[
Bontadini, F., Vona, F. (2022). Anatomy of Green Specialisation: Evidence from EU Production Data, 1995–2015. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM). https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep41836. Accessed: 26 January 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bucher, H., Drake-Brockman, J., Kasterine, A., Sugathan, M. (2014). Trade in Environmental Goods and Services: Opportunities and Challenges. International Trade Centre Technical Paper, Geneva. https://www.intracen.org/uploadedFiles/intracenorg/Content/Publications/AssetPDF/EGS%20Ecosystems%20Brief%20040914%20-%20low%20res.pdf. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, J., Kelly, R. C. (2022). Environmental Economics: Definition, Importance, and Example. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/environmental-economics.asp. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dai, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, R. (2021). The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Trade Flows: A Focus on Environmental Goods Listed in APEC and OECD. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773749. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daly, H. E., Farley, J. (2004). Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. Island Press. 454 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dangelico, R. M., Pontrandolfo, P. (2010). From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 18, Issues 16–17. Pages 1608–1628, ISSN 0959-6526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.07.007. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dangelico, R. M., Vocalelli, D. (2017). “Green Marketing”: An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 165, Pages 1263–1279, ISSN 0959-6526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.184. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dansk Branchekode DB07. https://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/dokumentation/nomenklaturer/db07. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2013). Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Building the Single Market for Green Products. Facilitating better information on the environmental performance of products and organisations. Brussels, 9 April 2013. COM(2013) 196 final. https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2013:0196:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2015). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2174 of 24 November 2015 on the indicative compendium of environmental goods and services, the format for data transmission for European environmental economic accounts and modalities, structure and periodicity of the quality reports pursuant to Regulation (EU) No. 691/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European environmental economic accounts. https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32015R2174. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission (2022). Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions. On making sustainable products the norm. COM/2022/140 final. https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0140. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission. Sustainable products initiative. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12567-Sustainable-products-initiative_en. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Marketing Confederation (2022). European Marketing Agenda 2022: “On the way to … Data-Driven, Omnichannel Marketing”. 37 p. https://www.emc.be/uploads/emc-marketing-agenda-2022-def-b0229.pdf. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Parliament, Council of the European Union (2011). Regulation (EU) No. 691/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2011 on European environmental economic accounts (with amendments as of 31 January 2023). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/691/oj. Accessed: 31 January 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat (2016). Environmental goods and services sector accounts. Handbook. 131 p. DOI: 10.2785/79114. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/7700432/KS-GQ-16-008-ENN.pdf/f4965221-2ef0-4926-b3de-28eb4a5faf47. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat (2017). Environmental protection expenditure accounts. Handbook. 176 p. DOI: 10.2785/097600. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/7903714/KS-GQ-17-004-EN-N.pdf/7ea9c74b-eda4-4c23-b7bd-897358bfc990?t=1489135578000. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat (2022a). EGSS data collection questionnaire – 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/environment/methodology. Accessed: 27 February 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat (2022b). Questionnaire on environmental protection expenditure accounts 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/1798247/6191545/Environmental+protection+expenditure+accounts+questionnaire. Accessed: 10 June 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat (2022c). Sustainable development in the European Union: Monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context. 375 p. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/15234730/15242025/KS-09-22-019-ENN.pdf/a2be16e4-b925-f109-563c-f94ae09f5436?t=1667397761499. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat (2023). Environmental goods and services sector (env_egs). Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS) (as of 01 February 2023). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/env_egs_esms.htm. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat. How has the EU progressed towards the SDGs? https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/sdi/key-findings. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fraj, E., Martínez, E., Matute, J. (2013). Green marketing in B2B organisations: An empirical analysis from the natural-resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28(5), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858621311330245. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gelderman, C., Schijns, J., Lambrechts, W., Vijgen, S. (2021). Green marketing as an environmental practice: The impact on green satisfaction and green loyalty in a business-to-business context. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2732. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gordon, R., Carrigan, M., Hastings, G. (2011). A framework for sustainable marketing. Marketing Theory 11(2) 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111403218. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kotler, P. (1972). A Generic Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 36 (April, 1972), pp. 46–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laheri, V. K, Dangi, H., Vohra, A. (2014). Green Marketing: Development of Construct and Its Evolution. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation. 10(2):147–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X14536220. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laricchia, F. (2023). Global green technology and sustainability market size 2021–2030. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1319996/green-technology-and-sustainability-market-size-worldwide/#statisticContainer. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Monkelbaan, J., Sugathan, M., Naranjo, A. (2021). Environmental Goods and Services: Questions and Possible Ways Forward in the TESSD. Working Paper No. 2 in Trade and Environmental Sustainability Series. QUNO, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. 22 p. https://quno.org/sites/default/files/resources/Environmental%20Goods%20and%20Services%20working%20paper%202%202021.pdf. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NielsenIQ (2018). Was 2018 the year of the influential sustainable consumer? 17 December 2018. https://nielseniq.com/global/en/insights/analysis/2018/was-2018-the-year-of-the-influential-sustainable-consumer/. Accessed: 18 June 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD (2019). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Denmark 2019, OECD Environmental Performance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, 242 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/1eeec492-en. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ottman, J. (2011). The New Rules of Green Marketing: Strategies, Tools, and Inspiration for Sustainable Branding. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. 272 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polonsky, M. J. (2011). Transformative green marketing: Impediments and opportunities. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 64(12), pages 1311–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.01.016. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polonsky, M. J. L., Rosenberger, P. J. (2001). Reevaluating Green Marketing: A Strategic Approach. Business Horizons. September–October 2001. https://www.academia.edu/705602/Reevaluating_green_marketing_a_strategic_approach. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polonsky, M. J., Carlson, L., Fry, M.-L. (2003). The Harm Chain: A Public Policy Development and Stakeholder Perspective. Marketing Theory, 3(3): 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059310333003. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SER International (2007). Restoring Natural Capital: Science, Business, and Practice. J. Aronson, S. J. Milton, J. N. Blignaut (Eds.), Society for Ecological Restoration International, Island Press. 384 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shaw, E. H., Jones, D. G. B. (2005). A History of Schools of Marketing Thought. Marketing Theory 5(3), 239–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593105054898. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
StatBank Denmark. https://www.statbank.dk/. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Statistics Austria. www.statistik.at. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Türker, M. F., Öztürk, A., Pak, M. (2003). Total economic value of forest resources in Turkey. XII World Forestry Congress, 2003, Canada. https://www.fao.org/3/xii/0410-a2.htm. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United Nations (2014). System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 ‒ Central Framework. 346 p. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seearev/seea_cf_final_en.pdf. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vaccaro, V. L. (2009). B2B green marketing and innovation theory for competitive advantage. Journal of Systems and Information Technology. Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287260911002477. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vantage Market Research. Green Technology and Sustainability Market - Global Industry Assessment & Forecast. https://www.vantagemarketresearch.com/industry-report/green-technology-and-sustainability-market-1581. Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrublevska, O., Kostenko, I. (2004). The Impact of the Social-Psychological Determinants on the Ecological Demand. Scientific bulletin: Management of natural resources, environmental and forest policy. Collection of scientific and technical publications. Lviv, Ukrainian State University of Forestry and Wood Technology. Issue 14.2. 212 p. Pp.134–140. (In Ukrainian) https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vpliv-sotsialno-psihologichnih-determinant-na-formuvannyaekologichnogo-popitu Accessed: 14 March 2023.
]Search in Google Scholar
