[
AGAMBEN, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ALKIRE, S. (2002). Dimensions of Human Development. World Development, 30(2), 181-205.10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00109-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BICKENBACH, J. (2014). Reconciling the Capability Approach and the ICF. Alter, European Journal of Disability Research, 8(1), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2013.08.00310.1016/j.alter.2013.08.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BIRNBACHER, D. (2019). Neuroenhancement – eine ethische Sicht. In K. Viertbauer & R. Kögerler (Eds.), Neuroenhancement: Die philosophische Debatte (pp. 18-42). Suhrkamp Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BOSTROM, N. (2009). The Future of Humanity. In J.-K. Berg Olsen, E. Selinger & S. Riis (Eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Technology (pp. 186-216). Palgrave McMillan.10.1057/9780230227279_10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BOSTROM, N. (2018). Die Zukunft der Menschheit: Aufsätze. Trans. by Jan-Erik Strasser. Suhrkamp Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BOSTROM, N., & SANDBERG, A. (2009). Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, 311-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9142-510.1007/s11948-009-9142-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BUCHANAN, A. (1995). Equal Opportunity and Genetic Intervention. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12(2), 105-135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026505250000469610.1017/S0265052500004696
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BUCHANAN, A., BROCK, D. W., DANIELS, N., & WIKLER, D. (2000). From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511806940
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BUCHANAN, A., BROCK, D. W., DANIELS, N., & WIKLER, D. (2009). Warum nicht das Beste? In B. Schöne-Seifert & D. Talbot (Eds.), Enhancement: Die ethische Debatte (pp. 267-294). Mentis Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CAPLAN, A. L. (2009). Ist besser das Beste? Ein renommierter Ethiker plädiert für Enhancement des Gehirns. In B. Schöne-Seifert & D. Talbot (Eds.), Enhancement: Die ethische Debatte (pp. 165-168). Mentis Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CLAUSEN, J. (2008). Gehirn-Computer-Schnittstellen: Anthropologisch-ethische Aspekte moderner Neurotechnologien. In J. Clausen, O. Müller & G. Maio (Eds.), Die “Natur des Menschen” in Neurowissenschaft und Neuroethik (pp. 39-58). Königshausen & Neumann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DEGRAZIA, D. (2000). Prozac, Enhancement, and Self-Creation. Hastings Center Report, 30(2), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/352831310.2307/3528313
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DOUDNA, J. A., & STERNBERG, S. H. (2017). A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution. Houghton Mifflin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ELLIOTT, C. (1998). The Tyranny of Happiness: Ethics and Cosmetic Psychopharmacology. In E. Parens (Ed.), Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications (pp. 177-188). Georgetown University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FEINBERG, J. (1980). The Child’s Right to an Open Future. In W. Aiken & H. LaFollette (Eds.), Whose Child? Children’s Rights, Parental Authority, and State Power (pp. 124-153). Rowman & Littlefield.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GALERT, T. (2016). Philosophische Aspekte der tiefen Hirnstimulation. In D. Sturma & D. Lanzerath (Eds.), Tiefe Hirnstimulation: Neurologische, psychiatrische und philosophische Aspekte (pp. 61-197). Karl Alber Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GALERT, T. et al. (2009). Das optimierte Gehirn. Gehirn & Geist 11, 1-12. https://www.spektrum.de/sixcms/media.php/976/Gehirn_und_Geist_Memorandum.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GUTMANN, T. (2017). Perfektionierungszwang? Autonomie und Freiwilligkeit in den Bereichen pränataler Diagnostik und neurologischen Enhancements. In G. Brudermüller & K. Seelmann (Eds.), Erzwungene Selbstverbesserung? (pp. 31-52). Königshausen & Neumann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HABERMAS, J. (2005 [2001]). Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur: Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Suhrkamp Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HEINRICHS, J.-H. (2019). Neuroethik. J. B. Metzler Verlag.10.1007/978-3-476-04727-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HILL, T. E. JR. (2004). Die Bedeutung der Autonomie. In K. Ameriks & D. Sturma (Eds.), Kants Ethik (pp. 178-189). Mentis Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KANT, I. (1906 [1785]). