007/s11050-005-4532-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, Lisa L.-S. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldberg, Lotus M. 2005. Verb-stranding VP ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study. McGill: McGill University dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gribanova, Vera. 2013. A new argument for verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44(1). 145–157.10.1162/LING_a_00122
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoji, Hajime. 1998. Null Object and Sloppy Identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 29(1). 127–152.10.1162/002438998553680
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmberg, Anders. 2001. The syntax of yes and no in Finnish. Studia Linguistica 55. 141–174.10.1111/1467-9582.00077
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmberg, Anders. 2007. Null subjects and polarity focus. Studia Linguistica 61(3). 212–236.10.1111/j.1467-9582.2007.00135.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmberg, Anders. 2014. The syntax of the Finnish question particle. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 9, 266–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740390.003.0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmberg, Anders. 2016. The syntax of yes and no. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701859.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 531–574.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 1987. Remarks on empty categories in Chinese. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 321–337.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 1988. Shuo ‘shi’ he ‘you’ (On ‘be’ and ‘have’ in Chinese). The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 59.1. 43–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 1991. Modularity and Chinese A-not-A questions. In Carol Georgopoulos & Roberta Ishihara (eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to linguistics: Essays in honor of Yuki Kuroda, 305–332. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-3818-5_16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 1994. Verb movement and some syntax-semantics mismatches in Chinese. In J.-K. Paul Li, Chu-Ren Huang & C.-C. Jane Tang (eds.), Chinese languages and linguistics 2, 587–613. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 1997. On lexical structure and syntactic projection. In Feng-Fu Tsao & H. Samuel Wang (eds.), Chinese languages and linguistics 3, 45–89. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, Shin-Sook. 2002. Intervention effects are focus effects. In Noriko Akatsuka & Susan Strauss (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 10, 615–628. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, Shin-Sook. 2006. More evidence that intervention effects are focus effects. In Changguk Yim (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar: Minimalist Views on Language Design, 161–180. Seoul: Hankook.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Law, Paul. 2006. Adverbs in A-not-A questions in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(2). 97–136.10.1007/s10831-005-4916-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Thomas Hun-tak. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 2007. Beyond empty categories. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan (Chungoku Gogaku) 254. 74–106.10.7131/chuugokugogaku.2007.74
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 2014. Born empty. Lingua 151. 43–68.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, Jonah T.-H. & Cecilia C.-Y. Liu. 2005. Coercion, event structure, and syntax. Nanzan Linguistics 2. 9–31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, Jonah T.-H, Jia-Chi Yu & Tzu-Ling Chen. 2018. “Modifiers” as verbs: The case of Mandarin. Studia Linguistica 72(3). 625–661.10.1111/stul.12083
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, Chi-Ming Louis. 2014. A modular theory of radical pro drop. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
López, Luis. 1994. The syntactic licensing of VP-ellipsis: A comparative study of Spanish and English. In Michael L. Mazzola (ed.), Issues and theory in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIII April 1–4 1993, 333–354. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
López, Luis. 1995. Polarity and predicate pnaphora. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
López, Luis & Susanne Winkler. 2000. Focus and topic in VP-anaphora constructions. Linguistics 38(4). 623–664.10.1515/ling.2000.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mattthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 2011. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar, 2nd edn. London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 661–738.10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pan, Victor Junnan. 2019. Derivation of the apparent narrow scope of sentence-final particles in Chinese: A reply to Erlewine (2017). Studies in Chinese Linguistics 39(2). 99–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pan, Victor Junnan & Waltraud Paul. 2016. Why Chinese SFPs are neither optional nor disjunctors. Lingua 170. 23–34.10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paul, Waltraud. 2014. Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 77–115.10.1111/stul.12020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paul, Waltraud. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and monographs 271). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paul, Waltraud & John Whitman. 2017. Topic prominence. In Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom065
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365–424.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Belletti Adriana (ed.), Structures and beyond, vol. 3, The cartography of syntactic structures, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sato, Yosuke & Masako Maeda. 2021. Syntactic head movement in Japanese: Evidence from verb-echo answers and negative scope reversal. Linguistic Inquiry 52(2). 359–376.10.1162/ling_a_00380
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sato, Yosuke & Shintaro Hayashi. 2018. String-vacuous head movement in Japanese: New evidence from verb-echo answers. Syntax 21(1). 72–90.10.1111/synt.12148
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simpson, Andrew. 2015. Verbal answers to yes/no questions, focus, and ellipsis. In Yen-hui Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & W.-T. Dylan Tsai (eds.), Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, 300–333. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soh, Hooi Ling. 2009. Speaker presupposition and Mandarin Chinese sentence-final -le: A unified analysis of the “change of state” and the “contrary to expectation” reading. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27. 623–657.10.1007/s11049-009-9074-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soh, Hooi Ling & Meijia Gao. 2006. Perfective aspect and transition in Mandarin Chinese: An analysis of double -le sentences. In Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society conference, 107–122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sun, Yenan. 2021. A bipartite analysis of zhiyou ‘only’ in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 30. 319–355.10.1007/s10831-021-09228-w
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sybesma, Rint. 1997. Why Chinese verb -le is a resultative predicate. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6. 215–261.10.1023/A:1008238319773
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tancredi, Chris. 1990. Not only EVEN, but even ONLY. Unpublished manuscript. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Sze-Wing. 1998. Parametrization of features in syntax. Irvine: University of California, Irvine dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2001. The (non-)existence of gapping in Chinese and its implications for the theory of gapping. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10. 201–224.10.1023/A:1011250802691
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2010. Xingshi Hanyu jufaxue [Formal Chinese syntax]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe [Shanghai educational publishing house].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2015. Yueyu yufa jiangyi [Lectures on Cantonese grammar]. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Ting-chi. 1989. Hanyu cifa jufa xuji [Studies on Chinese morphology and syntax II]. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsai, Wei-Tian Dylan. 2008. Tense anchoring in Chinese. Lingua 118(5). 675–686.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.002
]Search in Google Scholar
