This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
DESA Publications. World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. [Online]. [Accessed 04.01.2025]. Available: https://desapublications.un.org/publications/world-population-prospects-2024-summary-resultsSearch in Google Scholar
Kour R. et al. Persistence and remote sensing of agri-food wastes in the environment: Current state and perspectives. Chemosphere 2023:317:137822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137822Search in Google Scholar
Udeagha M., Ngepah N. The nexus between innovation and environmental sustainability. 2023.Search in Google Scholar
Bai J., Shin H. D., Watkins M. Design for service-oriented approach: a case of collaborative consumption. University of Limerick. Conference contribution. https://doi.org/10.31880/10344/10162Search in Google Scholar
Europe is not prepared for rapidly growing climate risks. [Online]. [ Accessed 05.01.025]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/newsroom/news/europe-is-not-prepared-forSearch in Google Scholar
European Climate Risk Assessment. [Online]. [Accessed 05.01.2025]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/european-climate-risk-assessmentSearch in Google Scholar
CGR 2022. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://circularity-gap.world/2022#Download-the-reportSearch in Google Scholar
Sustainable waste management: what the EU is doing. Topics. European Parliament. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20180328STO00751/sustainable-waste-management-what-the-eu-is-doingSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission. Waste and recycling. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling_enSearch in Google Scholar
European Environment Agency. Latvia 2024 circular economy country profile. [Online]. [Accessed 05.01.2025]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/circular-economy/country-profiles-on-circular-economy/circular-economy-country-profiles-2024/latvia_2024-ce-country-profile_final.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
De Laurentiis V., Caldeira C., Sala S., Tonini D. Life cycle thinking for the assessment of waste and circular economy policy: status and perspectives from the EU example. Waste Management 2024:179:205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.02.037Search in Google Scholar
Atkritumu apsaimniekošanas likums [Waste Management Law]. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=221378 (In Latvian).Search in Google Scholar
Atkritumu apsaimniekošanas likums un uz tā pamata izdotie Ministru kabineta noteikumi. [Waste Management Law and the regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers issued on its basis]. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/atkritumu-apsaimniekosanas-likums-un-uz-ta-pamata-izdotie-ministru-kabinetanoteikumi (In Latvian).Search in Google Scholar
Atkritumu apsaimniekošanas valsts plāns 2021.–2028. gadam. [State waste management plan for the years 2021–2028]. [Online]. [Accessed 03.01.2025]. Available: https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/atkritumu-apsaimniekosanasvalsts-plans-2021-2028gadam-0Search in Google Scholar
Municipal waste statistics. [Online]. [Accessed 04.01.2025]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Municipal_waste_statisticsSearch in Google Scholar
Official Statistics Portal. Municipal and hazardous waste. [Online]. [Accessed 04.01.2025]. Available: https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/environment/waste-management/other/5598-municipal-and-hazardous-wasteSearch in Google Scholar
Kantar survey on Latvian residents’ waste sorting habits. [Online]. [Accessed 04.01.2025]. Available: https://www.kantar.lv/cetri-no-pieciem-79-latvijas-iedzivotajiem-sava-majsaimnieciba-skiro-atkritumus/Search in Google Scholar
Clean R pētījums: atkritumus šķiro 68% iedzīvotāji, no tiem 50% – dabas saudzēšanas nevis naudas dēļ [Clean R study: 68% of residents sort waste, 50% of them – because of nature conservation and not money]. [Online]. [Accessed 04.01.2025]. Available: https://cleanr.lv/clean-r/aktualitates/clean-r-petijums-atkritumus-skiro-68-iedzivotaji-no-tiem-50-dabas-saudzesanas-nevis-naudas-del/Search in Google Scholar
Minelgaitė A., Liobikienė G. Waste problem in European Union and its influence on waste management behaviours. Science of The Total Environment 2019:667:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.313Search in Google Scholar
Myhrer K. S., Gaarder M. Ø., Berget I., Almli V. L. Need to Change, Want to Change, or Hard to Change? Targeting three dinner food waste profiles with regard to attitudes and personality traits. Food Quality and Preference 2024:119:105231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105231Search in Google Scholar
Vittuari M. et al. How to reduce consumer food waste at household level: A literature review on drivers and levers for behavioural change. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2023:38:104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.03.023Search in Google Scholar
Popović A., Radivojević V. The circular economy: Principles, strategies and goals. Economics of Sustainable Development 2022:6(1):45–56. https://doi.org/10.5937/ESD2201045PSearch in Google Scholar