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. 3rd Edition. Verlag der Dürrʼschen Buchhandlung.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KRAMER, P. D. (1993). Listening to Prozac: A Psychiatrist Explores Antidepressant Drugs and the Remaking of the Self. Viking.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LACHENMEIER, M. (2017). Rechtlicher Übersetzungsversuch des bioethischen Arguments des sozialen Drucks. In G. Brudermüller & K. Seelmann (Eds.), Erzwungene Selbstverbesserung? (pp. 69-108). Königshausen & Neumann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MERKEL, R. (2019). Neuroenhancement, Autonomie und das Recht auf mentale Selbstbestimmung. In K. Viertbauer & R. Kögerler (Eds.), Neuroenhancement: Die philosophische Debatte (pp. 43-88). Suhrkamp Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MILL, J. S. (1864 [1859]). On Liberty. 3rd Edition. Longman, Green, Longman, Robert & Green.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MONA, M. (2017). Optionen als Zwang? Autonomie und gesellschaftlicher Druck im Kontext von Human Enhancement. In G. Brudermüller & K. Seelmann (Eds.), Erzwungene Selbstverbesserung? (pp. 53-67). Königshausen & Neumann Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NEIDERS, I. (2019). Can We Use the Capabilities Approach to Evaluate Human Enhancement? In P. Sýkora (Ed.), Promises and Perils of Emerging Technologies for Human Condition: Voices from Four Postcommunist Central and East European Countries (pp. 85-102). Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NIJBOER, F., KLEIH, S., & KÜBLER, A. (2009). Gehirn-Computer-Schnittstellen für schwerstgelähmte Menschen. In O. Müller, J. Clausen & G. Maio (Eds.), Das technisierte Gehirn. Neurotechnologien als Herausforderung für Ethik und Anthropologie (pp. 51-62). Mentis Verlag.10.30965/9783969750896_006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NUSSBAUM, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftw
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NUSSBAUM, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RAWLS, J. (1999 [1971]). A Theory of Justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RAWLS, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROBEYNS, I. (2006). The Capability Approach in Practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351-376.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RODUIT, J. A. R., HEILINGER, J.-CH., & BAUMANN, H. (2015). Ideas of Perfection and the Ethics of Human Enhancement. Bioethics, 29(9), 622-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.1219210.1111/bioe.12192
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SCHÖNE-SEIFERT, B., & STROOP, B. (2015). Enhancement. In D. Sturma & B. Heinrichs (Eds.), Handbuch Bioethik (pp. 249-254). J. B. Metzler Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SCHULZE-BONHAGE, A., & BALL, T. (2009). Entwicklung und Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Brain-Machine-Interfaces bei Epilepsiepatienten. In O. Müller, J. Clausen & G. Maio (Eds.), Das technisierte Gehirn. Neurotechnologien als Herausforderung für Ethik und Anthropologie (pp. 35-49). Mentis Verlag.10.30965/9783969750896_005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SEN, A. (1980). Equality of What? In S. M. McMurrin (Ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (pp. 195-220). University of Utah Press, Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SEN, A. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SÝKORA, P. (2019). Towards the Posthuman Through the Editing of Genes for Cognitive Capabilities. In Filozofia, 74(7), 511-529. https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2019.74.7.110.31577/filozofia.2019.74.7.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TALBOT, D., & WOLF, J. (2006). Dem Gehirn auf die Sprünge helfen. Eine ethische Betrachtung zur Steigerung kognitiver und emotionaler Fähigkeiten durch Neuro-Enhancement. In J. S. Ach & A. Pollmann (Eds.), No Body is Perfect: Baumaßnahmen am menschlichen Körper – Bioethische und ästhetische Aufrisse (pp. 253-278). Transcript.10.1515/9783839404270-012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TOMAŠOVIČOVÁ, J. (2021a). Human Cognitive Enhancement and the Problem of Equality. In J. Tomašovičová (Ed.), The Blurring of Boundaries in Bioscientific Discourse (pp. 105-117). Logos Verlag.10.30819/5422
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TOMAŠOVIČOVÁ, J. (2021b). Social and Ethical Consequences of Neuroenhancement. In Filozofia, 76(3), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2021.76.3.210.31577/filozofia.2021.76.3.2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VIERTBAUER, K., & KÖGERLER, R. (Eds.) (2019). Neuroenhancement: Die philosophische Debatte. Suhrkamp Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