Hoffman M., Lubell M., Hillis V. Linking knowledge and action through mental models of sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2014:111(36):13016–13021. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400435111Search in Google Scholar
Mental Models: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Methods. Conceptual Model, Scribd. [Online]. [Accessed 05.01.2025]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/463617709/MENTAL-MODELSSearch in Google Scholar
Chen H., Cheng S., Qin Y., Xu W., Liu Y. Sustainability evaluation of urban large-scale infrastructure construction based on dynamic fuzzy cognitive map. Journal of Cleaner Production 2024:449:141774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141774Search in Google Scholar
Morone P., Falcone P. M., Lopolito A. How to promote a new and sustainable food consumption model: A fuzzy cognitive map study. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019:208:563–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.075Search in Google Scholar
Morone P., Yilan G., Imbert E. Using fuzzy cognitive maps to identify better policy strategies to valorize organic waste flows: An Italian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021:319:128722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128722Search in Google Scholar
Özesmi U., Özesmi S. L. Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecological Modelling 2004:176(1–2):43–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.027Search in Google Scholar
Kosko B. Adaptive inference in fuzzy knowledge networks. In Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems, Dubois D., Prade H., Yager R. R., (Eds.), Morgan Kaufmann, 1993:888–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-1450-4.50093-6Search in Google Scholar
Mental Modeler. [Online]. [Accessed 16.04.2023]. Available: https://www.mentalmodeler.com/scenario/Search in Google Scholar
Gray S., Cox L., Henly-Shepard S. Mental Modeler: A Fuzzy-Logic Cognitive Mapping Modeling Tool for Adaptive Environmental Management. In 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea, HI, USA, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.399Search in Google Scholar
Conservation strategies for sustainable resource use in the Kizilirmak Delta in Turkey – ProQuest. [Online]. [Accessed 12.03.2023]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/openview/9f73b3626cd16bf9152e0707155f5406/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=ySearch in Google Scholar
Nakamura K., Iwai S., Sawaragi T. Decision Support Using Causation Knowledge Base. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1982:12(6):765–777. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1982.4308910Search in Google Scholar
Bohvalovs G., Kirsanovs V., Blumberga A., Blumberga D. Bioeconomy Sustainability Index: A Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Approach. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):1257–1267. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0095Search in Google Scholar
Buede D. M., Ferrell D. O. Convergence in problem solving: a prelude to quantitative analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1993:23(3):746–765. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256547Search in Google Scholar
Harary F., Norman R. Z., Cartwright D. Structural models: an introduction to the theory of directed graphs. Wiley, 1965.Search in Google Scholar
Gray S., Chan A., Clark D., Jordan R. Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in social – ecological decision-making: Benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity. Ecological Modelling 2012:229:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.011Search in Google Scholar
Yoon B. S., Jetter A. J. Comparative analysis for Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping. In 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2016:1897–1908. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806755Search in Google Scholar
Circular economy: definition, importance and benefits. Topics | European Parliament. [Online]. [Accessed 05.01.2025]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20151201STO05603/circular-economy-definition-importance-and-benefitsSearch in Google Scholar
Bosma C., Glenk K., Novo P. How do individuals and groups perceive wetland functioning? Fuzzy cognitive mapping of wetland perceptions in Uganda. Land Use Policy 2017:60:181–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.010Search in Google Scholar
Vasslides J. M., Jensen O. P. Fuzzy cognitive mapping in support of integrated ecosystem assessments: Developing a shared conceptual model among stakeholders. Journal of Environmental Management 2016:166:348–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.038Search in Google Scholar
Kokkinos K., Lakioti E., Papageorgiou E., Moustakas K., Karayannis V. Fuzzy Cognitive Map-Based Modeling of Social Acceptance to Overcome Uncertainties in Establishing Waste Biorefinery Facilities. Frontiers in Energy Research 2018:6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00112Search in Google Scholar
Wiesner K., Ladyman J. What Is a Complex System? Yale University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300251104.001.0001Search in Google Scholar